
'Bad' Muslim preacher fights for religious freedom
Sydney-based Al Madina Dawah Centre cleric Wissam Haddad has been accused of racial discrimination in a series of fiery sermons from November 2023, which have racked up thousands of views online.
In the speeches, Haddad - also known as Abu Ousayd - referred to Jewish people as "vile", "treacherous", "murderous" and "descendants of pigs and apes".
His lawyer Andrew Boe previously argued his speeches were intended for a small private Muslim audience and weren't reasonably likely to attract the attention of the broader community.
Yet he conceded at the 11th hour that the speeches were not made in private, after Mr Haddad admitted he knew they would be published online.
Mr Boe argued the speeches were not racist because they were historical and religious lectures delivered in good faith to contextualise the war in Gaza.
He maintains Mr Haddad was referring to Jews of faith, not ethnicity, while comparing seventh century Jews to the current Israeli government.
"We may not necessarily embrace that the correlation he was making is a good one," Mr Boe said in his closing remarks on Friday.
"He may be a very bad preacher. That doesn't mean what he's saying about Islam doesn't fall within (the protections for freedom of religious expression)."
Mr Haddad had been quoting in large part from Islamic texts so ruling in favour of the two Jewish plaintiffs would be the equivalent of prohibiting the recitation of religious material, Mr Boe argued.
He told the court such a judgment would suggest there was an "inextricable link" between religious speech, religious narratives and racially motivated speech.
"I'm not understating the awfulness of some of the language," Mr Boe said.
"A rejection of the applicants' case … does not mean the court condones the actions of the respondent in any way."
However, lawyers for Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chief executive Peter Wertheim and deputy president Robert Goot who are suing Mr Haddad, said there was "no basis" for concluding the speeches were an exercise of religious freedom.
"The evidence positively says Islam doesn't require or justify wholesale negative expression about Jewish people," Hannah Ryan told the Federal Court.
Peter Braham SC concluded the argument that Mr Haddad was trying to comfort and educate his congregation was "putting a very thin veil" over a message that equated to "Jews bad".
He pointed to Mr Haddad's previous provocative comments about the Christian and Hindu communities as evidence of an offensive pattern of behaviour by the preacher.
His clients are seeking the removal of the published speech, a public declaration of wrongdoing and an order restraining Mr Haddad from making similar comments in future.
"He should be ordered to not repeat the conduct," Mr Braham said.
The hearing continues.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
Labor introduces second workers' compensation reform Bill after backlash
The Labor government will seek to introduce a second Bill to reform workers' compensation in NSW despite an earlier version still being subject to a parliamentary inquiry. Treasurer Daniel Mookhey said the state government would introduce the Bill on Tuesday afternoon, the first sitting day of NSW parliament after the winter break. Mr Mookhey said the Bill was 'very similar in nature' to an earlier version that was sent back for a second inquiry by the upper house just earlier this year. He said changes reflected 'agreed amendments' with the lower house crossbench, including Sydney MP Alex Greenwich, and changes to some 'other related schemes'. 'The reason why is because the need for reform remains urgent,' Mr Mookhey said of the need to introduce the Bill. 'The workers' compensation system is failing small business, it's failing the not-for-profit sector, and it's failing injured workers.' The Labor government had hoped to pass its sweeping reforms to workers' compensation before the end of financial year. Instead, the Bill was sent to an upper house inquiry following significant pushback from the Coalition, Greens, unions, and the legal sector. The Coalition, who have joined with embattled MLC Mark Latham to propose amendments for the Bill, say the reforms would leave the most vulnerable workers at risk. Their proposed changes would also impact provisions around sexual harassment, including who can make a claim for compensation. A public inquiry on Friday heard evidence from a range of industry leaders, including from the legal and psychology sectors, as well as the unions. The Treasurer said the second Bill was also necessary because the state government did not expect the upper house to conclude the inquiry anytime soon. 'At this point, it's not clear when that (original) Bill will return, and therefore, from our perspective, we do think it's necessary to have to introduce this Bill,' he said. 'Should we get some clarity from the committee about what their intentions are with the first Bill – if they are intending to release it at a time in which parliament can take it up – then of course, the government will consider whether or not we need to repeat the exercise of having a vote again in the Legislative Assembly.' Mr Mookhey said the lower house would likely have to vote again on the original Bill if amendments were passed in the upper house. The Treasurer said work was under way to set insurance premiums for the nominal insurer, with the private sector reporting loses from the scheme of $6m per day. He told the media on Tuesday that 25 disability organisations had warned they faced a 36 per cent rise in premiums over the next three years if reforms weren't implemented. 'That will almost certainly mean that they either have to dramatically scale back their services or close them together,' he said.

Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
‘Genuine Australians' being misrepresented at pro-Palestine protests
Former Victorian Liberal Party president Michael Kroger says pro-Palestine rallies are 'full of antisemites'. Mr Kroger told Sky News Australia that 'Jewish hating people' attend the protests to use as 'cover' for their antisemitic views. 'And unfortunately mixed up in that are genuine Australians who get used in these demonstrations.'


West Australian
2 hours ago
- West Australian
Melbourne man accused of sending death threats, anti-Semitic remarks to Australian politicians
A Melbourne man accused of sending death threats to a federal lawmaker is working with authorities on a support plan to address his underlying issues, a court has been told. The 33-year-old from Reservoir, in the city's north, was arrested on February 6 as part of an investigation by the AFP-led Special Operation Avalite – set up in the wake of the Adass Israel Synagogue firebombing late last year to probe anti-Semitic threats and violence to Australia's Jewish community and parliamentarians. The man, who cannot be named for legal reasons, was charged with four counts of using a carriage service to menace and one count of using a carriage service to threaten to kill. According to the AFP, it's alleged he used social media and email to make death threats and anti-Semitic comments towards a NSW-based federal MP between January 16 and 18 this year. The man is also alleged to have made threats to a Victorian state MP the same month over social media. He appeared in the Melbourne Magistrates' Court on Tuesday for a short hearing after his case was referred to the Assessment and Referral Court (ARC). According to the Magistrates' Court of Victoria website, the ARC aims to assist people with complex mental health conditions receive support for up to 12 months before sentencing. 'ARC's therapeutic approach increases participants' engagement with the court process while providing treatment and support tailored to their needs and to address the underlying causes of their offending,' the website states. During the hearing, Magistrate Vincenzo Caltabiano left the bench to sit around a large oval-shaped desk with the accused man, his lawyer Jackson McLeod, a police prosecutor and court support services in a less formal setting. The court was told the man was engaging with support services to develop an individual support plan and access treatment needs. 'A lot of this stuff I've needed for years; its kind of irritating it's come this far,' he said. The accused man complained about his support worker, saying he'd avoided her recently because 'all she wants to do is drug me' and repeatedly mentioned an ex-boyfriend who, he said, had thrown his life into disarray. Mr Caltabiano said he was not going to pretend the ARC process would make things 'rosy' for the accused man, but the hope was his personal situation would improve. 'What I see in here is a number of things that hopefully if they can come together means some of these challenges become less significant,' the magistrate said after reviewing case notes. The accused man will return to court in a month for another case management check-in.