A Fair Work Commission ruling on a WFH dispute could have massive impact on working parents
Paul Collins, a technical specialist at global software company InterSystems Australia, lodged an application with Fair Work seeking flexible working arrangements after attempts to reach a compromise with his employer failed.
He submitted a request in January to work from home every Wednesday and Thursday to care for his 8- and 10-year-old children and the need for a work and life balance.
Until late 2024, Mr Collins had been working remotely on both these days under a hybrid working model adopted by InterSystems following the Covid-19 pandemic.
In November that same year, the company announced it was ending this arrangement and staff would need to return to the office five days a week from February 2025.
Mr Collins' WFH request was denied, but InterSystems offered an alternate arrangement of one work-from-home day per week.
This was rejected and Mr Collins escalated the dispute to the FWC.
In her judgment on Monday, FWC deputy president Lyndall Dean said she was not satisfied Mr Collins had established the 'requisite nexus' between his responsibility as a parent and the change he was seeking in his work arrangements.
She said his written request 'merely expressed a preference to continue with a pre-existing pattern of remote work' and did not specify how working from home twice a week 'specifically supported or related to his parental responsibilities'.
The judgement comes as companies attempt to get people back into the office full time following the end of COVID restrictions.
During the federal election campaign, then opposition leader Peter Dutton wanted public servants in Canberra to return to the office, but walked the policy back following a backlash from the Albanese government and trade unions who believed the policy would negatively impact women.
Newly appointed opposition leader Sussan Ley has endorsed full time working from home arrangements for some working families if the need arises.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Perth Now
23 minutes ago
- Perth Now
PM on winning strategy for hearts and minds in Beijing
Few do pomp and ceremony as well as the Chinese. As he met with leaders in Beijing's Great Hall of the People on Tuesday, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese was given the red carpet treatment. Rows of immaculately decorated soldiers were wheeled around the hall in perfect synchronicity and a People's Liberation Army brass band played Chinese covers of Aussie pub rock classics by the likes of Paul Kelly and Midnight Oil. The lavish display may be par for the course for world leaders ushered into the grand neoclassical sanctum of Chinese power. But the warm reception to the prime minister's six-day trip of China and gushing praise heaped upon him was notable in the highly choreographed world of Chinese political theatre, where symbolism and ritual are key. Protocols matter, says Associate Professor Graeme Smith, an expert on Chinese politics at the Australian National University. "All foreign policy, but particularly for China, is for a domestic audience," he tells AAP. "This is not about us. It's about citizens, about Chinese Communist Party members. That's what these are for and we're just a nice prop for them." The constant refrain of co-operating where they can, disagreeing where they must and engaging in the national interest was calibrated to chime with Beijing's own goals. Focusing on moving the relationship forward gave them an out for their unilateral decision to torch relations in 2020 while allowing them to save face. The unusually long duration of the prime minister's trip and the fact it occurred so soon after being re-elected, was interpreted by both sides as a sign of the importance of the two nations' relationship. Likewise, Mr Albanese remarked that the length of the meetings he had with President Xi Jinping, Premier Li Qiang and National People's Congress Chairman Zhao Leji was a sign of "respect" - a word he would keep coming back to through the course of his trip. "I had meetings for around about eight hours yesterday," he said at the Great Wall on Wednesday. "It was a very long meeting but it also showed respect to both sides, the fact that President Xi didn't just have a meeting but we had a lunch where President Xi as well invited Jodie to attend. "That lunch was a sign of respect to Australia, to our country." The fact the military band at the leaders' meetings learned to play songs specifically chosen to suit the prime minister's taste showed the effort they were willing to put in. "Those gestures matter, respect matters between countries," he said. "The opportunity to sit down and have a meal and talk about personal issues, talk about things that aren't necessarily heavily political, is really important part of diplomacy. "One of the things that my government does is engage in diplomacy. We don't shout with megaphones." The contrast to the way the US conducts diplomacy under Donald Trump couldn't be more stark. The US president was a constant elephant in the room during the trip. From his first day in Shanghai, Mr Albanese's visit was almost derailed after it emerged Pentagon strategist Elbridge Colby had been pressuring Australian and Japanese diplomats to provide assurances about joining the US in a hypothetical conflict with China over Taiwan. But Mr Albanese refrained from engaging in the transactional style of diplomacy his American counterpart trades in. When the opposition criticised him for failing to bring back tangible results and "indulgent" visits to the Great Wall and a panda research centre, the prime minister said they were missing the point. "The Great Wall of China symbolises the extraordinary history and culture here in China and showing a bit of respect to people never cost anything," he said "You know what it does? It gives you a reward." Patient, consistent diplomacy is the government's modus operandi. Tracing the footsteps of Labor leader Gough Whitlam along the Great Wall was a powerful bit of symbolism, Prof Smith says. Mr Whitlam visited the wonder in a landmark trip as opposition leader acknowledging communist rule of the People's Republic of China in 1971, becoming one of the first Western politicians to do so. It sent a clear message about the enduring strength of the relationship, Prof Smith says. "This is probably one of the strongest cards we've got to play in terms of the relationship, that we were a first mover in recognising China. That gets us a lot of points." Premier Li praised Mr Albanese for his personal role in mending Sino-Australian relations in their meeting on Tuesday. Chinese state media, which poured endless scorn on Australia when relations were at their lowest, was glowing in its coverage of Mr Albanese, casting the previous coalition government as the source of the conflict. "In recent years, as China-Australia relations have continued to improve, the Australian government's understanding of its relationship with China has also deepened," according to an opinion piece in Chinese state-owned tabloid the Global Times. "(Mr Albanese) has demonstrated a pragmatic and rational approach to China policy. "Today's China-Australia relationship is like a plane flying in the 'stratosphere' after passing through the storm zone and the most turbulent and bumpy period has passed." Australian Strategic Policy Institute executive director Justin Bassi says the prime minister's visit was positive for economic relationships and trade. But the approach is not without its risks. "I think here the risks are threefold," he told ABC News. "I think there is a risk that we are used for propaganda purposes. There is a risk that … trade becomes an over-dependency and the third risk is that we provide a perception, both to China and to our own public, that short-term economics are outweighing long-term security."
7NEWS
an hour ago
- 7NEWS
Union takes action against Commonwealth Bank for alleged ‘sham' redundancies
Action has been launched against the country's biggest bank over claims it carried out 'sham' redundancies in Australia to take advantage of cheap overseas labour. The Commonwealth Bank announced in June it was making 304 roles across its technology and retail departments redundant. But the Finance Sector Union argues the CBA breached the Enterprise Agreement when it was 'caught' advertising the same jobs at its Indian subsidiary in Bangalore, India. The union said 110 of the roles advertised to be based at CBA India had the same job title as those involved in the redundancies. 'By hiring for the same job, at their own Indian subsidiary, they're showing themselves to have breached the Enterprise Agreement and essentially lied to their workers,' FSU national secretary Julia Angrisano said. 'This is the very definition of bad faith.' According to Clause 36 of the EBA, redundancies can occur if work is no longer required, needs to be done at a different location which is not within a reasonable commuting distance, or if the role is restructured so that some or all of the duties of the position are split up between one or more other positions. 'Sham redundancy action' The union said its members had been left 'outraged' and is taking its claims to the Fair Work Commission. 'We do not believe that the redundancies outlined in these change processes are in fact genuine redundancies and that in doing so, CBA has breached the terms of the Agreement,' Angrisano said. 'These jobs are not required to be done in India, they're just moving the work there to take advantage of cheaper labour and further line their own pockets.' Angrisano said Australian taxpayers are 'paying for the sham redundancy action'. 'Bona fide redundancies are taxed concessionally in the hands of the workers. It is especially disgusting that the nation's richest company is also reducing the tax take as it makes the final payment to hundreds of Australians that we know are being sacked solely to have their work performed offshore,' Angrisano said The Commonwealth Bank said the FSU 'did not raise any concerns' about like-for-like job changes during formal consultation, and said there 'is no basis to their allegations'. 'Like many organisations, we regularly review how we are organised to deliver the best experiences and outcomes for our customers,' a bank spokesperson said. 'We have been transparent in communicating workforce shifts with our technology team over the last three years. 'This includes being explicit about roles which are declining and offering reskilling and upskilling opportunities to people in those roles.' The union savaged the CBA in March for slashing more than 150 jobs shortly after revealing a $2.6 billion quarterly profit.
9 News
an hour ago
- 9 News
Young Aussies locked out of housing market turning to $24k investment
Your web browser is no longer supported. To improve your experience update it here Young micro-investors are sinking their spare cash into shares after being locked out of the property market, leading economist Tom Piotrowski says. Piotrowski said unaffordable property prices have made stock market investments an "attractive" choice for a record number of Australians aged under 40 as home ownership remains painfully out of reach. "The fact that it has become increasingly difficult to establish a foothold [in the property market] has certainly contributed to the fact the ease of investing in the share market by comparison is more attractive," Piotrowski told Piotrowski said unaffordable home prices in Australia have made first-time stock investments an "attractive" choice. (Getty) "You can see a pathway to building your wealth in a more incremental way rather than having to stump up with a very sizable deposit." This month marks 30 years since Commonwealth Bank's online share trading platform CommSec launched in Australia and the economic landscape has undoubtedly changed enormously since 1995. In the mid-'90s, CommSec trades were done slowly by telephone and fax for $75 each and most investors were older, wealthier Australians. Now, Piotrowski said, young people with various incomes are now using their smartphones to trade shares at lunch time hoping to build their "nest egg". And according to figures from Finder, Australians have an average of $24,020 invested in shares. This casual investing may be funded by inheritance or a small amount of disposable income, Piotrowski said. "We're in the midst of one of the largest transitions of wealth from the baby boomer generation to a younger generation," Piotrowski said. According to Finder, Australians have an average of $24,020 invested in shares. (Getty) "Some are fortunate that they might be able to get some help with a leg up to buying their first property because of that wealth transition, others perhaps might not be that lucky. "Investing in the share market is attractive to them from that perspective because they're coming into some money. "They might not quite have enough for a deposit. "From that vantage point, you'd certainly be interested in looking at the share market." The percentage of customers trading on CommSec aged under 40 has surged to 39.8 per cent, compared to just over 25 per cent in 2020. CommBank revealed the rate of women with share holdings has nearly tripled in the past five years. Piotrowski credits this with a rise in online financial literacy since the COVID-19 pandemic. Leading economist Tom Piotrowski. (Supplied) "There are a lot more female content producers now that are interested in the share market, and that's important in terms of creating a commonality with the audience," he said. "It's become far more mainstream than it ever has been and that is directly tied to technology and social media." CommSec's biggest day of trading in 2025 so far was in the wake of Donald Trump's tariff announcements on April 7. But Piotrowski said Trump's influence likely won't have much of a negative impact on investors willing to play the long game and ride the wave. Investors under the age of 40 are turning to CommSec in droves. (Nine) "Yes, things are volatile, but volatility has always been a feature of equity markets," he said. "From time to time, you have seismic events that create big price movements. But it's a cliche. "The thing that protects you against that volatility is that long-term perspective." The information provided on this website is general in nature only and does not constitute personal financial advice. The information has been prepared without taking into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. Before acting on any information on this website you should consider the appropriateness of the information having regard to your objectives, financial situation and needs. finance Economy Australia national commonwealth bank money Economics Shares tariffs CONTACT US
