
Schools told to make sex education ‘stage appropriate' as age limit plans axed
Primary school teachers may decide to discuss the sharing of naked images or online sexual content if it is affecting their pupils and they know that children have seen pornography, according to the final statutory Government guidance on relationships, sex and health education (RSHE) in schools.
Proposals to impose strict age limits on topics in the RSHE curriculum, proposed by the previous Conservative government, will not go ahead.
Draft guidance, published in May last year under the Conservatives, had suggested sex education should be taught no earlier than Year 5.
It had proposed for issues like sexual harassment, revenge porn, upskirting and sexual exploitation and abuse to not be taught before Year 7 (age 11), and for explicit discussion of sexual violence, including rape and sexual assault, to not take place before Year 9 (age 13).
The draft guidance also said schools should not teach pupils about the concept of 'gender identity'.
The final guidance on RSHE, which has been published a year after a consultation over the draft Conservative guidance closed, has not assigned specific ages to certain RSHE topics.
Instead, it said schools should develop the RSHE curriculum to be 'relevant, age and stage appropriate and accessible to pupils in their area'.
The Government guidance, published on Tuesday, said pupils should be taught the facts and the law about biological sex and gender reassignment.
But on the debate around biological sex and gender reassignment, it told schools to be 'careful not to endorse any particular view or teach it as fact'.
It said schools should avoid materials that use cartoons or diagrams that 'oversimplify' the topic, or which 'encourage pupils to question their gender'.
The Department for Education (DfE) has said revised guidance for schools and colleges on gender questioning children is due to be published this summer.
In her foreword to the updated RSHE guidance, Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson said: 'The depth and breadth of views is clear, and there are understandable and legitimate areas of contention.
'Our guiding principles have been that all of the compulsory subject content must be age appropriate and developmentally appropriate.
'It must be taught sensitively and inclusively, with respect to the backgrounds and beliefs of pupils and parents while always with the aim of providing pupils with the knowledge they need of the law.'
When asked about removing the plans for strict age limits for sex education, Ms Phillipson told the BBC: 'I think what parents want to know is that they'll be able to see what's being taught.
'There sometimes can be occasions where it's necessary to broach a topic a little bit sooner in response to something that might have happened within the school, but parents would be informed and involved on that.'
The guidance said pupils should be given the opportunity to discuss the sexual norms endorsed by so-called 'involuntary celibates' (incels) or online influencers by the end of secondary school.
It added that secondary school pupils should be taught about the prevalence of 'deepfakes' and how pornography can portray 'misogynistic' attitudes and it can present harmful activities as normal.
Students should be taught that strangulation – applying pressure to someone's neck – is a criminal offence regardless of whether it causes injury.
The guidance has also advised secondary schools to work closely with mental health professionals to discuss suicide prevention in an age-appropriate way.
It added that schools should continue to share RSHE curriculum materials with parents on request.
Since September 2020, relationships and sex education has been compulsory in secondary schools in England, while relationships education has been compulsory in primary schools.
In March 2023, then-prime minister Rishi Sunak brought forward a review of RSHE guidance for schools after hearing concerns that children were being exposed to 'inappropriate' content.
Schools in England will have to follow the statutory RSHE guidance from September 2026.
Paul Whiteman, general secretary at school leaders' union NAHT, said: 'We are pleased to see that there are no age 'limits' included in this new guidance.
'Schools already work hard to ensure that teaching is age-appropriate and this approach gives them the vital flexibility to respond to their own community and the needs of pupils in their schools.'
But he added: 'NAHT has particular concerns that the inclusion of suicide prevention content has not been accompanied by a commitment from the Government to provide funded training for all teachers to give them both the knowledge and the confidence they need to discuss suicide prevention and self-harm with young people.
'The provision of training is vital before this content becomes statutory and it is unacceptable that the guidance simply says that schools should work with mental health professionals to discuss how this sensitive content should be tackled in the classroom.'
Margaret Mulholland, Send and inclusion specialist at the Association of School and College Leaders (ASCL), said: 'We welcome the clarity over biological sex and gender reassignment in the guidance.
'There are strongly held and sometimes polarised views over these issues and it is important to have a clear set of national guidelines to follow.
'We hope soon to see specific guidance on supporting gender questioning children – something for which we have been calling for several years.'
She added: 'We also welcome the focus on suicide prevention and pay tribute to campaigners for their work on highlighting this issue and the risks to young people.
'Schools already have a great deal of experience in supporting the wellbeing of pupils – and many have seen a rising number of young people struggling with their mental health in recent years.
'Unfortunately, there is still not enough external support available and we would like to see more work done to ensure that young people can access specialist services in a timely manner.'
Laura Mackay, chief executive officer of LGBT+ young people's charity Just Like Us, said: 'Some teachers still struggle to discuss LGBT+ topics with their pupils. So it's good to see the new RSHE guidance strongly encouraging primary schools to teach about diverse families, including same-sex parents.
'However, there are aspects of the new guidance that could make teachers feel even more anxious about what they can do or say to support all LGBT+ young people.
'If schools treat gender identity as something that is taboo, trans and gender diverse young people across the UK will feel further alienated and unsafe at school.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


STV News
15 minutes ago
- STV News
John Swinney: It's in Scotland's interest I meet Donald Trump
Scotland's First Minister has said it is in the interests of the country that he meets US President Donald Trump. John Swinney said he had an 'obligation' to 'protect and promote' Scotland. He said there would be an opportunity during his meeting to discuss tariffs, Gaza and Ukraine. Swinney will meet the Republican politician later this month when he is expected to visit his golf courses in Aberdeenshire and Ayrshire. Trump will also meet Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer in Aberdeen, he has said. Speaking during a visit to Rutherglen, the First Minister said Scots would expect him to meet a US president visiting Scotland. He said: 'I've taken a decision that's in Scotland's interest to meet with the president of the United States so that I can use every opportunity to protect and to promote the interests of the people of Scotland. 'There's obviously a range of issues that we can cover around the international situation that's causing such anxiety to people in Scotland, around the situation the Middle East, and the situation in Ukraine, and the domestic issues that are important to us around about the implications of, for example, trade and tariffs on some of our key sectors, including Scotch whisky. 'So I think people in Scotland would expect their First Minister to meet with the president of the United States to put forward Scotland's position.' Earlier this week, Trump said he would go to Aberdeen, which he said was the 'oil capital of Europe'. 'They have so much oil there,' he said. 'They should get rid of the windmills and bring back the oil. '[Because] the windmills are really detrimental to the beauty of Scotland and every other place they go up.' Asked about those comments, Swinney said he supported renewables in Scotland, which he said was key to the future of the country. He said: 'There's going to be different views expressed by different political leaders, and I'm a supporter of renewable energy. 'I think it's important that we use the opportunities that we have in Scotland to capture the natural and sustainable energy that surrounds us and it's all around us, and we should take those opportunities, which the Scottish Government has done in a sustainable way. 'We've got to protect the planet. We've got to protect our communities, and that's at the heart of the Government's agenda in Scotland.' The Scottish Greens, who were previously in Government with the SNP, have criticised the First Minister for his plans to meet the president. Co-leader Patrick Harvie said the meeting was 'tragic' and 'out of step with Scotland's values'. But Swinney defended the decision, saying: 'The people of the United States have elected their president, and that's their choice, and he's coming to visit Scotland. 'And I think for me, my obligation of what members of the public would expect of their First Minister is for me to engage with the leader of the United States to protect and to promote the interests of Scotland.' On Wednesday, the Scottish Secretary also defended Swinney's decision to meet Trump, along with Sir Keir's decision, saying it was 'the right thing to do'. Ian Murray praised the Prime Minister for putting in a 'lot of effort' to 'cultivate' a relationship with the president. He said US tariffs and the situation in Ukraine could be on the agenda for the discussions. He said: 'At this stage we have no sight of what the president's programme is, but we do know the First Minister and the Prime Minister will meet him, and it is right for them both to do so.' He said the meetings were 'the right thing to do because those relationships are incredibly important in terms of our own national interest'. He added: 'We should make sure we are working very closely with our allies for the benefit of Scotland and the whole of the United Kingdom.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country


Daily Mirror
15 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Urgent change for teachers demanded in disturbing Southport attacks report
A review into the Prevent programme recommended a string of steps to prevent more failings like those made with Southport murderer Axel Rudakubana and terrorist Ali Harbi Ali, who killed Tory MP Sir David Amess Frontline workers like teachers must get better training to spot dangerous extremists, a crucial extremism report has found. Authorities must also work with tech firms to identify would-be terrorists if lessons are to be learned from the Southport murders and the killing of Tory MP Sir David Amess, it said. Lord David Anderson said improvements must be made to the Prevent programme to help prevent similar tragedies. Both Axel Rudakubana, who murdered three young girls at a dance class in Southport, and Mr Amess's killer Ali Harbi Ali had previously been referred to the programme. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said the Government would "immediately act" on the findings. Lord Anderson, the UK's Interim Independent Prevent Commissioner, concluded that several failures happened before Ali went on to kill in 2021. These included poor communication and lack of proper six-month reviews. And referring to the failure to escalate Rudakubana's case, he wrote: "It is hard to see how the test of 'reasonable grounds to believe that there are no Prevent concerns' could have been satisfied on the known facts of the case'." He called for urgent steps to make sure worrying online activity is better used to identify and investigate potential terrorists. And he said frontline public sector workers should be clear that those who show a fascination with "extreme violence or mass casualty attacks" must be referred to Prevent. The Commissioner upheld the findings of learning reviews into the two attacks, which found opportunities were missed to stop both Ali and Rudakubana. Lord Anderson said both had been referred to Prevent by their schools, but the programme "failed to provide what might have helped them". And he urged the Government to work with tech firms and social networks to strenghten methods of flagging dangerous fanatics. He wrote: "Whether different decisions might have spared their victims will never be known: both attacks came years later, and many imponderables intervened. But wrong decisions were taken; more should have been done; and from these failures, lessons must continue to be learned'" Rudakabana's trial heard he was not treated as a terrorist because there was no clear extremist ideology. This was despite him being fascinated with the Manchester Arena attack and an Al-Qaeda training manual being found at his home. Lord Anderson said Prevent must remain open to those who become obsessed with extreme violence, even if they do not have a clear ideology. He also called for a new task force to look into linking Prevent with a broader safeguarding and violence prevention programme. And the Commissioner said training for frontline workers must be rolled out for the end of the year. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said the Government must look at how Prevent works "to stop further missed opportunities". She said progress has been made on a string of measures she announced back in December. These include a review into the way the programme treats people with severe mental health problems and provide improved support for those who do not qualify for Prevent intervention. Ms Cooper said: "Prevent training is being rolled out at pace to educate frontline professionals about the ideologies, such as Islamist extremism, that drive terrorism." In a statement to MPs, the Home Secretary said: "My department remains steadfast in its commitment to keeping the public safe and safeguarding people at risk of radicalisation. "The victims, their families and those who survived the Southport attack but continue to live with the physical and emotional pain, and Sir David Amess's family remain in our hearts and prayers."

Rhyl Journal
19 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
John Swinney: It's in Scotland's interest I meet Donald Trump
John Swinney said he had an 'obligation' to 'protect and promote' Scotland. He said there would be an opportunity during his meeting to discuss tariffs, Gaza and Ukraine. Mr Swinney will meet the Republican politician later this month when he is expected to visit his golf courses in Aberdeenshire and Ayrshire. Mr Trump will also meet Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer in Aberdeen, he has said. Speaking during a visit to Rutherglen, the First Minister said Scots would expect him to meet a US president visiting Scotland. He told the PA news agency: 'I've taken a decision that's in Scotland's interest to meet with the president of the United States so that I can use every opportunity to protect and to promote the interests of the people of Scotland. 'There's obviously a range of issues that we can cover around the international situation that's causing such anxiety to people in Scotland, around the situation the Middle East, and the situation in Ukraine, and the domestic issues that are important to us around about the implications of, for example, trade and tariffs on some of our key sectors, including Scotch whisky. 'So I think people in Scotland would expect their First Minister to meet with the president of the United States to put forward Scotland's position.' Earlier this week, Mr Trump said he would go to Aberdeen, which he said was the 'oil capital of Europe'. 'They have so much oil there,' he said. 'They should get rid of the windmills and bring back the oil. '[Because] the windmills are really detrimental to the beauty of Scotland and every other place they go up.' Asked about those comments, Mr Swinney said he supported renewables in Scotland, which he said was key to the future of the country. He said: 'There's going to be different views expressed by different political leaders, and I'm a supporter of renewable energy. 'I think it's important that we use the opportunities that we have in Scotland to capture the natural and sustainable energy that surrounds us and it's all around us, and we should take those opportunities, which the Scottish Government has done in a sustainable way. 'We've got to protect the planet. We've got to protect our communities, and that's at the heart of the Government's agenda in Scotland.' The Scottish Greens, who were previously in Government with the SNP, have criticised the First Minister for his plans to meet the president. Co-leader Patrick Harvie said the meeting was 'tragic' and 'out of step with Scotland's values'. But Mr Swinney defended the decision, saying: 'The people of the United States have elected their president, and that's their choice, and he's coming to visit Scotland. 'And I think for me, my obligation of what members of the public would expect of their First Minister is for me to engage with the leader of the United States to protect and to promote the interests of Scotland.' On Wednesday, the Scottish Secretary also defended Mr Swinney's decision to meet Mr Trump, along with Sir Keir's decision, saying it was 'the right thing to do'. Ian Murray praised the Prime Minister for putting in a 'lot of effort' to 'cultivate' a relationship with the president. He said US tariffs and the situation in Ukraine could be on the agenda for the discussions. He said: 'At this stage we have no sight of what the president's programme is, but we do know the First Minister and the Prime Minister will meet him, and it is right for them both to do so.' He said the meetings were 'the right thing to do because those relationships are incredibly important in terms of our own national interest'. He added: 'We should make sure we are working very closely with our allies for the benefit of Scotland and the whole of the United Kingdom.'