WDOC returns some inmates from out-of-state facilities; 135 remain in Mississippi
WDOC sent 240 Wyoming inmates to TCCF in November 2023 because of staff vacancies. Since then, WDOC has anticipated maintaining inmates at TCCF until staffing increases within the agency.
'A great number of recruiting efforts have been undertaken, including a contract with a professional staffing and recruiting firm, higher starting wages, and training and development for staff,' WDOC Public Information Officer Stephanie Dack wrote in email correspondence with the Wyoming Tribune Eagle. 'This has resulted in an increase in the number of correctional officers hired for all of our facilities, including the Wyoming State Penitentiary in Rawlins and the Wyoming Women's Center in Lusk.'
Last November, WDOC returned 60 inmates to WDOC-operated facilities, and 30 more inmates were returned on May 20. Fifteen more inmates were returned to WDOC facilities for additional reasons on single or smaller transports, according to Dack.
While Wyoming's staffing has increased, TCCF continues to house 135 of the state's inmates, as recruitment and retention efforts continue.
The number of staff required to allow the remaining inmates to be transferred back to Wyoming is not public information.
'We evaluate staffing and operations regularly,' Dack wrote when asked how much staff has to increase to transfer the remaining inmates back to the state. 'Staffing has improved, and we are optimistic about returning all of our inmates to Wyoming. We do not share specific staffing numbers.'
Though WDOC officials say they can't currently share the staffing levels required to return the remaining inmates, department officials have shared those numbers in the past.
In 2023, after the department initially sent the 240 inmates to Mississippi, WDOC Director Dan Shannon told members of the Legislature's Joint Appropriations Committee that the department had a little over 130 vacancies.
At the time, there was a 33% vacancy rate at the Wyoming State Penitentiary in Rawlins and a 43% vacancy rate at the Wyoming Women's Center in Lusk, according to previous reporting by the Wyoming Tribune Eagle.
Shannon told the Legislature that the department needed to fill 43 to 47 positions before it could safely consider bringing back those 240 inmates. Shannon added that, in 2023, the main issue was recruitment, as opposed to retention.
'We clearly are retaining staff, but we're not receiving applications,' Shannon said. 'We continue to significantly be challenged in staff recruitment.'
WDOC did not share how many positions have been filled since.
Dack wrote that staffing information is subject to Wyoming Statute 16-4-203(b)(vi), and cannot be released because it would jeopardize the safety and security of the state's correctional facilities.
WDOC has inmates housed under contract in several Wyoming county jails and in Tallahatchie while they work toward full staffing.
As staffing increases, many factors determine which inmates are moved back into the state, but how those decisions are made is not public information, either.
Dack again cited Wyoming Statute 16-4-203(b)(vi) as a reason to not disclose what determines which inmates are transferred back into the state. Doing so would jeopardize the safety and security of the facilities, according to Dack.
Being housed out of state means that inmates are subject to visitation privileges based on the facility where they are housed. The visitation procedures at TCCF are very similar to WDOC procedures, according to Dack. However, the distance creates a barrier for family members of Wyoming inmates held in Mississippi.
'We recognize it is more challenging for families when their loved ones are housed out of state,' Dack wrote.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Special sessions explained: How they work, what the rules are
AUSTIN (KXAN) — Texas's constitution limits the legislature to just 140 days every other year to pass new laws. However, it also lets the governor call for 'special sessions' between those biennial regular sessions. TxLege data: How many bills have state lawmakers passed? From 1876 until 2025, the state has had more than 100 special sessions, according to the Legislative Reference Library of Texas, or LRL. Governors average slightly over two extra sessions between regular ones. What rules does the Governor have to follow? Texas' special sessions first began during the Civil War, when most of the state's rules about the sessions were not established. The 1876 Texas Constitution created the rules used in our modern special session rules. When the Legislature shall be convened in special session, there shall be no legislation upon subjects other than those designated in the proclamation of the Governor calling such session, or presented to them by the Governor; and no such session shall be of longer duration than thirty days. Texas Constitution of 1876, section 30 Here are the rules placed on the Texas Governor: During a regular session, they can announce there will be a special session; Must issue a proclamation setting a session's start date and its topics; and, Can add topics during a special session. The LRL has answered questions about special sessions that it gets frequently, which provide additional insight into what a governor can and can't do: No limit to how many special sessions can be called; Can't convene a special session until a session adjourns; Can convene on the same day a session adjourns; and, Breaks between sessions are not required. What rules do lawmakers have to follow? Here are the rules placed on the Legislature: Can only meet in special session for 30 days maximum; Can only file legislation related to the topics chosen by the governor; and, Can submit resolutions that aren't related, but joint resolutions must be related. The Texas Senate and its House of Representatives use slight modifications to their rules of procedure during special sessions. These rule changes mostly serve to tighten up time frames to work within the shorter session. For example, House rules require committees to post notice of a public hearing at least five days before said hearing. During a special session, committees are only required to post notice 24 hours beforehand. Bills can be filed 30 days prior to the start of a special session. Topics set tone, tempo of sessions A governor isn't limited in how many topics they can call. In 1918, Gov. William Pettus Hobby called a special session with 172 topics. In 2013, Gov. Rick Perry called a session with just one topic. Fewer topics before the legislature should help focus lawmakers' efforts. That 2013 session ended with the legislature passing an infrastructure bill after seven days. However, it would be inaccurate to say that fewer topics mean a shorter session. A 1989 special session called by Gov. William Clements, Jr. asked lawmakers to only address 'reform of the worker's compensation system.' It lasted 29 days and passed one bill. A politically contentious topic can stir up more debate and pushback from opponents, which eats up the session's limited time. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
When power picks the people: How redistricting in Texas works
Ordinary voters can be forgiven if their eyes don't well up over the possibility of a few Congress members losing their seats. Beginning Monday, the Legislature convenes a special session, and one of the agenda items is to tackle the unusual mid-decade redrawing of Texas' district boundaries — a move aimed at boosting Republican clout in Washington. It's true that much of the media coverage leading into the special session has centered on the horse-race aspect of perhaps one of the most political activities lawmakers engage in. The coverage tends to focus on which members might be drawn out of office, protected, or newly positioned to win reconfigured districts. As interesting as all that might be for political junkies and politicians whose necks are on the line, the real-world implications go deeper. Let's start with the basic school civics question: What difference does it make which politician goes to Washington to represent which part of Texas? The answer might sound more than a bit naive, though it shouldn't be. The federal government is intrusive, demanding, too opaque to most Americans and very, very expensive to operate. For every Texan — actually for every American — who's not actually working in the federal government, their most accountable point of contact in the nation's capital is their Congress member. Your aging parent needs help with Social Security or Medicare, call your congressman's office. Your graduating senior wants to go to West Point, the Naval Academy or any of the other service academies, a nomination from your congressman will go a long way. You're getting jacked around trying to apply for some sort of federal assistance, or you want to complain that any federal assistance is a black hole for wasted money, show up at the next town hall your member of Congress hosts. READ MORE: Why a walkout on GOP redistricting could be very risky for Texas Democrats Now, here's where the politics get even more political, and more than a little bit complicated. The makeup of congressional districts is not random. And even though Texas has 38 U.S. House members, each individual Texan has exactly one. U.S. senators are a different matter, so let's put a pin in that topic for now. Congressional districts, in a perfect world, are drawn once a decade to align with the latest figures from the U.S. Census. They are supposed to be made up of what are called "communities of interest." That should mean that families in the High Plains aren't matched up in a congressional district with residents of downtown condos in places like Austin, Houston or San Antonio. The districts are also supposed to be as geographically compact as possible, giving constituents at least some sense of community. And they're not supposed to be drawn so that communities of color are effectively shut out when it comes to representation. But the world is not perfect. And Texas' diversity — whether it be geographic, economic, commercial, climate, demographic or political — means that many of the lofty goals laid out in the previous paragraph have to be set aside or outright ignored. Now let's mix in population imperatives. A district covering vast expanses of cotton farms and cattle ranches has to have about the same number of actual people as one where most people live just a couple of feet, or just a couple of floors, from their neighbors. READ MORE: In wake of Texas floods, questions seek not blame but accountability Adding another layer of complexity, let's consider that in the 1970s, each of the 435 members of the U.S. House represented about 470,000 people. In the half-century since, the U.S. population has grown by approximately 130 million. However, the number of Congress members — 435 — has remained the same as it was when disco topped the charts. That means each member has roughly 785,000 constituents. So, all that means that getting the attention of your member of Congress is about twice as hard as it was for your grandparents when they were your age. Finally, here's the uncomfortable truth: you don't truly choose your representative — your Congress member, in effect, chooses you. And that's how redistricting actually works. The map drawers have highly sophisticated computer programs that tell them which neighborhoods tend to vote for one party or the other. The programs let them know the area's racial composition, about how much money families make, how those families spend that money, whether they have kids or whether they prefer pets, whether they're still working, whether they're looking for work, or whether they're retired. And some neighborhoods get randomly assigned to one district or another because they'll balance out the population but will have no real influence on election day. All that information gets dissected, bisected and digested, and members of Congress and wannabe members of Congress will decide which neighborhoods, not which individuals, are most likely to vote for them. So if you get swept into a district that's likely to elect someone of your political persuasion, good for you. If you're in the opposite camp, better luck when they do it all again in 2031. Or maybe sooner, depending on the mood of whoever's in charge at the time. This article originally appeared on Austin American-Statesman: Texas redistricting is all about the politicians, it's never about you
2 hours ago
Texas Republicans aim to redraw House districts at Trump's urging, but there's a risk
AUSTIN, Texas -- U.S. Rep. Vicente Gonzalez, a Texas Democrat who represents a slice of the Rio Grande Valley along the border with Mexico, won his last congressional election by just over 5,000 votes. That makes him a tempting target for Republicans, who are poised to redraw the state's congressional maps this coming week and devise five new winnable seats for the GOP that would help the party avoid losing House control in the 2026 elections. Adjusting the lines of Gonzalez's district to bring in a few thousand more Republican voters, while shifting some Democratic ones out, could flip his seat. Gonzalez said he is not worried. Those Democratic voters will have to end up in one of the Republican districts that flank Gonzalez's current one, making those districts more competitive — possibly enough so it could flip the seats to Democrats. 'Get ready for some pickup opportunities,' Gonzalez said, adding that his party is already recruiting challengers to Republicans whose districts they expect to be destabilized by the process. 'We're talking to some veterans, we're talking to some former law enforcement.' Texas has 38 seats in the House. Republicans now hold 25 and Democrats 12, with one seat vacant after Democrat Sylvester Turner, a former Houston mayor, died in March. Gonzalez's district — and what happens to the neighboring GOP-held ones — is at the crux of President Donald Trump's high-risk, high-reward push to get Texas Republicans to redraw their political map. Trump is seeking to avoid the traditional midterm letdown that most incumbent presidents endure and hold onto the House, which the GOP narrowly controls. Trump's push comes as there are numerous political danger signs for his presidency, both in the recent turmoil over his administration's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case and in new polling. Surveys from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research show most U.S. adults think his policies have not helped them and that his tax cut and spending bill will help the wealthy. The fear of accidentally creating unsafe seats is one reason Texas Republicans drew their lines cautiously in 2021, when the constitutionally mandated redistricting process kicked off in all 50 states. Mapmakers — in most states, it's the party that controls the legislature — must adjust congressional and state legislative lines after every 10-year census to ensure that districts have about the same number of residents. That is a golden opportunity for one party to rig the map against the other, a tactic known as gerrymandering. But there is a term, too, for so aggressively redrawing a map that it puts that party's own seats at risk: a 'dummymander.' The Texas GOP knows the risk. In the 2010s, the Republican-controlled Legislature drew political lines that helped pad the GOP's House majority. That lasted until 2018, when a backlash against Trump in his first term led Democrats to flip two seats in Texas that Republicans had thought safe. In 2021, with Republicans still comfortably in charge of the Texas Statehouse, the party was cautious, opting for a map that mainly shored up their incumbents rather than targeted Democrats. Still, plenty of Republicans believe their Texas counterparts can safely go on offense. 'Smart map-drawing can yield pickup opportunities while not putting our incumbents in jeopardy,' said Adam Kincaid, executive director of the National Republican Redistricting Trust, which helps coordinate mapmaking for the party nationally.. Republican Gov. Greg Abbott called a special session of the Legislature, which starts Monday, to comply with Trump's request to redraw the congressional maps and to address the flooding in Texas Hill Country that killed at least 135 people this month. Democratic state lawmakers are talking about staying away from the Capitol to deny the Legislature the minimum number needed to convene. Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton posted that any Democrats who did that should be arrested. Lawmakers can be fined up to $500 a day for breaking a quorum after the House changed its rules when Democrats initiated a walkout in 2021. Despite the new penalties, state Rep. Trey Martinez Fischer, who led the walkout in 2021, left open the possibility of another. 'I don't think anybody should underestimate the will of Texas Democrats," he said. Texas is not the only Republican state engaged in mid-decade redistricting. After staving off a ballot measure to expand the power of a mapmaking commission last election, Ohio Republicans hope to redraw their congressional map from a 10-5 one favoring the GOP to one as lopsided as 13-2, in a state Trump won last year with 55% of the vote. Democrats have fewer options. More of the states the party controls do not allow elected partisans to draw maps and entrust independent commissions to draw fair lines. Some party leaders, such as California Gov. Gavin Newsom, are maneuvering to try to find ways around their commissions to counter Texas, but they have few options. The few Democrat-controlled states that do allow elected officials to draw the lines, such as Illinois, have already seen Democrats max out their advantages. Trump and his allies have been rallying Texas Republicans to ignore whatever fears they may and to go big. On Tuesday, the president posted on his social media site a reminder of his record in the state last November: 'Won by one and a half million Votes, and almost 14%. Also, won all of the Border Counties along Mexico, something which has never happened before. I keep hearing about Texas 'going Blue,' but it is just another Democrat LIE.' Texas has long been eyed as a state trending Democratic because of its growing nonwhite population. But those communities swung right last year and helped Trump expand his margin to 14 percentage points, a significant improvement on his 6-point win in 2020. Michael Li, a Texas native and longtime watcher of the state at the Brennan Center for Justice in New York, said there's no way to know whether that trend will continue in next year's elections or whether the state will return to its blue-trending ways. 'Anyone who can tell you what the politics of Texas looks like for the balance of the decade has a better crystal ball than I do,' Li said. One region of the state where Republican gains have been steady is the Rio Grande Valley, which runs from the Gulf of Mexico along much of the state's southern border. The heavily Hispanic region, where many Border Patrol officers live, has rallied around Trump's tough-on-immigration, populist message. As a result, Gonzalez and the area's other Democratic congressman, Henry Cuellar, have seen their reelection campaigns get steadily tighter. They are widely speculated to be the two top targets of the new map. The GOP is expected to look to the state's three biggest cities to find its other Democratic targets. If mapmakers scatter Democratic voters from districts in the Houston, Dallas and Austin areas, they could get to five additional seats. But in doing so, Republicans face a legal risk on top of their electoral one: that they break up districts required by the Voting Rights Act to have a critical amount of certain minority groups. The goal of the federal law is to enable those communities to elect representatives of their choosing. The Texas GOP already is facing a lawsuit from civil rights groups alleging its initial 2021 map did this. If this year's redistricting is too aggressive, it could trigger a second complaint. 'It's politically and legally risky,' Li said of the redistricting strategy. 'It's throwing caution to the winds.'
