logo
If You Thought Facebook Was Toxic Already, Now It's Replacing Its Human Moderators with AI

If You Thought Facebook Was Toxic Already, Now It's Replacing Its Human Moderators with AI

Yahoo04-06-2025
Few companies in the history of capitalism have amassed as much wealth and influence as Meta.
A global superpower in the information space, Meta — the parent company of Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, and Threads — has a market cap of $1.68 trillion at the time of writing, which for a rough sense of scale is more than the gross domestic product of Spain.
In spite of its immense influence, none of its internal algorithms can be scrutinized by public watchdogs. Its host country, the United States, has largely turned a blind eye to its dealings in exchange for free use of Meta's vast surveillance capabilities.
That lack of oversight coupled with Meta's near-omnipresence as a social utility has had devastating consequences throughout the world, manifesting in crises like the genocide of Muslims in Myanmar, or the systemic suppression of Palestinian rights organizations.
How do you uncover the harms caused by one of the most powerful companies on earth? In the case of public violence, the evidence isn't hard to trace. However, Meta's unprecedented corporate dynasty also creates less obvious harms, which scores of scholars, researchers, and journalists are devoting entire careers to uncovering.
One prominent group of said investigators is GLAAD, the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation, which recently released its annual report on social media safety, privacy, and expression for LGBTQ people.
The report notes that Meta has undergone a "particularly extreme" ideological shift over the past year, adding harmful exceptions to its content moderation policies while disproportionately suppressing LGBTQ users and their content. The tech giant has also failed to give LGBTQ users sovereignty over their own personal data, which it collects, analyzes, and wields to generate huge profits.
While Meta collects all of our data — from which it draws over 95 percent of its revenue — the practice is particularly harmful to LGBTQ users, who then have to contend with algorithmic biases, non-consensual outing, harassment, and in some countries state oppression.
"It's a dangerous time, certainly for trans people, who as a minority have been so ridiculously maligned, but also a dangerous time for gay people, openly bi[sexual] people, people who are different in any way," says Sarah Roberts, a UCLA professor and Director of the Center for Critical Internet Inquiry.
To address these shortcomings and the dangers they introduce, GLAAD made a number of recommendations. One key suggestion was to improve moderation "by providing training for all content moderators focused on LGBTQ safety, privacy and expression." The media advocacy group doesn't mince words, adding that "AI systems should be used to flag for human review, not for automated removals."
However, it doesn't look like Meta got the message.
Weeks after GLAAD issued its findings, internal Meta documents leaked to NPR revealed the company's plan to hand 90 percent of its privacy and integrity reviews over to "artificial intelligence."
This will impact nearly every new feature introduced to its platforms, where human moderators would typically evaluate new features for risks to privacy and safety, and the wellbeing of user groups like minors, immigrants, and LGBTQ people.
Meta's internal risk assessment is an already opaque process, and Roberts notes that government attempts at risk oversight, like the EU's Digital Services Act, are likewise a labyrinth of filings which are largely dictated by the social media companies themselves. AI, chock full of biases and prone to errors — as admitted by Meta's own AI chief — is certain to make the situation even worse.
Earlier this week, meanwhile, the Wall Street Journal revealed Meta's plans to fully automate advertising via the company's generative AI software, which will allow advertisers to "fully create and target ads" directly, with no human in the loop.
This includes hyper-personalized ads, writes the WSJ, "so that users see different versions of the same ad in real time, based on factors such as geolocation."
Data hoarders like Meta — which track you even when you're not using its platforms — have long been able to profile LGBTQ users based on gender identify and sexual orientation, including those who aren't publicly out.
Removing any human from these already sinister practices serves to streamline operations and distance Meta from its own actions — "we didn't out gay users living under an oppressive government," the company can say, "even if our AI did." It's no coincidence that Meta had already disbanded its "Responsible AI" team as early as 2023.
At the root of these decisions — Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg's right wing turn notwithstanding — is the calculated drive to maximize revenue.
"If there's no reason to rigorously moderate harmful content, then why pay so many content moderators? Why engage researchers to look into the circulation of this kind of content?" observes Roberts. "There ends up being a real cost savings there."
"One of the things I've always said is that content moderation of social media is not primarily about protecting people, it's about brand management," she told Futurism. "It's about the platform managing its brand in order to make the most hospitable environment for advertisers."
Sometimes these corporate priorities line up with progressive causes, like LGBTQ user safety or voter registration. But when they don't, Roberts notes, "dollars are dollars."
"We are looking at multibillion-dollar companies, the most capitalized companies in the world, who have operated with impunity for many, many years," she said. "How do you convince them that they should care, when other powerful sectors are telling them the opposite?"
More on Meta: Meta's Platforms Have Become a Cesspool of Hatred Against Queer People
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mark Cuban said the Trump administration needs to crack down on ads in AI models
Mark Cuban said the Trump administration needs to crack down on ads in AI models

Business Insider

time11 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

Mark Cuban said the Trump administration needs to crack down on ads in AI models

"Shark Tank" star Mark Cuban said on Saturday that the White House should "make it illegal for AI models to offer advertising." Cuban said in an X post addressed to David Sacks, the White House's AI and crypto czar, that the administration should "examine referral fees as well." "The last thing we need is to have algorithms designed to maximize revenue driving LLM output and interactions," Cuban wrote. "They are already recommending brands and we don't know if they are getting paid for it. We need to have learned our lessons from algos in social media," he added. Cuban said in a subsequent post on Saturday that he would be willing to accept advertising on AI models if they are "identified as an ad" and kept "completely independent from the user generated chats." Cuban's proposal comes just days after the Trump administration unveiled its 28-page " AI Action Plan" on Wednesday. Back in January, President Donald Trump had signed an executive order calling for "existing AI policies and directives that act as barriers to American AI innovation" to be revoked. Trump has adopted a relatively light-touch approach toward AI regulation compared to his predecessor, President Joe Biden. In October 2023, Biden signed an executive order demanding greater transparency from companies developing AI tools. Trump's new "AI Action Plan" proposed withholding federal funding from states that want to impose "burdensome" AI regulations. Cuban and the White House did not respond to requests for comment from Business Insider. Social-media déjà vu Cuban's worries may not be unfounded. Major AI players such as have been deepening their leadership bench with former executives from social media platforms like Facebook and Instagram. In May, OpenAI chief Sam Altman said he had hired Fidji Simo, the CEO and chair of Instacart, to serve as OpenAI's new CEO of applications. Before she joined Instacart, Simo worked at Meta, where she oversaw Facebook's app and advertising products. Last year, OpenAI hired Kevin Weil as its chief product officer. Weil was previously vice president of product at Instagram and senior vice president of product at Twitter. OpenAI's rival, Anthropic, made a similar move in May 2024 when it hired Mike Krieger, cofounder and former CTO of Instagram, as its chief product officer. Cuban has long warned about the risks and dangers that could come with AI tools like chatbots. He told comedian Jon Stewart in a podcast interview that aired in 2023 that online misinformation "is only going to get worse" with the proliferation of AI tools. "Once these things start taking on a life of their own, it will be difficult for us to define why and how the machine makes the decisions it makes, and who controls the machine," Cuban said. Last week, Cuban wrote in an X post that he expects AI companies to hoard talent and intellectual property to stay ahead of their competitors. "If you create valuable IP, encrypt and silo it. Let companies bid on it. Or just use it for your own behind a paywall model. IP is KING in an AI world," Cuban wrote on July 20.

Samsung reveals a mysterious $16.5 billion chip deal.
Samsung reveals a mysterious $16.5 billion chip deal.

The Verge

time2 hours ago

  • The Verge

Samsung reveals a mysterious $16.5 billion chip deal.

Chip race: Microsoft, Meta, Google, and Nvidia battle it out for AI chip supremacy See all Stories Posted Jul 28, 2025 at 3:04 AM UTC Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates. Richard Lawler Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All by Richard Lawler Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Business Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All News Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Samsung Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Tech

Fed decision, jobs report will step out into spotlight
Fed decision, jobs report will step out into spotlight

Miami Herald

time2 hours ago

  • Miami Herald

Fed decision, jobs report will step out into spotlight

It's rare that folks think about a week of economic reports as potentially dramatic. This week, however, has the potential to be very dramatic. There's just so much data and, yes, politics, about to be loosed on markets, on businesses and around the world. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter There's the July unemployment report, due Friday. The widely studied and analyzed PCE inflation report inflation report, due Thursday. There's the first round of estimates of second-quarter gross domestic product, the report card on how the economy is faring. Related: It's a lollapalooza week ahead for markets Parallel to the economic data are some 843 earnings reports due this coming week from the likes of Microsoft (MSFT) , Facebook-parent Meta Platforms (META) , Apple (AAPL) and (AMZN) . It all comes in the context of continued negotiations on trade deals with tariff rates coming in at lower rates than President Trump suggested in April. Trump said Sunday the European Union has agreed to a deal that envisions tariffs on European goods at 15%. The United States is still negotiating on tariffs with China, Canada and others. So far, stock investors are happy to get a settlement. Stock index futures were signaling stocks will open higher on Monday. Gains would come after the Standard & Poor's 500, Nasdaq Composite and Nasdaq-100 indexes all hit record highs last week. And, of course, there's the Federal Reserve meeting on Tuesday and Wednesday. Will the central bank cut its key federal funds rate, not at 4.25% to 4.5%? Donald Trump wants a rate cut badly now. Treasury Scott Bessent says he wants it. Howard Lutnick, the Commerce Secretary, says he wants it. Two Fed governors, Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman, are for it. But the other 10 voting members of the Federal Open Market Committee, including Fed Chairman Jerome Powell, have said they're content to wait, probably until the Fed's Sept. 16-17 meeting. Related: Intel CEO outlines 'hard but necessary decisions'; Trader Guilfoyle: CEO Tan 'Has a Chance' Powell attracts most of President Trump's ire; he's threatened to fire Powell, whose term expires next May. (Whether he legally can fire Powell is not clear.) Powell remains worried the president's big beautiful tax bill and his tariffs will affect inflation. Powell is not opposed to cutting later and, in fact, the futures markets think the Fed will decide to wait until September. A second rate cut will come in October or December. Overnight trading in the 10-year Treasury note shows the yield rising to 4.41% from Friday's 4.392%. Related: Mexican restaurants, chains hit hard by Chapter 11 bankruptcy There are estimates showing jobs growth falling to around 110,00 from 147,000 in June with the unemployment rate holding at 4.1% or so. But this bit of data has become quite volatile and a bit suspect because it's getting harder to obtain reliable data from phone and online surveys. Bloomberg/Getty Images Another indicator should come Thursday when outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas should release its monthly tally of reported layoffs and job cuts. One more jobs indicator: the weekly report on initial jobless claims, due Thursday. The most recent report showed 217,000 layoffs, down 4,000 from a week earlier. More Tech Stocks: Analyst who correctly predicted Rocket Lab stock surge resets forecastVerizon Q2 earnings report surprises with remarks on tax reformFund manager who forecast Nvidia stock rally reboots outlook The Personal Consumption Expenditures Index measures what is happening to prices for services and products consumers actually buy. It was 2.3% year-over-year in June and may be up slightly in July. Related: Chapter 11 bankruptcy forces popular animal attractions to close Two reports will look at this question: the S&P Case-Shiller report that looks at home prices on Tuesday and the National Association of Realtors Pending Home Sales Index on Wednesday. The Case-Shiller report has suggested home prices are moderating. The pending sales report was up slightly in June but is down around 40% from levels last seen in 2022. Part of the downturn is due to: Higher interest home little construction of homes aimed at first-time home buyers. The Conference Board releases its Consumer Confidence Index report for July at 10 a.m. Tuesday. The University of Michigan releases its Consumer Sentiment Index at 10 a.m. Friday. Both look at how consumers are looking at inflation, the economy and other factors. The June reports showed increasing confidence, a reflection of better conditions in financial markets and the economy. Related: Veteran fund manager points to glaring stock market risk The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store