logo
A Kashmir Diary: War Ravaged Families Await Relief as Statehood Remains Elusive

A Kashmir Diary: War Ravaged Families Await Relief as Statehood Remains Elusive

The Diplomata day ago
While common Kashmiris wait for statehood that will empower the Omar Abdullah government they elected, families affected by the recent India-Pakistan war languish.
Tanveer stands in front of his house, destroyed by Pakistani shelling, at Ramgahi village, Salamabad, close to the Line of Control.
SRINAGAR, KASHMIR — An azure sky seems to embrace the virgin swathes of the Himalayas as one treks down steep slopes in Salamabad in Kashmir, close to the Line of Control that cleaves the region between India and Pakistan. The air is salubrious and the natural surroundings stun, explaining why a handful of families settled at Ramgahi, a village in the secluded foothills. But the region's warring history precludes yearning for romanticism.
When India and Pakistan went to war in May, the border villagers were the first casualties. Their homes being reduced to rubble inflamed the nation's mood, but already they have been forgotten by the rest of India. Given Kashmir's dual power structure, led by the chief minister and a New Delhi-nominated lieutenant governor, locals are not sure who to approach for redress — a bafflement most Kashmiris share.
Tanveer, a villager who returned to Ramgahi to search for his possessions in the collapsed mounds of concrete, says he received only 6,500 Indian rupees ($75) as compensation. Pointing to the dusty remains of his house, he complains that the administration strangely categorized it as 'partly damaged,' which entitles him to minimum relief. If his petition for the enhanced compensation earmarked for fully damaged houses were approved, he would get 130,000 rupees ($1,514), still woefully insufficient to shift the debris or procure raw materials for rebuilding.
'On the night of the shelling on May 6-7, we hid behind makeshift bunkers we had erected ourselves. For three weeks, we lived in rented rooms in Uri, exhausting all our savings, before the officials accommodated us at Uri Trade Centre quarters,' Tanveer recounts. According to him, Chief Minister Omar Abdullah had promised a sum of 1 million rupees ($11,647) to those whose houses had been obliterated, 'but it is not clear who calls the shots.'
Despite the National Conference led by Abdullah storming to power in last year's provincial elections, with his coalition securing 49 of Jammu and Kashmir's 90 seats, New Delhi is unwilling to hand over executive powers to him, or restore statehood. Jammu and Kashmir was downgraded into a Union Territory in August 2019 when its semi-autonomous status was revoked.
Abdullah has so far shown restraint and political pragmatism in trying to engage constructively with New Delhi and negotiate a meaningful federal arrangement for Kashmir. His lack of bellicosity has provoked some of his own colleagues who point to the gradual dilution of Kashmir's political goalposts from demanding a plebiscite to demanding statehood. While their lamentation is valid, and shared by the people in general, they have not been able to articulate what a head-on confrontation with New Delhi should look like given its iron-fist control.
They accuse Abdullah of repudiating his election mandate, which they frame as a mandate to 'restore Kashmir's special status.' While it is true that common Kashmiris are aghast at the loss of autonomy, the claim that they voted in last year's elections hoping the National Conference would bring back that special status is misleading.
The historic turnout was triggered by the need to preclude BJP-aligned parties from securing power.
In an interview with The Diplomat, ahead of the elections, Abdullah told this reporter that the path to reclaim Article 370, which guaranteed Kashmir special status, is arduous. 'Something that took the BJP decades to roll out is not going to be undone by us in five years,' he said.
Nevertheless, the pressure for quick-fix solutions is mounting.
Sameer Ahmed Naik, whose family has been displaced since the India-Pakistan standoff, is one of the Kashmiris upset with the local government. His wife, Zeenat Begum, was injured in the legs and chest when intense shelling by Pakistani armed forces rocked their village, Naupora.
'Initially we got a lump sum payment of 30,000 rupees ($349) to compensate for hospitalization charges. But now we are abandoned, bearing medical costs of our own, at roughly 10,000 rupees ($116) per month. Where is the chief minister and his council?' Naik asked as his two children stared glumly. Naik said that although his house is destroyed, he is still getting electricity bills amounting to 1,500 rupees ($17) every month.
Commenting on the inability of the National Conference (NC) to help their case, eminent historian and political scientist Siddiq Wahid said what was desirable was 'private consultations between the NC and the People's Democratic Party [PDP] at what the Union Territory's government's priorities ought to be politically and in civic administration.'
'From the outside it appears that no such consultations were held,' he told this reporter. 'Meanwhile, the PDP's tactic, from the get go, has been to attack the NC rather than to contemplate political unity in the interests of the Union Territory.'
But Waheed Parra, leader of the PDP whose popularity among all sections of Kashmiris is soaring, says it was the National Conference's pugnacious power play that hollowed out opposition unity in Kashmir.
'They (NC) suo moto declared candidates [for Parliamentary elections] and lobbied to keep the PDP out of the Opposition's I.N.D.I.A. alliance,' Parra says. According to him, 'No two Kashmiri have reason to fight today. We lost everything, our constitution and our history. The path ahead is self-preservation and resistance democratically.'
Jammu and Kashmir witnessed historic democratic participation in the provincial elections held in September 2024 — with turnout at 63.88 percent. Prominent politician and fifth-time legislator from Kulgam constituency, M.Y. Tarigami, feels the Narendra Modi government is wasting a big opportunity to strengthen the political process.
'The BJP-government at the center seems to be more concerned in disarming the elected provincial government further. Despite repeated assurances, uncertainty regarding restoration of full statehood continues. The perception is widespread here in J&K that the present BJP regime is more focused on implementing its Hindutva agenda than restoration of constitutional and democratic rights of the people,' he told The Diplomat.
Tensions between India and Pakistan flared up following a terrorist attack on tourists on April 22 at Baisaran, at the periphery of the Pahalgam meadow, roughly 90 kilometers south of Srinagar, Kashmir's capital. Twenty-six tourists, all men, were killed after being segregated on the basis of religion. Adil Hussain Shah, a pony guide, was the only Muslim to die. He sacrificed his life saving tourists.
The Resistance Front, an off-shoot of Lashkar-e-Taiba, a U.N.-designated terrorist group operating from Pakistani soil, claimed responsibility for the attack but later retracted that claim. India on May 7 launched Operation Sindoor, a missile raid, targeting what it said were terrorist launchpads in Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir. On May 10, after intense aerial offensives that alarmed the international community, the two countries agreed to a ceasefire.
India's television channels whipped up a nationalistic frenzy, circulating theories of local facilitation of terrorists. Sketches of three suspected perpetrators were flashed relentlessly on TV screens, including of Aadil Thoker, a local Kashmiri. The National Investigative Agency of India later said the sketches were misleading and that there was no local involvement. But by this time there had been a series of targeted attacks against Kashmiris, with the Association of Protection of Civil Rights reporting 184 incidents against Muslims and Kashmiris. The security agencies were also accused of punitive actions against people unrelated to the terrorist attack. Houses of at least ten alleged militants were razed, and youths randomly detained under the Public Safety Act, an anti-terror law that allows incarceration without trial for up to two years.
This reporter unsuccessfully tried contacting the family members of Aadil. His house at Guri Thukarpora in Anantnag district of South Kashmir was demolished arbitrarily by the authorities. Villagers claimed there was an unspoken ban on talking to media. A neighbor of Adil, requesting that his name not be published, said his two brothers, Zahid Thoker and Arsalan Thoker, have been detained at the Joint Interrogation Center in Anantnag.
'We don't know if Aadil ever joined the militant ranks. It is a police theory. He disappeared in 2018… not sure if he is alive,' the neighbor sighed.
Th neighbor underscored the counterproductive nature of police coercion. 'This has been an Ikhwan (renegade) village, avowedly pro-India even when militancy raged in the 1990s. Punitive actions will only alienate the people,' he warned.
This is a stark reminder why the provincial government's involvement in overseeing law and order is indispensable. It is elected representatives who can ensure a semblance of democratic norm in the state's interaction with civilians.
At New Colony in Naushera village, the family members of a man named Shahnawaz are still perplexed at his detention. It was around midnight that the police barged into the quiet, sparse settlements of Naushera, and apprehended Shahnawaz. By the time his father, Ashraf Nengroo, a retired employee with the Wildlife Protection Department, reached the neighborhood police station, Shahnwaz had been sent away to Kot Bhalwal jail in the adjoining Jammu region, 200 kilometers away. Shahnwaz, under psychological care for the past few years and largely immobile, has been charged under the draconian PSA.
Nengroo says a likely trigger could be Shahnwaz's alleged involvement in a stone-pelting incident years ago. 'Why apprehend him now?' he asks. Nengroo reached out to opposition leader Iltija Mufti and local legislator Bashir Veeri of the NC, who 'were kind and raised our case, but there was no respite.'
Nengroo is among those who would be happy if the provincial government were empowered. The Modi government maintains it will gradually restore Jammu and Kashmir's statehood. Any sign of that is elusive. Yet, sources close to Abdullah say he is confident New Delhi will eventually relent, restoring statehood as early as August. That may be true in the face of unabated infiltrations in the Poonch, Rajouri pockets which pose a security challenge. Sources say there is also articulation of international concern — though not pressure — about the volatile situation in Kashmir, which New Delhi does not gloss over.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How Corruption Hollows Out Pakistan's Benazir Income Support Program
How Corruption Hollows Out Pakistan's Benazir Income Support Program

The Diplomat

timean hour ago

  • The Diplomat

How Corruption Hollows Out Pakistan's Benazir Income Support Program

Pakistan's largest social support initiative is a vital lifeline for the poor – but is plagued by 'total corruption' at all levels of disbursement. In June 2008, Pakistan launched the Benazir Income Support Program (BISP), the country's largest single social support initiative. It was established as an autonomous institution in 2010, facilitating its expansion. The program's name is a tribute to Pakistan's late Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto. According to a World Bank report, Pakistan's social safety net programs prior to the BISP had been ineffective due to their limited coverage and lack of objective targeting. In response to rising inflation, the government of Pakistan introduced the BISP, an unconditional cash transfer (UCT) program. Since its inception, the BISP has become the country's flagship social safety net, providing support to the poorest families. As of December 2024, the BISP supports around 9.6 million families, positively impacting approximately 58 million people, which is nearly one-fourth of Pakistan's population. The selection criteria for the program is primarily based on economic need, without regard to religious, racial, geographical, or political backgrounds. To qualify for support through the BISP, a family's monthly income must be less than 50,000 Pakistani rupees (approximately $175). Eligible beneficiaries receive 13,500 rupees quarterly through a biometric verification system (BVS) at designated retail outlets or payment centers. In some cases, beneficiaries have the option to receive funds directly into their bank accounts. In the past, various methods such as smart debit cards, mobile phone banking, and money orders via Pakistan Post were used to transfer the funds. Despite its mission to provide an income safety net to the millions of poor families in Pakistan, the program is faced with rampant corruption. In 2020, the issue of the disbursement of BISP funds to ineligible beneficiaries came to light. In January 2023, the office of the Auditor General of Pakistan (AGP) informed the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) of country's National Assembly that 19 billion rupees of the BISP funds were illegally distributed among 143,000 government officials – including 2,500 ranked at Basic Pay Scale-17 or higher, meaning at the assistant director and under secretary level or above. Using the names of their spouses and relatives, these officials were tapping into funds meant to help Pakistan's poor. The government ordered the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) to investigate the issue. The situation does not appear to have improved. According to the Audit Report for the fiscal year 2023-2024, there were financial irregularities amounting to 141 billion rupees in the BISP during this period. The report indicates that more than 3 million beneficiaries lacked a registered family Computerized National Identity Card, yet 116.95 billion rupees in funds were transferred without proper verification into their names. Officials have warned that these funds may have been transferred to businesspersons, government employees, and other ineligible beneficiaries. There is another level of corruption that directly impacts eligible beneficiaries. A reliable source, who spoke to The Diplomat on the condition of anonymity, stated that bank employees responsible for distributing fingerprint devices to retailers, as well as the retailers themselves, are keeping some of the BISP funds for themselves. This results in beneficiaries receiving less than they are entitled to. According to the source, 'Five fingers are not equal. Some retailers deduct only 500 to 1,000 rupees from each beneficiary, while others engage in more deceitful practices. These dishonest retailers take beneficiaries' biometric information and claim that their funds are not available. They then hold onto the money until the beneficiaries return, at which point they may deduct up to 4,000-5000 rupees from the actual amount of 13,500 rupees owed.' Furthermore, the source claimed that 'the funds collected by the retailers are then distributed among various officials, including those from law enforcement and public administration services. Additionally, the relevant monitoring official from the BISP at the district level also demands a share of the money. Typically, these BISP officials request between 40,000 to 50,000 rupees per retailer. However, in the last quarter, the demand increased to 100,000 rupees per retailer.' The source also claimed that 'journalists, as well as social and political workers, also take their share from retailers to keep them silent.' Additionally, 'Bank officials collect amounts from retailers that are not part of any official fees.' This source estimated that the total amount of misappropriated funds in just one district of Sindh Province amounted to 'approximately 30 to 40 million rupees.' The total amount of corruption can vary from district to district based on the number of beneficiaries registered. With multiple actors skimming off funds at all levels of the disbursement process, 'the BISP is unfortunately facing total corruption,' the source lamented. The corruption is effectively mandatory. The source stated, 'Retailers are threatened with the possibility of having their devices blocked and confiscated or facing criminal charges' if they don't partake in these illegal practices. As a result, corruption is pervasive throughout a program that is intended to alleviate the financial burden on low-income families. While the source cited above has direct knowledge only of Sindh, the situation is reportedly the same in Pakistan's other provinces: Punjab, Balochistan, and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. A source from Balochistan said that 'payment centers charge a minimum of 500 rupees for withdrawals. Additionally, there are agents who charge between 300 and 500 rupees to assist individuals in withdrawing their funds. There have also been reports of fake and duplicate payments occurring in the province. Furthermore, it has been highlighted that some government officials are illegally benefiting from the BISP.' Perhaps this is not surprising, given that Pakistan ranks 135th out of 180 countries in the Corruption Perception Index (CPI) for 2024. But the corruption eating away at social support payments is particularly alarming in a country where over 44 percent of the population lives in poverty. The Benazir Income Support Program, which was intended to help alleviate poverty, is instead riddled with corruption. It appears that the program serves not only to support those in need but also to foster corrupt practices among government officials. Despite various measures introduced to reduce corruption within the program, such as different payment methods, those in power consistently find ways to profit illicitly.

Can the Quad Hold the Line on Taiwan?
Can the Quad Hold the Line on Taiwan?

The Diplomat

time2 hours ago

  • The Diplomat

Can the Quad Hold the Line on Taiwan?

U.S. calls for clearer commitments on Taiwan underscore the growing pressure on the Quad, as the Taiwan issue increasingly tests the group's unity and strategic purpose. The Quad Foreign Ministers Meeting at the Department of State in Washington, D.C., July 1, 2025. From left, Japanese Foreign Minister Iwaya Takeshi, Indian External Affairs Minister Dr. Subrahmanyam Jaishankar, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Australian Foreign Minister Penny Wong. Taiwan's 40th Han Kuang military exercise, its most extensive to date, will span ten days and simulate a full-scale Chinese invasion. These drills incorporate amphibious assaults, joint-force coordination, and extensive civilian-military integration across multiple domains. Taiwan also showcased enhanced deterrent capabilities with U.S.-supplied HIMARS rocket systems, F-16V fighter jets, and indigenous Sky Sword II and Sky Bow III missile systems. The activation of 22,000 reservists marked an unprecedented expansion of national defense mobilization, signaling Taiwan's growing commitment to preparing for conflict rather than merely deterring it. This shift is a direct response to the increasingly aggressive behavior of China's People's Liberation Army (PLA). Gray zone coercion has become routine. PLA aircraft and naval incursions across the Taiwan Strait's median line surged from 565 in 2022 to over 3,070 in 2024, an average of more than eight per day. In January 2025 alone, Taiwan's Air Defense Identification Zone recorded 248 crossings, which represents a 75 percent increase compared to January 2022. These provocations are designed to wear down Taiwan's defenses without crossing the threshold into open conflict, reflecting China's long-term strategy of psychological pressure, strategic normalization, and the gradual erosion of Taiwan's sovereignty through fatigue Taiwan is no longer waiting passively for external support. It is building an active and layered defense strategy in anticipation of a volatile future. This recalibration has drawn attention from Taiwan's strategic partners, particularly the members of the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (Quad): Australia, India, Japan, and the United States. Originally conceived as a maritime security initiative, the Quad has evolved into a broader Indo-Pacific framework committed to ensuring a free, open, and rules-based regional order. Yet the Taiwan question exposes the grouping's limitations. Unlike NATO, the Quad is not a military alliance. Still, the urgency of Taiwan's situation has sparked debate over whether the group should develop a more coherent strategy for collective deterrence. The United States has called for greater clarity from its allies Australia and Japan regarding their roles in a potential Taiwan conflict. The Pentagon is also actively working to align operational plans with allies through behind-the-scenes consultations and strategic dialogues. However, progress remains slow, hindered by political constraints and divergent national priorities. Japan has strengthened its defense posture, increasing its budget from 6.8 trillion yen in 2023 to 8.7 trillion yen in 2025, or 1.8 percent of GDP. It has expanded joint drills with the United States and is reassessing its strategic doctrines. However, constitutional limits and public ambivalence remain obstacles. A survey by Asahi Shimbun found that 62 percent of Japanese citizens consider a regional conflict likely, yet a majority prefer that Japan pursue a path of neutrality and global cooperation, with only 18.7 percent supporting closer alignment with the United States. Australia has also adopted a cautious approach. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's visit to China this week highlights the dual-track strategy of deepening U.S. defense ties while preserving strong economic relations with China. Amid U.S. calls for clarity on Taiwan, the Australian government stated that 'it would not commit troops in advance to any potential conflict.' The stakes are significant, as Australia's exports to China reached AU$196 billion (US$$128 billion) last year, exceeding the combined total of Australia's next four largest markets. A report by the Bankwest Curtin Economics Center estimated that Australia's trade with China contributes an additional AU$2,600 to the average household income each year. In contrast, recent tariffs imposed by the United States average around 10 percent, while those under the China-Australia Free Trade Agreement remain at just 1.1 percent. This disparity has strengthened the perception of China as a more stable and economically reliable partner for Australia. India, the only member of the Quad that is not a U.S. ally, continues to maintain deliberate silence on Taiwan, consistent with its longstanding recognition of the One China policy since 1949. Even amid rising cross-strait tensions, New Delhi has avoided statements in forums such as ASEAN, reflecting a strategic calculation to avoid provoking China, especially given unresolved border disputes in the Himalayas. At the same time, India has steadily expanded its engagement with Taiwan. Companies like Foxconn and Pegatron are integral to Make in India and Atmanirbhar Bharat, and bilateral trade has increased sixfold since 2001. Talks on a free trade agreement and semiconductor cooperation are progressing. A conflict in the Taiwan Strait would severely disrupt global supply chains and pose significant economic risks, which India increasingly recognizes. While the July 2025 Quad Foreign Ministers' meeting expressed 'serious concerns' over rising tensions in the East and South China Seas, it refrained from directly condemning China. Strategic and economic divergences within the Quad underscore its central dilemma. The alliance was never designed for collective military action and lacks both the institutional structure and legally binding mutual defense commitments that define NATO. However, China's growing assertiveness over Taiwan and its expanding capabilities demand a more coordinated response. Even as public statements remain measured, the Quad must avoid strategic drift. Coordinated efforts in contingency planning, intelligence sharing, and logistical interoperability need to accelerate. The alliance's credibility, and that of the broader rules-based order, depends on readiness and sustained alignment. China will continue to test the Quad's cohesion, but this also presents an opportunity to forge a more adaptable and politically viable model of deterrence, one rooted in regional awareness, interoperability, and expanding partnerships particularly with ASEAN. Taiwan is no longer a peripheral concern. It has become the crucible in which the Quad's purpose and unity will be tested. As pressure mounts in the Taiwan Strait, the time for strategic ambiguity is narrowing. The stability of the Indo-Pacific may well depend on the Quad's ability to adapt, align, and act with resolve.

Pakistan-Afghanistan Trade Grows Amid Security Challenges
Pakistan-Afghanistan Trade Grows Amid Security Challenges

The Diplomat

time5 hours ago

  • The Diplomat

Pakistan-Afghanistan Trade Grows Amid Security Challenges

Political and security hurdles, particularly TTP-related violence, continue to prevent the two countries from realizing the full potential of bilateral trade. Trucks carrying goods on the road from Jamrud in Pakistan to the Torkham Border Crossing on the Pakistan-Afghanistan border. In an encouraging development, bilateral trade volume between Pakistan and Afghanistan reached nearly $1 billion in the first half of 2025, according to a report from the Afghan Ministry of Industry and Commerce. The growth was driven by strong Pakistani exports to Afghanistan, which mainly included medical supplies, parboiled rice, sugar, cotton textiles, and raw materials. While this marks an increase in trade between the two neighbors, it is not the first time that bilateral trade has reached this level in recent years. Besides, the current trade relationship between Pakistan and Afghanistan is way below potential. It is estimated that the trade could grow to $8 to 10 billion annually if obstacles could be overcome. While recent trade growth shows mutual demand from both sides, the persistent militant attacks by the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) have become a significant obstacle to strengthening trade and economic relations between Pakistan and Afghanistan. The issue of terror remains a central concern for Pakistan when it comes to its relationship with Afghanistan, including trade talks. According to a Pakistan Institute for Peace Studies report, Pakistan faced 521 terror attacks in 2024 — a 70 percent increase over the previous year. These attacks claimed nearly 1,000 lives across Pakistan. In the first six months of 2025, the TTP claimed responsibility for more than 1,300 terror attacks in Pakistan, which resulted in over 1,600 casualties. Arguably, terrorism is one of the major reasons why Pakistan and Afghanistan have not made significant progress in trade dealings. In a policy shift in 2023, Pakistan imposed a 10 percent fee on goods imported by Afghanistan using its ports. The move was seen as Pakistan using its economic leverage against the Afghan Taliban to push Kabul to act against terrorist groups operating from Afghanistan. The existing modest growth in bilateral trade also coincides with the cautious easing of tensions between the two countries. In recent months, there have been visible efforts to improve the bilateral relationship. Much of this is being facilitated by the Chinese mediation that appears to have created space for high-level diplomatic engagement between the two countries. For instance, in May, the Pakistani government announced that it would appoint an ambassador to Afghanistan. This is the first such appointment by Pakistan since the Afghan Taliban seized control of Kabul in 2021. A turning point in this regard occurred in April 2025, when Pakistan's Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar visited Afghanistan. This was the first high-level visit from Pakistan after more than two years. Last month, China, Pakistan, and Afghanistan signed an agreement to extend the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) into Afghanistan. It appears that Pakistan and China are focusing on trade discussions to motivate the Afghan Taliban to put pressure on the TTP and other militant groups. Such a course of action could potentially create economic space for the Afghan Taliban and pave the way for wider international recognition of their government. In recent days, the ongoing diplomatic thaw between Pakistan and Afghanistan has fueled speculation that Pakistan might be considering formally recognizing the Taliban government. This idea has gained attention, especially after Russia decided earlier this month to recognize the Taliban government in Afghanistan, becoming the first to do so. However, Pakistan has not issued any statement that could strengthen this speculation. From Pakistan's perspective, the country's security concerns, especially TTP activities, must be addressed before any such step is taken. Pakistan has consistently claimed that the Afghan Taliban provide logistical and operational support to TTP fighters. The latest report of the U.N. Security Council's sanctions monitoring team revealed the Afghan Taliban's continued support for the TTP in Pakistan. The report said that 'the status and strength of TTP in Afghanistan had not changed,' but its attacks on Pakistan have significantly increased. Afghan Taliban authorities recently announced plans to move thousands of Pakistani refugees away from border provinces. The Afghan Taliban usually refer to Pakistani refugees to describe those related to the TTP and their families. It is possible that during his recent visit to Afghanistan, Dar requested Afghanistan to relocate TTP elements. However, the implementation of these plans remains uncertain as the Afghan Taliban continue to deny and reject all reports and claims related to the TTP's presence in Afghanistan. The $1 billion in bilateral trade over the last six months reflects a shared economic interest and a lot of potential that needs to be tapped. However, the existing political hurdles, particularly TTP-related violence, continue to pose significant challenges to the true potential of bilateral trade. For now, the path to stability regarding the Afghanistan-Pakistan relationship depends on continued trade, ongoing dialogue, and TTP containment. This noticeable increase in bilateral trade, while encouraging, may not contribute to determining the future of bilateral relations so long as terrorism remains a major concern.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store