UK signs treaty on defence, trade and migration with Germany
'This is a historic day for German-British relations," said Merz, making his first official visit to Britain since taking office in May. 'We want to work together more closely, particularly after the United Kingdom's withdrawal from the European Union. It is overdue for us to conclude such a treaty with each other." Starmer said the agreement — signed at London's V&A Museum, which is named after Queen Victoria and her German husband, Prince Albert — was a 'statement of intent, a statement of our ambition to work ever more closely together." Starmer has made it a priority of his centre-left Labour Party to curb the gangs behind cross-Channel people smuggling. About 37,000 people were detected crossing the English Channel from France in small boats in 2024, and more than 20,000 people made the crossing in the first six months of 2025. Dozens have died trying to make the crossing.
Berlin agreed last year to make facilitating the smuggling of migrants to the UK a criminal offence, a move that will give law enforcement more powers to investigate the supply and storage of small boats to be used for the crossings. Merz is expected to commit to adopting the law change by the end of the year.
'Chancellor Merz's commitment to make necessary changes to German law to disrupt the supply lines of the dangerous vessels which carry illegal migrants across the Channel is hugely welcome," Starmer said.
The treaty builds on a defence pact the UK and Germany, two of the biggest European supporters of Ukraine, signed last year pledging closer co-operation against a growing threat from Russia. It includes a promise to come to one another's aid in the event of an attack — though as NATO members, they are already committed to that.
The leaders' talks over lunch at 10 Downing St. included ways to boost European support for Ukraine, following US President Donald Trump's announcement of a plan to bolster Kyiv's stockpile by selling American weapons to NATO allies who would in turn send arms to Kyiv.
They announced that German defense startup Stark, which makes drones for Ukraine, will open a factory in England. They are also expected to agree to jointly produce defense exports such as Boxer armored vehicles and Typhoon jets, and to develop a deep precision strike missile in the next decade.
Starmer has worked to improve relations with Britain's neighbours, strained by the UK's acrimonious departure from the European Union in 2020. He has sought to rebuild ties strained by years of ill-tempered wrangling over Brexit terms, an worked to reduce trade barriers and to strengthen defense cooperation.
But Starmer has ruled out rejoining the 27-nation bloc's single market or customs union, and has been cool to the idea of a youth mobility agreement with the EU.
The two countries agreed on a more limited arrangement that will make it easier for schoolchildren to go on exchange trips.
'I am glad we were able to reach an agreement so that schoolchildren and students can come to Britain more easily in the future, and the other way round can come to Germany more easily, so that the young generation in particular has an opportunity to get to know both countries better," Merz said. (AP) GSP
view comments
First Published:
July 17, 2025, 19:15 IST
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
23 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Trump says nobody has asked him to grant clemency to Ghislaine Maxwell
US President Donald Trump said on Friday that nobody had asked him to grant clemency to Ghislaine Maxwell, the British socialite serving a 20-year prison sentence for helping Jeffrey Epstein abuse underage girls. 'I'm allowed to do it, but nobody's asked me to do it. I know nothing about it. I don't know anything about the case, but I know I have the right to do it,' Trump told Newsmax. Trump also said he would not pardon Sean 'Diddy' Combs, who was convicted in July on two charges of transportation to engage in prostitution.
The Hindu
23 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Stephen Colbert's last stand
A couple of weeks ago, viewers of CBS's The Late Show with Stephen Colbert were surprised by the host returning from vacation with a wispy black-and-white moustache. Like many, I initially thought it might be a prop, until the host said otherwise. 'That's right, it's me underneath this salt-and-pepper cookie-pusher,' Colbert quipped. 'For tonight, my upper lip is home to what many in the beauty industry are calling 'technically a moustache''. Later in the same episode, Colbert criticised CBS's parent company Paramount for settling a lawsuit with President Donald Trump for $16 million, calling it 'a big fat bribe'. Trump had alleged that CBS 'deceptively edited' an interview with Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris, a claim that Paramount said was 'entirely without merit' in their reply. Yet they coughed up $16 million anyway. Colbert finished the segment about Paramount by joking that even if the network decides to discontinue The Late Show to placate Trump, he could 'always sneak into the building with this moustache'. Three nights later, Colbert announced on the show that the cancellation fears were real; Paramount had decided to discontinue the show in May 2026 for 'financial reasons'. He's not being replaced by a different host — the entire Late Show franchise (David Letterman was at the helm from 1993-2015) will simply cease to exist. Colbert's former colleague and fellow satirist Jon Stewart pointed out another crucial piece of the puzzle. 'The fact that CBS wouldn't save its own number-one-rated network late-night franchise,' Stewart said, 'that's been on the air for over three decades, is part of what's making everybody wonder was this purely financial? Or maybe the path of least resistance for your 8-billion-dollar merger?' Stewart was referring to Paramount's impending $8 billion merger with the firm Skydance — a deal that Trump had previously indicated he would block as payback for his perceived grievance about the Harris interview. What happens to satire? As one of the most-loved and followed talk show hosts and political satirists in the world, Colbert surely deserved a better farewell — to go out on his own terms rather than becoming a political football between Paramount and Donald Trump. But the Late Show's cancellation does place another question mark over the future of the late-night talk show format. In the ongoing streaming epoch, where 'appointment viewing' is becoming increasingly dominated by live sports, the late-night talk show is one of the last surviving templates from TV's original golden era (the 1950s and 60s). Some news, a few topical jokes, some interviews with coiffed-up celebrities, and a live performance or two — this basic outline has served successive generations of American TV hosts, starting with Ed Sullivan (who began in the late 1940s and was on the air until the early 70s). At the end of a long day at the office, you can often enter a state of 'decision paralysis' while fiddling with the TV remote — do you watch trashy fun things or more sophisticated, cerebral fare? The late-night show drew inspiration from its cousin, the 'variety show', and took this indecision out of the equation. There's something for everyone in this format, the celeb-obsessed gossip-column reader as well as the serious-minded consumer of 'hard news' and political satire. However, in the streaming era, the competitive advantage offered by this format has depleted significantly. Today, no matter how specific or whimsical your ask is, chances are you will find a streamer willing to fulfil it. The end of an era In the last two to three years, we have been witnessing several manifestations of this programming impasse. In 2023, it was reported that James Corden's The Late Late Show was losing CBS $20 million annually prior to its cancellation. Before that, in 2022, Trevor Noah left The Daily Show after seven years at the helm. Of the survivors in this circuit, Jimmy Fallon has been reduced to a kind of parody of himself, resorting to increasingly over-the-top gags. Jimmy Kimmel is second in the ratings behind Colbert, but his jokes have definitely been wearing thin in recent years. Post-Colbert, Seth Meyers' show is perhaps now the go-to venue for smart political comedy and off-kilter humour. How are the late-night shows meeting the challenges of this new era? One thing that they all seem to be doing is inviting more Gen-Z guests, especially people who are popular on the Internet. In India, for instance, Kapil Sharma's Netflix show (the closest equivalent, format-wise) had a group of young podcasters and influencers as guests recently. Of course, this move doesn't always work smoothly; Colbert himself had a supremely awkward interview with the 22-year-old actor Jenna Ortega (from Wednesday and the Scream horror-movie franchise) earlier this year where it was quite obvious neither of them knew or cared much about the other. The other option, of course, is to go 'gloves off', as Colbert declared last week on his show. Chances are that until May 2026, we are in for a far more aggressive, scathing, no-quarter-given version of Stephen Colbert — not bad for a last hurrah. The writer and journalist is working on his first book of non-fiction.
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Has the world entered the era of ‘slowbalisation'?
Under Trump 2.0, it appears that even the fig leaf of environment sensitivity has been dispensed with, and a robust and aggressive protectionist stance is the strong flavour of his Second Coming. In the EU, German and French industrial policies include huge subsidies and protectionist 'Buy European' clauses. India's 'Atmanirbhar Bharat Abhiyan' (self-reliance campaign) and 'Vocal for Local' programmes are illustrative of the rapidly changing global economic landscape. Inherent in this new phase is the risk of deglobalization. A December 2022 Goldman Sachs report, The Path to 2075: Slower Global Growth, But Convergence Remains Intact, covering 104 countries, underlines that two decades of emerging markets convergence has resulted in a more equal distribution of global incomes. But while income inequality between countries fell, income inequality within countries has risen. This poses a major challenge to the future of globalization. The Economist, on the other hand, argues that we have entered the 'slowbalisation' era: World trade rose from 39 per cent of the world GDP in 1990 to 61 per cent in 2008, and fell to 58 per cent by 2019, mostly because of a slowdown in trade from emerging markets. Cross-border investments and bank credit flows are down too…. Services are playing a growing role in global value chains. Trade flows based on labour-cost arbitrage are declining in some value chains. And global value chains are becoming more knowledge-intensive. The question posed by Marcos Troyjo, former president of the New Development Bank (NDB), in 2021 is still as relevant as it was four years ago—'With so much disconnect around the world, the question today is: will deglobalisation linger or are we walking into something else?' To this, we may add our own queries: What will be the defining characteristic of this different phase we are entering? Is globalization metamorphosing yet again? First, the purchasing power and relative economic clout of various nations are changing. As of end-2021, the combined GDP, measured in PPP terms, of the G7 was over 21 per cent less than that of the seven leading emerging economies, including China. This marks a historic and historical geo-economic shift with profound consequences for the wealth of nations and the well-being of their citizens. These consequences also relate to, as Adam Smith originally noted in his formulation of a comprehensive system of political economy, the fourth or final stage of commercial interdependence. One view is that emerging markets are increasing their commercial exchange with each other, and may offer a larger market for trade in the wake of creeping protectionism in OECD states. The second characteristic concerns how GVCs are being rerouted by the burgeoning presence of emerging economies. This phenomenon is much broader than global supply chains as consumption will also be impacted. Geopolitics is an important driving force in reconfiguring these new value chains. Equally, if not more, significant is the evolution of some of the world's most major economies. China, experts say, is no longer a low-cost country or a simple manufacturer of low-value-added goods; it has become one of the most important sources of FDI. It is leading the world in many state-of-the-art technologies, and accounts for an increasing share of high-technology embodied manufacturing products. As a result, some lower-value-added economic activity has migrated from China to neighbours such as Vietnam, Indonesia, Myanmar and Bangladesh, and a trickle to India. It is a phenomenon that is not new in history—in the 1970s and 1980s, the Asian Tigers displaced Japan as low-cost, low-wage manufacturers in the region. Simultaneously, international trade and investment agreements are influencing the rerouting of GVCs. A prominent example is the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) which was signed by 15 Asia-Pacific nations in November 2020. There is consensus among experts that in a trade system 'where the term 'international" applies to the exchange of goods even at an intra-firm level', it should come as no surprise that these trade agreements influence the flows of investment. The regional consolidation of trade in the post spaghetti-bowl era holds the danger of India being left out. Ambitious countries are also promoting domestic economic reforms that allow their economies to become more business-friendly, and open to FDI while being nimble about addressing core security concerns. A case in point is China, which announced in March 2024 that it would 'further shorten the negative list for foreign investment and implement pilot programs to ease access for global companies in the fields of scientific and technological innovation […] and broaden market access for foreign investment.' The PRC has also promised to remove restrictions on foreign participation in the manufacturing sector, and continues to increase its openness in hi-tech sectors such as telecommunications and healthcare. Its stated policy is that foreign financial entities will be granted greater access to the country's banking and insurance sectors, and the operational scope for foreign financial institutions will be expanded in China's domestic bond market as well. In parallel, the disarray in the WTO has been exemplified by the tariffs imposed on ally and adversary alike by Trump in 2025, which follow the unilateral imposition of higher tariffs on select commodity exports to China by the US in 2018, and the passing of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) by the EU in 2022. These measures are considered to be violative of the most favoured nation (MFN) principle of the organization. The US' virtual boycott of the WTO's Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) has seriously dented the WTO's ability to oversee a rules-based multilateral trading order. The final issue impacting globalization is talent. In this context, talent means going beyond the economic theory of comparative advantage. 'Countries need to ask themselves: What can I do besides what I am already very good at?' This is also the basis of Michael Porter's compelling argument that it is 'competitive advantage' and not the traditional comparative advantage that drives world trade flows. Countries which build their competitive advantage through the accumulation of human talent, technology, and an ecosystem supportive of enterprise have outscored others which had a comparative advantage but could not convert it to their benefit. The striking contrast between Asian economies including China and their Latin American counterparts is ample proof of this phenomenon of the supremacy of competitive advantage. India will have to learn from this contrasting experience. Excerpted with permission from Rupa Books from Everything All At Once: India and the Six Simultaneous Global Transitions by Rajiv Kumar and Ishan Joshi.
