How was the wheel invented? Computer simulations reveal the unlikely birth of a world-changing technology nearly 6,000 years ago
You've resigned yourself to the grueling monotony of mining life. Then one afternoon, you witness a fellow worker doing something remarkable.
With an odd-looking contraption, he casually transports the equivalent of three times his body weight on a single trip. As he returns to the mine to fetch another load, it suddenly dawns on you that your chosen profession is about to get far less taxing and much more lucrative.
What you don't realize: You're witnessing something that will change the course of history – not just for your tiny mining community, but for all of humanity.
Despite the wheel's immeasurable impact, no one is certain as to who invented it, or when and where it was first conceived. The hypothetical scenario described above is based on a 2015 theory that miners in the Carpathian Mountains – now Hungary – first invented the wheel nearly 6,000 years ago as a means to transport copper ore.
The theory is supported by the discovery of more than 150 miniaturized wagons by archaeologists working in the region. These pint-sized, four-wheeled models were made from clay, and their outer surfaces were engraved with a wickerwork pattern reminiscent of the basketry used by mining communities at the time. Carbon dating later revealed that these wagons are the earliest known depictions of wheeled transport to date.
This theory also raises a question of particular interest to me, an aerospace engineer who studies the science of engineering design. How did an obscure, scientifically naive mining society discover the wheel, when highly advanced civilizations, such as the ancient Egyptians, did not?
It has long been assumed that wheels evolved from simple wooden rollers. But until recently no one could explain how or why this transformation took place. What's more, beginning in the 1960s, some researchers started to express strong doubts about the roller-to-wheel theory.
After all, for rollers to be useful, they require flat, firm terrain and a path free of inclines and sharp curves. Furthermore, once the cart passes them, used rollers need to be continually brought around to the front of the line to keep the cargo moving. For all these reasons, the ancient world used rollers sparingly. According to the skeptics, rollers were too rare and too impractical to have been the starting point for the evolution of the wheel.
But a mine – with its enclosed, human-made passageways – would have provided favorable conditions for rollers. This factor, among others, compelled my team to revisit the roller hypothesis.
The transition from rollers to wheels requires two key innovations. The first is a modification of the cart that carries the cargo. The cart's base must be outfitted with semicircular sockets, which hold the rollers in place. This way, as the operator pulls the cart, the rollers are pulled along with it.
This innovation may have been motivated by the confined nature of the mine environment, where having to periodically carry used rollers back around to the front of the cart would have been especially onerous.
The discovery of socketed rollers represented a turning point in the evolution of the wheel and paved the way for the second and most important innovation. This next step involved a change to the rollers themselves. To understand how and why this change occurred, we turned to physics and computer-aided engineering.
To begin our investigation, we created a computer program designed to simulate the evolution from a roller to a wheel. Our hypothesis was that this transformation was driven by a phenomenon called 'mechanical advantage.' This same principle allows pliers to amplify a user's grip strength by providing added leverage. Similarly, if we could modify the shape of the roller to generate mechanical advantage, this would amplify the user's pushing force, making it easier to advance the cart.
Our algorithm worked by modeling hundreds of potential roller shapes and evaluating how each one performed, both in terms of mechanical advantage and structural strength. The latter was used to determine whether a given roller would break under the weight of the cargo. As predicted, the algorithm ultimately converged upon the familiar wheel-and-axle shape, which it determined to be optimal.
During the execution of the algorithm, each new design performed slightly better than its predecessor. We believe a similar evolutionary process played out with the miners 6,000 years ago.
It is unclear what initially prompted the miners to explore alternative roller shapes. One possibility is that friction at the roller-socket interface caused the surrounding wood to wear away, leading to a slight narrowing of the roller at the point of contact. Another theory is that the miners began thinning out the rollers so that their carts could pass over small obstructions on the ground.
Either way, thanks to mechanical advantage, this narrowing of the axle region made the carts easier to push. As time passed, better-performing designs were repeatedly favored over the others, and new rollers were crafted to mimic these top performers.
Consequently, the rollers became more and more narrow, until all that remained was a slender bar capped on both ends by large discs. This rudimentary structure marks the birth of what we now refer to as 'the wheel.'
According to our theory, there was no precise moment at which the wheel was invented. Rather, just like the evolution of species, the wheel emerged gradually from an accumulation of small improvements.
This is just one of the many chapters in the wheel's long and ongoing evolution. More than 5,000 years after the contributions of the Carpathian miners, a Parisian bicycle mechanic invented radial ball bearings, which once again revolutionized wheeled transportation.
Ironically, ball bearings are conceptually identical to rollers, the wheel's evolutionary precursor. Ball bearings form a ring around the axle, creating a rolling interface between the axle and the wheel hub, thereby circumventing friction. With this innovation, the evolution of the wheel came full circle.
This example also shows how the wheel's evolution, much like its iconic shape, traces a circuitous path – one with no clear beginning, no end, and countless quiet revolutions along the way.
This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: Kai James, Georgia Institute of Technology
Read more:
Disaster evacuations can take much longer than people expect − computer simulations could help save lives and avoid chaos
The horse bit and bridle kicked off ancient empires – a new giant dataset tracks the societal factors that drove military technology
The mysterious biomechanics of riding – and balancing – a bicycle
Kai James receives funding from The National Science Foundation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scientific American
6 days ago
- Scientific American
Archaeologists Stumble upon Tomb of Ancient Maya City's First Ruler
In C.E. 331, Te K'ab Chaak ascended to the throne as the first ruler of the ancient Maya city of Caracol in what is today Belize. Archaeologists have learned about him through writings from years after his death as they have excavated the city over the past 30 years. But it wasn't until this year that they found his tomb—completely by chance. The Maya civilization began around 2000 B.C.E. and endured for more than 3,000 years. It included multiple city-states, such as Chichen Itza in modern-day Mexico and Tikal in modern-day Guatemala. Caracol began as a collection of small settlements that coalesced around 650 B.C.E, and it later became one of the largest cities in Maya history. On supporting science journalism If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today. In February married archaeologists Diane and Arlen Chase, both at the University of Houston, were digging in a site they had excavated many times before. As they broke through the bottom of one tomb, they discovered another chamber underneath. 'If we continued one of our [excavations] 40 centimeters, we would have [found] it in a previous season,' Diane Chase says. After forming a small hole in the chamber wall, the team was able to peek inside and quickly confirm this was the tomb of someone special. 'We knew there was a body in there. We could see vessels; we could see red cinnabar [a red mineral powder]. It was pretty amazing, but it was covered with dirt, so we could see just the tops of this stuff poking out,' Arlen Chase says. Once they gained entry into the tomb, the researchers found pottery vessels, intricately carved bone tubes, jade jewelry and—rarest of all—a mosaic death mask. In 40 years of work, the team has only found one other death mask—at a different Maya site. Death masks 'are not that common,' Diane Chase says. 'There are not that many in the Maya world, so that told us [that the person buried in the tomb was] a ruler.' Although the tomb was distinctively Maya, previous findings from the site suggest that Te K'ab Chaak supported diplomatic relations between Maya people and those in Teotihuacan, an independent, non-Maya city in what is now Mexico that was later occupied by the Aztecs. Despite the 1,200 kilometers separating the two cities, burials the team had previously uncovered at the same site showed a cremation style that is distinctively Teotihuacan, not Maya, which placed the start of Teotihuacan interactions in the Maya region around C.E. 350, earlier than was previously estimated. And although previous theories posited that the people of Teotihuacan had invaded Maya cities, the artifacts from Caracol suggest the situation was far more nuanced, with both cultures being aware of and influenced by each other's practices. 'This is quite a significant discovery, considering that after 40 years of research, this is the first time a jadeite death mask has been recovered in the context of a royal tomb,' says Melissa Badillo, director of the Institute of Archaeology in Belize. Badillo was not involved in the discovery, but the Institute of Archaeology provided the research permit for the site. 'We anticipate that with continued research and analyses, we will learn a lot more about Te K'ab Chaak and his role in the development of Caracol.' The research team is still analyzing the contents of the burial chamber, reconstructing the jade death mask, and conducting DNA and isotope analyses on the skeletal remains. The researchers plan to present their findings in August at a meeting at the Santa Fe Institute.
Miami Herald
14-07-2025
- Miami Herald
5,500-year-old ‘pyramids' discovered during landscape work — in Central Europe
Constructed pyramids have long been thought of as one of the peaks of human engineering. Despite the structures standing for thousands of years, archaeologists are still working to learn how the ancient Egyptians or Mayans were able to build with such precision and ingenuity. As the mystery continues, a different kind of pyramid has been unearthed for the first time, and not in Egypt or Mexico. In a landscape park in western Poland, remote sensing equipment discovered long, triangular formations below the surface, according to a July 9 Facebook post from the Team of Landscape Parks of the Greater Poland Voivodeship. Archaeologists began work to excavate one of the structures, and found that it was an ancient megalithic tomb, officials told the Polish Press Agency (PAP), through the Ministry of Science and Higher Education. The tombs range in length from a few dozen feet to more than 650 feet, officials said, and were formed in an elongated triangle. The 'front' of the triangle is multiple feet wide and about 13 feet tall before narrowing as the triangle tapers into the embankment, according to the PAP. The tombs were called Polish pyramids or the beds of giants, according to the Facebook post, and were created by members of the Funnel Beaker culture in the Stone Age. The structures were dated to 5,500 years ago, officials said. Funnel Beaker communities lived in the temperate regions of Europe and earned their names from bell-shaped beakers commonly decorated with toothed stamps made by the people, according to Britannica. Funnel Beaker groups were typically pretty egalitarian, but the larger, megalithic tombs were created for important members of their community like a leader, a priest or a shaman, specialist Artur Golis told the PAP. Each generation created their own megalith, Golis said, and would typically hold a single burial that would be surrounded by grave goods and sometimes covered in cobblestones. Officials believe the human skeleton inside the tomb likely hasn't survived, but goods like pottery or copper ornaments may still be buried inside, according to the PAP. The remote sensing showed five promising formations underground, but only two have been examined more closely and only one excavated, officials said. This is the second grouping of these kinds of pyramids to be discovered in Poland. The site is located in Wyskoć, in west-central Poland. Chat GPT, an AI chat bot, was used to translate the Facebook post from the Team of Landscape Parks of the Greater Poland Voivodeship. Google Translate was used to translate the news release from the Polish Press Agency.
Scientific American
08-07-2025
- Scientific American
Science Makes the U.S. a Great Nation
One of history's dark jokes is that the Roman Empire, for all its vaunted accomplishments, only made a single great 'contribution' to science: the killing of Archimedes. Today the U.S. risks suffering the same kind of shame. In 212 B.C.E. the Romans sacked the city of Syracuse after a prolonged siege , and a Roman soldier killed Archimedes, then the greatest living mathematician, physicist and engineer—and one of the greatest minds of all time. Exact accounts vary, but according to one, Archimedes was engrossed in sketching a problem in sand when his murderer arrived, sword drawn. Covering his work, the mathematician said, 'I beg of you, do not disturb this.' In response, the soldier struck down the 72-year-old man. American science now faces another sharpened edge. The Trump administration stands with its own sword drawn. It's choking our universities. It's stamping out the free flow of ideas. It's cutting funding to basic science. It's ready to make the killing blow, all in the name of making America great again. On supporting science journalism If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today. Despite declines since the COVID pandemic, science remains one of the most trusted and most well regarded institutions in the U.S. And while modern science has many flaws, it is one of those few things we can point to as a society and say that this, this, is what already makes us great. Our technological and scientific prowess is the envy of the world, unmatched across the globe and indeed throughout human history. No other country, no other culture, no other civilization has matched what the U.S. has poured into fundamental research in the years since World War II. After the stunning success of the Manhattan Project, political leaders in the U.S. learned what the rulers of ancient Syracuse already knew: wise nations invest in their most brilliant minds. Last year the U.S. government funded about $90 billion of nondefense research. And for the relatively paltry sum of close to a hundred billion dollars—essentially a rounding error in total federal outlays—repeated year after year for decades, we have miracles made manifest: cures and treatments, consisting of a few milliliters of molecules, to balm the worst of our diseases; machines that breathe fire to take us to the stars; devices, held in our hands, that connect us to friends, family and strangers a world away. Chances are that all those marvels, great and small, can trace their roots to publicly supported research. It's easy enough to point to the monetary benefits of scientific research—and the immediate harms that will be done if the administration's proposed cuts go through. One dollar of National Institutes of Health research funding produces $2.56 in economic activity. Cutting annual research funding in half would save the American taxpayer $260 this year—and cost them $10,000 in future wealth. Federal funding of nondefense research has accounted for about 20 percent of our nation's business productivity growth since World War II. In addition, although the majority of trainees in science do not end up following a career as a researcher, they go on to add value to a wide variety of organizations, including businesses and government agencies. Science takes our best and brightest and throws them into the crucible, pitting them against the toughest problems known to humanity, and then sets them loose to solve the everyday challenges of our modern economy. But the true greatness of our achievements is in the intangibles—not in what we construct but in what we perceive. We have built telescopes to peer back through deep cosmic time and see the dim, faded light of the first galaxies to emerge in the heavens. We have developed electronic machines to mimic our own intelligent speech and, in doing so, allow us to wrestle with the nature of our own humanity. We have set ourselves to a great mission of conquest—not of a people or a rival nation but of the scourge of cancer. We have had the courage to look into our history, our own communities, our own social connections and ask uncomfortable questions and reveal painful truths. Is this not what great nations do? They don't just build bridges and roads and monuments of stone and steel. They erect edifices of the intellect. They place their stamp on history. They create gifts to be enjoyed by generations yet to come. They become beacons that future civilizations emulate. Americans have long held themselves to be different than people in other nations. French historian Alexis de Tocqueville, the great observer of early American life, wrote in his book Democracy in America that 'the position of the Americans is therefor quite exceptional, and it may be believed that no democratic people will ever be placed in a similar one.' Our modern institution of science is one our country's truly exceptional achievements. This is why fundamental science is worthy of public funding. No private enterprise would ever dare sacrifice profits to study the arcane corners of the universe. No single patron, no matter how wealthy, can provide the funding necessary to slake our thirst for answers. Only nations—great nations—can afford to take a slim measure of the public's treasury and devote it to science. Science is part of what makes us noble. It demonstrates our abilities to the world and to history. It is a projection of our strength. Look at us, we say to the world, so wealthy and wise that we set our sights farther, our minds deeper. It's here, in this nation, that we will produce works that will stand the test of time. The minuscule savings achieved from the proposed cuts to science research won't be felt in the average taxpayer's pocketbook. But the cuts will hurt us. They will hurt us now and for generations to come. That is the bitter reality that we are now facing: that we are deliberately making our children impoverished—materially and intellectually—in the name of insignificant savings today. The proposed budget cuts kill all of this —the learning; the advancement; the courage; the powerhouse of American ingenuity; and one of the pillars that we can stand on to rightly claim our place in history as a great nation. How will our descendants remember us and this moment? Will they view us as a people that dared mighty things—or as so much blood in the sand? Go ahead, strike down science if you will. But remember this: The name of Archimedes echoes through the centuries. The name of the solider who killed him does not. I beg of you, do not disturb this.
