A theocrat's prayer to end democracy
It was a time of great and fervent excitement. By act of Congress, citizens were asked to turn to their Creator in supplication and meditation. This national day of prayer was to be celebrated in statehouses across the land, with every individual invited to offer hosannas or amens or other holy words of praise. The places of lawmaking were transformed into houses of worship, where the symbols dear to the faithful festooned the galleries and holy banners fluttered from balconies.
When the appointed day arrived, lawmakers made thunderous speeches and pounded their desks in protestations of righteousness. There was no louder din than in the capitol building of an interior province, a region known as much for its piety as for the bountiful harvests of wheat and corn. Under a great copper-sheathed dome, choirs of young people sang the praises of the One who made the sky while lawmakers clustered elbow to bended elbow and murmured their approval.
Few remembered the ancient day when the day of supplication became the law of the land, or the war that had prompted its passage, or the innkeeper and the lawmaker who had championed it. An ambassador of this interior province, was not yet born when the day was proclaimed, but from a dais in the capitol rotunda he addressed the assembled flock.
His face was stern as he clutched his holy book and urged the assembled to celebrate the land's deliverance from the rule of the godless. At long last the battle for theocracy had nearly been won. The faithful were in power under the great copper dome. It would be a small matter to extinguish the infidels entirely. No true patriot could doubt the land was specially ordained by the Almighty for greatness. Victory was at hand. The ambassador bowed his head and asked the One to bestow wisdom on the leaders of the land. He unashamedly asked this for all in the name of peace and love.
No one could remember a more passionate or powerful sermon.
Then an aged stranger approached. She moved silently down the aisle and mounted the platform, her chalky robe swirling like smoke. Her white hair fell in rivulets to her shoulders. Her face was as pale as those of the statues of long-dead statesmen in the alcoves of the rotunda.
The stranger touched the ambassador on the arm and bid him step aside, which the startled man did. She grasped the lectern with skeletal hands and surveyed the congregation with eyes burning with uncanny light.
'I am sent from the Throne,' she said, her voice solemn and deep. 'The One has heard your prayers, and they will be granted — if you wish. But know that for every prayer answered, another must be dashed. Each request for favor brings with it the unspoken plea that another be disfavored. All supplications for earthly power are wishes both selfish and damned.'
Her eyes smoldered.
'You have asked the One for victory,' she said, 'so that you might rule this land in the way which pleases you. Very well. I will repeat your prayer, as it falls upon the ears of the One above the clouds.'
There were calls for the capitol guards to remove the stranger, but they stood as transfixed as the crowd.
'Almighty One, grant us the power over our political enemies, so that we may not only exalt You but punish them,' she said, her voice growing stronger. 'Let us make laws that take the food from their mouths, the homes of their families, and their ability to pay for medicine and doctors to see them through sickness. Grant us the power to choose in their stead the governing of their bodies and their minds. Allow us to restrict the means of controlling conception and then force women to bear unwanted children, even when violated.'
The stranger paused and clutched the robe to her breast.
'Let us purge from their libraries those books we deem to be improper or impious. Allow us to deny our enemies the ability to seek redress by controlling the manner in which their leaders are selected. Grant us the right to banish from our shores those who utter seditious dissent.'
The crowd grew still.
'Let our enemies live from this day forward with fear in their hearts,' the stranger said. 'Let them fear the loss of their positions if they speak of equity or inclusion, make them cower if they dare say azure instead of crimson, allow them pain if they insist on choosing how they shall be called by others. Make their nights sleepless in expectation of a knock at midnight's door. Grant them freedom of worship only if they worship as we do, deny them public office if they refuse any manner of worship, and enforce the social and marital codes of a society these thousands of years dead.'
The ambassador attempted to mutter 'blasphemy,' but the word caught in his throat. The stranger regarded him for a moment with pity, then turned back to the crowd.
'Allow no truth to free a human soul,' the stranger continued. 'Shutter the great houses of learning lest a whisper be made against the ambassador or his earthly king. Make a virtue of intolerance and paint it as just. Make retribution the supreme law of the land, power the only virtue, and chaos the only mode. Force them to abandon the sacred civic code that once governed this land, just as we have, and accept in their stead whimsy, nonsense and malice. Allow the land to wither beneath tariffs on foreign things, the fear of strangers, and the rapacious hunger of misers and kings.'
The stranger shook her head and her hair floated cloud-like about her face.
'Finally, Greatest One, ignore the prayers of the meek, the young, the sick and the old,' she said, her voice growing soft. 'Comfort not those who pray with pure hearts. Reward not those who thirst for righteousness. Punish those who seek the truth. Banish those who challenge power with fact. All are enemies of the state, Greatest One, and are therefore your enemies. Damn their hopes, dash their dreams, and make their eyes wet with tears. Deny them comfort, afflict their spirits, and fill their hearts with lead. Smite them and their generations to come. Forever make them inequal to us. Grant us the end of history and relieve us of the will to change. This we implore of You, in the name of love.'
The stranger paused.
'This is the prayer of your secret hearts,' she said, her voice a quaver. 'If you still desire it, speak! The messenger of the One awaits.'
It was reported afterward that the old woman was a lunatic, because there was no sense in what she said. On the way to the asylum, a copy of Mark Twain's 'The War Prayer' was found in the folds of her voluminous robe.
Max McCoy is an award-winning author and journalist. Through its opinion section, the Kansas Reflector works to amplify the voices of people who are affected by public policies or excluded from public debate. Find information, including how to submit your own commentary, here.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

USA Today
40 minutes ago
- USA Today
People abuse Medicaid. That's why Trump's Big Beautiful Bill makes it stronger.
My Democratic colleagues in Congress have spread misinformation about the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, claiming that it is a disaster for families. That's simply untrue. Earlier this year, President Donald Trump tasked Congress with developing a bill that enacts his domestic policy agenda and kickstarts the American economy. This piece of legislation, known as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, was signed into law by the president on July 4. It accomplished its goal of providing tax relief for Kentucky families, securing our border, investing in our military readiness, unleashing American energy and strengthening Medicaid for our most vulnerable Americans. In Congress, I am honored to serve as the chairman of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce. At the onset of the work on the One Big Beautiful Bill, we were tasked with finding $880 billion in savings from our committee's jurisdiction. The final version of the One Big Beautiful Bill includes over $1 trillion in savings from my committee's jurisdiction. To accomplish this, we worked to eliminate reckless Green New Deal environmental regulations, promote American energy dominance and eliminate waste, fraud and abuse within the Medicaid program. As you may have seen in the news over the past few weeks, my colleagues on the other side of the aisle have spread misinformation about this bill, claiming that it is a disaster for Kentucky families. That's simply untrue. Let's take a moment to address a few of the false narratives that have been spread to scare the American people. Opinion: Trump isn't gutting Medicaid and food stamps. He's fixing our broken welfare system. Truth and lies about the One Big Beautiful Bill Act and Medicaid Allegation: Single mothers, children, seniors and people with disabilities will lose access to health care. Truth: The Medicaid provisions included in the One Big Beautiful Bill ensure our most vulnerable Americans continue receiving the support they need. It strengthens the program by removing deceased recipients from the Medicaid rolls, requiring states to conduct more frequent eligibility checks for the expansion population, ensuring that individuals are not enrolled in multiple states and enacting commonsense work requirements for able-bodied Americans who choose not to work. Additionally, our bill expands access to home and community based services for low-income seniors and individuals living with a disability. Allegation: Work requirements are a 'ruse' to force people off Medicaid. Truth: According to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, there are 4.8 million able-bodied adults currently on Medicaid who don't work. A survey showed this population spends roughly 184 hours a month watching television and socializing – that's 50% higher than employed beneficiaries. Your Turn: Medicaid handouts only create dependency. Able-bodied adults should work. | Opinion Forum Our bill enacts basic work requirements to require individuals to be employed, participate in job training, go to school or volunteer in their communities for just 20 hours per week to receive Medicaid. Notably, the One Big Beautiful Bill exempts people ages under 19 or over 65, pregnant women, tribal members, caregivers of children and seniors with disabilities and parents with dependents under 15. I believe most people would agree it's appropriate to expect able-bodied, unemployed adults on Medicaid to work or give back to their communities to receive fully subsidized health insurance. Kentuckians' support for these policies is strong, as this year, the Kentucky General Assembly voted overwhelmingly to overturn Gov. Andy Beshear's veto and institute a similar state-level work requirement. Allegation: Over 35 Kentucky hospitals are at risk of closing as a direct result of this bill. Truth: The allegation that 35 rural hospitals will close is a blatant mischaracterization at best. This number stems from a list of hospitals that generally receive high levels of Medicaid funding or experienced three consecutive years of negative total profit margin. This claim fails to mention the $50 billion Rural Health Transformation Program created by the bill to support rural health providers care for their patients. This will bolster funding for our most vulnerable hospitals and allow them to keep serving their communities. Trump's bill refocuses Medicaid to cover the most vulnerable Our legislation eliminates restrictive Biden-Harris era state requirements, forcing ineligible individuals to remain enrolled, and lifts Americans out of poverty by encouraging reentry into the workforce. By cutting top-down mandates, we refocus Medicaid dollars to cover the most vulnerable and give states' budgets the ability to further invest in hospitals. Spending in the Medicaid program continues to chart an unsustainable path, growing at twice the rate of inflation between 2018 and 2023. If not addressed, the program will no longer have the capacity to serve its intended purpose. In order to preserve this safety net for generations to come, Republicans have committed to policies that empower states to care for our most vulnerable Americans – pregnant women, children, individuals living with a disability and low-income seniors. The One Big Beautiful Bill is a commonsense win that strengthens Medicaid for Kentucky's most vulnerable, and I'm proud to have supported its passage. Congressman Brett Guthrie has served the people of Kentucky's Second District in Congress since 2009. He currently serves as chairman of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce. This column originally appeared in the Courier Journal.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Luna vows discharge petition for stock trading ban
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.) is vowing to file a discharge petition for legislation to ban members of Congress from trading stocks, as some lawmakers reignite the years-long push to do away with the practice. Luna's office confirmed her plan to start a discharge petition to The Hill. The House is currently on an extended summer recess and is slated to return to session the first week of September. 'Members of Congress should be banned from trading individual stocks because their access to privileged, nonpublic information creates unavoidable conflicts of interest that erode public confidence in government,' Luna said in a statement. 'As lawmakers, we receive classified briefings, shape economic policies, and interact with industry leaders, giving us insights that can influence stock prices.' 'Even if no laws are broken, the appearance of profiting from this access fuels distrust among Americans,' she added. 'The American people do not trust the US government, and this is a step forward to building that trust.' Once Luna files a discharge petition, she will have to acquire signatures from at least 217 colleagues to force a vote on the legislation. The procedural gambit allows consideration of measures if they have support from at least half of the House. Several lawmakers have introduced bills to ban members of Congress from trading stocks over the years. The current push comes after the House Ethics Committee last week found that Rep. Mike Kelly (R-Pa.) violated the lower chamber's code of conduct when his wife traded stock of the company Cleveland-Cliffs — which has a facility in Kelly's district — after Kelly received word that an announcement would be made to benefit the company. The trade was made before the information was public. The panel, however, cleared Kelly of intentionally causing his wife to trade based on insider information and having committed a conflict of interest. The effort to ban members of Congress from trading stocks has been long-running, with some lawmakers looking to make headway on the issue that is popular among the public but difficult for some on Capitol Hill. Resistance to the idea is, in part, fueled by the fact salaries for lawmakers have been frozen since 2009. It is already illegal for lawmakers to trade on insider information, and the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act (STOCK) Act, signed into law in 2012, mandates members report their stock transactions within 30 days. But ethics advocates say the law is not strong enough and does not adjudicate conflict of interest concerns. Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) backed banning members from trading stocks in May, telling reporters: 'I'm in favor of that, because I don't think we should have any appearance of impropriety here.' He did, however, make note of the salary freeze. Rank-and-file representatives and senators make $174,000 per year. 'If you stay on this trajectory, you're going to have less qualified people who are willing to make the extreme sacrifice to run for Congress,' Johnson said. 'I mean, just people just make a reasonable decision as a family on whether or not they can come to Washington and have a residence here, residence at home, and do all the things that are required. So the counterargument is, and I have some sympathy, 'Look, at least let them, like, engage in some stock trading, so that they can continue to, you know, take care of their family.'' But 'on balance,' Johnson said, 'we probably should' ban stock trading, 'because I think it's been abused in the past, and I think sadly, a few bad actors discolor it for everyone.' House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) expressed support for the idea in April after The New York Times published a report that said Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) bought tens of thousands of dollars in stocks the day before and day of President Trump's pause in tariffs, which sparked a rise in the markets. The House came close to voting on legislation to ban member stock trading in 2021, but it never made it to the floor for consideration. Ethics watchdogs and some Democrats at the time said it was not strong enough, and Republicans were frustrated they were not included in the process. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Pelosi endorses stock trading ban
Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), the former House Speaker, backed a congressional stock trading ban on Wednesday after a Senate panel narrowly voted to advance the bipartisan proposal. The Honest Act, introduced by Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), was originally called the Preventing Elected Leaders from Owning Securities and Investments, or PELOSI, Act — a nod to the criticism Pelosi has faced for her husband's extensive trading. But, working with Democrats, Hawley dropped the contentious name and expanded the lawmaker ban to apply to future presidents and vice presidents as well. Pelosi touted the changes made to the legislation and said she 'strongly' supports it and looks forward to voting for it when it reaches the House floor. 'If legislation is advanced to help restore trust in government and ensure that those in power are held to the highest ethical standards, then I am proud to support it — no matter what they decide to name it,' Pelosi said in a statement. 'While I appreciate the creativity of my Republican colleagues in drafting legislative acronyms, I welcome any serious effort to raise ethical standards in public service,' she continued. 'The HONEST Act, as amended, rightly applies its stock trading ban not only to Members of Congress, but now to the President and Vice President as well.' Hawley's bill advanced with the support of all Democrats and no other Republicans on the committee. The step comes amid renewed efforts in Congress to pass a stock-trading ban, a proposal with broad bipartisan support from the public. President Trump said in April that he would 'absolutely' sign a congressional stock trading ban if it came across his desk and, on Tuesday, he said he would 'take a look' at the bill, adding, 'but conceptually, I like it.' On Wednesday, however, he struck a different tune, sharply criticizing Hawley for voting with Democrats to advance the bill. Pelosi dropped her opposition to legislation banning members of Congress from trading stocks in 2022. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data