US judge blocks Trump from ending Temporary Protected Status for Haitians
FILE PHOTO: A woman holds a placard as Haitian immigrants and supporters rally to reject DHS Decision to terminate TPS for Haitians, at the Manhattan borough in New York, U.S., November 21, 2017. REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz/File Photo
NEW YORK - A federal judge on Tuesday rejected the Trump administration's bid to end temporary deportation protections and work permits for approximately 521,000 Haitian immigrants before the program's scheduled expiration date.
The Department of Homeland Security had in February rescinded Democratic President Joe Biden's extension through February 3, 2026 of Temporary Protected Status for Haitians.
It called for the program to end on August 3, and last week pushed back that date to September 2.
U.S. District Judge Brian Cogan in Brooklyn, however, said Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem did not follow instructions and a timeline mandated by Congress to reconsider the TPS designation for Haitians.
"Secretary Noem does not have statutory or inherent authority to partially vacate a country's TPS designation," making her actions "unlawful," Cogan wrote. "Plaintiffs are likely to (and, indeed, do) succeed on the merits."
Cogan also said Haitians' interests in being able to live and work in the United States "far outweigh" potential harm to the U.S. government, which remains free to enforce immigration laws and terminate TPS status as prescribed by Congress.
Homeland Security did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Cogan was appointed to the bench by Republican President George W. Bush.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
World Trump says US could reach trade deal with India, casts doubt on deal with Japan
Singapore A second chance to excel: 3,800 private candidates taking O- and A-level exams in 2025
Multimedia Right on track: Meet the new JB-Singapore RTS Link train
Opinion US strikes on Iran: The impact ripples on, from Baghdad to Beijing
Singapore 'He fought till the end': Man who survived acid attack as a baby dies of cancer at 26
Singapore Judge rejects woman's claim that she owns 99% of Bukit Timah condo mostly paid for by ex-boyfriend
Asia Thai PM's suspension could spell end of Shinawatra clan's era of political dominance
Business Key features and risks of investment products to be on one page under MAS proposals
The case had been filed on March 14 by nine Haitian TPS holders who said Noem did not do a required review of current conditions in Haiti before ending TPS early.
Lawyers for the plaintiffs had no immediate comment.
TRUMP CRACKDOWN
Republican President Donald Trump has made a crackdown on legal and illegal immigration a central plank of his second White House term.
Federal courts blocked Trump from ending most TPS enrollment during his first term.
Noem shares Trump's hardline stance, and moved to end TPS for about 350,000 Venezuelans as well as thousands of people from Afghanistan and Cameroon.
On May 19, the U.S. Supreme Court let TPS end for the Venezuelans, signaling that other terminations could be allowed.
Noem has authority to grant TPS for six to eight months to people from countries experiencing natural disasters, armed conflict or other extraordinary events.
The nine Haitian plaintiffs also claimed the suspension of their TPS status was motivated in part by racial animus, violating their constitutional right to equal protection.
Trump falsely said in a September 2024 debate with Democratic candidate Kamala Harris that Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio were eating pets, sparking fear of retaliation toward Haitians.
More than 1 million people, over half of them children, are displaced within Haiti, where gang violence remains prevalent despite a United Nations-backed security mission that began last year. REUTERS
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
US judge blocks Trump asylum ban at US-Mexico border, says he exceeded authority
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox FILE PHOTO: A drone view of the Rio Grande River between Mexico and the United States in Presidio County, Texas, U.S., February 24, 2025. REUTERS/Cheney Orr/File Photo WASHINGTON - A federal judge on Wednesday blocked President Donald Trump's asylum ban at the U.S.-Mexico border, saying Trump exceeded his authority when he issued a proclamation declaring illegal immigration an emergency and setting aside existing legal processes. U.S. District Judge Randolph Moss said in a 128-page opinion that Trump's January 20 proclamation blocking all migrants "engaged in the invasion across the southern border" from claiming asylum or other humanitarian protections went beyond his executive power. The ruling is a setback for Trump, a Republican who recaptured the White House promising a vast immigration crackdown. Since Trump took office, the number of migrants caught crossing illegally has plummeted to record lows. The American Civil Liberties Union brought the challenge to Trump's asylum ban in February, arguing it violated U.S. laws and international treaties. Trump's border restrictions went beyond a similar ban put in place by former President Joe Biden, a Democrat, in 2024. Key parts of the Biden ban were blocked by a separate federal judge in May in a lawsuit also led by the ACLU. Moss said he would stay the effective date of his order for 14 days to allow the Trump administration to appeal. REUTERS
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Ukraine left scrambling, seeking clarity after US says halting some arms shipments
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Rescuers working at the site of a children's hospital that was hit by a Russian missile in Kyiv, Ukraine, on July 8, 2024. KYIV - Ukraine appealed to the United States for clarity on July 2 after it was caught off guard by a White House announcement that Washington was halting some arms shipments to the war-battered country. The Ukrainian defence ministry, which is deeply dependent on US arms, said it had not been notified about the reduction in aid announced one day earlier. Moscow revelled in the decision, saying it could bring the end of the war closer. Any slowdown in US support could harm Kyiv's ability to fend off escalating Russian aerial bombardments or front-line gains. Kyiv has long feared halts to US aid since Mr Donald Trump returned to the White House in January, having criticised the tens of billions of dollars in support and weapons sent by his predecessor, Mr Joe Biden. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said in an evening address that Kyiv and Washington were clarifying details on supplies. 'Continued American support for Ukraine, for our defence, for our people is in our common interest,' he said. 'It will be even more scary, even more painful, and even more civilians will suffer,' Kyiv resident Yevgenia Prysiazhna told AFP, referring to a increase in overnight drone and missile attacks on Ukraine. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Singapore and Cambodia to expand collaboration in renewable energy, carbon markets and agri-trade World Trump announces Vietnam trade deal with 20% import tariff Singapore From camping to mentorship, Singapore Scouts mark 115th anniversary of the youth movement Singapore Ong Beng Seng's court hearing rescheduled one day before he was expected to plead guilty World Sean 'Diddy' Combs convicted on prostitution counts but cleared of more serious charges Singapore Teen, 17, to be charged with allegedly trespassing on MRT tracks Singapore Granddaughter of Hin Leong founder O.K. Lim fails to keep 3 insurance policies from creditors' reach Singapore Man on trial for raping drunken woman after offering to drive her and her friend home 'I really hope that this is a temporary decision,' the communications manager said. Mr John Ginkel, the deputy chief of mission at the US embassy in Kyiv, was summoned by the foreign ministry – a rare diplomatic move usually reserved for foes and rivals, not vital allies – given uncertainty about what the cuts would mean for Kyiv. 'Now is not the time for weak decisions,' Ukraine's Foreign Minister Andriy Sybiha wrote on X. 'We need more interceptors and systems. We are also ready to purchase or rent them,' he added. The White House had said that it was halting some key weapons shipments promised by the previous US administration, without elaborating. Under Mr Biden, Washington spearheaded Western support for Ukraine, with Congress having approved more than US$100 billion (S$127 billion) in aid, including US$43 billion in weaponry. Mr Trump instead has pushed the two sides into peace talks, including in phone calls with Russian President Vladimir Putin – who rejected pleas for a ceasefire and demanded that Ukraine cede more territory if it wants Moscow to halt its invasion, which was launched in 2022. 'Consistent pressure' The US president has refused to announce new aid packages and Kyiv has been corralling Washington's European allies to step up their support. Kyiv remains 'seriously dependent' on US arms supplies, a high-ranking source in the Ukrainian military told AFP. 'Europe is doing its best, but it will be difficult for us without American ammunition,' the source added. A May report by the Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) said that Europe 'had only made limited progress' in strengthening its defence industries. But it said that 'continued US aid remains extremely important for Ukraine's long-term effectiveness on the battlefield.' In Moscow, the Kremlin said that reducing weapons deliveries to Kyiv would help end the conflict. 'The fewer the number of weapons that are delivered to Ukraine, the closer the end of the special military operation,' Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters in response to a question by AFP, using Russia's term for its more than three-year-long offensive. The White House told AFP in an email that the decision to reduce shipments was taken following a 'review of our nation's military support and assistance to other countries'. Kyiv said that it was caught off-guard by the move. The defence ministry said that the country had 'not received any official notifications' on the issue. Escalating drone attacks Politico and other US media reported that missiles for Patriot air defence systems, precision artillery and Hellfire missiles are among the items being held back. Russia ramped up attacks on Ukraine in June, launching nearly twice as many missiles and over 30 percent more drones than in May, according to an AFP analysis of Ukrainian air force data. Kyiv was in June subjected to at least four fatal attacks that left more than 40 people dead. Its residents are worried that a cessation of US aid would leave the capital even more vulnerable. 'We had gotten used to seeing America as a country of values, a country that defends democracy,' Mr Igor Stambol, a Kyiv resident, told AFP. 'But there is hope that they will remember their values,' the 36-year-old added. AFP
Straits Times
3 hours ago
- Straits Times
US senator urges bribery probe over Trump-Paramount settlement
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren, a Democrat, has called for a full investigation into Paramount's reported US$16 million settlement with US President Donald Trump. WASHINGTON - A US senator renewed calls July 2 for a bribery probe into Paramount following its reported US$16 million (S$20 million) settlement with President Donald Trump over a lawsuit the entertainment giant initially described as meritless. The president had sued the CBS News parent company for US$20 billion, claiming its 60 Minutes programme had deceptively edited an interview with his 2024 election rival Kamala Harris in her favour. The suit is described by Mr Trump's critics as part of a broader assault on press freedom that has seen him bar the Associated Press from the Oval Office and sue other media organisations over their coverage. Paramount nevertheless entered into mediation in a bid to placate Mr Trump, as it seeks to close its US$8 billion merger with the entertainment company Skydance, which needs federal government approval. 'With Paramount folding to Donald Trump at the same time the company needs his administration's approval for its billion-dollar merger, this could be bribery in plain sight,' said Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren, a Democrat. 'Paramount has refused to provide answers to a congressional inquiry, so I'm calling for a full investigation into whether or not any anti-bribery laws were broken.' Ms Warren was among three senators who wrote to Paramount Global chair Shari Redstone in May with bribery concerns over the company's efforts to settle the suit, and calling for a congressional probe. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Singapore and Cambodia to expand collaboration in renewable energy, carbon markets and agri-trade World Trump announces Vietnam trade deal with 20% import tariff Singapore From camping to mentorship, Singapore Scouts mark 115th anniversary of the youth movement Singapore Ong Beng Seng's court hearing rescheduled one day before he was expected to plead guilty World Sean 'Diddy' Combs convicted on prostitution counts but cleared of more serious charges Singapore Teen, 17, to be charged with allegedly trespassing on MRT tracks Singapore Granddaughter of Hin Leong founder O.K. Lim fails to keep 3 insurance policies from creditors' reach Singapore Man on trial for raping drunken woman after offering to drive her and her friend home Republicans control both chambers of Congress, limiting the power of Democrats to investigate or compel answers from witnesses. The senators' letter came after CBS News head Wendy McMahon and 60 Minutes executive producer Bill Owens announced they were quitting over Paramount's handling of the showdown with Mr Trump. 'Paramount's surrender' The company – which did not immediately respond to AFP's request for comment – initially called the suit 'completely without merit' and had sought to have it dismissed. 'The Trump administration's level of sheer corruption is appalling and Paramount should be ashamed of putting its profits over independent journalism,' Ms Warren added. Mr Trump accuses CBS of airing two different snippets from the same answer that Ms Harris, then vice-president, gave about Israel, to help her in her election campaign. The Republican billionaire sued in October 2024, alleging that the interview violated a Texas consumer protection law. Legal experts have argued that the lawsuit would have been an easy victory in court for CBS, which made public an unedited transcript of the Harris interview. And media watchers have pointed out that Mr Trump routinely takes part in interviews that are edited for all manner of reasons, often in his favour. The US$16 million will go towards Mr Trump's future presidential library rather than to him personally, according to a Paramount statement published by the Los Angeles Times on July 1. ABC News, owned by Disney, agreed to donate a similar amount to the library in its own settlement with Mr Trump in late 2024. Mr Jameel Jaffer, executive director of the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, called the settlement 'a sad day for press freedom.' 'This was a frivolous lawsuit and the payment being described as a 'settlement' bears no relation to Paramount's actual legal exposure in the case, which was negligible,' he said in a statement. 'Paramount should have fought this extortionate lawsuit in court, and it would have prevailed. Now Trump's presidential library will be a permanent monument to Paramount's surrender, a continual reminder of its failure to defend freedoms that are essential to our democracy.' AFP
