Field day at East Coast station Tutumatai on Friday
Beef + Lamb New Zealand is hosting a field day on hub farm Tutumatai Station near Ruatōria on Friday.
The property in Mangaoporo Rd was named as a B+LNZ whenua Māori monitor farm early last year.
Promoted, resourced and supported by B+LNZ for a two-year period, with the option of a third year, it follows on from a successful monitor farm programme B+LNZ ran at Waikura Station at Tiniroto for several years.
'B+LNZ Hub Farms are all about bringing farmers together to connect, share ideas and tackle regional challenges,' a B+LNZ spokesman said.
'They provide a unique chance to follow a real farm business as it navigates change, helping you see firsthand how decisions play out over time and translating those insights into practical strategies for your own farm.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
a day ago
- Scoop
Beef Australia Appoints Livestock Event Manager
Central Queensland cattle breeder, Bonni Geddes has been appointed Livestock Event Manager at Beef Australia. Beef Australia CEO Simon Irwin said it was great to announce Bonni joining the team in the lead up to the 2027 event. 'Bonni has been involved with the Beef Australia Stud Cattle Committee as Coordinator in 2018, and later as a committee member in both 2021 and 2024 and has a strong understanding of the operational and organisational needs of the role, as well as a genuine appreciation for the work and culture of Beef Australia.' 'Bonni has also held a variety of volunteer roles at local agricultural shows, including secretary of the Central Queensland Carcase Classic; and has been an active competitor in both stud and carcase competitions.' Mr Irwin said this was the first time Beef Australia has appointed a person to specifically oversee all aspects of the cattle events, and the position had attracted many well-qualified applicants. 'The Livestock manager is an integral member of the management team having oversight of the Stud, Commercial and Carcase championships, and will ensure the cattle competitions remain at the heart of the Beef event,' Mr Irwin said. 'Bonni will work with our cattle committees and the team at Beef Australia to make sure that our competitions are a great experience for exhibitors and the public.' Bonni will start work next week, and some of her first tasks will be calling for applications from people seeking to join the three cattle committees, with a call for expressions of interest going out next week.
NZ Herald
a day ago
- NZ Herald
City Rail Link: Auckland's $5.5b project promises lasting benefits
Just as the opening of the Auckland Harbour Bridge 66 years ago changed roading, a completed CRL will have the same seismic impact for rail and the wider public transport network. A CRL connected into Auckland's upgraded rail network will rewrite train timetables – services will be more frequent, faster and reliable, transforming access for people in and out of the city centre and even to big crowd destinations like Eden Park. CRL tunnel work – Fencing is used at CRL station platforms to keep workers safety in high-voltage locations. CRL is well placed to set higher benchmarks that range from social procurement, workforce development, a strong partnership with mana whenua and safety leadership. Right in the heart of the country's largest city, we are delivering something this country has never seen before - a transport project huge in scale and complexity. Add to the mix CRL's constrained footprint and you have the catalyst for improving technical excellence, system integration, and collaboration-driven delivery. It's not just construction success, it's also about long-term value - the lessons we are learning and sharing with others are legacies that will benefit the construction sector long after our work is done. CRL is divided into three main tunnel-related contracts: The project has enhanced existing industry practice, and we've introduced our own to get the best possible legacy outcomes. Dramatic legacy C1 delivered one of the earliest and most dramatic of CRL's legacy achievements, one I describe as a bold and extraordinary example of our 'can-do' attitude. After two years of meticulous planning supported by technical innovation, 14,000 tonnes of the heritage-listed Chief Post Office (CPO), 'front door' to the Waitematā Station, was lifted on to temporary foundations to build the CRL tunnels underneath. A low-headroom hydrofraise (reverse circulation rig for excavation) was designed to work in the cramped basement and 50mm high-strength steel reinforcing bars required for new foundations was manufactured in New Zealand for the first time. The historic building is now supported securely on diaphragm (D) walls sunk 20m below ground, new foundation columns, cross beams and the tunnel boxes themselves. CPO basement – CRL tunnel construction in the basement of the heritage-listed Chief Post Office. The benefits are twofold. Lifting and lowering the CPO and building tunnels below the level of the nearby Waitematā Harbour set new boundaries for the way complicated construction is completed successfully, and, very importantly, it's given our wider industry confidence to tackle complex challenges. Global first CRL legacy began before construction started with a global first – integrating Māori cultural values into the project by establishing a partnership directly with Tāmaki Makaurau Māori. Eight iwi are represented on CRL's Mana Whenua Forum – an active, meaningful and rewarding collaboration that has meant much better project outcomes. CRL Karanga-a-Hape station exterior – the exterior of Karanga-a-Hape Station showing traditional Māori design. Aucklanders can see straight away its positive influence just by looking at station designs that reflect the city's cultural heritage and the Māori view of the world – you won't see anything as stunning anywhere else in the world! The forum also brings value to our sites. It leads karakia for culturally significant events, supports health and wellbeing programmes and was a critical ally during the pandemic to keep our workers safe and our sites open. It backed employment opportunities for young Māori and Pasifika that boosted the pool of qualified workers for the project and the wider industry (43 graduates and 70 per cent employed post-programme). It helped drive initiatives for increasing supply chain diversity - $155 million spent directly with Māori and Pasifika businesses - building their capacity and capability in the construction sector. In a word, the Mana Whenua Forum is an absolute win-win for CRL. Sharing the risks An important CRL Ltd decision was the adoption of the alliance model to deliver C3, the largest and most challenging of our project's contracts – the main tunnels, stations and rail systems. The Link Alliance includes six design and construction companies with New Zealand and international experience and CRL Ltd. As an alliance, they share risks and rewards. Decisions are made on a 'best-for-project' basis. The big advantage is having everyone – designers, builders and us – sitting around the same table at the same time, making decisions collaboratively. One team gives us the ability to move with speed and flexibility to improve project management and deal with changes in scope and any other challenges. Toolbox and start-up meetings are critical platforms for CRL's health and safety education. One immediate advantage occurred when a contractor went into administration and the Link Alliance was able to efficiently include this key contract into C3's scope and programme. Certainly, during the early stage of the pandemic and associated shut-downs the Link Alliance was able to keep working on design and construction programmes even under constrained conditions, and we were well placed to quickly regain construction momentum when things returned to normal. Non-negotiable priority Over the years, more than 14,000 inductions of staff and subcontractors have taken place on CRL sites, with teams delivering 23 million hours of work with no fatalities. Given the numbers, safety has always been a non-negotiable priority for us. Safety protocols have to keep pace with an ever-changing cycle of risk management as the project's stages have shifted from demolition, utilities upgrades, civil works, tunnelling, working under mining regulations, constructing buildings and streetscapes, architectural fitouts, station and rail system installation and commissioning, multiple high-voltage energisations and testing trains through the stations and tunnels. CRL test train – train tests and driver training are a critical part of CRL's commissioning and testing programme. Strong leadership and embedding the right structures to keep workers safe range from the basics – insisting that full personal protective equipment (PPE) is always worn - using toolbox and start-up meetings to educate, adhering to strict health guidelines to keep sites open, and training exercises with emergency services that reflect CRL's changing landscape. The start of CRL construction identified opportunities to improve safety protocols to align them closer with international standards. Roll forward a few years and CRL Ltd and the Link Alliance are now transferring health and safety learnings and successes to big projects in Canada and Australia. Sustained success When construction started in 2016, sustainability and environmental protection were project cornerstones with CRL making industry-leading changes a 'business-as-usual' function. Contractors were challenged to think not only about cost and programmes, but resource efficiency as well. Those who valued sustainability were rewarded when they bid for CRL work. CRL substantially reduced the project's carbon footprint, delivered savings around the use of construction and operational energy, made more efficient use of water and materials, dramatically reduced waste earmarked for landfill – material retrieved from the project's demolition programme is now being reused in Auckland and in cyclone-damaged buildings in Tonga – used high-tech computer technology like BIM (Building Information Modelling) to track the project's carbon footprint during design and construction, and protected Auckland's colonial heritage. The project's commitment and focus on sustainability have paid off. CRL is now officially recognised as meeting the highest sustainability standards on either side of the Tasman. TBM breakthrough – CRL's tunnel boring machine, Dame Whina Cooper, breaks through at Te Waihorotiu Station. The Australian-based Infrastructure Sustainability Council (ISC) has praised CRL for adopting sustainability into the 'DNA of its operations' and awarded its highest 'Leading' As-built rating to the C1, C2 and C3 contracts – the entire project from Waitematā to Maungawhau. ISC also awarded the Link Alliance a 'Leading' As-built rating for the construction of the main tunnels and the Te Waihorotiu, Karanga-a-Hape and Maungawhau Stations, including its use of a tunnel boring machine. One of the most important takeaways we have to share around sustainability is that people drive success more than policies. We're able to demonstrate that passionate, committed and tenacious people who are engaged and empowered at every level are a priceless sustainability asset. Strong communications We do, however, acknowledge that along with the gains, CRL has tackled many challenges. New Zealand's never before dealt with a project the size of CRL in the middle of a bustling city. One of the most important takeaways we have to share around sustainability is that people drive success more than policies. Patrick Brockie Delays caused by the pandemic, the weather, and other organisations taking advantage of CRL work to undertake their own required works contributed to criticism being levelled at the project by neighbours impacted by construction. CRL is committed to building and maintaining strong relationships with its neighbours and stakeholders. Often the message is one people and businesses don't want to hear, but we have always prioritised our engagement with communities to enable residents and businesses to plan ahead throughout construction. Alongside face-to-face meetings, newsletters, social media posts and media releases, the project also took a proactive role to promote and celebrate the communities it was a part of through an activation and events programme. This included supporting businesses to take part in events such as Branch Out in Uptown and First Thursdays on Karangahape Rd and creating space for communities such as a Pocket Park concert stage in Pitt St. Micro-grants and independent advice from a business adviser helped businesses adapt to the changing environment by introducing and adapting their services or products. On the public day, thousands of Aucklanders visited CRL's tunnel boring machine, Dame Whina Cooper, before it began excavations. In 2021, CRL began administering a $12m Targeted Hardship Fund established by CRL's sponsors, the Government and Auckland Council, to support those small businesses worst impacted by disruption. We value all the support we get from our neighbours, and we hope that they will benefit from living and working in more attractive and vibrant communities when our work is done. Continuous, consistent communication is not restricted to our neighbours. We have a 'no-surprises' policy to keep the sponsors informed. There are monthly meetings and reporting on project progress. This is a regular part of any relationship with the Crown or a council, but their importance for us grew because of our site locations and the impact on our neighbours as well as the construction challenges created by the pandemic. With heavy construction finished, the project has also established an informal One Client Alliance for the next phase of work, commissioning and testing the station and rail systems required to make CRL operate safely. Experience from overseas tells us that this is the most challenging part of any new rail project - it is work we cannot do alone. Our approach is to collaborate with others. The One Client Alliance involves CRL Ltd, Auckland Transport and KiwiRail, which will operate and maintain a completed CRL. They are supported by Link Alliance and Auckland One Rail, the city's train operator. This is collaboration and communication at its best. Alongside commissioning, we have 16,000-plus tests and re-testing to complete. Sharing everyone's resources and expertise will get the best possible outcomes for the city by delivering the great dividends everyone wants. CRL's commitment to lift the infrastructure bar is a catalyst for wider change. Patrick Brockie, CEO City Rail Link Ltd. We're just the stepping stone for those who follow us. We share lessons learned as much as we can but there is still much to be done – how to minimise disruption for people and businesses impacted by works, social and environmental sustainability and value capture, particularly of land adjacent to project sites. Legacy is an ongoing story, but everyone who has worked on CRL can already be proud of our successful and long-lasting achievements of innovation and positive change that are helping make Auckland and New Zealand better places. Patrick Brockie is chief executive of City Rail Link. City Rail Link is an advertising sponsor of the Herald's Infrastructure report.
NZ Herald
4 days ago
- NZ Herald
I've got cancer so how should I invest my KiwiSaver?
True, you miss out on higher average returns. But you don't need the worry that the markets might be down at the very time you might have to withdraw. If anything, you should perhaps move all your money into a lowest-risk defensive fund. These funds, sometimes called cash funds, typically invest in bank term deposits and the like. Investors' balances usually just keep growing steadily. It's slow but smooth sailing. But if you want to be 'in the market' to some extent, your current mix is fair enough. And perhaps you could encourage other family members to take a bit of risk with their KiwiSaver choices. Note, though, that you may not be able to withdraw your KiwiSaver money when you want to. Inland Revenue says your health reason has to be either: 'An illness, injury or disability that permanently affects your ability to work or poses a risk of death. 'A life-shortening congenital condition that lowers your life expectancy below the age of eligibility for New Zealand Superannuation (currently 65).' Some people have been turned down because they don't quite fit the criteria. You can read about a woman in a similar situation to you on the Financial Services Complaints website, here: You might want to ask your provider about your eligibility before you count on it. I hope the time ahead of you goes as well as possible. Yes, but what about mortgages? Q: We hear much about the need to increase retirement savings, compulsory contributions to KiwiSaver etc – often from obviously self-interested providers. Have you seen any analysis about whether more people are retiring with mortgage debt who wouldn't have previously, or more debt than they would have had if they hadn't been contributing so much to savings? Is everybody truly better off at retirement? It's always presented as if it is a pure win. A: You raise an interesting point. It must be true that at least some contributions to KiwiSaver would otherwise have gone into reducing mortgages or other debt. While it sounds good to reach 65 with, say, $100,000 in KiwiSaver, nothing is gained if the person owes $100,000 more on their mortgage. Actually, that's not quite accurate. Because of the extra KiwiSaver input from the Government and employers, our person's KiwiSaver balance would probably be higher than the extra mortgage debt. But still, encouraging people – or forcing them by compulsion – to increase their KiwiSaver contributions would probably make people better off at retirement only if there are added KiwiSaver incentives. And they need to be genuine incentives, not increased employer contributions – as in this year's Budget – that Treasury assumes will largely come out of people's future pay rises. There doesn't seem to be any research specifically on this issue. NZIER says 2022 research shows 66% of people 65 and over own their homes mortgage-free, 13% have a mortgage and 20% rent. It adds: 'Less than half of Māori seniors and about one-quarter of Pacific seniors own their homes outright.' It also says: 'The number of people 65 and over with mortgage debt has grown from 118,000 in 2018 to 134,000 in 2022.' Associate professor Susan St John, of the University of Auckland's Pensions and Intergenerational Equity (PIE) research hub, doesn't link that trend to KiwiSaver. 'While I think that we see more people coming into retirement renting, or with a mortgage, I don't think there is evidence to attribute that to KiwiSaver contributions.' However, Treasury seems to disagree. It assumes about 80% of the 2025 Budget increase in employee contributions to KiwiSaver 'will come from a redirection of other forms of saving (eg, lower mortgage repayments or contributions to other investments)'. Either way, St John sums up the situation: 'Saving for retirement should not be viewed as an alternative to home ownership. It may mean that homes have to be more modest. It may mean governments have to increase attractiveness with subsidies rather than reduce them.' Hear, hear! Tax break for homeowners? Q: In a Q&A last week you pointed out that the mortgage interest rate was, say, 5.5% and that the return on savings is 'unlikely to be anywhere near 5.5%' – after tax and fees. True indeed. However, the equation is probably even worse. Mortgage interest is paid with tax-paid money – so if the person's top tax marginal rate is, say, 33%, the 5.5% mortgage rate is really 8.2%. You need to earn $8200 to have the $5500 after tax to pay the interest on $100,000. The mortgage interest rate is always way worse than it looks. Unfortunately, mortgage interest is a case of the miracle of compound interest – but in reverse. A: I think your point is that mortgage interest is not tax-deductible in New Zealand. A 2023 OECD report on tax relief for home ownership lists 17 countries as giving some kind of tax relief for homeowners' mortgage interest. They are Austria, Belgium, Chile, Colombia, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Iceland, Italy, Luxembourg, Mexico, Netherlands, Portugal, Russia, Slovak Republic, Sweden and the United States. Should New Zealand do the same? Wikipedia points out: 'Most economists believe mortgage interest deduction is bad policy and is counterproductive. They note that it increases inequality, is an unnecessary market distortion, and contributes to housing unaffordability.' While the idea has strong appeal for homeowners, New Zealand doesn't really need to further encourage home ownership, which is already overrated as the only way to do well financially. Nor do we need more tax dollars flowing towards generally better-off people. So I'm afraid I'm not on that particular bandwagon! Your final comment is really a different issue. But you're right – interest on any debt compounds in the same way as interest on savings. It's not uncommon for people to take out, say, a $400,000 mortgage and end up paying more than twice that over the years. It's always a great move to cut any debt as fast as possible to reduce the compounding. Go with lowest fees Q: With so many index funds tracking the same index, such as the S&P500, why don't investors just invest with the fund offering the lowest fees? What other points of difference do funds offer? A: I reckon the lowest fee should be the main basis on which you choose a fund. However, if you're investing in KiwiSaver, there's also data on which providers offer better services and that could sway your decision somewhat. Here are the KiwiSaver providers that have told the Retirement Commission, in its regular services survey, that several or all of their funds are 'passively managed in their entirety and track an index': AMP, InvestNow, Kernel, Koura, Sharesies, SuperEasy and SuperLife, Also, NZ Funds' Balanced Fund is passive. Of these providers, NZ Funds got the highest score for services. Then came AMP, SuperLife, Koura, Kernel, Sharesies and, in a draw for the bottom slot were InvestNow and SuperEasy. But of course many of their services might not interest you. If there's a particular issue for you – perhaps ease of deposits or withdrawals – you can always ask providers if they offer it. Email or phone them, and if they don't reply within a few days, cross them off the 'good services' list. You can compare the different funds' fees using the Smart Investor tool on Or use Sorted's KiwiSaver Fund Finder to get an estimate of the total fees you will pay in each fund until you retire. What if you want to invest outside KiwiSaver? Many of the above providers also offer non-KiwiSaver funds. And Smart Investor also ranks fees on non-KiwiSaver managed funds. Another option is to use overseas-based funds. But that introduces complications with tax, settling estates and so on. It's much simpler to use a New Zealand-based fund that invests in overseas indexes. Many baskets? Q: Interesting stuff in last week's column about low fees and index funds. I note you do though also emphasise diversification. I recently switched from a major bank to a fund that allows me to split my KiwiSaver over several providers. So I can invest with Generate, Milford, Pathfinder and Nikko to name but four, and can do so in a mixture of conservative, balanced and growth funds. Thus my eggs go into many baskets. The trade-off is of course higher fees. Would it be better to go with a pure index fund that has low fees? I like Buffett's idea of 20% bonds and 80% index funds for people like me who are total amateurs. Which KiwiSaver provides this option? A: Several KiwiSaver providers enable you to invest in a range of funds run by other providers. And it's true that would give you further diversification. But that comes at the price of simplicity. And you won't necessarily get a higher total after-fees return, or less volatility. The providers you name tend to offer actively managed funds, as opposed to the passive index funds discussed above. And their fees are almost always higher, sometimes a lot higher. In any given year, some actively managed funds will perform better than the always middle-of-the-road passive funds, while some will do worse. But over time, it doesn't tend to be the same ones that outperform. Looking at what has done well so far doesn't guarantee their success will continue. Passive funds, with their lower fees, tend to be the best bet. Choose one that follows an index with many shares in it, such as the MSCI world share index, and you will have wonderful diversification. Rentals in retirement Q: I was surprised when you stated that most people invest in rental properties for the capital gain. We purchased a two-bedroom, cross-lease property in 1986 only to provide extra income on retirement. If we sold the property now for the Auckland Council capital valuation we would receive more income from a term deposit at 4% than we do from our rental, even before deducting expenses, rates, insurance, agent's fees, maintenance etc. A: At the risk of sounding mean, why don't you sell then? I don't really understand using rental property as a retirement investment – unless you are wealthy and enjoy being a landlord, or regard the property as your children's inheritance. But if you're having anything less than a financially comfortable retirement, it doesn't make sense to tie up all the money in a property when you could be gradually spending the proceeds from selling it, along with returns earned on that money in the meantime. On your first sentence, I've looked through recent columns and I don't think I've said that. I have, though, written that many new landlords find their expenses exceed their rental income, so they have to top up mortgage payments. Presumably they hope this imbalance will ease over time. But my guess is that many also hope to sell at a gain. Exempt employers Q: The Financial Markets Authority administers the register of exempt employers of KiwiSaver. The full list is available to view on the FMA website. A: You're right. You can see the list here: However, that list includes only employers who had qualifying employee superannuation schemes back in the early days of KiwiSaver, before November 2009, says the FMA. 'A scheme offered to employees by the employer had to have a minimum contribution rate of 4% of gross base salary of the member, which could be from either the member or the employer or a combination of both. 'Today only a new employee who joins the employment of an employer who holds exempt employer status and who is not already a KiwiSaver member would be covered by these provisions.' The FMA list does not include employers discussed in last week's Q&A, such as an employer that is not a New Zealand resident or does not carry on a business 'from a fixed establishment in NZ'. Mary Holm, ONZM, is a freelance journalist, a seminar presenter and a bestselling author on personal finance. She is a director of Financial Services Complaints Ltd (FSCL) and a former director of the Financial Markets Authority. Her opinions do not reflect the position of any organisation in which she holds office. Mary's advice is of a general nature, and she is not responsible for any loss that any reader may suffer from following it. Send questions to mary@ Letters should not exceed 200 words. We won't publish your name. Please provide a (preferably daytime) phone number. Unfortunately, Mary cannot answer all questions, correspond directly with readers, or give financial advice.
