
AI and fiber bust parallel is partly hallucinated
Chinese startup DeepSeek claims to be able to train and run its cutting-edge AI model at a fraction of the cost of U.S. companies like OpenAI. That confounds conventional wisdom that brute-force investment in computing power – and, to feed it, chips, data centers and energy - was the most reliable method. This parsimony slammed the valuations of companies benefitting from rising capital expenditures. Chipmaker Nvidia (NVDA.O), opens new tab lost nearly $600 billion in market value, the largest one-day wipeout ever. The pain extended from cooling specialist Vertiv (VRT.N), opens new tab to nuclear power provider Constellation Energy (CEG.O), opens new tab.
Grizzled investors might have reason to fear that it's 2000 all over again. Back then, telecom providers had gone on a splurge, laying reams of fiber-optic cable to transmit data, bidding up rights to transmit over airwaves and acquiring rivals. Companies borrowed about $2 trillion globally in the five years prior to 2001, according to Thomson Reuters data.
That bubble popped. Valuation multiples had grown much faster than revenue; vendors propped up demand by offering financing to buyers. As threatens to happen now, though, the biggest hit came from technological innovations with hard-to-parse names like DOCSIS, VDSL and WDM, which vastly improved the efficiency of existing infrastructure. Prices cratered and losses ballooned. The five biggest telecom equipment firms – names like Nortel Networks, Cisco Systems (CSCO.O), opens new tab and JDS Uniphase – were worth around $1 trillion, collectively, equal to nearly $1.9 trillion in today's dollars. They lost 90% in value in a little over a year. Heavily indebted builders like Global Crossing blew up.
While that sounds grim, any damage this time will be more manageable. Private-sector tech investment has increased for decades, but there has been no sudden spike like in the late 1990s, when spending as a percentage of GDP jumped by nearly a third in five years.
Firms driving investment now are stronger. Sure, OpenAI's $157 billion valuation could teeter. But giant companies like $3.3 trillion Microsoft (MSFT.O), opens new tab and $1.7 trillion Meta Platforms (META.O), opens new tab are the real movers. They have not piled on leverage like fiber builders did. Microsoft's credit rating is a rare AAA. The full implications of DeepSeek's breakthroughs are also still unclear: Nvidia shares regained some ground on Tuesday.
There's also an upside from the last crash to consider. Yesterday's bloated investment helped create today's tech giants. Firms like Alphabet (GOOGL.O), opens new tab and Amazon.com (AMZN.O), opens new tab thrived as internet connections became cheaper. If the same happens to AI, companies that use it to make more compelling products, whether existing titans or startups, will be big winners.
Follow @rob_cyran, opens new tab on X
CONTEXT NEWS
Nvidia, the U.S. maker of chips seen as crucial for powering artificial intelligence, lost nearly $600 billion of market capitalization on Jan. 27 after Chinese startup DeepSeek released a cutting-edge AI model the previous week.
DeepSeek's R-1 Zero appears to perform about as well as models from ChatGPT-maker OpenAI and Facebook parent Meta Platforms. However, its developer claims that it is dramatically cheaper to train and use. DeepSeek says final training costs for the model that powers R-1 Zero were less than $6 million.
For more insights like these, click here, opens new tab to try Breakingviews for free.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Economist
an hour ago
- Economist
Can Bernard Arnault steer LVMH out of crisis?
Louis Vuitton's new 17,000-square-foot development in Shanghai is, quite literally, the luxury brand's Chinese flagship. The structure, which serves as a store, restaurant, museum and billboard, is shaped like a giant boat, its hull emblazoned with Louis Vuitton's unmistakable monogram print. To some, it is also a metaphor for Louis Vuitton's parent company, LVMH, which is floundering in China and beyond. Is it a superyacht headed for promising new waters, asks Flavio Cereda-Parin of GAM, an asset manager, or 'Titanic 2.0'?


The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
Competition shows humans are still better than AI at coding
Computers have taken the crown in chess, Go and poker, but when it comes to competitive coding, humans still have the edge – just. Przemysław Dębiak, a Polish coder and mind sports champion, narrowly clinched a victory over OpenAI's entrant in the AtCoder World Tour Finals 2025 in Tokyo earlier this month. The elite coder, however, who goes by the online name Psyho, predicts he may be the last human to win the prestigious title given the incredible pace of technological progress. 'That's probable,' said Psyho, 41, who worked at OpenAI before retiring five years ago. 'I would prefer not, mostly because I like these competitions and knowing there's this magical entity that can do it better than me would be a little bit frustrating.' There is an irony, Psyho acknowledged, in the fact that coders have contributed to their own professional demise. 'Before the contest, I tweeted 'live by the sword, die by the sword',' he said. 'I helped developing AI and I would be the one who would be the loser of the match. Although I won, in the end, for now.' The AtCoder euristic division included 11 human participants invited on the basis of world rankings and a coding algorithm designed by OpenAI, which finished in second place, 9.5% behind Psyho's winning score. Sam Altman, OpenAI's CEO, tweeted his congratulations. The 10-hour contest involves solving a complex optimisation problem. A classic in the genre is the 'travelling salesman problem', where the salesman needs to figure out the shortest possible route between various cities, each visited once. These problems are simple to state, but finding an optimal solution is computationally very complex. So while ChatGPT is now routinely used to write boilerplate code, the AI's performance on an open-ended logic problem will be viewed as impressive. 'At the current state, humans – top humans, to be clear – are still much better at reasoning and solving complex problems,' said Psyho. But humans are 'bottlenecked' by how quickly they can type code, while an AI can try out lots of small adjustments very rapidly. 'The model is like cloning a single human multiple times and working in parallel,' he said. 'AI might not be the smartest right now but it's definitely the fastest. And sometimes multiplying a single average person many many times produces a better result than a single, special human being.' The result comes as major tech companies, including Meta and Microsoft, are turning to AI to write software code. The Anthropic CEO, Dario Amodei, said in May that AI could take 20% of white-collar jobs in the next one to five years. 'Every profession has this right now, more or less,' said Psyho. 'Some people have it coming right now – all of the white collar jobs. For manual jobs, robotics is lagging by several years.' Like many in the industry, Psyho is ambivalent about the potential impact of ever more powerful AI models. 'We have a tonne of issues,' he said. 'Disinformation, social impact, humans not having a purpose in life. Historically society moves at a very slow pace. Technological progress right now is moving at a faster and faster and faster pace.'

Finextra
6 hours ago
- Finextra
AI and the Future of Finance: Sam Altman at the Federal Reserve: By Vipin Kumar Sharma
Sam Altman joined the Federal Reserve this week to talk about AI's growing role in finance, and every FinTech leader should be paying attention. On July 22, 2025, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman joined the Federal Reserve Vice Chair Michelle Bowman in Washington, D.C. to explore how artificial intelligence is reshaping banking, security, and the future of financial services. Yes, the CEO of OpenAI walked into one of the most traditional institutions in global finance and painted a future that's anything but conventional. Here are some key takeaways from their discussion: AI voice cloning is becoming highly realistic. Altman pointed out that AI can now mimic voices so well that traditional tools, such as voice-based authentication, may no longer be reliable, especially for high-value transactions. It's time to rethink security. Banks and regulators must develop new, more advanced methods to verify identities and prevent fraud as AI becomes increasingly sophisticated. AI can drive real improvements. From faster credit checks to better customer service, Altman believes AI can help financial institutions become more efficient and cost-effective if implemented thoughtfully. AI should be accessible, not exclusive. He emphasized the importance of 'democratizing AI,' ensuring that the benefits of this technology are widely shared and not concentrated among a few large players. Job roles may shift, but opportunities can also change. While some roles will change due to automation, Altman stressed the need for retraining and smart policy to help workers transition and grow with new tools. While no formal partnership was announced, both OpenAI and the Fed expressed interest in continued dialogue and collaboration. AI in finance isn't just a future concept; it's already part of the conversation at the highest levels. Now is the time for leaders in finance, technology, and policy to collaborate and shape the future.