AI and fiber bust parallel is partly hallucinated
Chinese startup DeepSeek claims to be able to train and run its cutting-edge AI model at a fraction of the cost of U.S. companies like OpenAI. That confounds conventional wisdom that brute-force investment in computing power – and, to feed it, chips, data centers and energy - was the most reliable method. This parsimony slammed the valuations of companies benefitting from rising capital expenditures. Chipmaker Nvidia (NVDA.O), opens new tab lost nearly $600 billion in market value, the largest one-day wipeout ever. The pain extended from cooling specialist Vertiv (VRT.N), opens new tab to nuclear power provider Constellation Energy (CEG.O), opens new tab.
Grizzled investors might have reason to fear that it's 2000 all over again. Back then, telecom providers had gone on a splurge, laying reams of fiber-optic cable to transmit data, bidding up rights to transmit over airwaves and acquiring rivals. Companies borrowed about $2 trillion globally in the five years prior to 2001, according to Thomson Reuters data.
That bubble popped. Valuation multiples had grown much faster than revenue; vendors propped up demand by offering financing to buyers. As threatens to happen now, though, the biggest hit came from technological innovations with hard-to-parse names like DOCSIS, VDSL and WDM, which vastly improved the efficiency of existing infrastructure. Prices cratered and losses ballooned. The five biggest telecom equipment firms – names like Nortel Networks, Cisco Systems (CSCO.O), opens new tab and JDS Uniphase – were worth around $1 trillion, collectively, equal to nearly $1.9 trillion in today's dollars. They lost 90% in value in a little over a year. Heavily indebted builders like Global Crossing blew up.
While that sounds grim, any damage this time will be more manageable. Private-sector tech investment has increased for decades, but there has been no sudden spike like in the late 1990s, when spending as a percentage of GDP jumped by nearly a third in five years.
Firms driving investment now are stronger. Sure, OpenAI's $157 billion valuation could teeter. But giant companies like $3.3 trillion Microsoft (MSFT.O), opens new tab and $1.7 trillion Meta Platforms (META.O), opens new tab are the real movers. They have not piled on leverage like fiber builders did. Microsoft's credit rating is a rare AAA. The full implications of DeepSeek's breakthroughs are also still unclear: Nvidia shares regained some ground on Tuesday.
There's also an upside from the last crash to consider. Yesterday's bloated investment helped create today's tech giants. Firms like Alphabet (GOOGL.O), opens new tab and Amazon.com (AMZN.O), opens new tab thrived as internet connections became cheaper. If the same happens to AI, companies that use it to make more compelling products, whether existing titans or startups, will be big winners.
Follow @rob_cyran, opens new tab on X
CONTEXT NEWS
Nvidia, the U.S. maker of chips seen as crucial for powering artificial intelligence, lost nearly $600 billion of market capitalization on Jan. 27 after Chinese startup DeepSeek released a cutting-edge AI model the previous week.
DeepSeek's R-1 Zero appears to perform about as well as models from ChatGPT-maker OpenAI and Facebook parent Meta Platforms. However, its developer claims that it is dramatically cheaper to train and use. DeepSeek says final training costs for the model that powers R-1 Zero were less than $6 million.
For more insights like these, click here, opens new tab to try Breakingviews for free.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
China's Xi calls for 'proper handling of frictions' at tense summit with E.U. officials
BEIJING — Chinese President Xi Jinping urged top European Union officials on Thursday to 'properly handle differences and frictions' as he criticized Brussels's recent trade actions against Beijing at a tense summit dominated by concerns on trade and the Ukraine war. Expectations were low for the summit in the Chinese capital marking 50 years of diplomatic ties after weeks of escalating tension and wrangling over its format, with the duration abruptly halved to a single day at Beijing's request. 'The current challenges facing Europe do not come from China,' Xi told visiting European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and European Council President Antonio Costa, state news agency Xinhua said. He urged the E.U. to 'adhere to open cooperation and properly handle differences and frictions,' after von der Leyen earlier called for a rebalancing of trade ties with the world's second-largest economy, saying relations were at an 'inflection point.' 'Improving competitiveness cannot rely on 'building walls and fortresses,'' Xi added, according to Xinhua. ''Decoupling and breaking chains' will only result in isolation.' 'It is hoped that the European side will keep the trade and investment market open and refrain from using restrictive economic and trade tools,' Xi said. During the meeting in Beijing's Great Hall of the People, von der Leyen told Xi, 'As our cooperation has deepened, so have imbalances,' according to a pool report. 'We have reached an inflection point,' she added, urging China to 'come forward with real solutions.' She was referring to the E.U.'s trade deficit with China, which ballooned to a historic 305.8 billion euros ($360 billion) last year. E.U. trade actions in the past year have targeted Chinese exports of EVs among other goods, and its officials have repeatedly complained about Chinese industrial overcapacity. In a further veiled criticism of Brussels's recent hawkish stance on China, Xi also warned E.U. leaders to 'make correct strategic choices.' The two E.U. officials were set to meet Chinese Premier Li Qiang later. Both sides hope to reach a modest joint statement on climate, now one of the rare bright spots in their cooperation. At the start of President Donald Trump's second term, both sides had more of a consensus in working together to tackle trade challenges from the United States, said Cui Hongjian, a foreign policy professor at Beijing Foreign Studies University. 'Recently the situation has changed,' Cui said. 'The E.U. has continued to compromise with the United States, which means that there is currently a lack of impetus for E.U.-China ties to become closer.' The run-up to the summit saw tit-for-tat trade disputes and hawkish European rhetoric, such as a July 8 accusation by von der Leyen that China was flooding global markets as a result of its overcapacity and 'enabling Russia's war economy.' In a post on X on Thursday, however, von der Leyen struck a more conciliatory tone, describing the summit as an opportunity to 'both advance and rebalance our relationship.' Topics the Europeans are expected to raise in the talks are electric vehicles and China's rare earth export controls that disrupted supply chains worldwide, causing temporary stoppages in European automotive production lines in May. But China's exports of rare earth magnets to the E.U. surged in June by 245% from May, to stand at 1,364 metric tons (1,503 short tons), though that was still 35% lower than the year-earlier figure, customs data showed.
The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
US stock futures higher after trade deals with Japan, Philippines
Magnificent Seven stocks are megacap tech stocks that have a strong influence on the market. They also include Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, Meta and Amazon. In 2024, they accounted for about one-third of the S&P 500's total market capitalization. When Tesla and Alphabet report, investors will scour their reports and comments for any signs of weakness in artificial intelligence spending or effects of tariffs to extend the rally begun by trade deals announced by President Donald Trump. The U.S. and Japan agreed to a trade deal that included Japan's investing $550 billion in the U.S. and a 15% tariff on Japanese goods entering the U.S. That includes auto tariffs, which will be lowered to 15% from the current 25%, according to reports. Additionally, Trump said the U.S. struck a trade deal with the Philippines that includes a 19% tariff on goods imported from the southeast Asian country and no tariffs on U.S. goods entering the Phillippines. The two countries will also work togther militarily, he said. Final talks with Indonesia on its trade deal are also underway, the White House said. The framework includes will no tariffs on U.S. goods, while Indonesian goods entering the U.S. will be taxed at 19%. At 6 a.m. ET, futures tied to the blue-chip Dow rose 0.50%, while broad S&P 500 futures gained 0.39% and tech-heavy Nasdaq futures added 0.18%. Before the market opens, toy maker Hasbro, AT&T, Boston Scientific and Hilton are among the companies expected to report earnings. Corporate news Texas Instruments' second-quarter results topped Wall Street estimates, but the lower range of its current quarter guidance missed. CoStar Group reported better-than-expected results for the second quarter. Cal-Maine Foods results in the company's last three months of its fiscal year beat analysts' expectations, helped by egg prices. Enphase Energy's second-quarter earnings topped anlaysts' expectations, but current-quarter revenue forecast was mostly below forecasts. Medora Lee is a money, markets, and personal finance reporter at USA TODAY. You can reach her at mjlee@ and subscribe to our free Daily Money newsletter for personal finance tips and business news every Monday through Friday.
Reuters
3 hours ago
- Reuters
Breakingviews - Netscape IPO casts a shadow from 1995 over AI boom
NEW YORK, July 24 (Reuters Breakingviews) - With a $300 billion valuation, ChatGPT developer OpenAI towers over peak Netscape. The trailblazing web browser, however, looms large from Silicon Valley to Wall Street as the 30th anniversary of its world-shaking initial public offering approaches. Both the similarities and differences with the internet craze have created some worrisome conditions for today's artificial intelligence mania. Netscape IPO delirium was instrumental in reshaping technology and finance. The company went public on August 9, 1995, just 16 months after veteran entrepreneur Jim Clark and computer programming whiz Marc Andreessen started it. With assistance from Morgan Stanley's Frank Quattrone and Mary Meeker, and Bill Hambrecht of Hambrecht & Quist, the co-founders cleared the way for unprofitable, fast-growing ventures to attract investments from big money managers. The frenzy to buy its shares also spawned a dotcom boom that would run for nearly five years. Moreover, Netscape helped rewrite funding handbooks, debunked some of the first-mover gospel, and provides lasting cautionary tales about capital intensity and the threat from entrenched rivals. As AI fever grips the market, these developments are instructive. Consider the technological backdrop as Netscape released its user-friendly Navigator browser three decades ago. Soon after the market debut, Meeker drafted the first of her regular trend-spotting reports, which have become required reading, opens new tab for the industry. 'What is the Internet?' she pondered early in the inaugural 323-page presentation. While TVs and corded telephones could be found in 95% of U.S. households, less than 1% of the world's population had access to the worldwide web, including email. There were about 16 million users. Netscape sold 5 million shares for $28 apiece, nowhere near enough to satisfy insatiable demand for a company considered to be the future of the internet, despite having lost $4 million on $15 million of revenue during the first half of 1995. The stock nearly tripled, before ending the day at about $58 to impute a $2.3 billion market value. Six months later, the boom got an extra boost from the U.S. government. Deregulation of the telecom industry helped fuel a nearly $500 billion spending spree over roughly five years to build network capacity. There are some notable differences between then and now. Just look at OpenAI, whose ChatGPT exploded onto the scene much like Netscape did by making an arcane technology accessible to the masses. The firm led by Sam Altman is now almost a decade old and three years have passed since it shook up the industry, but it remains beyond the reach of most investors. OpenAI recently raised $40 billion privately, the single biggest funding round in Silicon Valley history, at a $300 billion valuation. With so much venture and later-stage money available to entrepreneurs, it's no wonder the number of tech IPOs has plummeted from 370 in 1999 to just 14 last year. Myriad scandals from the dotcom era involving inflated valuations, excess commissions and improperly allocated shares also led to new regulations that chilled some of Wall Street's willingness to underwrite unproven business models. Efforts in 2012 to make it easier for smaller startups to go public failed to jumpstart the market and arguably put investors at greater risk by reducing the amount of required corporate disclosure. New tech stock issuance is so fallow that JPMorgan has started providing, opens new tab clients with research about private ones. 'Some good business models are out there,' Hambrecht, one of the bankers who advised Netscape, told Breakingviews in an interview earlier this month. 'There's still a lot of demand for new investments, and sites like Robinhood are bringing a new dimension with younger, more aggressive investors. There's just a lack of issues, and I just think the financial markets have changed so significantly since Netscape.' Another big reminder of the time remains entrenched in the technological firmament: Microsoft (MSFT.O), opens new tab. The software behemoth squashed Navigator, which had amassed about 90% of the browser market, by bundling its competing Internet Explorer with the Windows 95 operating system. The aggression attracted the attention of U.S. trustbusters, leading to a landmark lawsuit and settlement. Seemingly heeding the ominous precedent, Microsoft boss Satya Nadella carefully partnered with OpenAI in 2019 while providing a $1 billion investment. Since then, however, the relationship has become increasingly strained, leaving open the possibility that history will rhyme. Altman has another good reason to brush up on the browser wars. Netscape could not have mobilized any faster, having developed a product, dominated the market and created investment buzz within 16 months. And yet it was unable to keep up with a deep-pocketed rival. The company swiftly ceded its share of users and succumbed to giving Navigator away free. In late 1998, Netscape agreed to an ill-fated sale to dial-up internet service provider America Online for about $4 billion in stock, worth $10 billion by the time the deal closed months later. One risk for Altman is that ChatGPT winds up similarly clearing a path only for more established rivals to ultimately walk it. 'It's always striking – given all the tech enthusiasm – how few companies become massive winners. There's a lesson there,' Meeker wrote to Breakingviews in an emailed reply to questions. 'There's also a lesson related to just how massive and foundational the big winners can become.' Her observation partly explains the mad rush to build data centers, buy chips and secure the power used to train and expand large language models. The danger is that all this investment alters Big Tech's use of capital for the worse. Alphabet (GOOGL.O), opens new tab, (AMZN.O), opens new tab, Meta Platforms and Microsoft are on track to deploy more than $300 billion this year alone, a 13-fold increase from a decade ago. Although they're funding the outlays with their own cash flow, unlike the debt-heavy telecom providers of the 1990s, there is a risk that capacity winds up similarly outpacing demand. As if all that isn't enough to give investors pause, there are other indications of recklessness, any one of which could cause fear to ripple through the market. Cryptocurrency exuberance abounds thanks to relaxed restrictions; shell companies stuffed with cash have made a comeback buying speculative ventures; meme stocks keep raging; and U.S. regulators have proposed rolling back rules designed to curb day trading and protect investors from big losses that were put into place in 2001 after the dotcom bust. The dearth of IPOs is also leading to a proliferation of sites offering unproven access to hot, private tech firms. It's all part of a shaky edifice that portends another bittersweet anniversary. Full view will be published shortly. Follow Jeffrey Goldfarb on X, opens new tab and Linkedin, opens new tab.
