logo
Indiana school banned mom for recording principal. Think tank says it's unconstitutional

Indiana school banned mom for recording principal. Think tank says it's unconstitutional

After Northeast Indiana mom recorded a meeting with her daughter's principal last year and then posted it online, she was banned from school grounds and limited in her communications with school employees.
Nicole Graves was disciplined after twice violating a Whitley County district policy not to record meetings without the building administrator's permission, according to a district letter sent to her.
The Goldwater Institute, a conservative-leaning Arizona-based think tank, is pushing to rescind the policy, arguing that it violates the right to free expression protected under the First Amendment. It's a policy found in other schools around the state and the country.
"We're very hopeful that the school district will simply just change the recording policy," attorney Adam Shelton said. "However, we are still open to litigation depending on how the conversation with the school district continues to go."
If the school restricted Graves from talking about the meeting or drafting a transcript, Shelton said, it would undoubtedly violate the First Amendment. He questions why a recording would be any different.
"This is just a measure the school's adopted to prevent the most accurate record of conversation from being taken," he said.
The school has since lifted its punishments as part of a typical end-of-school-year review, said Laura McDermott, superintendent of Whitley County Consolidated Schools, in a statement.
The statement did not mention the recording policy, and McDermott has not responded to additional IndyStar questions. In a prior statement to Fort Wayne TV station WPTA, she said Graves violated the recording policy meant to protect student privacy.
"The parent was not restricted from school property for expressing concerns, but rather due to a pattern of aggressive interactions with school staff and public commentary involving children other than her own," the statement to IndyStar reads. "As a school district, we have an obligation to protect the privacy and well-being of all students and to maintain a safe, respectful environment for staff and families."
Nicole Graves asked to meet with Indian Springs Middle School principal, Wesley Mullett, after her daughter reported an incident on the school bus.
In a video produced by Goldwater, Graves said her daughter's school bus driver was smacking his belt against his hand and had his underwear visible.
Graves asked to meet with Mullett to ask about the incident and why she wasn't notified when her daughter reported the driver's behavior. She also previously had issues with other bus drivers in the district, Shelton said.
Graves said she lost confidence in the school after hearing Mullett's explanations about the situation and later posted the meeting recording on social media. She decided to record the meeting so she could accurately recount what was said, according to Goldwater.
Graves received a letter detailing punishments for violating the district's recording policy. She was asked to take down the audio clip, according to the letter.
Goldwater argues Graves' Fourteenth Amendment rights to control her child's education were violated. Shelton said Graves should have been notified about her child's report of the bus driver, and there are concerns about her subsequent punishment limiting access to her daughter's education.
In a letter sent to school officials in May, Shelton and Goldwater argue that the school's policy violates her rights to free expression. Though Graves is no longer banned from school grounds, Shelton said the think tank wants to see this policy rolled back.
McDermott did not respond to an IndyStar question about the details of the policy and whether it is under review.
The First Amendment extends to conduct that is inherently expressive, which courts have decided does include video and audio recordings in some cases.
Goldwater's argument lands in a legal gray area. Shelton believes the right to record government officials is protected and argues that freedom should not be limited to a public setting if there are no other privacy concerns at play.
"There's no meaningful constitutional difference between speaking about what happened at a meeting and recording what happened at a meeting," Shelton said.
Still, there isn't clear case law on this issue.
The USA TODAY Network - Indiana's coverage of First Amendment issues is funded through a collaboration between the Freedom Forum and Journalism Funding Partners.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sen. Mark Kelly Won't Rule Out A 2028 Presidential Run
Sen. Mark Kelly Won't Rule Out A 2028 Presidential Run

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Sen. Mark Kelly Won't Rule Out A 2028 Presidential Run

Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.) gave a fleeting answer when asked if he's planning to run for president in the 2028 election. 'I'm going to give you a yes-or-no question here, senator … you did a town hall in Michigan and you're [livestreaming right now] from Pennsylvania, both of them are key battleground states,' CNN's 'State of the Union' host Jake Tapper said Sunday. 'Yes or no, are you considering running for president in 2028?' 'That is a good question. I know you want a yes-or-no answer,' Kelly responded before ultimately declining to answer. 'I'm not going to give you a yes or no. Because I'm just trying to do this job, get the word out to the American people. 'And I'm trying to improve the polling that you talked about, and just listen to voters wherever they are about, you know, what are the problems they're dealing with and how do we fix them,' he added. Kelly's name has arisen as a potential candidate for both president and vice president in the past. Kelly, who was elected to the U.S. Senate in 2020 when he defeated Republican Martha McSally, was floated as a potential running mate with Vice President Kamala Harris after former President Joe Biden ended his reelection bid. Kelly, a retired NASA astronaut and Navy combat veteran, is the husband of former Rep. Gabby Giffords, who in 2011 survived an assassination attempt. Kelly, 61, is up for reelection in 2028. Watch Kelly's appearance on 'State of the Union' below. Related... GOP Senator Says Timing Of Tulsi Gabbard's Obama Conspiracy Push Seems Curious GOP Senator Says 'Radical' Leftists Made Trump Sick After Diagnosis Goes Public Democratic Senators Walk Out Of Trump Judicial Nominee Emil Bove's Hearing

Colorado Prof Cheers ‘South Park' Trump Mockery, Frustrated By Comics Not Doing Same
Colorado Prof Cheers ‘South Park' Trump Mockery, Frustrated By Comics Not Doing Same

Forbes

timean hour ago

  • Forbes

Colorado Prof Cheers ‘South Park' Trump Mockery, Frustrated By Comics Not Doing Same

PHOENIX, ARIZONA - DECEMBER 22: U.S. President-elect Donald Trump looks on during Turning Point ... More USA's AmericaFest at the Phoenix Convention Center on December 22, 2024 in Phoenix, Arizona. The annual four day conference geared toward energizing and connecting conservative youth hosts some of the country's leading conservative politicians and activists. (Photo by) A Colorado professor said it was 'funny as hell' the way South Park went after President Donald Trump in its Season 27 premiere episode, yet he's frustrated that more comedians on the left aren't taking the same approach. South Park, of course, is set in the fictionalized Colorado city of South Park, which follows four elementary school friends: Cartman, Stan, Kyle and Kenny. In the new episode, called Sermon on the 'Mount, series creators and voice stars Trey Parker and Matt Stone skewered the president by, among other things, giving him small genitalia both in South Park-style animation and through a live-action AI deepfake. The episode also showed a South Park-animated version of Trump in bed with Satan and in some not-so-flattering 'White House portraits,' plus it also refers to 'Epstein's list.' The debut of the South Park Season 27 episode came only hours after Paramount Global announced a deal it made with Parker and Stone to bring South Park and 50 new episodes to its Paramount+ streaming platform, as well as the first 26 seasons of the Comedy Central series. The deal, which is for five years, was reported by several outlets to be worth $1.5 billion and comes just as Skydance finalizes its acquisition of Paramount Global. Given the classic animated Comedy Central series' history where everyone is subject to ridicule, Parker and Stone also took aim not only at Trump, but Paramount Global in its Season 27 premiere episode on Thursday. The episode not only called out the company's $16 million lawsuit settlement with Trump over a 60 Minutes segment, but it also skewered the company's decision to cancel its late-night talk show The Late Show with Stephen Colbert. Colorado State University Associate Professor of Film and Media Studies Nick Marx told Wired in an article published Thursday that he was refreshed by the way South Park went after Trump following the methods the ousted talk show host and others have used criticize the president. 'It's f---ing funny as hell that they seek to sexually humiliate Trump,' Marx told Wired, noting how Parker and Stone were going after the president's 'vanity and insecurity.' However, now that Parker and Stone went there with Trump, Marx told Wired that he's frustrated by how more comedians aren't doing the same. 'I think that is the card to play … and I am frustrated that more of the comedians that I love on the left haven't leaned into that really harsh attack of him,' Marx told Wired. SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA - JULY 24: (L-R) Matt Stone and Trey Parker speak onstage at Comedy Central ... More Adult Animation: "South Park", "Beavis & Butt-Head", and "Digman" Panel during 2025 Comic-Con International: San Diego at San Diego Convention Center on July 24, 2025 in San Diego, California. (Photo by) Trey Parker Briefly Addressed The White House Criticism At San Diego Comic Con While media outlets lauded the South Park Season 27 premiere episode, White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers slammed it in a statement to media outlets on Friday. 'This show hasn't been relevant for over 20 years and is hanging on by a thread with uninspired ideas in a desperate attempt for attention,' Rogers said in the statement (via Variety). 'President Trump has delivered on more promises in just six months than any other president in our country's history – and no fourth-rate show can derail President Trump's hot streak.' In his reaction by the White House during a San Diego Comic Con panel on Friday (via Deadline), Parker simply responded in a not-so-sincere manner, saying, 'We're terribly sorry.' In addition, Parker and Stone assured viewers that, in spite of the release of a promotional reel for Season 27 earlier this year, fans will still get topical episodes of South Park and none of them are pre-packaged. 'You seriously think we made a bunch of shows ahead of time and baked them for later? We're not doing any of that,' Parker exclaimed, to which Stone quipped, 'No politics. None of that s---.' South Park Season 27 is new on Comedy Central on cable and streaming on Paramount+.

Arizona man arrested after DNA match in 1984 murder-rape case of 2 California teens
Arizona man arrested after DNA match in 1984 murder-rape case of 2 California teens

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Arizona man arrested after DNA match in 1984 murder-rape case of 2 California teens

An Arizona man was awaiting extradition to Shasta County, California, where authorities say he's their suspect in a murder-rape case that's gone unsolved for nearly 41 years. Roger Neil Schmidt Sr. of Tucson was arrested July 19 in connection with the 1984 shooting death of 18-year-old Terry Arndt and the sexual assault of a girl Arndt was with when he was killed, the Shasta County Sheriff's Office announced July 23. The 64-year-old faces murder and sexual assault charges, authorities said. Schmidt, who was born in Shasta County, was 23 years old and a Burney, California, resident when the crimes were committed in 1984, according to investigators. Arndt, an 18-year-old Shasta College student, was shot twice through the window of his parents' car with a rifle on a wooded lovers' lane near Burney High School, according to authorities. The assailant then sexually assaulted the teenage girl Arndt was with, authorities said. Another man was previously accused in the case. Thomas Elmer Brewster was exonerated during a 1997 capital trial. DNA taken from the girl's semen-stained blouse proved that Brewster wasn't her assailant. Nearly 30 years later, investigators had what seemed to be a breakthrough in the case, the Record Searchlight of Redding, California, first reported. In a press conference, Shasta County Sheriff Michael Johnson said his department worked with Tucson law enforcement officials and a private company specializing in investigative genealogy to carry out a search warrant and collect DNA evidence from Schmidt. Authorities compared Schmidt's DNA to evidence collected from the girl the night she was assaulted and obtained a match, he said. The DNA analysis "opened up a whole new avenue to the investigation, which ultimately led to the suspect's arrest," Johnson said. Schmidt was booked into the Pima County jail. Michele Chandler covers public safety, dining and whatever else comes up for the Redding Record Searchlight/USA Today Network. She accepts story tips at 530-338-7753 and at mrchandler@ Shawn Raymundo covers Phoenix and Scottsdale. Reach him at sraymundo@ or follow him on X @ShawnzyTsunami. News alerts in your inbox: Don't miss the important news of the day. Sign up for azcentral newsletter alerts to be in the know. This article originally appeared on Arizona Republic: Arizona man arrested after DNA match in 1984 cold case

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store