Sex Trafficker Ghislane Maxwell Moved to Minimum Security Prison
Maxwell's transfer from a federal facility in Tallahassee, Florida, to Federal Prison Camp Bryan comes just one week after she met with Department of Justice (DOJ) Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche amid ongoing controversy over the Trump Administration's handling of the so-called "Epstein files".
The Trump administration has faced sharp criticism from the public, and many of the president's own supporters, following the release of a July memo from the DOJ denying the existence of a 'client list', ruling Epstein's death a suicide, and closing the case.
That announcement contradicted numerous statements made by key figures in Trump's inner circle, including U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel, before they joined Trump's administration.
When asked by reporters about the possibility of a pardon for Maxwell last week, Trump said: 'I'm allowed to do it, but it's something I have not thought about.'
The Federal Bureau of Prisons confirmed in a Friday statement to TIME that Maxwell has now been moved to the federal prison camp in Bryan, though they did not state the reason for her move.
David O. Markus, Maxwell's attorney, has not publicly commented on the transfer.
The Bryan facility houses 635 female inmates and is known for holding incarcerated people who are serving non-violent offenses and white-collar crimes, according to the BBC. Other prominent figures have been housed at FPC Bryan include Real Housewives of Salt Lake City Star Jen Shah, who was convicted of wire fraud, and Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes, who was found guilty of defrauding investors.
Renewed interest in Maxwell comes as her attorneys seek an appeal for her conviction, which was filed to the Supreme Court in April. The Justice Department in July asked the Court to reject her appeal, before its recent interviews with Maxwell.
House Oversight Chair James Comer has also subpoenaed Maxwell to testify, but her public testimony seems unlikely as Congress refused to grant her immunity, which her attorneys listed as part of her demands for testifying.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ghislaine Maxwell doesn't want grand jury transcripts released, say lawyers
Jeffrey Epstein's former girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell wants to keep grand jury records secret in the sex trafficking case that sent her to prison, her lawyers have said. It comes as prosecutors in the US urge a court to release some of those records in the criminal case-turned-political fireball. Maxwell has not seen the material herself, her lawyers said — the grand jury process is conducted behind closed doors. But she opposes unsealing what her lawyers described as potentially 'hearsay-laden' transcripts of grand jury evidence, which was given in secret and without her lawyers there to challenge it. 'Whatever interest the public may have in Epstein, that interest cannot justify a broad intrusion into grand jury secrecy in a case where the defendant is alive, her legal options are viable and her due process rights remain,' lawyers David O Markus and Melissa Madrigal wrote. A message seeking comment from prosecutors was not immediately returned. US government lawyers have been trying to quell a clamour for transparency by seeking the transcripts' release — although the government also says the public already knows much of what is in the documents. Most of the information 'was made publicly available at trial or has otherwise been publicly reported through the public statements of victims and witnesses,' prosecutors wrote in court papers on Monday. They noted that the disclosures excluded some victims' and witnesses' names. Prosecutors had also said last week that some of what the grand jurors heard eventually came out at Maxwell's 2021 trial and in various victims' legal cases. There were only two grand jury witnesses, both of them law enforcement officials, prosecutors said. Prosecutors made clear on Monday that they are seeking to unseal only the transcripts of grand jury witnesses' evidence, not the exhibits that accompanied it. But they are also working to parse how much of the exhibits also became public record over the years. While prosecutors have sought to temper expectations about any new revelations from the grand jury proceedings, they are not proposing to release a cache of other information the government collected while looking into Epstein. The filing aimed to support their request to release the usually secret records amid a public clamour for more transparency about the investigation into Epstein, six years after the financier died in prison. Maxwell, his former girlfriend, was later convicted of helping him prey on underage girls. The transcript face-off comes six years after authorities said Epstein killed himself while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges and four years after Maxwell was convicted. Some of US President Donald Trump's allies spent years suggesting there was more to the Epstein saga than met the eye and calling for more disclosures. A few got powerful positions in Mr Trump's Justice Department — and then faced backlash after it abruptly announced that nothing more would be released and that a long-rumoured Epstein 'client list' does not exist. After trying unsuccessfully to change the subject and denigrating his own supporters for staying interested in Epstein, the Republican president told Attorney General Pam Bondi to ask courts to unseal the grand jury transcripts in the case.
Boston Globe
26 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Epstein's ex, Ghislaine Maxwell, doesn't want grand jury transcripts released
Advertisement A message seeking comment from prosecutors was not immediately returned. Government attorneys have been trying to quell a clamor for transparency by seeking the transcripts' release — though the government also says the public already knows much of what's in the documents. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Most of the information 'was made publicly available at trial or has otherwise been publicly reported through the public statements of victims and witnesses,' prosecutors wrote in court papers Monday. They noted that the disclosures excluded some victims' and witnesses' names. Prosecutors had also said last week that some of what the grand jurors heard eventually came out at Maxwell's 2021 trial and in various victims' lawsuits. There were only two grand jury witnesses, both of them law enforcement officials, prosecutors said. Advertisement Prosecutors made clear Monday that they're seeking to unseal only the transcripts of grand jury witnesses' testimony, not the exhibits that accompanied it. But they are also working to parse how much of the exhibits also became public record over the years. While prosecutors have sought to temper expectations about any new revelations from the grand jury proceedings, they aren't proposing to release a cache of other information the government collected while looking into Epstein. The filing aimed to support their request to release the usually secret records amid a public clamor for more transparency about the investigation into Epstein, six years after the financier died in prison. Maxwell, his former girlfriend, was later convicted of helping him prey on underage girls. The transcript face-off comes six years after authorities said Epstein killed himself while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges and four years after Maxwell was convicted. Some of President Donald Trump's allies spent years suggesting there was more to the Epstein saga than met the eye and calling for more disclosures. A few got powerful positions in Trump's Justice Department — and then faced backlash after it abruptly announced that nothing more would be released and that a long-rumored Epstein 'client list' doesn't exist. After trying unsuccessfully to change the subject and denigrating his own supporters for staying interested in Epstein, the Republican president told Attorney General Pam Bondi to ask courts to unseal the grand jury transcripts in the case.
Buzz Feed
26 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
Trump's Drug Price Claims Spark Disbelief Online
Donald Trump's math on cutting drug prices didn't add up. Again. The president this weekend repeated his promise to get pharma companies to lower the cost of medications for Americans, who often have to pay much more for certain drugs than people abroad. But the actual amount of the 'tremendous drop' in cost that Trump boasted about had critics scratching their heads. 'You know, we've cut drug prices by 1,200, 1,300, 1,400, 1,500%,' Trump said. CNN 'I don't mean 50%. I mean 14, 1,500%,' he added. CNN But as many on social media pointed out, that would mean all drugs are free and people actually get paid to receive them. Trump: You know, we've cut drug prices by 1200, 1300, 1400, 1,500%. I don't mean 50%. I mean 1400, 1,500% — Acyn (@Acyn) August 4, 2025 @Acyn / CNN / Via Also, drug prices haven't actually come down, despite Trump's pressure on pharmaceutical companies. Trump appeared to acknowledge that when he later said, 'We'll be dropping drug prices ... by 1,200, 1,300 and even 1,400% and 500% but not just 50% or 25%, which normally would be a lot because the rest of the world pays much less for the identical drug.' CNN Reality is 'eroding before our eyes,' said one critic. Others agreed. Tomorrow, it'll be eleventy thousand percent, and the media will report it without question, and we'll all shake our heads and move along, and it'll be just another day of reality eroding before our eyes. — Jennifer Erin Valent 🇺🇸🇺🇦 (@JenniferEValent) August 4, 2025 @JenniferEValent / CNN / Via Time and again, he's shown himself to be utterly innumerate. — George Conway 👊🇺🇸🔥 (@gtconway3d) August 4, 2025 @gtconway3d / CNN / Via Same guy currently claiming he fired the job numbers expert over bad statistics. — J.J. Abbott (@jjabbott) August 4, 2025 @jjabbott / CNN / Via It's great that we have a numerically illiterate person unilaterally in charge of our tariff policy. — Gregg Nunziata (@greggnunziata) August 4, 2025 @greggnunziata / CNN / Via Wharton (undergrad) called, and they would like their degree back. — Sedge Dienst🇺🇦 (@SedgeDienst) August 4, 2025 @SedgeDienst / CNN / Via 100% would mean all drugs are free. So this is @realDonaldTrump seriously claiming that drug companies are now paying US 14 times the price of our medications just to take them. Dumbest man on the fucking planet. — Andrew—#IAmTheResistance—Wortman (@AmoneyResists) August 4, 2025 @AmoneyResists / CNN / Via I think he MAY have failed first year stats. — Peter Baugh (@PWBaugh) August 4, 2025 @PWBaugh. CNN / Via Is it too much to ask for a president who knows how numbers work. — Michael Freeman (@michaelpfreeman) August 4, 2025 @michaelpfreeman / Via this was in the same discussion in which the president reiterated that he didn't trust the math of the Bureau of Labor and Statistics on the economy: — Edward-Isaac Dovere (@IsaacDovere) August 4, 2025 @IsaacDovere / Via There's a real temptation here to make a joke, or to ask which drugs these are that pharma companies are now paying patients to take, because let's all get in on it! But honestly, all I can feel is sad that someone this stupid could be our president. Again. — Dr. Michelle Au (@AuforGA) August 4, 2025 @AuforGA / Via He lies as he breathes. — Wajahat Ali (@WajahatAli) August 4, 2025 @WajahatAli / Via
