MPs vote to support proscribing Palestine Action as terror group
Legislation passed in the Commons yesterday, as MPs voted 385 to 26, a majority of 359 in favour of proscribing the group under the Terrorism Act 2000.
While security minister Dan Jarvis told MPs that Palestine Action as not a 'legitimate protest group', others criticised the move and described it as 'draconian overreach' and likened the group to the Suffragettes.
Zarah Sultana, the independent MP for Coventry South, told the Commons: 'To equate a spray can of paint with a suicide bomb isn't just absurd, it is grotesque. It is a deliberate distortion of the law to chill dissent, criminalise solidarity and suppress the truth.'
The motion is expected to be debated and voted on by the House of Lords today before it becomes law.
Meanwhile, pro- Palestine demonstrators have hit out at the government, accusing it of 'hypocrisy' as it prepares to ban an activist group under anti-terror law.
The decision to proscribe the group comes after two planes were vandalised at RAF Brize Norton on June 20.
Speaking to The Independent while demonstrating outside parliament, David Collins, a retired veteran with no links to Palestine Action and who served with the Marines for nine years, said: 'In comparison to some of the atrocities that this government is approving – and sending arms to Israel – amongst some people that is justified action. They are warplanes that can be repaired. There was nobody hurt. I would say that is a legitimate form of protest.'
Jonathan Fluxman, 69, a retired doctor who was also demonstrating on Wednesday, said a ban was 'utterly ridiculous'. 'Palestine action are a direct action group. They are avowedly non-violent and I think this is much more about them embarrassing the British government by being incredibly effective in terms of interrupting the flow of weapons from Britain to Israel to try and stop the awful, awful genocide', he said.
Four people, including 'a man who blocked the gates of Downing Street with his mobility scooter', were arrested following the protest in Westminster, the Metropolitan Police has said.
On Tuesday, two more arrests were made after Palestine Action claimed to have blockaded the entrance of an Israeli defence company's UK headquarters. A spokesperson for the group said activists had blocked the entrance to Elbit Systems in Bristol and covered it in red paint 'to symbolise Palestinian bloodshed'.
Kat, another protester demonstrating outside parliament on Wednesday morning, accused the government of a 'complete clampdown on our right to protest'. She said: 'There are many groups that use the same tactics and have used the same tactics in the past and they've never had this extreme a response to it. I think they're shutting it down because its effective. It is making an impact on the profits of Elbit Systems who is Israel's largest weapons manufacturer.'
But home secretary Yvette Cooper said 'violence and serious criminal damage has no place in legitimate protest. The right to protest and the right to free speech are the cornerstone of our democracy and there are countless campaign groups that freely exercise those rights.'
The prime minister, Keir Starmer, said the action at RAF Brize Norton was 'disgraceful' and an 'act of vandalism'.
While the government is rushing through parliament absurd legislation to proscribe Palestine Action, the real terrorism is being committed in Gaza
Palestine Action
The shadow home secretary, Chris Philp, also condemned the group, saying: 'This attack on Britain's military is totally unjustified. They are undermining the very organisation that protects us all. Palestine Action should be pursued, prosecuted and banned for what they have done. In this country we settle disagreements through debate and democracy, not through acts of vandalism and violence.'
A spokesperson for Palestine Action said: 'While the government is rushing through parliament absurd legislation to proscribe Palestine Action, the real terrorism is being committed in Gaza. Palestine Action affirms that direct action is necessary in the face of Israel's ongoing crimes against humanity of genocide, apartheid and occupation, and to end British facilitation of those crimes.'
Opening the debate in the Commons on Wednesday, security minister Dan Jarvis said proscription of the group would 'reaffirm the UK's zero tolerance approach to terrorism, regardless of its form or underlying ideology'.
'Proscription is rightly ideologically neutral. It judges an organisation on its actions and the actions it is willing to deploy in pursuit of its cause', he said, adding that proscription was 'one of the most powerful counter-terrorism tools available to government. Any decision to proscribe is taken with great care and following rigorous consideration.'
Unveiling the intention to ban the group following the incident on June 23, Cooper said it was the latest in a 'long history of unacceptable criminal damage committed by Palestine Action'.
The group, which intends to bring a legal challenge against the government, has staged a series of demonstrations in recent months, including spraying the London offices of Allianz Insurance with red paint over its alleged links to Elbit, and vandalising Donald Trump's Turnberry golf course in South Ayrshire.
Palestine Action's website says it uses disruptive tactics to target 'corporate enablers of the Israeli military-industrial complex' and seeks to make it 'impossible for these companies to profit from the oppression of Palestinians'.
Some 81 organisations have been proscribed under the 2000 Act, including Islamist groups such as Hamas and al-Qaeda, far-right groups such as National Action, and the Russian private military company the Wagner Group.
The draft order laid on Monday also lists neo-Nazi group Maniacs Murder Cult and far-right nationalist group Russian Imperial Movement, including its paramilitary arm, Russian Imperial Legion, to be proscribed in the UK.
Belonging to or expressing support for a proscribed organisation, along with a number of other actions, are criminal offences carrying a maximum sentence of 14 years in prison.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
40 minutes ago
- The Independent
Gap in law could see young people ‘committing terrorist acts by weekend'
Young people 'are going to be committing terrorist acts, probably, by the weekend', Lord Walney has warned during a debate on the proscription of protest group Palestine Action. The former independent adviser on political violence and disruption described a 'gap in the law', because the Government cannot proscribe protest groups which are 'committing systematic criminality' without using terrorism powers. He backed the Home Office's plan to ban Palestine Action, adding it to the list of 81 organisations which are already proscribed including Hamas, al Qaida and National Action. Lord Walney told peers it was 'a nonsense' that groups which have advocated causing 'damage', such as Palestine Action, 'have been able to operate freely for as long as they have'. But opposing the move, Labour former Northern Ireland and Wales secretary Lord Hain warned: 'If you start labelling people willy-nilly terrorists right across the board, you're going down a very, very dangerous route.' Lord Walney said: 'There is a gap in the law, it seems to me at the moment, where we ought to be able to place a restriction on an organisation that is committing systematic criminality in the name of a cause without necessarily branding them as terrorists.' He suggested a future law change could mean authorities do not 'end up branding young people who are going to be committing terrorist acts, probably, by the weekend' as terrorists. The independent crossbench peer, who was previously a Labour MP, later said: 'I think we have to think more in the Labour movement about working people here, because they have been systematically targeted in defence factories. They have been deeply intimidated. 'At times, they have been violently injured, and it's totally unacceptable for the Labour movement to say, 'well that's ok, because it's in a cause'.' The Home Office's order, using the Terrorism Act 2000, will make it a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison to be a member of Palestine Action or to support it. The group claimed responsibility for a break in at RAF Brize Norton last month, when activists damaged two RAF Voyager aircraft using paint. Crossbencher Lord Carlile of Berriew, a former independent reviewer of terrorism legislation, urged peers to 'act responsibly' by 'accepting this instrument'. He said: 'Every day the police prosecute people for theft. The maximum for theft – I'm not sure if it still is, but it was seven years at one time. Practically nobody gets seven years for theft. 'Most people get a non-custodial sentence. The assumption that everybody who's prosecuted is going to be locked up for years and years and years is a misleading premise for this debate.' Lord Hain was one of three Labour rebels who backed a motion to 'regret' the Home Office's plan, which Green peer Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb moved. He was joined in the 'content' lobby by Lord Hendy and former Trade Union Congress general secretary Baroness O'Grady of Upper Holloway. 'Frankly, I'm deeply ashamed,' Lord Hain told peers. 'This Government is treating Palestine Action as equivalent to Islamic State or al Qaida, which is intellectually bankrupt, politically unprincipled and morally wrong.' Lord Hain earlier said: 'In 1969-70, I was proud to lead a militant campaign of direct action to disrupt all-white, racist South African rugby and cricket tours, and we successfully succeeded in getting them stopped for two decades. 'No doubt, I would have been stigmatised as a terrorist today rather than vilified as I was then. 'That militant action could have been blocked by this motion, as could other anti-Apartheid activity, including militant protests to stop Barclays bank recruiting new students on university campuses, eventually forcing Barclays to withdraw from Apartheid South Africa.' Home Office minister Lord Hanson of Flint said he had previously protested. ' Freedom of expression, freedom of assembly are cornerstones in our democracy,' he said. 'I have protested. I know of many other members who've protested against various things in our lives, and we have done so in a fair and open way.' He added: 'People engaged in lawful protests do not need weapons. 'People engaged in lawful protests do not throw smoke bombs and fire pyrotechnics to innocent members of the public, and people engaged in lawful protest do not cause millions of pounds of damage to national security infrastructure, including submarines and defence equipment for Nato.' Baroness Jones described a 'long and noble tradition of the use of direct action by protest movements'. She added that 'Palestine Action is not like any other group that the British Government has declared a terrorist organisation so far'. Her motion to regret was rejected by 144 votes to 16, majority 128. Peers who had stayed in the chamber afterwards called 'content' to back the order, which has also received MPs' backing in the Commons after a vote on Wednesday.
Times
43 minutes ago
- Times
Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves are tied to each other now
It was as carefully choreographed as it gets. A day after Rachel Reeves broke down in the House of Commons — a moment so unexpected it took her closest friends and allies by surprise — the chancellor attempted to get back on the front foot. First came an unscheduled public appearance alongside Sir Keir Starmer to launch the NHS's ten-year plan in a very public show of unity. The prime minister embraced her, praised her for doing a 'fantastic' job and made it clear she was going nowhere. Then she faced the cameras. 'People saw I was upset, but that was yesterday,' she said. 'Today's a new day and I'm just cracking on with the job.' Her explanation was simple — she was having a bad day. While refusing to elaborate on the precise nature of the 'personal issues' that led to her tears in the Commons, she insisted that they were nothing to do with her professional life.
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Lucy Letby is a ‘convenient SCAPEGOAT' who must have retrial – her conviction could easily be blown apart, says Farage
NIGEL Farage has a 'horrible feeling' that killer nurse Lucy Letby might have been a 'very convenient scapegoat' and should be retried. The Reform leader said there were 'serious questions' about the case which have left him with increasing doubts over her conviction in recent months. 6 6 Letby is serving 15 whole-life orders in jail for the murder of seven babies over a year-long reign of terror between 2015 and 2016. She was also found guilty of trying to kill seven others during her time at the Countess of Chester hospital. Letby, 35, has always maintained her innocence and her conviction in 2023 has since been scrutinised by some medical experts. It includes a panel of doctors led by Dr Shoo Lee who says the prosecution misinterpreted his evidence on how air embolisms could lead to discolouration of a baby's skin. Several politicians have since expressed scepticism over the initial verdict, including Reform leader Mr Farage. Revealing why he waded into the debate, he told The Sun: 'I think, as a political thought leader, it is quite right to ask questions. 'And I haven't come out unequivocally on this, but I increasingly think that the argument for a retrial is very strong.' 'The argument that it should be looked at again is very strong. If you look at what's happened with the neonatal units, not just in Chester, but we could look at East Kent, we could look at two or three others, where the rates of baby death have been too high. 'I just have this horrible feeling that she might have been a very convenient scapegoat.' Mr Farage highlighted that since 1970 there have been 500 miscarriages of justice in Britain and he 'fears this could be another one.' He added: 'I'm not saying Lucy Letby is innocent, I'm not saying it's all made up. 'I've just increasingly over the months had doubts. 'And I think having confidence in our judicial system has been a fundamental point of what has made this country great. 'We, since Magna Carta all those years ago, have had more faith in our judicial system than any other European country. Maybe even overall any other country in the world. And I think the Letby case raises serious questions.' The Letby case hit the headlines again this week as three former senior staff at the Countess of Chester hospital were arrested for gross negligence and manslaughter. 6 6 6 Cheshire Police said the arrests 'did not impact on the convictions of Lucy Letby for multiple offences of murder and attempted murder". Instead the cops said the arrests related to the decision-making of the senior leadership team in the hospital during the time of the killings.
