logo
US reaches deal with Japan, tariff cut

US reaches deal with Japan, tariff cut

Gulf Today2 days ago
The United States, riding a tariff wave launched by President Donald Trump, has concluded a trade agreement with Japan, the fourth largest economy in the world, in Washington on Tuesday.
According to the agreement, the US will impose 15 per cent tariff on all goods imported from Japan. This is a much lower rate than the 25 per cent that Trump had threatened Japan with from August 1. Even as the deadline hovered over the talks, the two sides managed to arrive at an agreement much before the dreaded date.
Trump had declared on his Truth Social, his personal portal, 'This Deal will create Hundreds and Thousands of Jobs – There has never been anything like it. This is a very exciting time for the United States of America, and especially for the fact that we will continue to always have a great relationship with the Country of Japan.'
Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said, 'Since February, we have been negotiating with our national interests at stake. Both sides have engaged in all-out, close-to-the-edge negotiations over automobiles and other products. I believe this outcome reflects those efforts.'
The trade agreement reflects interesting details. Though it appears that the United States has gained hugely going by the headline figures – Japan will have to invest $550 billion in the United States, open its agricultural sector to American rice – the impact on the Japanese GDP would be a mere 0.55 per cent. Even if the tariff rate had remained at the apparently punitive 25 per cent, the impact on Japanese GDP would have been 0.85 per cent. The US was running a trade deficit of $69.4 billion. And Japan will channel the investments in the US from state-backed institutions like Japan Bank for International Cooperation (JBIC) or through guaranteed loans. The Japanese investments are to be made in semi-conductors, pharmaceuticals, steel, shipbuilding, critical minerals, aviation, energy, automobiles, AI and quantum technology.
The sensitive area for Japan is the import of rice. Japan consumes seven million tonnes of rice every year. It maintains a tariff-free quota of 770,000 tonnes. And it will increase the ratio of US rice imports within this range. It is said that there is room for rice imports outside the free tariff quota, with the proviso of 341 yen ($.2.33) per kilogramme of rice.
Prime Minister Ishiba referring to the opening of rice imports from the US, said, 'You can think of it as increasing the proportion of rice procured from the United States, under the minimum access arrangement, but this agreement does not include any provisions that would sacrifice agriculture.'
Both sides have bargained hard, and each side has claimed victory. The Japanese believe that that they have succeeded in bringing down the reciprocal tariff rate from 25 per cent to 15 per cent, a clear 10 per cent reduction. The US believes that it has managed to force Japan to necessarily invest in the US – according to the deal $550 billion – and that 90 per cent of the profits made from the investments will remain in the United States, and that it has succeeded in prising open the protected agricultural market, especially with regard to rice.
It is expected that the US-Japan trade deal will serve as a template for the trade agreements with the European Union (EU) and China. The expectation is that the US will settle for a 15 per cent tariff with these two as well. The US is willing to be reasonably generous with big trade partners like Japan, EU, and China. But with smaller countries and economies like the Philippines and Indonesia it is playing tough. In the deal with the Philippines and Indonesia, the US has brought down the tariff regime from 20 per cent to 19 per cent. The trade balance of the US with these two countries is much lower, $17.9 billion with Indonesia and $4.9 billion with the Philippines.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Thailand and Cambodia Agree to Immediate Ceasefire
Thailand and Cambodia Agree to Immediate Ceasefire

UAE Moments

time41 minutes ago

  • UAE Moments

Thailand and Cambodia Agree to Immediate Ceasefire

Thailand and Cambodia have agreed to an immediate and unconditional ceasefire, effective from midnight local time on July 28, 2025, following five days of the worst border clashes in over a decade. The landmark agreement was reached during high‑level talks in Putrajaya, Malaysia, chaired by Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, with participation from the United States. At least 35 people were killed and more than 260,000 civilians displaced across both countries during the violence—making it the deadliest conflict in the modern era between the two ASEAN neighbours. The clashes erupted after Thursday, when a landmine explosion killed five Thai soldiers. Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet welcomed the truce, expressing hope it will allow displaced families to return home and rebuild normal bilateral relations. Acting Thai Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai Thailand's desire for peace, remained cautious, saying that a ceasefire could only follow after Cambodia approaches the ceasefire talks with "sincere intentions". As part of the ceasefire agreement, military commanders from both sides will meet Tuesday morning, and a border committee, to be hosted by Cambodia, will convene on August 4 to build a joint mechanism for monitoring and implementation. Defence and foreign ministers from Thailand and Cambodia will also resume the process. The role of U.S. pressure, in particular from President Donald Trump, was widely credited with helping secure the ceasefire—Trump reportedly warned that trade negotiations and tariff relief would be halted unless a truce was achieved. Despite the agreement, reports indicate that some clashes in the border areas even on the day the ceasefire was declared, underscoring the fragility of the deal and the deep-seated mistrust between the parties. Experts warn that without substantive dispute resolution and institutional trust-building, the ceasefire may prove vulnerable to escalation.

Donald Trump admits 'real starvation' happening in Gaza in meeting with UK leader
Donald Trump admits 'real starvation' happening in Gaza in meeting with UK leader

The National

timean hour ago

  • The National

Donald Trump admits 'real starvation' happening in Gaza in meeting with UK leader

US President Donald Trump has admitted for the first time that children in Gaza are suffering "real starvation", amid mounting international criticism of Israel's actions in the strip. The situation in Gaza dominated an hour-long press conference between Mr Trump and the UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer in Scotland, in which the US President gave an assessment that was at odds with that of Israel's leaders. In unusually strong language, Mr Trump said he wanted to see children fed, in response to Mr Starmer's view that there is 'revulsion' at the images of emaciated infants. Mr Trump added that 'we're giving a lot of money and a lot of food, and other nations are now stepping up. That's real starvation stuff, I see it, and you can't fake that,' Mr Trump said. 'We have to get the kids fed. 'Israel has a lot of responsibility' for addressing the crisis, Mr Trump added. 'I want them to make sure they get the food.' The US President also appeared to blame Iran for derailing ceasefire talks between Hamas and international mediators last week. 'Iran has been sending out bad signals, I'll tell you, for a country that just got wiped out, they've been sending very bad signals, very nasty signals, and they shouldn't be doing that.' He accused Iran's Foreign Minster Abbas Araghchi of 'saying things that he shouldn't be talking about' and said Iran 'they got involved in this negotiation'. The crisis in Gaza is a priority for the two leaders, but Mr Trump also made a surprise announcement that he had set new deadline of "10 to 12 days" for Russia to make a ceasefire deal in Ukraine, a significant reduction on the previous deadline of 50 days. Mr Trump added that he will make an official announcement on this "tonight or tomorrow". Hostage shield The US President said he was in touch with Benjamin Netanyahu about getting the remaining 20 Israeli hostages in Gaza released, but said it would be difficult to make a deal now that Hamas has only a few hostages left, because the group uses them as a 'shield'. 'Hamas has become very difficult to deal with in the last couple of days, because they don't want to give up this last 20 because they think as long as they have them, they have protection,' he said. 'I'm speaking to Bibi Netanyahu and we are coming up with various plans. If they didn't have the hostages, things would go very quickly but they do, and we know where they have them. When they give them up, they no longer have a shield.' Mr Trump said he told the Israeli Prime Minster Benjamin Netanyahu that the fight in Gaza against Hamas would have to be conducted in a different way after the latest talks on a ceasefire and hostage release agreement fell apart last week. "I told Bibi that you have to maybe do it a different way," Mr Trump said. "A ceasefire is possible, but you have to get it, you have to end it." Plan for peace UK officials said Mr Starmer had developed a plan for peace in Gaza that prioritised immediate deliveries of humanitarian aid as well as charting a path to a two-state solution. "It's a humanitarian crisis, right?" he said. "It's an absolute catastrophe. I think people in Britain are revolted at seeing what they're seeing on their screen." Speaking in the ballroom of the Turnberry golf hotel in Scotland, where he is on a private trip to his courses, Mr Trump said the US would spearhead efforts to increase aid to Gaza. He said the UK and other European countries would join in provide aid to Gaza 'so we're going to set up food centres where people can walk in with no boundaries,' he said. 'We're not going to have fences.' The US had to 'take care of the humanitarian needs on what they used to call the Gaza Strip' he said, adding that the US had 'trillions of dollars' to spend, with some of it on food. Mr Starmer hopes to promote a UK-led plan 'in the coming days' with his cabinet and with other international allies, including Arab states. The Prime Minister's spokesman added that it was a matter of 'when, not if' the UK recognises a Palestinian state, but said it must be one step on a pathway to peace. The pair met at Mr Trump's luxury golf resort in Turnberry, on Scotland's west coast, before travelling on together later to a second championship estate owned by Trump in the east, near Aberdeen. Hundreds of police officers guarded the perimeter of the Turnberry course and the nearby beach, with a helicopter hovering overhead, although there was no sign of protesters outside the course.

Time for international organisations to adapt and change
Time for international organisations to adapt and change

Al Etihad

time3 hours ago

  • Al Etihad

Time for international organisations to adapt and change

29 July 2025 01:16 By: OBAID FAISAL ALKAABIThe international organisations and their role in today's world have become a subject of debate, not only in the Global South but also in the western corridors of power. Over the past decade, some western countries have taken the lead in criticising international organisations and blocs with some even opting to withdraw from them, claiming that these bodies no longer serve their interests or align with their policies, with the United States at the forefront during the first and second administrations of President Donald the most recent US decisions in this regard was its withdrawal from UNESCO; it has already left the World Health Organization, the Paris Climate Agreement, and the Human Rights Council. Trump's return to the White House has renewed this trend, as his administration once again reviews America's membership in various United Nations-affiliated bodies. Official justifications for these decisions often centre around claims of bias, lack of independence, poor crisis management, and failure to achieve US interests. The United States contributes significantly more funding to these organisations than many other, more populous countries. The change has gone to the point that a Republican senator introduced a bill in the Senate urging the US to quit the United moves significantly weakened the activity of some organisations and perhaps paralysed others, whether due to funding cuts or by banning their operations in certain from official reasons, Trump is not convinced by the post-World War II global order, which was established by the US and led to the creation of international political and economic institutions, chief among them the United Nations and its agencies. While the multiple US withdrawals from international organisations and treaties may diminish its global role to some extent, Washington views this as a principled rejection of multilateral mechanisms, even as international law is largely dependent on such Trump, the United States adopts a transactional attitude towards global engagement. As such, membership in international organisations is evaluated through a cost-benefit lens, especially in terms of economic cutting costs may be one factor, the more decisive motive remains the 'America First' policy. Accordingly, Washington places little value on organisations that do not align with its inward-focused policies and its preference for domestic over international before Trump came to power, there was another example from the western part of the world. In 2016, the United Kingdom chose to leave the European Union for reasons connected to immigration, economics, and sovereignty. This marked a return of protectionist measures to the global economic scene, culminating in today's widespread tariff hikes, although many believed such practices had been dismantled in the post-World War II transformations take time, there seems to be a shift toward alternative mechanisms that may marginalise international organisations, especially if this western vision is not merely a passing phase tied to certain political figures. Yet, we must also acknowledge the shortcomings of international organisations in the face of global conflicts. Some international organisations' handling of wars and crises has often exposed institutional bias, either embedded within their structures or forced upon them by dominant global powers seeking to legitimise their geopolitical end of World War II ushered in a new era of global governance, where sovereign equality among nations would be enshrined through the United Nations. But it seems that the current US administration wants to reshape the world in a way that advances its own interests and reinforces its dominance and values. It seeks to rewrite the rules on global issues like trade, cyberspace, and emerging technologies. Meanwhile, many countries in the Global South remain disillusioned by the current global system that has yet to fulfill their aspirations. They now call for a multi-polar world order that respects sovereignty and ensures economic and social these diverging global visions, international organisations find themselves at a critical juncture: Will they remain entrenched in the current world order, or will they evolve to become foundational institutions in the coming era as well? The columnist is a staffer at the think-tank firm TRENDS Research & Advisory

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store