You could live on a tiny remote island off the UK coast and get paid a staggering £70K a YEAR… but it's not all easy
The initiative falls under the "Our Living Islands" policy, designed to attract more residents and breathe new life into remote communities.
8
8
8
The Irish government is offering individuals up to £70,000 to purchase a home on one of the country's remote islands.
Around 23 inhabited offshore islands are eligible for the scheme.
As of 2016, the combined population of these remote isles was just 2,734.
The Aran Islands are the most famous ones in the scheme and feature three picturesque rocky isles, Inishmaan, Inisheer and Inishmore.
However, the most remote island is Tory (Toraigh), which had a population of just 141 people as of 2023.
Each isle has its own unique landscapes and features that shape its character and the lives of those who live there.
The scheme is open to everyone, even if you're not an Irish citizen — but there's a catch.
The £70,000 grant provided by the government is intended to renovate vacant or derelict homes on the island.
They are not paying people to move there directly.
The scheme aims to improve infrastructure in the area, which in turn will help create more sustainable communities.
The beautiful home on Irish market for €750k with incredible island views
Successful applicants must use the money solely for restoring properties, as it is not a lump sum that can be used for general living expenses.
Renovating properties can be expensive, and once complete, the scheme does not permit the home to be used as a holiday let or short-term rental.
Despite not needing to be an Irish citizen, applicants must meet certain criteria to qualify.
To receive the grant, applicants must either own or be in the process of buying a property that meets the age and vacancy requirements.
Those looking to move to one of these remote islands can only choose a vacant or derelict property built before 2007 that has been unoccupied for a minimum period.
Applicants must also plan to live there permanently or rent the property out for at least 10 years to avoid having to repay large portions of the grant.
If someone sells the property, stops using it as their main home, or it's no longer rented out, they may have to repay all or part of the grant to the local authority.
In the first five years, homeowners must repay the full grant. Between five and ten years, they must repay 75 per cent of the grant.
After ten years, homeowners can keep the property without repaying any of the grant.
8
8
8
8
8
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BreakingNews.ie
23 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Maurice Regan sent text saying he hoped news article gave John Magnier a 'heart attack'
Construction magnate Maurice Regan, involved in the bitter dispute over the failed sale of Barne Estate in Co Tipperary, wrote in a text to a third party that he hoped a newspaper article would give rival bidder and billionaire John Magnier a "heart attack". US-based Mr Regan appeared in the Four Courts in Dublin on Wednesday morning before Mr Justice Max Barrett giving evidence of his involvement in bids for the estate when it was put to him by Paul Gallagher SC, for the Magnier side, that he sent the WhatsApp message. Mr Regan replied: "All is fair in love and war." Advertisement Mr Magnier wants the court to enforce a €15 million 'handshake deal' he claims he sealed at his home on August 22nd, 2023, with Richard Thomson-Moore, an heir to the 751-acre, 17th-century estate. The Magnier side has sued the Barne Estate, Mr Thomson-Moore and three companies of IQEQ (Jersey) Ltd group – the estate trustees – seeking to enforce the purported deal, which they say had been "unequivocally" agreed. The Barne defendants say there was never any such agreement, as they needed the consent of the trustees to finalise any deal. They subsequently preferred to sell the estate to Mr Regan for €22.25 million. Mr Thomson-Moore has told the court that while a "price" was agreed with Mr Magnier for Barne, a "deal" was not. Advertisement The trustees who hold the estate initially decided to remain loyal to the Magnier offer and felt Mr Regan's higher offer could be seen as "provocative". After the exclusivity period had ended, the trustees decided to go with Mr Regan's offer. On Wednesday at the High Court, Mr Regan, who is not a party to proceedings, was questioned about the message sent in October 2023 to another man with some knowledge of the deal's progression. Mr Gallagher said Mr Regan sent a link to the man of a newspaper article referencing Mr Magnier and Mr Regan and followed this up by saying "hopefully, it will give him a heart attack". Mr Gallagher said the message referred to Mr Magnier, to which Mr Regan said, "Yes, we were at war, according to him [Mr Magnier] and... all is fair in love and war". Advertisement The row between the two businessmen has been described as a "war" by witnesses in the case. Mr Regan told Martin Hayden SC, for Barne Estate and Mr Thomson-Moore, that he rejected being described as a "dark force" in the deal by Mr Gallagher at a previous hearing when claiming Mr Regan was funding the defendants in the litigation. After agreeing on €15 million, Barne and the Magniers entered into an exclusivity agreement stipulating that Barne would not permit itself or its representatives to solicit or encourage any expression of interest, inquiry or offer on the property from anyone other than Mr Magnier between August 31st to September 30th, 2023. Mr Regan said a description of him as a "dark force" trying to breach the exclusivity agreement was a "cheap shot" and that he had been a victim of "derogatory remarks" that were going to be in the press "forever". Advertisement Mr Regan described Mr Gallagher's remarks as "very hurtful" to him, that he did not know why they were made. He added he "just wanted to buy a farm... and here I am today". He said he never knew anything about the exclusivity agreement when bidding on the farm and that nobody told him it was in place. He denied funding the Thomson-Moores defence and said that he had, last April, given Barne Estate Ltd a commercial loan from one of his companies against the farm. Mr Regan said he was "blocked" out of bidding for the farm and that "multiple offers were ignored for a long time" making him think that "something is going on". Mr Regan told Mr Hayden he admired the Thomson-Moores as a nice family and would not have "misled" them in the selling process, as claimed by Mr Magnier in his evidence. Advertisement Mr Regan told Mr Gallagher that the signed exclusivity imposed obligations on the vendors of Barne but not on him and that he did not attempt to induce any breach of the agreement. At one stage during the evidence, Mr Regan had to clarify to Mr Gallagher that he was using "light humour" when he said that the silence from Barne on his offers made him wonder if Richard Thomson-Moore had actually been "kidnapped". Mr Regan said approaches to the joint estate agents handling the deal was an attempt to make himself "relevant" regarding the sale and to get "back in the game". Ireland Court hears of alleged 'secret' mobile phone to Jo... Read More Mr Gallagher put it to Mr Regan that his contact with certain individuals with knowledge of the deal was "highly improper". "Me being blocked out at a higher price than a lower price is improper," said Mr Regan. Mr Regan said legal letters sent to the joint estate agents handling the sale were not meant to "frighten" or "threaten" but his concern was that his bids were not getting to the trustees of the estate. Mr Hayden asked if any of the defendants or anyone from the Magnier side had at any point written to Mr Regan to say he should desist in his bidding and was told "no".
BreakingNews.ie
2 hours ago
- BreakingNews.ie
St Stephen's Green Shopping Centre Dome saved as planning permission for €100m redevelopment refused
One of Dublin's most famous landmarks - the Dome at St Stephen's Green Shopping Centre has been saved - for now. This follows An Coimisiún Pleanála (ACP) refusing planning permission to contentious plans for the €100m redevelopment of St Stephen's Green Shopping Centre in Dublin. Advertisement The refusal by ACP overturns a grant of permission made to DTDL Ltd issued by Dublin City Council in December 2023. The largest component of the new scheme was to be office use providing for 35,043 sq metres of offices and ancillary spaces and the applicants increased the level of retail and Food & Beverage space after the Council expressed concerns. In its refusal, ACP concluded that the scheme "lacks a strong sense of original aesthetic and would not achieve a sufficiently high standard of placemaking, urban design and architecture at this key city centre location". As a result, ACP has concluded that the scheme would be contrary to a number of policies in the area of High Quality Architecture, Architectural Design and Brownfield, Regeneration Sites and Large Scale Development of the Dublin City Development Plan 2022-2028. Advertisement ACP states that these policies 'aim to encourage innovative, high quality urban design and architectural detail in all new development proposals, that positively contribute to the city's built and natural environment and incorporate exemplar standards of high-quality, sustainable and inclusive urban design and architecture befitting the city's environment and heritage'. ACP concluded that the proposed development would, therefore, be contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area. The board of ACP upheld a recommendation by its own inspector in the case to refuse planning permission. However, in its order, the board of ACP included a note that it did not share the view expressed by the inspector that the existing shopping centre represents an exemplar twentieth century building. Advertisement Opening the door for a new application in the future, ACP concluded that the replacement of the existing façade, including the existing external trellis detailing and dome, would not contravene the Dublin City Development Plan 2022-2028, subject to an appropriately high quality design solution for this key city centre location. The appeal came before ACP following three third party appeals by An Taisce, former Environment Editor at The Irish Times, Frank McDonald and St Stephen's Green Shopping Centre trader, Emmett Rogers. In his appeal, Mr Rogers told the appeals board that if the redevelopment proceeds 'I see Dublin losing another bit of its unique identity to developers'. Mr Rogers has been operating the Tribe outlet at the St Stephen's Green shopping centre since 1992. Advertisement In the appeal, Mr Rogers stated that he was 'horrified' that the Council had granted planning permission to the mixed use scheme. The An Taisce appeal, jointly signed off by Dublin City Planning Officer, Kevin Duff and Heritage Officer, Ian Lumley, stated that the predominantly large office development 'lacks architectural sensitivity towards St Stephen's Green and results in the loss of an impressive naturally lit space'. In his appeal, Frank McDonald told the appeals board that what is proposed to replace the existing St Stephen's Green shopping centre 'is simply not good enough and does not qualify as a building of 'exceptional design and outstanding architectural quality'. In recommending a grant of permission, a 51 page City Council planner's report concluded that "the proposed reductions to the scale and massing of the building significantly reduces the visual impact on this sensitive environment'. Advertisement The planner's report acknowledged that the existing shopping centre is a local landmark but this was not due to the quality of its architecture and stated that the shopping centre is not a Protected Structure. An architectural design statement drawn up by architects for the ambitious plan, BKD architects stated that since opening in 1988, the St St Stephen's Green Shopping Centre has faced many difficulties in attracting sustainable retailers. The report stated that these include that most unit sizes are too small and the smaller shop units particularly those at the upper levels trade poorly and can operate only on short term leases. Planning consultants for the scheme, John Spain & Associates told the Council that the existing building "has become outdated" and the proposal seeks to enhance a high quality shopping centre and office facility on a centrally located site. Plans were first lodged in January 2023 and Mr Spain argued that the proposal represents a significant rejuvenation of a key site at the gateway to Dublin's south retail core. The report stated that the St Stephen's Green Shopping Centre 'is currently underperforming in its retail function and the proposal through the provision of medium sized units, which are currently in demand by higher order retailers, has the potential to significantly improve the retail offering in the area.
BBC News
3 hours ago
- BBC News
Executive considering storm compensation law
The Northern Ireland Executive could make compensation a legal right for households which lose electricity supplies during extreme Ireland is currently the only part of the UK which does not have such a compensation led to humiliation for Executive ministers in the wake of Storm Éowyn earlier this first and deputy first ministers had called for the grid owner Northern Ireland Electricity (NIE) Networks to make voluntary "goodwill" payments, but it declined to do so. Stormont's Department for the Economy later issued a statement in defence of NIE saying "no other electricity company shareholders in Britain or Ireland have been asked to bear the cost of compensation for Storm Éowyn which was an unprecedented weather event."NIE's only significant shareholder is the Irish department says the independent Utility Regulator will now revisit a consultation from suggested initial compensation of £70 for loss of power with subsequent payments for every 12 hours a household is off supply, up to a cap of £ Executive did not act on those recommendations. Announcing the new consultation, the Economy Minister Caoimhe Archibald cautioned that a compensation scheme would have implications for all consumers."For example, having a smaller population than Britain, the cost of payments after a major storm would be shared among fewer people, meaning the cost to each consumer would be greater," she said."The administrative costs of any scheme could potentially also be relatively high."Earlier this year, Archibald expressed scepticism about any scheme which would mean higher costs overall. The regulator's consultation will run between October and December with recommendations due to be presented in March 2026."My department will then, without delay, bring forward new regulations if required in response to any changes agreed by the Executive," Archibald said.
