California farm raids shape up to be the biggest since January, Trump administration says
One farmworker died after falling from a greenhouse roof during the chaotic raids on Thursday after the Department of Homeland Security executed criminal search warrants at Glass House Farms facilities in Camarillo and Carpinteria, northwest of Los Angeles. What happened?
During the raid on the Camarillo site, crowds gathered seeking information about their relatives and to protest immigration enforcement. Authorities clad in military-style helmets and uniforms faced off with the demonstrators, and people ultimately retreated amid acrid green and white billowing smoke.
Glass House Brands is a major cannabis company in California that started a decade ago with a greenhouse in the Santa Barbara County community of Carpinteria.
The company said it later expanded, buying another facility in the Ventura County community of Camarillo that included six tomato and cucumber-growing greenhouses. Glass House converted two of them to grow cannabis, according to the company's website.
Relatives of workers at the Camarillo site said tomatoes are still also grown at the location. Arrest numbers keep rising
The federal government initially reported that some 200 people suspected of being in the country illegally were arrested.
Then on Saturday, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said 319 people were arrested and said on X it was 'quickly becoming one of the largest operations since President Trump took office.'
A day later, the arrest numbers according to the Department of Homeland Security, were up to 361 from the two locations.
The government said four of the 361 arrested had prior criminal records, including convictions for rape and kidnapping. One death reported from the raids
A farmworker who fell from a greenhouse roof during the raid at the farm in Camarillo died Saturday of his injuries.
Jaime Alanis, 57, is the first known fatality during one of the Trump administration's ongoing immigration enforcement operations. Yesenia Duran, Alanis' niece, confirmed his death to The Associated Press.
She posted on the fundraising site GoFundMe that her uncle was his family's only provider and he had been sending his earnings back to a wife and daughter in Mexico. Alanis worked at the farm for 10 years, his family said.
He called his wife in Mexico and told her he was hiding from federal agents during the raid Thursday. A doctor told his relatives the ambulance crew who took him to a hospital said he fell about 30 feet (9 meters), Duran said. Why was the business raided?
The government says it is investigating potential child labor, human trafficking and other abuse. Initially, DHS said 10 immigrant children were on the property. They later increased that number to 14.
Authorities declined to share the warrant for the operation. The administration has released no additional information about the children, including their ages and what they were doing on the property when authorities arrived. DHS has not provided details to back up its claim of possible trafficking or other abuse, and the company has not been charged with anything.
It was unclear if any of the minors were the children of farm workers at the sites or if they came to the U.S. without an adult.
Federal and state laws allow children as young as 12 to work in agriculture under certain conditions, according to the U.S. Department of Labor . In California, children as young as 12 can work on farms outside of school hours, while those as young as 16 can work during school hours if they are not required to attend school, the agency said on its website.
No one under the age of 21 is allowed to work in the cannabis industry.
The California Department of Cannabis Control conducted a site visit in May 2025 and observed no minors on the premises, a spokesman said. After receiving a subsequent complaint, the state opened an investigation to ensure full compliance with state law. U.S. citizens were among those arrested
Four U.S. citizens were arrested during the raids for allegedly 'assaulting or resisting officers,' according to DHS, and authorities were offering a $50,000 reward for information leading to the arrest of a person suspected of firing a gun at federal agents.
Among those arrested was California State University Channel Islands professor Jonathan Caravello, U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli posted on X.
Essayli said Caravello was arrested for throwing a tear gas canister at law enforcement and was to appear in court Tuesday.
The California Faculty Association said Caravello was taken away by agents who did not identify themselves nor inform him of why he was being arrested. The association said he was then held without being able to contact his family.
Caravello was attempting to dislodge a tear gas canister that was stuck underneath someone's wheelchair, witnesses told KABC-TV, the ABC affiliate in Los Angeles.
Separately, the federal Bureau of Prisons said George Retes, 25, was in their custody at the Metropolitan Detention Center in downtown Los Angeles from Thursday to Sunday.
Retes' family told KABC-TV on Sunday that he is a U.S. citizen, works as a security guard at the farm in Camarillo and is a disabled U.S. Army veteran. They said Retes was trying to drive away during the clashes between protesters and agents when an officer stopped him, broke his car window and shot pepper spray before dragging him out of his car and arresting him.
Retes' sister, Destinee Magaña, told the television station on Sunday that the family had been trying to get in touch with her brother.
Federal agents 'thought he was probably part of the protest, but he wasn't, he was trying to reverse his car,' Magaña said.
Neither Retes nor Magaña responded to emails Monday from The Associated Press seeking comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fast Company
14 minutes ago
- Fast Company
‘Good Trouble Lives On': July 17 to see protests against Trump in all 50 states over voting rights, racial justice. Here's what to know
Organizers of the recent 'No Kings Day' and 'Hands Off' pro-democracy protests against the Trump administration have planned another nationwide day of action, dubbed 'Good Trouble Lives On,' for this Thursday, July 17, which will focus on promoting racial justice and voting rights. The organizers chose this date to commemorate the five-year anniversary of Congressman John Lewis' passing, a civil rights leader who frequently used the phrase 'good trouble,' and famously said, 'get in good trouble, necessary trouble and help redeem the soul of America'—meaning, when necessary, one should protest injustice. Lewis, who served in the House of Representatives from 1987 to 2021 representing Georgia's 5th congressional district, was a key figure in the civil rights movement, participating in the first mass sit-ins and Freedom Rides. He spoke at the March on Washington in 1963 alongside Martin Luther King Jr. His speech on that August day ended: ''Wake up America! Wake up!' For we cannot stop, and we will not and cannot be patient'—a sentiment echoed by many speakers at the many protests this year. Here's everything you need to know about the 'Good Trouble Lives On' July 17 protests. What is the 'Good Trouble Lives On' July 17 protest? Nationwide protests in all 50 states are aimed at carrying Lewis' legacy forward with a flagship event scheduled to take place in Chicago, and key additional events to be held in Atlanta; Washington, D.C.; Annapolis, Maryland; St. Louis; and tentatively San Francisco. 'Good Trouble Lives On: John Lewis National Day of Action is rooted in justice and peace,' Christine Wood and Allison Pulliam, co-directors of Declaration for American Democracy Coalition, one of the main organizers of the event, told Fast Company. 'For the past five years, we have fought to protect our civil liberties that generations of marginalized Americans have worked tirelessly to secure.' 'In only his first few months in office, Trump has pulverized that progress, attacking our right to vote, cracking down on free speech and our right to protest, deporting people without due process, cutting crucial programs, and DEI initiatives, defunding live-saving research,' they added. Who is behind the July 17 protest? The main organizing groups of the 'Good Trouble Lives On' protests are the Transformative Justice Coalition, Black Voters Matter, The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, League of Women Voters, the Declaration for American Democracy Coalition, and Mi Familia en Acción, along with a coalition of other groups. How big is the 'Good Trouble Lives On' protest? 'We expect at least several hundred thousand people will attend across the country,' a spokesperson for 'Good Trouble Lives On' told Fast Company. As of Wednesday, July 9, some 1,200 events and rallies were already confirmed. Since Trump took office in January, millions of Americans have taken to the streets and organized rallies across the nation in record numbers from big cities to rural towns, in both blue and red states. For more information about the July 17 protests and other scheduled events in your area, go here.
USA Today
17 minutes ago
- USA Today
From 'obsolete' to the 'opposite of that': Trump changes tune on NATO, criticizes Putin
WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump has changed his tune on NATO, now that U.S. allies are paying more for their self-defense. Before he was elected to office in 2016, Trump said the military alliance was from a "different time" and he called it "obsolete." But he has softened his tone and said this week that the Western alliance was "becoming the opposite of that." "It was very unfair because the United States paid for almost a hundred percent of it, but now they're paying their own bills, and I think that's much better," Trump told the BBC. "We changed NATO a lot," he added. Trump gave the interview after an Oval Office meeting with NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte. The pair announced a plan for Europe to pay the United States for weapons that the alliance ships to Ukraine. Trump issued an ultimatum to Russian President Vladimir Putin during the meeting, saying he has 50 days to make peace with Ukraine or he'll face economic punishment. NATO latest: Trump to send Ukraine weapons through NATO, threatens secondary tariffs on Russia Trump told the BBC later that he was disappointed with Putin but not done negotiating with the Russian leader, whom he suggested he does not trust. He told the British network he thought he had a deal with Putin to end the war four times. "And then you go home, and you see, just attacked a nursing home or something in Kyiv. I said: 'What the hell was that all about?'"
USA Today
17 minutes ago
- USA Today
SCOTUS lets Trump fire hundreds of Education Department workers, dismantle the agency
On Tuesday's episode of The Excerpt podcast: USA TODAY Supreme Court Correspondent Maureen Groppe discusses the high court's move to let President Donald Trump fire hundreds of workers from the Education Department and continue other efforts to dismantle the agency. A coalition of states is suing the Trump administration to restore billions of dollars in federal education funding. USA TODAY White House Correspondent Francesca Chambers breaks down Trump's decision to send Ukraine weapons through NATO. Plus, Senate pressure builds to sanction Russia. Some Trump loyalists are underwhelmed and upset with what's been delivered about Jeffrey Epstein. The MLB All-Star Game is tonight! Hit play on the player below to hear the podcast and follow along with the transcript beneath it. This transcript was automatically generated, and then edited for clarity in its current form. There may be some differences between the audio and the text. Podcasts: True crime, in-depth interviews and more USA TODAY podcasts right here Taylor Wilson: Good morning. I'm Taylor Wilson, and today is Tuesday, July 15th, 2025. This is USA TODAY's The Excerpt. Today what a Supreme Court decision means for the future of the Education Department, plus Trump's latest approach to Ukraine and how some in his inner circle are upset with what's been delivered about Jeffrey Epstein. ♦ The Supreme Court is letting President Donald Trump fire hundreds of Education Department workers and dismantle the agency. I discussed with USA TODAY's Supreme Court correspondent, Maureen Groppe. Maureen, always a pleasure having you on. How are you? Maureen Groppe: I'm good. Thanks for having me on. Taylor Wilson: Thanks for joining me. What did the court decide and how did the majority argue here? Maureen Groppe: So the Supreme Court lifted a lower court's order that had required the administration to rehire hundreds of Education Department employees and had stopped the administration from transferring some of the Education Department functions to other agencies. The majority did not give an explanation for why it disagreed with those decisions that were made by both a federal district judge and were backed up by an appeals court and said it was just a very short order lifting those decisions. Taylor Wilson: Well, this is an ideologically divided court on this. What did we hear from the dissenters? Maureen Groppe: So the three justices who were appointed by Democratic presidents, they opposed this order. Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote 19 pages explaining why. The gist of it is that she said that the majority of justices are allowing Trump to repeal laws that Congress passed creating the Education Department, allowing him to do that by firing all the employees who are needed to carry out the functions that Congress required the Education Department to undertake. And she said her colleagues are either naive to think that that is not what's happening or they are willfully looking the other way to allow it to happen. Taylor Wilson: All right. And what did we previously seen from the lower courts on this issue, Maureen? Maureen Groppe: So this started with a federal judge in Massachusetts who said that the White House decision to fire more than 1300 workers is preventing the government from effectively implementing programs and services that they're legally required by Congress to do. She said changes that magnitude have to be approved by Congress before the administration can do them. And the US Circuit Court of Appeals, which is based in Boston, they agreed with that federal judge and they said the administration hadn't provided any evidence to dispute that these firings were having a destabilizing effect on the Education Department. Taylor Wilson: Trump is clearly trying to fulfill his campaign promise to end the Education Department, Maureen. What are his practical goals here? How would this work? Maureen Groppe: He directed the Education Secretary to, as he put it, "facilitate the closure of the Department of Education." And the education Secretary previously announced that about half the workforce would be cut through a combination of layoffs and buyouts. And the administration also wants to move functions to other places, such as having these small business administration take over student loans and move special education services to the Department of Health and Human Services. Taylor Wilson: This decision came a week after the court allowed the administration to move forward with staffing cuts at a number of agencies. What's next, Maureen? Maureen Groppe: So the groups in states that are challenging these cuts, they can continue to do so. What the decisions mean, however, is that the layoffs can move forward for the time being. So it's possible that once these challenges eventually come back to the Supreme Court, the court could decide that the layoffs went too far. But even if it does do that, it could be difficult at that point to restore the agencies to the level they were at before they were gutted. Taylor Wilson: Maureen Groppe covers the Supreme Court for USA TODAY. Thank you, Maureen. Maureen Groppe: Thanks for having me. ♦ Taylor Wilson: In other education news, a coalition of states is suing the Trump administration to restore billions of dollars in federal education funding, including money for after school and summer learning programs. The group of Democratic Attorneys General representing 24 states in the District of Columbia, filed the lawsuit yesterday in a federal court in Rhode Island. In the complaint, the top lawyers in several blue states say the funding pause is unconstitutional and ask the court to restore the money in their states immediately. Since the Education Department's decision two weeks ago to withhold the funds which have been available to schools annually without interruption for decades, many districts nationwide have found themselves in financial uncertainty. You can read more with a link in today's show notes. ♦ President Trump has announced new weapons to Ukraine through NATO. I spoke with USA TODAY White House correspondent, Francesca Chambers, to learn more. Thanks for joining me, Francesca. Francesca Chambers: Thanks Taylor. Always pleasure. Taylor Wilson: All right, starting here. What did the president announce for sending weapons through NATO? Francesca Chambers: The president said that the United States would make the weapons, however now European countries would pay for them. The President said that Patriot missile systems that Ukraine was expected to receive would come from European countries, and then what the United States would do was backfill those countries' supplies. Taylor Wilson: Just on a practical level, Francesca, what will this functionally mean for Ukraine's ability now to fight back against Russia? Francesca Chambers: This is seen as critical for Ukraine. You may recall that Ukrainian President, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, had asked President Trump for the ability of Ukraine to be able to buy these types of weapons and air defense systems from the United States. This is something that President Trump said that he was considering before. And then of course, we heard from him last week that he was going to remove a temporary pause that the Pentagon had put in place on some weapons shipments to Ukraine. But to have him sit with the NATO Secretary General yesterday and say that he was now going to be doing this for Ukraine was seen by experts and those watching this closely as a major turning point in the discussion. Taylor Wilson: All right. You mentioned NATO Secretary General. I mean, what role did NATO leader, Mark Rutte, have in making this happen? Francesca Chambers: Taylor, he's relatively new to the role. He became NATO Secretary General in October, not too long before Donald Trump took office, and he's seen as a mediator between President Trump and other NATO nations. Listeners might recall that last month at the NATO summit in the Netherlands, Mark Rutte was the one who called Trump daddy and said that sometimes he has to use tough language. That pertained to President Trump's salty language about the fighting between Israel and Iran. But as you saw yesterday at the White House, Taylor, his closeness with President Trump has helped him to bring the US leader closer to positions that Europe wants. Taylor Wilson: Well, as for Trump this week, he's also threatening related new secondary tariffs. Francesca, what has he said specifically on that point? Francesca Chambers: The President has been under pressure from members of Congress on both sides of the aisle to put sanctions on Russia and to cut off financial revenue that it gets from its exports of oil and gas and also uranium. Now, that is something that's covered in a Senate bill that GOP leaders had said that they were trying to bring to the floor of both the Senate and the House, but President Trump said yesterday as he was sitting next to Rutte, that he would put severe tariffs on Russia and secondary tariffs on countries that do business with Moscow. Taylor Wilson: So senators have their own plans for terrorists or countries that do business with Russia as well, right? Francesca Chambers: Right. And that bill is now in limbo with the Senate majority leader saying that Trump appears to have plans of his own. He said to reporters yesterday evening that, "If at some point the President concludes that it makes sense and adds value and leverage that he needs in those negotiations to move on the bill, then we'll do it. We'll be ready to go." Taylor Wilson: All right. Francesca Chambers covers the White House for USA TODAY. Thank you, Francesca. Francesca Chambers: Thank you, Taylor. ♦ Taylor Wilson: For years, members of President Trump's inner circle have called on federal officials to release their files on Jeffrey Epstein. Since he took office, Trump administration officials have moved that campaign forward, suggesting new names from Epstein's purported client list and new accountability were in store. But many who were eagerly awaiting the administration's next steps are now disappointed what has been delivered. In a memo this month, the Justice Department and FBI said their systematic review of documents related to Epstein revealed no incriminating client list. After his team made such concrete promises, the report was tough for many Trump loyalists to swallow. Some of the president's strongest supporters were in uproar. You can read more about some of that friction and a timeline of what's been said with the link in today's show notes. ♦ The Major League Baseball All-Star Game will be held tonight in Atlanta. The game finally lands in Georgia after initially being yanked in 2021, following the state's passage of controversial laws. It comes after catcher, Cal Raleigh, won the Home Run Derby last night. You can follow along with USA TODAY Sports. ♦ Thanks for listening to The Excerpt. You can get the podcast wherever you get your pods. If you're on a smart speaker, just ask for The Excerpt. I'm Taylor Wilson, and I'll be back tomorrow with more of the Excerpt from USA TODAY.
