
Health Minister says latest funding package ‘absolute limit' after almost all NI GPs turn down government offer
BMA representatives say they cannot move forward without a firm commitment from the department for additional core funding for general practice.
GPs across Northern Ireland will now be asked to vote in a referendum on whether they would accept or reject the proposals from the department as they currently stand.
BMA NI GP committee chair Dr Frances O'Hagan said: 'We are deeply disappointed that we have got to this point, however it became clear in the negotiation meetings that the Department was not listening to our asks for more core funding, a full indemnity solution for all GPs and urgent funding to address the increase in National Insurance costs.
'Our asks are simple and will help stabilise general practice. Without more funding we will see more contract hand backs as some practices will no longer be financially viable.'
In the negotiations, BMA was asking for the Department of Health to agree a 1% uplift in the core GP contract, full indemnity for all GPs and full cost recovery for the increase in NIC contributions.
Mr Nesbitt said he met with BMA GP representatives on the 2025/26 contract and 'underlined the budgetary realities that I currently face this year'.
He added: 'In short, there is a projected half billion pound-plus shortfall between available monies and financial requirements across health and social care services.
'Despite these challenges, a package of £9.5 million additional funding is on offer to GPs.
'While I am determined to invest in and expand primary care going forward, this package is at the absolute limit of what is achievable this year. The package remains on the table.'
Alliance Health spokesperson Nuala McAllister has also urged the health minister to ensure that 'sustainable funding for GP practices is prioritised', saying that Northern Ireland cannot have services that are fit for purpose without adequate provision.
The North Belfast MLA added: 'To say the result of the BMA's ballot was overwhelming does not even appear to adequately describe the scale of rejection. That 99.6% of votes received were in opposition to the Department of Health (DoH)'s proposals, GPs could not make their opposition more evident.
'We recently met with members of the GP Committee and it was clearly expressed that, instead of improving the financial stability of general practices, the proposed contract terms would result in an overall net loss of funding.
'At a time when we are seeing an increasing number of practices handing contracts back due to lack of financial viability, DoH need to be working collaboratively with GPs to understand what is needed to secure their future.
'Given that 89% of respondents also indicated their willingness to take further collective action if required, it is crucial that the Minister prioritises reopening discussions urgently, as I understand Dr Frances O'Hagan, Chair of the BMA GP Committee in Northern Ireland, has already written to him requesting a meeting.
'Inability to access care from GPs is one of the most common complaints we receive as elected representatives. This will not change unless the Health Minister ensures general practice is sustainably funded. Without a fit for purpose contract, we won't have fit for purpose services.'
Dr O'Hagan also said that 'the department has focused on access issues for patients in the negotiations'.
She added: 'We asked the Department for a final offer to put to GPs, as we have made a commitment that GPs across Northern Ireland will be able to vote on this year's offer, but the Department have not replied to our most recent letter.
"Therefore, we have no other option but to ask GPs whether the proposals as they currently stand are enough. We are keen to hear the views of the profession to give us a mandate and advise us on the steps to move our negotiation forward.
'Without more funding there is a real risk that more practices will decide they have had enough and will close their doors for good. Others will have to take a hard look at their costs, including staffing costs and will have to decide if they can survive with fewer staff.
'Morale among GPs is at an all-time low. We already see 200,000 patients per week, 1 in 10 of the population, but we are being asked to see even more with less funding. It really has put the profession at breaking point.
'It's time now for GPs to tell us their views and we are encouraging all GPs to take part in our referendum, have their say and give us insight into what we do next.'
The referendum will be open from 1st to 11th May 2025.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
27 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Nurses could join doctors in wave of new NHS strikes after key vote
The Royal College of Nursing is furious nurses have been awarded a lower pay deal than doctors and its members have voted whether to accept a 3.6% rise Nurses are expected to reject their pay deal which could lead to them joining doctors on strike amid the prospect of a series of NHS walkouts. The Royal College of Nursing's 'indicative vote' on their 3.6% pay award closed on Sunday and it will be confirmed this week that members voted 'overwhelmingly' to reject the deal, the Times reported. Nurses are furious that for the second year running they have been given less than resident doctors, who have been awarded 5.4%. Tuesday is the final day of resident doctors' five-day strike and their members in the British Medical Association have a legal mandate for six months of strike action until January. The RCN has previously labelled it 'grotesque' that nurses were again being awarded less than doctors for 2025/26. The indicative vote would need to be followed by a formal ballot for strike action which is likely to take place in autumn. However RCN leaders will use the ballot to demand urgent talks with Government to avoid a walkout. It is reportedly open to talks on wider pay structures and career progression, not just headline pay. A spokesman for the RCN said: "The results will be announced to our members later this week. As the largest part of the NHS workforce, nursing staff do not feel valued and the government must urgently begin to turn that around." Ambulance and other hospital staff in the GMB union voted to reject their own 3.6% pay award last week, with strike action now being considered. The BMA consultants' committee, representing more senior doctors currently covering for striking colleagues, is also holding an indicative vote over a 4% pay deal it described as an "insult". Resident doctors - formerly known as junior doctors - are demanding a commitment to a full return to 2008 levels of pay, arguing that by the Retail Price Index Measure of inflation their real terms salaries are down a fifth since then. Health Secretary Wes Streeting said the BMA's resident doctors committee co-chairs 'have seriously underestimated me' after they walked out on last ditch talks to avert the five-day strike which started last Friday. Government sources have claimed the co-chairs appeared happy with a deal to postpone strikes, before announcing they would go ahead after going back to their full committee. The Guardian reports this deal would have involved hot meals when working overnight, some exam fees paid, funding for kit such as stethoscopes, improved mess rooms and changes to the way their postgraduate training rotations are organised. Footage taken by the Mirror shows co-chairs Dr Melissa Ryan and Dr Ross Nieuwoudt being heckled - with a passer-by shouting "bol****s to you" - as they arrived at Parliament for talks a fortnight ago to discuss 'creative solutions' to the strike, such as reducing training expenses. Tom Dolphin, BMA council chair, said resident doctors' salaries should reflect their responsibility for making "life and death decisions", adding: "Even nurses who've had a pretty bad time [are] not as badly off as doctors in terms of lost pay." While the BMA is adamant headline pay must rise, nurses are reported to be more open to talks on wider pay structures. The RCN has repeatedly complained that nurses can remain on the lowest rung of the NHS pay scale for decades. Reforms could allow them to move up the scale sooner as they gain experience. The RCN last engaged in strike action in late December 2022 and early January 2023 under the previous Tory government. The union's online survey of 345,000 members in England Wales and Northern Ireland, which is due later this week, will reportedly show a 'clear' rejection of the 3.6% award. Speaking last month, RCN General Secretary Nicola Ranger said: 'It is a grotesque decision to again favour doctor colleagues for higher increases than nursing and the rest of the NHS.' Tory leader Kemi Badenoch has pledged to outlaw strikes by doctors, bringing them into line with the police and army, if she becomes prime minister. A Downing Street spokesman said: "We hugely value the vital role of nurses and their contribution to patient care. That's why we've delivered two above inflation pay increases in 10 months, meaning for the first time ever nurses starting salaries have risen to over £30,000. "We have been clear we can't move any further on headline pay but we are committed to working with the RCN to improve their major concerns, including pay structure reform, concerns over career progression and wider working conditions."


North Wales Chronicle
2 hours ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Care home director warns of impact of visa restrictions
Kevin Edwards, from Meddyg Care, which runs two dementia care homes in Gwynedd, has written to Wales's First Minister, Eluned Morgan. He warned of the 'potentially devastating impact' of the UK Government's decision to end the Health and Care Worker visa. Mr Edwards believes the move could lead to care homes and domiciliary care companies shutting down. The issue is particularly severe in rural areas, which are already struggling to recruit local workers. Mr Edwards highlighted official statistics showing that 15 per cent of registered care workers in Wales were born outside the UK. He said: "The social care sector in rural North Wales is already under significant strain, grappling with high vacancy rates, an ageing population, and limited local workforce availability. "The Health and Care Worker visa has been a critical lifeline, enabling care providers to recruit international workers to fill staffing gaps." He has called on the First Minister to pressure the Westminster Government into either reversing the policy or implementing a transitional scheme for critical workers in social care. Mr Edwards is also advocating for more investment in training and pay levels to attract local workers and stronger measures to stop exploitation of international workers. He said: "The withdrawal of this visa will exacerbate existing challenges in rural North Wales, where geographic isolation and a smaller pool of domestic workers make recruitment particularly difficult." The ban on care workers bringing dependants, introduced in March last year, has already caused an 83 per cent fall in visa applications, with monthly applications dropping from 129,000 to 26,000 in a year. Mr Edwards said: "This sharp reduction demonstrates the policy's immediate impact, and the complete termination of the visa route will likely deepen the crisis. "The loss of international workers, who bring diverse skills and dedication, threatens to destabilise care homes and domiciliary services, potentially leading to closures." He extended an invitation to the First Minister to visit the care homes to see firsthand the impact of the potential closure of the visa scheme. The issue has also been raised by Care Forum Wales (CFW), who have branded the policy 'half-baked.' READ MORE: Ysbyty Gwynedd: 'Systemic challenges' but 'positive improvements' in ED Historic church on Anglesey with a 'lost well' in bid to extend graveyard The organisation warned that the policy, which came into force on July 22, risks 'extreme workforce shortages'. CFW Chair Mario Kreft MBE said: "This ill-thought through policy has come as a double whammy because it coincides with the increase in the employers' National Insurance contributions which amounts to a 37 per cent rise. "I'd also like to quash the myth once and for all that international workers are cheap labour because the exact opposite is true."


BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
'Hardline' BMA blocks emergency pleas for strike doctors to work
NHS bosses have criticised the British Medical Association for its "increasingly hardline" approach in rejecting emergency requests for striking doctors in England to return to work.A system known as 'derogation' is in place whereby the NHS can ask for resident doctors, who are taking part in a five-day walkout, to cross the picket line where patient safety is at of Sunday evening, 18 requests by hospitals for derogations had been rejected in this strike - the twelfth in the long-running pay dispute - with nine BMA said while it was ready to respond to emergencies, poor planning and the push to continue non-urgent care in this strike had stretched staffing too much. However, NHS England accused the doctors' union of putting safety at risk, criticising a "remote BMA panel" for "second-guessing" doctors on the ground who were trying to look after patients.A central committee of senior BMA doctors makes decisions on each derogation England said it was particularly worried about a number of requests relating to cancer care being turned it said the BMA was sitting on some requests for hours, with some rejected because hospitals would not pay striking doctors premium rates to come back this strike started, the BMA had only agreed to five derogations during the whole dispute. 'Rigorous' Among the requests agreed was a doctor to work at Nottingham City Hospital's neonatal intensive care unit over the BMA members were also brought in to work a night shift at the Northern General in the BMA rejected a request by Milton Keynes Hospital for a doctor to carry out prostate cancer checks. In that case the BBC understands a doctor did return to work under their own volition.A BMA spokesman added: "It remains our position that this agreement will be available for the NHS to rely upon should a safety-critical, urgent event occur."That process is there day and night throughout industrial action, and we remain ready to respond to any emergency requests."However, we need to be clear that the purpose of this agreement is not to facilitate the continued delivery of non-urgent care at the same time as senior doctors are covering for residents taking industrial action, as trusts simply do not have enough senior doctors to do that safely."NHS England sources said it was particularly disappointed with the rejections as the national organisation was now vetting every request from hospitals to ensure a consistency in approach between different request, they said, was based on "rigorous assessment"."We absolutely recognise the legal right for people to strike, but we also recognise that it's essential to maintain as many services for patients as possible," they five-day strike by resident doctors is due to run until 07:00 on Wednesday morning.