
‘Where are the foreigners': does a facile explanation lie behind Ballymena's outbreak of hate?
First came the shouts as the crowd worked its way through narrow terraced streets, proclaiming its mission to rid the town of 'scum'. Then came the shattered glass as rocks exploded through windows. Then the flames, licking up curtains and spreading to sofas, carpets, books and framed pictures until smoke billowed into the summer night.
They might have been scenes from another century, another country, but they played out in Northern Ireland this week in the glare of rolling news and social media, which recorded a soundtrack of glee and hate. 'Where are the foreigners?' the mob shouted.
The targets were families that were different – different nationality, different ethnicity, different skin tone, different language. The goal was expulsion – or immolation. 'There's someone in that room inside,' said a voice caught on video. 'Aye, but are they local?' responded a comrade. 'If they're local, they need out. If they're not local, let them stay there.'
No one died in Ballymena, the County Antrim town that erupted on Monday and flared for the rest of the week, or in other towns with smaller, copycat mayhem, but families fled, dozens of police were injured and Northern Ireland faced stark questions about racism, xenophobia and intolerance.
Three decades ago, the Good Friday agreement drew a line under the Troubles. Republican paramilitaries that wanted a united Ireland, and loyalist paramilitaries that wanted the region to remain in the UK, wound down the killing.
Peace brought the novelty of immigration and diversity. In the 2001 census just 14,300 people, or 0.8% of the overall population, belonged to a minority ethnic group. By 2021 it was 65,600 people, or 3.4%. Compared with England (18%), or Scotland (11%), Northern Ireland remains very white.
Despite this, many residents in Ballymena, a mainly working-class, Protestant town 25 miles north of Belfast, believe foreigners have 'invaded', 'infested' and 'ruined' their community.
It was not only the hundreds of young men in hoods and masks who hurled missiles: older residents, during lulls in violence, endorsed the disturbances. 'We want our voices to be heard. If this is the only way, so be it,' said one woman in her 30s, who declined to be named.
The Police Federation of Northern Ireland said its members, by drawing the wrath of mobs, had averted a pogrom.
The spark was an alleged sexual assault on a teenage girl by two 14-year-old boys, who appeared in court with a Romanian interpreter and were charged with attempted rape. Loyalist groups in other areas took that as their cue to protest. 'It's time to take a stand and stop welcoming these illegal migrant gangs flocking into our town, paedophiles, drug pushers, human traffickers, prostitutes,' said a group in Portadown, exhorting people to march on a hostel.
Such hostility has a blunt, facile explanation: some communities do not like outsiders – a broad, evolving category known occasionally in Northern Ireland as 'them 'uns'. Protestant loyalist mobs in Belfast burned Catholics from their homes at the outset of the Troubles in 1969. Ballymena earned notoriety in the 1990s and mid-2000s with sectarian attacks on Catholic schools and churches.
Loyalists in nearby towns have been blamed for a sporadic campaign of paint bombs, smashed windows, graffiti and threatening posters targeting non-white residents. Last year at least eight African families – half of them including nurses – were forced to flee an estate in Antrim town.
'There is fundamental racism in some places that, to put it nicely, have a proud sense of social and cultural cohesion,' said Malachi O'Doherty, a commentator and author of How to Fix Northern Ireland. Communities that are accustomed to living on the same estate can bristle when outsiders take houses that might otherwise have gone to friends or relatives, he said. 'Whether it's Catholics or Roma, it's seen as a dilution of that community.'
Just 4.9% of Ballymena's population is non-white, according to the 2021 census, and very few of the new arrivals are asylum seekers, yet there is widespread belief in proliferating 'scrounging refugees', and scepticism about official statistics. 'What we're reading is completely different from what the government is telling us,' said one resident in his 50s. The riots were welcome and overdue, although, he said, the noise was disturbing his sleep.
The current strife has a seasonal aspect: summer is when loyalists – and to a lesser extent republicans – assert their identity by parading with drums and flutes and lighting bonfires, traditions that fuel tension and confrontation.
Catholics have joined Protestants in anti-immigrant actions and staged their own protests in Catholic areas, but those eruptions tend to be smaller and less frequent. 'Catholics almost take a sectarian pride in not being racist. 'Oh, we're not like them,'' said O'Doherty.
Despite a gritty reputation, Northern Ireland scores better for housing, unemployment and poverty than many parts of England, Wales and Scotland. However, it has some of the worst education attainment rates in the UK and the highest rate of economically inactive people, metrics that hint at the alienation and hopelessness felt in some Catholic and Protestant working-class areas.
An education system that largely segregates the two main blocs also tends to silo minority ethnic pupils, said Rebecca Loader, a social science researcher at Queen's University Belfast. 'You have schools that have no diversity and schools with high levels, perhaps just separated by a few miles. Certain classes of people are never meeting. It's not conducive to meeting and learning about the other.' Also, very little in Northern Ireland's curriculum addresses racism, unlike curriculums in Britain, especially Wales, she said.
Two factors, neither unique to Northern Ireland, have aggravated the tension. One is politics. Leaders from across the political spectrum have condemned the violence and appealed for calm, as they did last August during a similar flare-up. However, critics say some unionist parties – which represent loyalism – give mixed signals by defending 'legitimate protest' and amplifying immigration myths.
Political unity fractured on Thursday after Gordon Lyons, the Democratic Unionist party (DUP) communities minister, complained on social media that he had not been consulted about a leisure centre in Larne hosting families evacuated from Ballymena. A short time later, a mob set the centre on fire. Hilary Benn, the Northern Ireland secretary, called on Lyons to reflect on his comments. Michelle O'Neill, the Sinn Féin first minister, suggested he should resign.
Paul Sceeny, an interim manager at the North West Migrants Forum in Derry, said growing international antipathy to immigrants was affecting Northern Ireland. 'People are becoming emboldened to use racist tropes. It's part of a wider pattern,' he said.
The other factor is social media. Protest organisers use Facebook, TikTok and other platforms to rally support and broadcast the results. In Ballymena, rioters reportedly requested likes, follows and gifts from viewers while livestreaming the destruction of a house.
During the daytime calm this week, while authorities cleared debris from streets and foreign families packed up and left, youths huddled over phones and analysed clips, like actors reviewing a performance, seeking ways to improve before the next show.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
28 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Man arrested on suspicion of murdering pregnant woman
A 28-year-old man has been arrested on suspicion of murder after a pregnant woman was found dead in Northern Ireland. Sarah Montgomery, 27, a mother of two, was found unconscious and seriously injured at a property in Donaghadee, County Down, on Saturday afternoon. Paramedics treated her for her injuries but she was pronounced dead at the scene. The arrested man remains in custody. Det Ch Insp Tom Phillips, of the Police Service of Northern Ireland, said: 'Inquiries are at an early stage into this deeply tragic case.' He added: 'Sarah's family are being supported by specially trained officers as the investigation continues.' Ch Insp Yvonne McManus said: 'Local people will see our officers in and around the area, with cordons still in place today. She added: 'We recognise the profound impact that violence against women and girls has on individuals, families and wider society. 'Addressing this issue remains a key priority, and we are committed to engaging directly with the local community to offer support, build trust and help people feel safe.' Alex Easton, the North Down MP, described the incident as 'appalling' and said there is a deep sense of shock within the community. Cllr Hannah Irwin said: 'Unfortunately, Sarah isn't the first woman to pass away in Donaghadee in the past year, or in Northern Ireland. 'I've almost lost count on how many women have passed away in tragic circumstances since 2020.' Stephen Dunne, a North Down assembly member, said he is 'deeply shocked and saddened by the devastating news'.


Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Have more children, says Labour
Bridget Phillipson has urged Britons to have more children because of the 'worrying repercussions' of a plummeting birth rate. In an apparent shift in government policy, the Education Secretary said too many young people were put off having families because of the huge cost of housing and childcare. She said her childcare plans would encourage people to have children who otherwise would have rejected the idea. In an article for The Telegraph, Ms Phillipson wrote: 'I want more young people to have children, if they so choose.' Several European leaders have called for their citizens to have bigger families to help grow their economies and deal with the pressures of ageing populations. Last year, Emmanuel Macron, the president of France, brought in free fertility checks for those aged 18 to 25 to encourage people to have children sooner, while Giorgia Meloni, Italy's prime minister, set a target of 500,000 births per year. But last year, Sir Keir Starmer said it was not his place to tell people how many children to have, or to set out a national 'birth plan'. The fertility rate in England and Wales is down to 1.49 babies per woman, well below the 2.1 needed to keep a population steady. The lower birth rate means there will be fewer workers to care for the elderly and to keep public services adequately funded through their taxes. In her article, Ms Phillipson said too many young couples were scared to have children because of the high costs involved. She said: 'A generation of young people have been thinking twice about starting a family; worried not only about rising mortgage and rent repayments, wary not only of the price of fuel and food but also put off by a childcare system simultaneously lacking in places and ruinously expensive.' The Education Secretary said Britain's falling birth rate represented a 'trend which has worrying repercussions for society in the future but tells a story, heartbreakingly, about the dashed dreams of many families'. 'Support for families' Ms Phillipson wrote: 'I want to begin to tell a different story. I have always believed that politics is about giving everyone, particularly the most disadvantaged in our country, the freedom to choose their own path in life. 'It's why I want more young people to have children, if they so choose; to realise the ordinary aspiration so many share, to create the moments and memories that make our lives fulfilling: having children, seeing them take their first steps, dropping them off at their first day at school, guiding them on their journey into the world of work or taking them to university for the first time. 'It's why this Labour Government believes that support for families matters right from the start, and why I have made improving our early years system my number one priority…' She added that the Government would go further to address the declining birth rate after 'a decade of government that believed in bemoaning Britain's present rather than building its future'. She said this was why spaces for childcare would open in empty classrooms across the UK. Ms Phillipson announced that the Government was on track to exceed its target to deliver more than 4,000 new school-based childcare places this September. There are nearly 200 schools where the new rooms for childcare will be open in two months' time – more than expected. The Office for Budget Responsibility last year warned that Britain's falling birth rate could cause the national debt to soar over the next 50 years. It said deaths would consistently outnumber births in Britain from the middle of the next decade, leaving the country dependent on migration to avoid a falling population. Sir Keir was asked whether Britons should have more children during a foreign trip in September. He replied: 'I've spent my whole time saying I'm not going to tell people how to live their lives – I'm not going to start by dictating whether they should or shouldn't have children.' Asked whether he thought the birth rate needed to rise, the Prime Minister said: 'I think there are a number of ways of growing the economy. 'When I said local growth plans, I actually had in mind plans led by mayors, local businesses, local representatives, not the birth plan. 'So I think growing the economy can be solved by local growth plans, by stabilising the economy and all the measures we've already set out – but I'm not going to lead a, sort of, birth plan.' How we break Britain's barriers to starting a family By Bridget Phillipson We're creating more nursery places so young people can realise their dream of starting a family. Over the last generation, the foundations of family life have changed entirely in our country. Over three quarters of mothers of dependent children are now in paid work, a fact we should all welcome: it means better living standards for families right across the country. But at the same time, the cost of living has soared, dominated by the vast increase in the cost of housing. A generation of young people has been thinking twice about starting a family; worried not only about rising mortgage and rent costs, wary not only of the price of fuel and food but also put off by a childcare system simultaneously lacking in places and ruinously expensive. It is the sorry legacy of a Conservative government which spent 14 years railing against Britain's problems rather than tackling any of them, that claimed to be the party of family while whittling down the pillars of support on which planning for a family depends. Reform, like the Conservatives, offer only back-of-a-fag-packet solutions that crumble under the slightest scrutiny. Their latest bout of make-believe budgeting would plunge families back into the financial insecurity they faced after Liz Truss and drive the dream of starting a family even further into the distance. No opposition party has the answers to our plummeting birth rate – a trend which has worrying repercussions for society in the future, but tells a story, heartbreakingly, about the dashed dreams of many families. I want to begin to tell a different story. I have always believed that politics is about giving everyone, particularly the most disadvantaged in our country, the freedom to choose their own path in life. It's why I want more young people to have children, if they so choose; to realise the ordinary aspiration so many share, to create the moments and memories that make our lives fulfilling: having children, seeing them take their first steps, dropping them off at their first day at school, guiding them on their journey into the world of work or taking them to university for the first time. It's why this Labour Government believes that support for families matters right from the start, and why I have made improving our early years system my number-one priority. That means families are able to access the services and advice they need from day one, whether that's support with breastfeeding, advice on reading with children or boosting their language development. More money on making memories And we are well on the way to that better system, delivering the ordinary hopes and dreams of thousands of families just a year in government. From the wreckage the Tories left behind, we put together a plan to deliver an ambitious expansion of childcare entitlements. This package will give children the very best start while slashing costs for families. Less cash spent on childcare in the week, and more money to spend on making new memories each weekend. Life chances for children, work choices for parents. We want more certainty for parents that the costs are manageable; more optimism that their children will get the better chances on which they might have missed out. That means tackling the childcare deserts the Tories created. In our first year, I have taken decision after decision to secure that ambition. The Early Years Pupil Premium has been raised sharply to drive extra provision in the places – and for the families – who need extra funded places now. The rate providers receive for each hour of childcare they deliver has been increased. We are also going further – the falling birth rate we face, after a decade of a government that believed in bemoaning Britain's present rather than building its future, means that suitable spaces for childcare are opening up in empty classrooms across our country. We are using that opportunity to open a new wave of school-based nurseries, first in areas of the North and Midlands where economic growth and parental opportunity are most desperately needed, but where a decade of inaction means childcare places are most stretched. And today, I can tell parents that we are on track to deliver more funded childcare places this September than we first anticipated – delivering on our Plan for Change, delivering the better life chances the country demands, and making real the ordinary hopes of thousands of people aspiring to have children. Families are the bedrock of our society, and we need them to succeed. As Education Secretary, I am determined that we support every child, in every family, in every part of the country, the very best start in life. It's right for them, right for their parents, and right for our country.


The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Zohran Mamdani won by being himself – and his victory has revealed the Islamophobic ugliness of others
Zohran Mamdani's stunning win in New York's mayoral primary has been a tale of two cities, and two Americas. In one, a young man with hopeful, progressive politics went up against the decaying gods of the establishment, with their giant funding and networks and endorsements from Democratic scions, and won. In another, in an appalling paroxysm of racism and Islamophobia, a Muslim antisemite has taken over the most important city in the US, with an aim to impose some socialist/Islamist regime. Like effluent, pungent and smearing, anti-Muslim hate spread unchecked and unchallenged after Mamdani's win. It takes a lot from the US to shock these days, but Mamdani has managed to stir, or expose, an obscene degree of mainstreamed prejudice. Politicians, public figures, members of Donald Trump's administration and the cesspit of social media clout-chasers all combined to produce what can only be described as a collective self-induced hallucination; an image of a burqa swathed over the Statue of Liberty; the White House deputy chief of staff, Stephen Miller, stating that Mamdani's win is what happens when a country fails to control immigration. Republican congressman Andy Ogles has decided to call Mamdani 'little muhammad' and is petitioning to have him denaturalised and deported. He has been called a 'Hamas terrorist sympathiser', and a 'jihadist terrorist'. It is a measure of how racist the reaction has been that Donald Trump calling Mamdani a 'communist lunatic' seems restrained in comparison. Some of the responses have been so hysterical that I often couldn't tell what was real and what was parody. Because the idea that Mamdani, whose style is, above anything else, wide-grinned earnestness, was some sinister Islamist sleeper agent is so clearly a joke. But it's not a joke, and if it is then it's on me for still, after all these years, underestimating what Muslims in the public sphere do to people's brains. And how utterly comfortable many are with anti-Muslim hate. And why shouldn't they be? To date, the most senior figures in Mamdani's own party, Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries, have not called out this onslaught, and those politicians and public figures who made them will suffer no censure or consequence. Because, fundamentally, anti-Muslim hate, like all racism when it becomes normalised, thrives when there is a systemic blessing of it through not even registering its offensiveness. But the apathy towards assaults against Mamdani is because he is an outsider in more meaningful ways, not just in his religious background. His crime is not one of daring to be Muslim and a politician – he might have 'passed' if he was a conventional Democratic apparatchik – but of having strong opinions about economics and politics that mark him out as a challenger of mainstream orthodoxies regarding capitalism and Israel. Given his leftwing opinions on taxation and rent control, and objections to the slaughter of Palestinians on the US's dime, a backlash to Mamdani was always likely. But he has done much to counter it. He has made thorough explanations of his abhorrence of antisemitism, of his pledge to combat all hate crime, and of the fact that his economic agenda is based on making the city, from its food to its childcare, more affordable. His offence has been in his unwillingness to water down his principles, not toeing the line on Israel, and not making frankly embarrassing assertions, like those running against him did, that Israel would be his first foreign trip. He has refrained from debasing himself through serial condemnations of phrases that have arbitrarily been erected as litmus tests of a Muslim's acceptability in the public domain. Mamdani's refusal to reject the phrase 'globalise the intifada', on the grounds that it expresses 'a desperate desire for equality and equal rights in standing up for Palestinian human rights' has been seized upon as an indication that he supports some kind of violent jihad – a reading that ignores his frequent assertions that Israel has the right to exist and condemnations of any violence against Jews. What are we doing here? There is no degree to which Mamdani could have become acceptably Muslim while holding these opinions – even though they are clearly universal enough for him to receive emphatic support from New Yorkers, including from Jews who voted for him, and the Jewish candidate Brad Lander, who endorsed him. He cannot be secular enough, American enough, or elite enough, as the son of a film-maker and a professor, to hold politics that will not be reducible to his inherently suspect identity. Even in demeanour, he has spoken of how he constantly has to measure his tone, lest he be smeared as a 'beast'. And in this, he mirrors a broader, exasperating reality – one where Muslims and pro-Palestinians are condemned as threatening, while there is a colossal attack on their rights and safety across the world, simply for opposing an incontrovertible crime being perpetrated in Gaza. From detention and deportation proceedings against activists such as Mahmoud Khalil in the US, to the vilification and securitisation of pro-Palestinian speech and activism in the UK and Europe, the messenger is shot, and then framed as the aggressor. But smears and diversions and outrageous extrapolations will not change the facts on the ground, which are that the Israeli state is occupying the West Bank, starving and killing Palestinians in Gaza, and accused of war crimes and genocide, all with the sponsorship of the US and support of western regimes. In that sense, Mamdani's victory is a threat, because it reveals how finally, all attempts to maintain an indefensible and intolerable situation have lost their grip on the growing number of people who are thinking for themselves. Mamdani isn't even mayor yet, and he will probably face an escalating campaign using his identity as a way of discrediting his beliefs, both economic and political. And here is where the response to his win is both alarming and potentially propulsive, like the clammy buildup to the final breaking of a fever. Mamdani is where he is because he is not alone. Not by a long shot. And in drawing out such naked and explicit anti-Muslim hate, Mamdani has inadvertently revealed the ugliness and weakness not just of his opponents, but of the wider political establishment, as well as their anti-democratic impulses. In drawing them out, Mamdani has shown how prejudice is rarely about individuals, but the fear that marginalised minority views could ever become powerful majority ones. In this mayoral race, from Palestine to local policing, anti-Muslim hate is not just a repellent phenomenon confined to Mamdani, it is a barricade against the desires of the voting public. Once people start making that connection, it really is over. Nesrine Malik is a Guardian columnist