Lawmakers hit with backlash after passing controversial crypto bill: 'A corporate giveaway, plain and simple'
The controversial HB230 bill establishes special rights for crypto companies with minimal local oversight, as John Weisheit, conservation director of Living Rivers-Colorado Riverkeeper, and Steve Erickson, board member at Great Basin Water Network, detailed for the Deseret News.
HB230, officially titled "Blockchain and Digital Innovation Amendments," gives crypto mining companies the right to mine cryptocurrency, run blockchain nodes, and stake tokens with minimal interference or oversight in Utah.
The bill shields these operations from local zoning laws, noise ordinances, and other regulations that normally govern businesses. It also waives requirements for digital operations to obtain money transmitter licenses, which typically involve financial audits.
This legislation prioritizes crypto industry profits over environmental protection and community well-being.
Proof-of-work cryptomining already consumes up to 2.3% of the entire U.S. electricity supply, according to the Energy Information Administration, more than many countries use. For Utah residents, this could mean higher electricity bills, increased strain on the power grid, and more pollution.
The bill creates special "opportunity zones" for crypto miners while offering no provisions for managing water usage, an oversight for a drought-prone state like Utah, where water conservation is important.
"Make no mistake — this is not innovation," wrote Weisheit and Erickson. "It will harm every Utahn who pays a power bill, who cares about clean air and water, or who believes public money should serve the public good."
Cryptocurrency mining's energy demands have a large pollution footprint. These operations run 24/7 while consuming electricity sourced mainly from dirty fuels — although the industry has begun shifting toward cleaner energy sources.
Despite these improvements, mining remains a highly energy-intensive process.
Do you think gas stoves should be banned nationwide?
No way
Let each state decide
I'm not sure
Definitely
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
Crypto mining facilities can consume as much water as 300,000 households yearly to prevent their machines from overheating, per Weisheit and Erickson. In a state like Utah that faces droughts, this water consumption pressures an already-strained resource.
Noise pollution also impacts communities near mining operations. The constant sound of cooling fans has been compared to having a semitruck engine running outside your window constantly — and this has led to lawsuits in some jurisdictions. Under HB230, local governments can't regulate this noise even when it disrupts residents' sleep and quality of life.
Arkansas passed similar legislation last year with disastrous results. The state quickly faced widespread noise complaints and utility cost increases, forcing lawmakers to reconsider. Some co-sponsors even admitted they had been misled about the bill's impacts.
"Lawmakers and the crypto industry are celebrating the passage of this bill as a bipartisan win that will position the state to lead," said Weisheit and Erickson. "But it's a corporate giveaway, plain and simple."
The National Coalition Against Cryptomining is now working in 18 states to combat this trend of deregulation. They're building a bipartisan movement of people concerned about corporations that negatively affect quality of life and receive special treatment from lawmakers.
You can help by staying informed about crypto legislation in your area and contacting your representatives when similar bills are proposed. Supporting organizations fighting for appropriate regulation of this industry helps ensure our shared resources are not exploited at the public's expense.
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Trump is ‘turning around the Titanic' on homelessness, Utah rep says
President Donald Trump signed an executive order on Thursday overhauling the federal government's approach to homeless policy in favor of a strategy more in line with the one being pursued in Utah. The presidential directive, titled 'Ending Crime and Disorder on America's Streets,' instructs executive agencies to encourage the use of civil commitment by states to move some homeless individuals into long-term institutional care. Following more than a decade of 'housing first' requirements from Washington, D.C., Trump's order makes federal grants conditional on prohibiting urban camping, abandoning 'harm reduction' tactics and meeting higher standards of accountability. The order garnered praise from Utah Gov. Spencer Cox, who has pushed hard to reset the state's homeless services amid record levels of chronic homelessness. But it also concerned some service providers who are skeptical that the law enforcement emphasis will be accompanied by additional funding. 'I'm grateful to the White House for making this important change,' Cox told the Deseret News in a statement. 'For too long, the federal government pushed a one-size-fits-all approach that left people on the streets and tied our hands when we tried to do better.' 'Utah has always believed that real compassion means getting people the help they need, especially those struggling with addiction or serious mental illness. This new executive order reflects the commonsense approach we've been calling for: treatment, accountability, and support — not just housing with no strings attached. It's good to see Washington finally moving in the right direction.' What will the order do? The Trump administration's new approach to homelessness will focus on 'protecting public safety' as the number of individuals experiencing homelessness reaches record highs, with nearly 771,500 people experiencing homelessness on one night in 2024, include more than 274,200 who were unsheltered. Recognizing that a significant portion of homeless individuals use hard drugs or suffer from serious mental illness, Trump's order instructs the U.S. Attorney General and secretary of Health and Human Services to remove federal obstacles to civil commitment. Civil commitment is a legal process that allows officials to court-order an individual into mental health treatment or confinement if they pose a risk to themselves or others because of severe mental illness or substance use disorder. Under Trump's order, relevant agencies will be tasked with helping state and local governments with guidance on how to adopt 'maximally flexible civil commitment' and other policies to forcibly remove those who present a threat to public safety. 'Shifting homeless individuals into long-term institutional settings for humane treatment through the appropriate use of civil commitment will restore public order,' the executive action says. The White House instructed departments to prioritize grant money for states and municipalities that enforce prohibitions on illicit drug use and urban camping; that require outpatient treatment or civil commitment for high-risk individuals; and that track sex offenders who are homeless. Secretaries of Health and Human Services and Housing and Urban Development are also now authorized to 'increase accountability' for homeless service providers by halting funds to supervised drug consumption programs and ending support for 'housing first' initiatives that don't promote recovery. A 'sea change' According to the lawmaker behind Utah's recent homelessness reforms, Thursday's executive order represents a 'sea change.' 'This executive order is like turning around the Titanic,' Rep. Tyler Clancy, R-Provo, told the Deseret News, 'We're going to prioritize providers and states and cities who take these innovative approaches, and recognize this is a human issue, not only a housing issue.' Over the past few legislative sessions, Clancy has spearheaded the governor's homelessness initiative by extending involuntary commitment times, prohibiting syringe exchange programs in certain areas and enhancing criminal penalties for drug possession in and around homeless shelters. These pieces of legislation — which also connected overdose survivors to county resources, expanded the state's homelessness database and codified a 'pathway to thriving' model — all passed the Utah Legislature unanimously. A separate resolution pressuring federal agencies to rescind housing-first restrictions on homelessness funding, which passed both chambers with all but two votes, is remarkably similar to the president's new initiative, Clancy noted. 'This isn't criminalizing homelessness,' Clancy said. 'This is saying, 'You need help, and as a society, we're not going to leave you out there to suffer. We're going to bring you inside and get you the best health care possible to help you heal.'' This approach requires a commitment to long-term treatment and prevention because mental illness and drug addiction drive homelessness just as much as economic factors, according to Clancy, who served as the executive director of Solutions Utah, a homeless policy advocacy group, before working as a detective at the Provo Police Department. Utah has already 'led the way' in reorienting policy conversations toward 'compassion through accountability,' and now the rest of the country 'will start moving in that same direction,' according to Devon Kurtz, the public safety policy director at the Texas-based Cicero Institute. 'The changes announced by the White House amount to a comprehensive restructuring of the national approach to homelessness,' Kurtz told the Deseret News. 'The executive order makes one thing abundantly clear: the era of recklessly inactive homelessness policy is over.' Concerns about cash But recent actions from the Republican-controlled executive and legislative branches in Washington do not inspire confidence that money will be provided to create the wrap-around services needed to accompany a law enforcement crackdown, said Rep. Grant Miller, D-Salt Lake City. Miller, a public defender who has proposed a 'homeless Bill of Rights,' said he welcomes the federal government shaking up its approach to homelessness, but the order's promise to invest in mental health treatment comes after historic cuts to Medicaid included in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. 'Medicaid is the No. 1 funding mechanism for us to get people into health care facilities,' Miller said. 'Without that funding that they just slashed ... I don't know that they saw the long-term connection.' Having seen the ineffectiveness of policies like civil commitment when those experiencing homelessness have nowhere to go, Miller said his greatest worry is that policies will lead to 'punishing poverty' instead of 'stabilization' through 'health care models.' On Wednesday, Cox, speaking at the 140th anniversary of the Utah State Hospital, drew attention to the fact that the number of beds for committed patients had decreased from 1,250 to 1,000 since the 1950s, even as the population increased from 700,000 to 3.5 million. Over the past two years, Clancy has initiated conversations about selling the old Utah State Hospital, and drastically expanding it into a system that spread across the Wasatch Front, but the issue has yet to gain traction. Michelle Flynn, the executive director of The Road Home, one of the largest networks of homeless shelters in the state, said Trump's order highlighted places where Utah has already made advances, but it failed to address a core issue: housing. 'The characterization of 'housing first' being 'housing only' is not correct,' Flynn told the Deseret News. ''Housing first' absolutely includes an intense amount of support services.' Flynn's worry is that a new restriction on funding 'housing first' initiatives could stop important funding for rental assistance programs that are essential for getting people off the streets so they can have their health issues addressed. The problem isn't necessarily a lack of sobriety requirements for housing, it's an unmanageable waiting list for mental health and substance abuse programs that leaves vulnerable individuals without the help they need, according to Flynn. 'The challenge is, where do we help people to go?' Flynn said. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Inside the movement to make Idaho a ‘Christian State' — and how that affects Latter-day Saints
One of the most influential conservative policy groups at the Idaho Capitol wants to make the state explicitly Christian. But their definition excludes a quarter of the population who are members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, not to mention those in the state who belong to other religions or no religion at all. Over the past five years, the Idaho Family Policy Center has become a legislative powerhouse, drafting, sponsoring and training lawmakers to debate a host of bills promoting Christian values in public spaces. This year the organization pushed to mandate daily Bible reading in public schools. Though the policy never received a floor vote, the organization has vowed to bring it back next year, with the proposal representing just the beginning of what the group envisions for the state. Religious litmus tests in Idaho? Idaho Family Policy Center president Blaine Conzatti told the Deseret News he would not oppose declaring Idaho a 'Christian state' and implementing religious tests for public office, although he clarified these are not his short-term goals. While the Supreme Court struck them down in 1961, provisions to prevent non-Christians from office are not new or radical, according to Conzatti. Many early American states incorporated religious tests requiring a belief in the Christian God, or a specific affiliation to Protestant sects. Conzatti does not advocate for states to put their stamp of approval on one specific denomination but he does draw a line between 'historic Christianity,' based on the Apostles' and Nicene Creeds, and the faith of Latter-day Saints. While they share many beliefs in common with Conzatti, some of the roughly one-third of Idaho lawmakers who belong to The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints say this approach could alienate the state's nearly half million members, and threatens religious pluralism. 'Mr. Conzatti, unfortunately, would not consider the majority faith in my legislative district to be Christian,' said Rep. Josh Wheeler, a Republican who represents the southeast corner of Idaho. 'That right there shows you the danger of becoming too narrow in what you require in policy that brings faith into the public square.' Since Wheeler entered the statehouse in 2023, legislators have introduced a record number of bills, with 'a large majority' of those originating from groups like the Idaho Family Policy Center, Wheeler said. The organization has had some major victories like the 2023 passage of bills letting parents sue libraries that carry sexually offensive books and letting students sue for encountering members of the opposite sex in public bathrooms. The Idaho Family Policy Center is characterized by its relentless approach, providing lawmakers with several versions of a bill to introduce each session to make it more likely that efforts like daily Bible reading will eventually pass, according to Wheeler. 'What I was surprised by is the way that this influence kind of shapes the whole legislative process in Idaho,' Wheeler said. But these legislative wins may ultimately come at the expense of broader goals to spread Christian values across society, Wheeler said, because they don't take into account the needs of all state residents. What the founders intended? In a series of email responses, Conzatti said that his political mission rests on the belief that the Founding Fathers crafted constitutions with the assumption that governments would actively promote what Conzatti calls 'biblical Christianity.' 'We are a Christian nation, as our founders at both the federal and state level affirmed,' Conzatti told the Deseret News. 'Put simply, we want our public schools and local governments to acknowledge God, in ways consistent with the history and tradition of our state and nation.' To support his conclusion, Conzatti, who studied government and law at Liberty University, cites numerous sources from the American Revolution and late 19th century where founders and Supreme Court justices affirmed the nation's Christian foundations. Drawing on Federalist leader Fisher Ames, Commentaries on the Constitution (1833) by Justice Joseph Story and Church of the Holy Trinity v. United States (1892), Conzatti argues that the First Amendment was never meant to put a wall between traditional Christianity and policymaking. His view is the opposite, that the maintenance of constitutional governance depends on the 'governmental promotion of biblical Christianity,' and that forgetting this has threatened American liberty, led to increased crime and weakened the family. 'Both policymakers and voters alike should take this opportunity to return to those biblical principles that made America a great place to work, worship, and raise families,' Conzatti said. Conzatti said he does not believe state-endorsed Christianity needs to come at the expense of religious liberty. The founding fathers, Conzatti said, were also firm believers in the natural right to freedom of conscience. While Conzatti is consistent in stating that voters of every state should have the power to choose what 'religious values and system of morality their state government will reflect,' he said 'biblical Christianity' is the only worldview that can sustain the country. 'We can — and we should — openly promote biblical Christian values and acknowledge God in our governmental affairs," Conzatti said. 'Idaho Family Policy Center affirms the freedom of all religious minorities to live out their faith, and we advocate for the religious freedom of everyone, Christian and non-Christian alike.' Idaho's history of religious discrimination Republican Rep. Stephanie Mickelsen, who represents the area west of Idaho Falls, said proposals for the state to come out in transparent support of a certain interpretation of Christianity have 'been on turbocharge over the last few years.' Groups like Idaho Family Policy Center have an 'outsized influence' in Idaho politics because of the partnerships they have developed with many sitting lawmakers and prospective primary challengers, Mickelsen said. While some of their initiatives align with conservative small government principles, like allowing tax dollars to follow students outside of public school, others would expand government through increased litigation, spending and regulations, according to Mickelsen. An approach to social issues that takes control away from local governments is not just heavy-handed, it could create a precedent that infringes on the kind of pluralism that protects religious diversity, Mickelsen said. 'I think that we're getting back to a very slippery slope of being like the Church of England, or the Roman Catholic influence in Italy,' Mickelsen said. 'When's this going to stop? What's good enough for them?' Even though the 14th Amendment extended the Constitution's prohibition on religious tests to the states in 1868, just after Idaho became a territory, in the state's early history there was an effort to exclude Latter-day Saints from political life. Despite Latter-day Saint missionaries being among the first Europeans to settle in Idaho, the territory's laws in the 1880s, and its first state constitution, required an 'Idaho Test Oath' that banned supporters of groups that practiced polygamy from voting, serving on juries or holding office. The Supreme Court upheld the law in an unanimous ruling in 1890 — the same year the church ended the practice of plural marriage. And while enforcement ended later in the 1890s, the language that had earlier disenfranchised Latter-day Saint voters was not removed from the Idaho State Constitution until 1982. Personal faith in the public sphere Like Wheeler, Mickelsen, who is also a member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, pointed to the church's seminary program as an example of how to bring religion into the public square without imposing on others. In southeast Idaho, as in Utah, high school students are given release time to leave campus for one period to attend church seminary buildings that are often built next door to the school. Former Republican Rep. Chenele Dixon, who was defeated in a primary in 2024 after opposing an Idaho Family Policy Center proposal, said she shared Wheeler and Mickelsen's view that an individual's faith should influence their policy decisions, and that this is healthy for society. During her single term in office, Dixon supported some bills written by the Idaho Family Policy Center that overlapped with her conservative views as a lifelong Republican, she said. But she said she thought other bills seemed like solutions in search of problems that the Idaho Family Policy Center had stirred up in an effort to box out views, or religions, they did not agree with. 'I do have a concern when we say that we need to be a Christian state, because there is always, I have found, a litmus test for Christianity with people that say that,' Dixon said. 'And actually, the folks who are saying that, don't have room for LDS people either, and I think a lot of LDS people don't understand that.' Correction: The Idaho Family Policy Center was not directly involved in lobbying for bills to require the display of the Ten Commandments in classrooms and to allow chaplains to serve as school counselors. Solve the daily Crossword
Axios
14-07-2025
- Axios
Thousands of Utahns could lose food assistance under Trump's megabill
Around 12,000 Utahns are at risk of losing at least some food assistance due to President Trump's newly signed " big, beautiful bill," per estimates from the left-leaning Center on Policy and Budget Priorities. Why it matters: It's a historic cut to the social safety net, which Republicans claim will weed out waste, fraud and abuse. But experts warn the move could leave more people hungry and uninsured. The big picture: The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), often called food stamps, helps low-income families, seniors and people with disabilities buy groceries. By the numbers: Nearly 179,000 Utahns — more than 5% of the state — were enrolled in SNAP as of March 2025, per federal data. More than half of Utah's SNAP households have children, Feeding America figures show. Zoom in: Utah's entire congressional delegation backed Trump's bill, including the SNAP cuts. How it works: Trump's law doesn't just slash funding — it rewrites the rules. Parents of children 14 and older must now work at least 20 hours a week to keep benefits. The new policy also bumps the work requirement age up to 64. It was 54. What they're saying: The work requirements "help transition people from welfare dependence to financial independence," Utah's four representatives — all Republicans — wrote in the Deseret News. "We're also requiring states to share more of the SNAP benefit costs, creating better accountability," they wrote. The other side: Anti-hunger advocates criticized the new work requirements, especially for homeless people, veterans and young adults who recently were in foster care — groups that previously were exempt.
