Fairphone 6 might be a hard sell as a mid-ranger, but not if you're a green customer
Fairphone 6 comes in three colors: Black, Forest Green and White | Image credit: Fairphone Dutch company Fairphone has just introduced its new modular smartphone, Fairphone 6. We've been talking about the device for about a week now, but if you haven't been following our news feed, the main selling point of the Fairphone 6 is how easy it is to repair and replace parts of it, either for customization or due to failing.Because this is a mid-range phone, you'd expect to be priced below the $500 / €500 price mark, but Fairphone 6 is a pretty expensive device. That's partly due to the fact that Fairphone 6 is a 'clean' device assembled in factories with fair labor conditions.
As such, Fairphone is asking €600 for the Android version and €650 for the /e/OS variant. In the US, Fairphone sells only the /e/OS model through its local partner Murena. Fairphone 6 is available for pre-order in the US for $900, but it won't ship until August. Fairphone 6 is the company's fairest phone yet
Made with more than 50% fair and recycled materials (by total weight)
Cobalt sourced through Fair Cobalt Alliance, an initiative Fairphone helped to create
Includes fair-mined gold and silver, and fair tungsten
Includes recycled aluminum & rare earth metals 100% e-waste neutral
Factories powered by 100% renewable energy
Supports better working conditions and living wages for the makers
Fairphone 6 allows users to attach various accessories | Image credit: Fairphone Besides that, it features the highest repairability rating given in the EU. Fairphone 6 is built in a way that lets you swap 12 different parts. More importantly, users can swap the phone's parts by simply using a standard screwdriver and the videos provided by Fairphone. Parts like the battery, screen, USB ports, and individual cameras can be easily swapped in case of need. Not to mention that Fairphone offers a five-year warranty for Fairphone 6 and no less than eight years of software support (seven major Android OS upgrades guaranteed). In comparison, Google offers just 1 year of manufacturer warranty for its latest Pixel phones. Fairphone 6 specs : Display : 6.31-inch LTPO OLED, FHD+ resolution, 10-120 Hz dynamize refresh rate, Corning Gorilla Glass 7i
: 6.31-inch LTPO OLED, FHD+ resolution, 10-120 Hz dynamize refresh rate, Corning Gorilla Glass 7i Chipset : Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
: Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 Memory : 8 GB RAM
: 8 GB RAM Storage : 256 GB (expandable up to 2 TB)
: 256 GB (expandable up to 2 TB) Camera : 50MP main (Sony Lytia 700C sensor), 13MP ultra-wide
: 50MP main (Sony Lytia 700C sensor), 13MP ultra-wide Front camera : 32MP (Samsung KD1 sensor)
: 32MP (Samsung KD1 sensor) Battery : 4,415 mAh, 30W wired
Prices for Fairphone 6 parts and accessories | Image credit: Fairphone The new stuff that Fairphone came up with for its new modular smartphone is the accessories that can now be attached to Fairphone 6 by removing two screws from the back cover. At launch, three accessories can be attached to the Fairphone 6: card holder, finger loop, and card holder.
Another new feature that Fairphone 6 brings compared to its predecessors is Fairphone Moments, ' a calm, distraction-free space that's more than a focus mode .' According to Fairphone, users can create their unique Moment with five essential apps and shut out everything else. Secure your connection now at a bargain price!
We may earn a commission if you make a purchase Check Out The Offer
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
GSM Arena
5 hours ago
- GSM Arena
Poco F7 vs Poco F7 Pro
The Poco F7 Series is here, and as usual, Xiaomi has released not one, but two near-flagship killers - the Poco F7 and the Poco F7 Pro. Both phones promise top-tier performance, premium features, and competitive pricing, staying true to Poco's legacy of delivering exceptional value. But while the regular F7 lands with a bigger battery and slightly larger display, the Pro model brings a sharper screen, superior cameras, and a more powerful chipset to the table. With just €100 between them, it's a tough choice - so which one offers the better deal? The Poco F7 arrives with a single flagship-grade memory option - 12 GB RAM paired with either 256 GB or 512 GB of UFS 4.1 storage, offering a smooth experience and plenty of space for apps, media, and games. In the EU, the 12+256 GB configuration is priced at €449.99, while the 12+512 GB jumps to €499.99, with a similar launch price bracket in India under INR 35,000 (~US $399/449). The Poco F7 Pro offers again 12 GB RAM combined with either 256 GB or 512 GB of UFS 4.1 internal storage. Pricing is set higher, with the global launch starting around US $499 (≈€499) for the 12+256 GB version and US $549 for 12+512 GB. Table of Contents: Design Display Battery Life Charging Speaker Test Performance Cameras Verdict For starters, you can compare the complete specs sheets or directly continue with our editor's assessment in the following text. Size comparison Xiaomi Poco F7 5G Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro There's a modest size difference between the Poco F7 and the Poco F7 Pro. The regular F7 is slightly taller, wider, and heavier than the Pro, likely due to its larger battery and screen. Still, both phones remain comfortably within the slim and lightweight category for large-screen devices. The differences in hand are noticeable but not drastic - if you value a more compact feel, the Pro has the advantage here. Both phones have the same design language, and both have IP68 ingress protection. For materials, the front of both phones is protected by Gorilla Glass Victus. The back of the F7 Pro is made of glass, while the regular F7 uses high-quality plastic, giving the Pro a slightly more premium feel. The middle frame is plastic on both models, though it's finished nicely to resemble aluminum. Connectivity is also identical for the most part. Both phones support dual SIM functionality, Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.4, and have USB-C ports. However, the Poco F7 supports DisplayPort video output over USB-C, which is missing on the F7 Pro for some reason. Speaker setup is identical too, with both phones offering stereo speakers tuned for Dolby Atmos. They're using a hybrid stereo arrangement with a shared earpiece and bottom-firing secondary speaker. The setup delivers loud and balanced sound. And both phones also feature a quality haptic motor. Button placement is standard and consistent between the two phones - volume rocker and power key are located on the right side, while the left side remains clean. Both phones use an under-display optical fingerprint reader, so there is no difference there. It's worth noting that both models have an IR blaster, which is located near the camera island on the back instead of its usual location on the top frame. Display comparison Xiaomi Poco F7 5G Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro Both phones feature high-quality AMOLED panels with 120Hz refresh rates and Dolby Vision video support. The Poco F7's is a larger 6.83-inch display with a 2772 x 1280px resolution, while the F7 Pro opts for a slightly smaller 6.67-inch display but with a higher 3200 x 1440px resolution. So in terms of sharpness, the Pro clearly wins with its 526ppi density. Max screen brightness is comparable - 1525 nits on the F7 and 1478 nits on the Pro - so both are excellent in sunlight. It really comes down to whether you value more screen estate or extra pixel sharpness. The bezels around the screens are symmetrical and minimal on both phones. Battery life The Poco F7 has the larger battery of the two, at 6500 mAh, compared to the F7 Pro's 6000 mAh. However, that extra capacity doesn't pay off as the F7 Pro delivers longer or equal battery life performance across all of our tests except gaming, which is the only test in which the F7 takes the win. Charging speed Xiaomi Poco F7 5G 6500 mAh Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro 6000 mAh Charging is equally impressive on both devices, with 90W wired charging supported out of the box. The Poco F7 Pro had a slight advantage in our charging speed test, reaching a full charge in just 34 minutes compared to the F7's 39 minutes. The Pro also manages to hit 53% in 15 minutes versus 50% on the F7. The differences are small and likely come down to battery size, but if we're splitting hairs, the Pro edges it. Speaker test Both phones offer stereo speaker setups and support for Dolby Atmos. In our loudness tests, they scored nearly identically, delivering powerful and well-balanced sound. The Poco F7 has slightly deeper bass presence, while the F7 Pro provides a cleaner midrange. There's not a huge difference, but audio enthusiasts might prefer the Pro's more refined tuning, whereas casual users will be happy with either. Performance The Poco F7 and Poco F7 Pro both aim for flagship-class speed, but they diverge significantly in processing power. The Poco F7 is equipped with the brand-new Snapdragon 8s Gen 4, built on a 4nm process with an all-big-core CPU architecture and peak clock speeds around 3.2 GHz. Despite trailing behind the full Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 inside the Pro, it punches well above its mid-range price, delivering robust performance in everyday tasks and light gaming. The F7 Pro's Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, however, edges ahead with a stronger GPU, and superior sustained performance under intensive workloads. Xiaomi Poco F7 5G Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro Memory-wise, both phones ship with 12 GB of LPDDR5X RAM, ensuring smooth multitasking and future-proof headroom. Storage configurations are generous, offering 256 GB or 512 GB of UFS 4.1 memory. Benchmark performance In synthetic benchmarks, the two phones are almost neck and neck in the compound AnTuTu test and even in the Geekbench CPU test. But the GPU-heavy 3DMark Wild Life test reveals a significant gap in performance - 4,795 vs. 3,953. In short, the two phones perform around the same and deliver more than enough speed for most users. However, the F7 Pro is the better performer in graphics-heavy scenarios like games. This, however, clearly comes at the expense of battery efficiency, as the F7 was able to last longer in our game battery test. Camera comparison Although both Poco F7 models deploy a 50 MP main camera with optical image stabilization and phase-detect autofocus, they actually use different sensors. The ultrawide cameras are identical on both phones: an 8 MP camera with a 15 mm lens focal length (read: not terribly wide). Neither camera supports autofocus, which is typical for a budget ultrawide sensor like this one. Selfies are captured by a 20 MP front camera (OmniVision OV20B, f/2.2) on both phones. There's no autofocus here either. Front-facing video is limited to 1080p. Speaking of video, both phones are capable of recording up to 4K at 60fps from the main camera. Ultrawide video remains capped at 1080p and lacks stabilization. Image quality In daylight, the Poco F7 Pro's main camera produces ever so slightly crisper photos. The F7 Pro also has better dynamic range with highlights coming out better preserved. The ultrawide cameras have quite a different output, despite using the same camera hardware. The Poco F7 appears to take less processed ultrawide photos, but we prefer the more sharpened look of the F7 Pro. As for the 2x shots, the ones by the vanilla F7, look decidedly better with superior sharpness and contrast than the Poco F7 Pro. Poco F7: 0.6x • 1x • 2x Poco F7 Pro: 0.6x • 1x • 2x In low-light photography, the two trade blows again. The F7 Pro's ultrawide camera really outshone the F7's with much sharper photos. But when it comes to the main cam, we'd give the nod to the Poco F7 this time around for its sharper output - a difference, which is visible upon closer examination. The F7's advantage continues at 2x zoom, too. Poco F7: 0.6x • 1x • 2x Poco F7 Pro: 0.6x • 1x • 2x Both the Poco F7 and F7 Pro are equipped with the same 20MP front-facing camera, and as expected, selfie image quality is quite similar, but we did spot slightly better highlight retention by the F7 Pro. Poco F7 selfie Poco F7 Pro selfie Video quality Both phones can record up to 4K at 60fps from the main camera, but stabilization and image clarity are better on the F7 Pro. The Pro's footage exhibits better detail, more natural colors, and better dynamic range. The same holds true in low light as well. The F7 isn't far behind, but the Pro model offers slightly better video quality across the board. Below we have a few framegrabs from the videos taken by the two phones at each focal length, so it's easier to compare to one another. Poco F7: 0.6x • 1x • 2x • 1x low light Poco F7 Pro: 0.6x • 1x • 2x • 1x low light Verdict The Poco F7 and Poco F7 Pro are both compelling offerings, delivering flagship-grade hardware at midrange prices. Each phone focuses on different priorities, which makes choosing between them a matter of preference and use case rather than a clear-cut winner. The Poco F7 stands out between the two with its larger 6.83-inch display and lower price tag. It manages excellent performance thanks to the Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 chipset and offers very good main camera performance with some great 2x digital zoom shots. The Poco F7 Pro, on the other hand, offers a more refined overall experience. It's also a bit lighter and more compact, and has a glass back instead of a plastic one. Its higher-resolution QHD+ AMOLED display is crisper, its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 delivers slightly better performance, and its cameras are slightly more dependable with better HDR processing and better ultrawide performance at night. Video quality is also superior across all cameras. Ultimately, both phones are a great choice and rely on the same formula to provide a great user experience. The Poco F7 Pro is slightly more refined, and it's worth the extra cash if you value the stuff it does better. For everyone else, the F7 delivers some great value that's hard to beat. The larger display. The longer gaming battery life. The better 2x zoom shots. The identical user experience. The lower price. The slightly lighter and more compact body. The higher-res display. The slightly better chipset performance. The better camera HDR (highlight retention). The better ultrawide in low light. The superior video quality.
GSM Arena
20 hours ago
- GSM Arena
Realme launches a second C71 version in Europe
The Realme C71, introduced in Asia earlier this month, has arrived in Europe. However, the European model doesn't share all the specs with its Asian counterpart. For starters, the Asian C71 packs a 6,300 mAh battery, while the European C71 comes with a 6,000 mAh cell under the hood. Fortunately, the charging speed remains the same, meaning the Realme C71's European version will also charge at a rate of up to 45W. Besides, it can be used to charge other devices, thanks to 6W reverse wired charging support. Another difference between the two models is that the Asian C71 comes with up to 6GB of RAM and 128GB of storage, whereas the European C71 has 8GB of RAM and 256GB of storage onboard. Realme C71 The rest of the features remain the same, so you get the European C71 with the Unisoc T250 SoC, a 6.67" 120Hz HD+ LCD, Android 15-based Realme UI 6.0, and a side-mounted fingerprint scanner. The smartphone sports a 5MP camera on the front and a 50MP primary camera on the rear, accompanied by an LED ring light for notifications and charging status. Additionally, the handset comes with MIL-STD-810H certification, making it drop-resistant up to 1.5m. This model of the Realme C71 comes in Forest Owl and White Swan colors and is available for purchase in Bulgaria through retailer Technopolis at a promotional price of BGN299 ($180/€150/INR15,310).
GSM Arena
a day ago
- GSM Arena
Apple announces App Store policy changes in the EU
Apple announced major updates to its App Store policies in the European Union yesterday under the Digital Markets Act (DMA) including new app distribution for EU-based developers and a new two-tier system for Store Services fees on purchases made outside of apps. EU devs are now free to advertise in-app offers for digital goods and services via external websites, other apps, and alternative app marketplaces. Developers can also include multiple URL destinations inside their apps with redirects and tracking. Apple's notorious scare screens, which users see when they tap an external link, can now be turned off after the first interaction within apps. Developers can also design their own interfaces for links to outside payments and promotions. Apple is also bringing a new Core Technology Commission which mandates 5% commission on outside App Store purchases made for apps distributed on the App Store. Apple is also retaining its Core Technology Fee (CTF), which charges €0.50 per download for each annual install over 1 million. There's also a new initial acquisition fee which adds a 2% fee on digital goods and services purchases outside of the App Store by new users in the first six months following an app download. Alongside those changes, Apple is introducing a new two-tier system for Store Services fees. Developers will be able to move between the two tiers on a per-app basis once per quarter. Tier 1 offers developers a lowered 5% commission on in-app purchases but severely limits key features like automatic app updates, automatic app downloads, search suggestions, ratings and performance metrics. Tier 2 asks for a higher 13% commission (10% for Small Business Program members) with developers getting access to all key features provided by the App Store for their apps Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney criticized Apple's new approach, calling the new Tier 1 list a 'mockery of fair competition' and 'unlawful'. Apple's new Digital Markets Act malicious compliance scheme is blatantly unlawful in both Europe and the United States and makes a mockery of fair competition in digital markets. Apps with competing payments are not only taxed but commercially crippled in the App Store.… — Tim Sweeney (@TimSweeneyEpic) June 26, 2025 So, how did we get here? Back in April, the European Commission (EC) issued a preliminary fine worth €500 million over Apple's continued anti-competitive App Store practices including steering and preventing users from using alternative payment platforms all of which were in violation of the DMA. Apple later appealed the decision on a privacy basis, but that was not enough for the EC. The Commission will now evaluate Apple's new policies affect consumers under the DMA. Source
