Pope repeats call for Gaza ceasefire as Israel issues evacuation order
'I once again call for an immediate end to the barbarity of this war and for a peaceful resolution to the conflict,' the pontiff said at the end of his Sunday Angelus prayer from his summer retreat in Castel Gandolfo.
Pope Leo also expressed his 'deep sorrow' for the Israeli attack on the only catholic church in the Gaza strip on Thursday, which killed three people and wounded 10 others, including the parish priest.
'I appeal to the international community to observe humanitarian law and respect the obligation to protect civilians as well as the prohibition of collective punishment, the indiscriminate use of force, and the forced displacement of populations,' the pope added.
The shelling of the Holy Family Catholic Church in Gaza also damaged the church compound, where hundreds of Palestinians have been sheltering from the Israel-Hamas war, now in its 21st month. Israel expressed regret over what it described as an accident and said it was investigating.
'We need to dialogue and abandon weapons,' the pope said earlier Sunday, after presiding over Mass at the nearby Cathedral of Albano.
'The world no longer tolerates war,' Pope Leo XIV told reporters waiting for him outside the cathedral.
Dozens killed on Sunday
In the Gaza strip, at least 73 people were killed while attempting to access aid at several locations across on Sunday, the Hamas-run health ministry in the Palestinian territory said.
The Israeli military said that soldiers had shot at a gathering of thousands of Palestinians in northern Gaza who posed a threat, and that it was aware of some casualties. But it said that the numbers being reported by teams in Gaza were far higher than the military's initial investigation found.
The military added that it is attempting to facilitate the entry of aid, and blamed Hamas militants for fomenting chaos and endangering civilians.
The largest toll, according to the ministry and local hospitals, was in the northern part of the territory, where at least 67 Palestinians were killed while trying to reach aid entering northern Gaza through the Zikim crossing with Israel.
It wasn't immediately clear whether they were killed by the Israeli army or armed gangs or both. But some witnesses said that the Israeli military shot at the crowd.
UN trying to clarify whether their facilities are included in the evacuation order
Meanwhile, the Israeli military published new evacuation warnings for areas of central Gaza on Sunday, in one of the few areas where the military has rarely operated with ground troops.
The evacuation cuts access between the city of Deir al-Balah and the southern cities of Rafah and Khan Younis in the narrow enclave.
The United Nations contacted Israeli authorities to clarify whether UN facilities in southwestern Deir al-Balah are included in Sunday's evacuation order, according to a UN official who spoke on the condition of anonymity.
The official said that in previous instances, UN facilities were spared from evacuation orders. The evacuation announcement covers an area stretching from a previously evacuated area all the way to the coast and will severely hamper movement for aid groups and civilians in Gaza.
Military spokesman Avichay Adraee warned that the military will attack 'with intensity' against militants. He called for residents, including those sheltering in tents, to head to the Muwasi area, a makeshift tent camp on Gaza's southern shore that the Israeli military has designated a humanitarian zone.
The announcement came as Israel and Hamas have been holding ceasefire talks in Qatar, but international mediators say there have been no breakthroughs.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has repeatedly stressed that expanding Israel's military operations in Gaza will pressure Hamas to negotiate, but negotiations have been stalled for months.
Earlier this month, the Israeli military said that it controlled more than 65% of the Gaza Strip.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
Meta ran ads to fundraise for Israeli Defence Forces, analysis shows
Ads run on Meta to fundraise for the Israeli Defence Force (IDF) bypassed EU legislation, according to a new analysis. Global advocacy group Ekō said it identified at least 117 ads run on Meta platforms by two parallel funding groups from March 2025 to June 2025 that explicitly raised money for Israeli military units. Ekō claims both groups targeted users in the United Kingdom and the European Union, raising roughly $2.4 million (€2.05 million) for the IDF from ads on their landing pages. Euronews Next is working to independently verify this number. A previous Ekō analysis into Meta IDF fundraising found similar ads last year. The platform removed the ads when they were reported but 'did nothing to stop the same publishers from launching new campaigns for the same military equipment,' the rights group said in a statement. 'Meta's actions reveal a clear pattern: its advertising platform is not just failing to block these fundraising efforts — it is actively enabling them,' Ekō said in a statement sent to Euronews Next. What did the ads say? One of the ads run by US-registered charity Vaad Hatzedaka used the story of a rabbi to solicit donations for thermal drones that could 'detect and eliminate deadly threats from Hamas,' to keep their fighters 'one step ahead'. The donation page includes information to donate generators, underwater drones, or thermal drones to the Israeli soldiers. Another ad campaign reported by Ekō shows a repost by an Israeli singer where unit snipers in Jabalia, northern Gaza, are asking for shooting tripods. The embedded link redirects users to the Chesed Fund, a US-registered charity that lets users send bulletproof vests, thermal drones or tactical helmets to the IDF on the frontlines. Ekō said the ad was flagged to Meta, who eventually took it down. The Chelsed Fund ad violated Meta's ad policy about social issues, elections or politics, the advocacy group said. Anyone who wants to post ads in the EU about political values and government or security and foreign affairs has to go through an 'authorisation process' before being published on Meta platforms, according to the tech company's guidelines. The authorisation process requires ad posters to send in a piece of government-issued ID along with the page they run to Meta for review. The ads also have to have a 'paid by' disclaimer to show who is funding it. Anyone who violates Meta's ad policies several times by running these ads without authorisation could face 'permanent restrictions,' the company said, but it doesn't expand on what these might be. Euronews Next reached out to Meta but did not receive an immediate reply at the time of publication. How did these ads get past European laws? The European Commission's Digital Services Act (DSA) requires large online platforms with a reach of more than 45 million EU citizens a month to maintain a public ad repository and assess how their systems are manipulated or could contribute to societal risks. Meta has a monthly user base of roughly 259 million in the EU, according to Commission estimates. Platforms with these large user bases, such as Meta, have to disclose more information about ads they are seeing online, including why a user could be targeted by a specific campaign over others. Maen Hammad, a researcher at Ekō, argues that the DSA also comes with obligations for Meta to 'swiftly remove illegal content,' especially if it could break national charity laws. 'Ads fundraising for military gear, including drones allegedly used by a military under investigation for genocide to enforce a 'kill zone' in Gaza, likely break charity laws in several EU countries,' he said. Hammad said Eko will be bringing these findings to the European Commission to see whether it breaches the act. If the Commission decides to go ahead with an investigation, it could first request more information from Meta about its ad policies, conduct interviews with the company or inspect the company premises. Penalties for a DSA infringement could go up to six per cent of a company's global turnover. Euronews Next reached out to the Commission to see whether it had received the Ekō report or a request for an investigation but did not receive an immediate reply.
LeMonde
3 hours ago
- LeMonde
'The best show in town': From a hilltop in Israel, observers have a sinister view of Gaza bombings
Between two bombardments, Liram, Afik, and Emmanuel passed around a joint. On Thursday, July 17, at 6:30 pm, as on most evenings, the three friends, 27-year-old Israelis who preferred not to share their last names, met at the top of Kobi Hill, the highest point overlooking the city of Sderot on the edge of the Gaza Strip, to talk about work, travel, and "stock market investments," they listed. Right across from them, about one kilometer away, past the highway, a few fields, and a separation barrier, lay Beit Hanoun and the north of the Gaza Strip, which has been bombarded without pause for nearly two years. "When I see and hear a missile fall on Gaza, I am happy," Afik said, grinning in his shorts and brightly colored T-shirt, his pack of cigarettes and phone in front of him. On his device screen, the watch shop manager showed a photo of Avi Megira, his uncle, killed on his motorcycle in the streets of Sderot by a Hamas member during the massacres of October 7. Facing his two friends, a trader and an employee at the large printing plant in Kibbutz Be'eri, adjacent to the Gaza Strip, the young man, "frightened" by the proximity of the border with the Palestinian enclave, said he believed that freeing the last 50 Israeli hostages, of whom only about 20 are thought to be alive, could only happen through a violent military operation. Even if "millions" of Palestinians must die, he added. According to the latest figures shared by NGOs and international organizations on the ground, more than 58,000 people, the majority of them civilians, have already been killed by the Israeli army since October 7.
France 24
4 hours ago
- France 24
ICJ to hand down watershed climate opinion
It is the biggest case ever heard at the International Court of Justice and experts say judges' opinion could reshape climate justice forever, with major impacts on laws around the world. The ICJ advisory opinion is "potentially one of the most consequential legal rulings of our times," said Joie Chowdhury, Senior Attorney at the Center for International Environmental Law, an advocacy group that backs the case. It could "define a new era, where climate justice is not a distant aspiration, but a global mandate for the here and now," added Chowdhury. The United Nations has tasked the 15 ICJ judges to answer two fundamental questions that, according to Chowdhury, "strike at the heart of climate justice." First: what must states do under international law to protect the environment from greenhouse gas emissions "for present and future generations"? Second: what are the consequences for states whose emissions have caused environmental harm, especially to vulnerable low-lying island states? To help answer these questions, ICJ judges have pored over tens of thousands of pages of submissions from countries and organisations around the world. Analysts say Wednesday's ruling is the most consequential of a string of recent rulings on climate change in international law. Courts have become a battleground for climate action as frustration has grown over sluggish progress toward curbing planet-warming pollution from fossil fuels. The Paris Agreement struck through the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) has rallied a global response to the crisis, but not at the speed necessary to protect the world from dangerous overheating. 'Disappear beneath the waves' In December, the iconic Peace Palace in the Hague hosted the court's biggest-ever hearings, with more than 100 nations and groups giving oral statements. In what was billed a "David Vs Goliath" battle, the debate pitted major wealthy economies against smaller, less developed states most at the mercy of a warming planet. Major polluters including the US and India warned the ICJ not to deliver a fresh legal blueprint for climate change, arguing the existing UNFCCC sufficed. The US, which has since withdrawn from the Paris accord, said the UNFCCC contained legal provisions on climate change and urged the court to uphold this regime. But smaller states said this framework was inadequate to mitigate climate change's devastating effects and that the ICJ's opinion should be broader. These states also urged the ICJ to impose reparations on historic polluters. "The cardinal principle is crystal clear. Responsible states are required to make full reparation for the injury they have caused," said Margaretha Wewerinke-Singh representing Vanuatu. These states demanded a commitment and timeline to phasing out fossil fuels, monetary compensation when appropriate, and an acknowledgement of past wrongs. Representatives from island states, many wearing traditional dress as they addressed the court for the first time in their country's history, made passionate pleas to the robed judges. "Despite producing less than 0.01 percent of greenhouse gas emissions, on the current trajectory of GHG emissions, Tuvalu will disappear completely beneath the waves that have been lapping our shores for millennia," said Eselealofa Apinelu from Tuvalu. The ICJ's advisory opinions are not binding upon states and critics say that top polluters will simply ignore what comes out of the court. But others note the moral and legal clout enjoyed by the world's highest court and hope the opinion will make a tangible difference to national climate change policies. "The impacts of climate change, absolutely dire right now, will become catastrophic as the years go by, if we do not course-correct," said Vishal Prasad, director of a campaign by Pacific Island students that pushed the issue before the court. "The urgency of the matter, the seriousness of why we're here, and how important this is, is not lost upon all Pacific Islanders, all small island countries. "That's why we're looking to the ICJ."
