Republicans and Democrats buck party lines in marathon votes for Trump megabill
Democrats, who have lined up in opposition to the bill, have offered a series of amendments and proposed changes throughout the voting session. While none have yet been adopted, some of the Democratic efforts have still managed to peel off GOP support.
The votes come as Democrats are seeking to hold Republicans' feet to the fire with potentially politically tough votes as they ramp up attacks against the bill, which is estimated to put trillions of dollars in tax cuts toward national deficits in the coming years, along with significant changes to reduce federal dollars for programs such as Medicaid and food assistance.
Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), a key moderate who has not yet announced how she plans to vote on the plan, has broken with her party on several votes for Democratic-backed measures.
That includes efforts seeking to 'eliminate any provisions that would lead to any nursing home closures' and those that 'change state provider taxes,' as well as another to block provisions that would 'result in increased likelihood of rural hospitals being forced to close.'
She also joined Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) in voting with Democrats against a GOP effort to block consideration of an amendment offered by Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.). The amendment sought to strip a provision in the bill that would block Medicaid funding to Planned Parenthood.
Murkowski, another moderate whose support GOP leadership has made efforts to secure in recent days, broke with her party on other votes as well. She also voted to back an effort by Sen. Chris Coons (D-Del.) aimed at removing provisions that strip 'individuals in the United States of the federal benefits to which they are entitled,' partly with the 'creation of new administrative burdens and paperwork requirements.'
She and fellow Alaska Sen. Dan Sullivan (R) voted to back an effort from Sen. Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.) to strike provisions related to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), also known as the food stamps program, as Republicans have proposed notable changes to the program to reduce federal spending in the bill.
The two GOP senators have also raised concerns over the scope of the bill's SNAP proposal and how requirements for states with higher payment error rates to pay a share of benefit costs for the first time would impact Alaska.
However, Democrats weren't the only ones to peel off across-the-aisle support during votes.
One amendment offered by Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) targeted states that use their own money to offer health care to migrants without legal status. States that continue to cover migrants without legal status would get their Medicaid cut from 90 to 80 percent.
Four Democrats joined Republicans in backing the effort: Sens. Catherine Cortez Masto (Nev.), Maggie Hassan (N.H.), Jon Ossoff (Ga.) and Raphael Warnock (Ga.).
Nathaniel Weixel contributed.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Photos show Elon Musk and President Donald Trump's relationship before their feud reignited
Elon Musk's feud with President Donald Trump has reignited, with the tech billionaire threatening to launch a new political party and Trump suggesting Musk could be punished for his opposition. This is a photo gallery curated by AP photo editors.
Chicago Tribune
11 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
House Republicans race toward a final vote on Trump's tax bill, daring critics to oppose
WASHINGTON — Republican leaders in the House are sprinting toward a Wednesday vote on President Donald Trump's tax and spending cuts package, determined to seize momentum from a hard-fought vote in the Senate while essentially daring members to defy their party's leader and vote against it. 'The American people gave us a clear mandate, and after four years of Democrat failure, we intend to deliver without delay,' the top four House GOP leaders said Tuesday after the bill passed the Senate 51-50, thanks to Vice President JD Vance's tiebreaking vote. It's a risky gambit, one designed to meet Trump's demand for a July 4 finish — and there's a steep climb ahead. Since launching early this year, Republicans have struggled mightily with the bill nearly every step of the way, often succeeding by only a single vote. Their House majority stands at only 220-212, leaving little room for defections. Some Republicans are likely to balk at being asked to rubber stamp the Senate bill less than 24 hours after passage, having had little time to read or absorb the changes that were made, many at the last minute to win the vote of Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski. House Republicans from competitive districts have bristled at the Senate bill's cuts to Medicaid, while conservatives have lambasted the legislation as straying from their fiscal goals. It falls to Speaker Mike Johnson and his team to convince them that the time for negotiations is over. The bill would extend and make permanent various individual and business tax breaks that Republicans passed in Trump's first term, plus temporarily add new ones that Trump promised during the campaign, including allowing workers to deduct tips and overtime pay, and provide a new $6,000 deduction for most older adults. In all, the legislation contains about $4.5 trillion in tax cuts over 10 years. The bill also provides some $350 billion for defense and Trump's immigration crackdown. Republicans partially pay for it all through less spending on Medicaid and food assistance. The Congressional Budget Office projects that it will add about $3.3 trillion in federal deficits over the coming decade. The House passed its version of the bill back in May, despite worries about spending cuts and the overall price tag. Now, they are being asked to give final passage to a version that, in many respects, exacerbates those concerns. The Senate bill's projected impact on federal deficits, for example, is significantly higher. Trump praised the bill profusely in a social media post, saying 'We can have all of this right now, but only if the House GOP UNITES, ignores its occasional 'GRANDSTANDERS' (You know who you are!), and does the right thing, which is sending this Bill to my desk.' Speaker Johnson, R-La., is intent on meeting the president's July 4 timeline. He's also betting that hesitant Republicans won't cross Trump because of the heavy political price they would have to pay. They need only look to Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., who announced his intention to vote against the legislation over the weekend. Soon, the president was calling for a primary challenger to the senator and personally attacking him on social media. Tillis quickly announced he would not seek a third term. Others could face a similar fate. One House Republican who has staked out opposition to the bill, Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky, is already being targeted by Trump's well-funded political operation. House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, R-La., said leadership was not entertaining the possibility of making changes to the bill before the final vote. He said the two chambers already agree on the vast majority of what's in it. 'It's not as easy as saying, 'hey, I just want one more change,' because one more change could end up being what collapses the entire thing,' Scalise said. Democratic lawmakers, united against the bill as harmful to the country, condemned the process as rushed. Rep. Jim McGovern, D-Mass., said there's no real deadline for getting the bill passed by July 4th. 'We're rushing not because the country demands it, but because he wants to throw himself another party,' McGovern said. 'This isn't policy. It's ego management.' House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries described the bill in dire terms, saying that cuts in Medicaid spending would result in 'Americans losing their lives because of their inability to access health care coverage.' He said Republicans are 'literally ripping the food out of the mouths of children, veterans and seniors.' 'House Democrats are going to do everything we can for the next few hours, today, tomorrow, for the balance of this week and beyond to stop this bill from ever becoming law,' Jeffries said. Republicans say they are trying to rightsize the safety net programs for the population they were initially designed to serve, mainly pregnant women, the disabled and children, and root out what they describe as waste, fraud and abuse. The package includes new 80-hour-a-month work requirements for many adults receiving Medicaid and applies existing work requirements in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program to more beneficiaries. States will also pick up more of the cost for food benefits, with the amount based on their payment error rates, which include both underpayments and overpayments. The driving force behind the bill, however, is the tax cuts. Many expire at the end of this year if Congress doesn't act. 'Passing this bill means smaller tax bills and bigger paychecks for the American people — permanently,' said Senate Majority Leader John Thune. 'It will also help get our economy firing on all cylinders again.' The Tax Policy Center, which provides nonpartisan analysis of tax and budget policy, projected the bill would result next year in a $150 tax break for the lowest quintile of Americans, a $1,750 tax cut for the middle quintile, and a $10,950 tax cut for the top quintile. That's compared to what they'd face if the 2017 tax cuts expired.
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US stock futures higher as Trump megabill heads to House
U.S. stock futures are higher after the Senate narrowly passed the One Big Beautiful Bill and passed it on to the House for final approval. Congress still aims to get the legislation to President Donald Trump's desk by July 4, but it remains to be seen if that will happen. Many House representatives are still grousing about cuts to Medicaid, food assistance and ballooning the deficit with only a few days to that deadline. At 6:05 a.m. ET, futures linked to the blue-chip Dow rose 0.15%, while broad S&P 500 futures gained 0.13% and tech-laden Nasdaq futures added 0.09%. Although the One Big Beautiful Bill is in the spotlight, trade issues continue to linger offstage. Trump's self-imposed trade deal deadline of July 9 is fast approaching, and there are mixed messages on whether the deadline is flexible. Last week, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters the July 9 deadline for restarting tariffs on countries that haven't yet reached a trade deal wth the U.S. is 'not critical," which some took as a hint the deadline was flexible. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent then said trade deals could come by Labor Day in September. However, Trump said this week he isn't considering delaying the deadline for higher tariffs to resume and renewed his threat to cut off talks and impose duty rates on several nations, including Japan. He criticized Japan for shunning U.S. rice exports and for imbalanced auto trade between the two countries. He floated 30% to 35% tariffs on Japanese goods and cast doubts on whether the U.S. could reach a deal with Japan. So far, markets have shrugged off fears of higher tariffs. "Investors are banking on yet another Trump retreat and reversal," said Mike O'Rourke, chief market strategist at JonesTrading. Verint Systems is in talks with buyout firm Thoma Bravo over a possible acquisition, according to Bloomberg. Centene withdrew its full-year outlook after the company said it received data showing its enrollees in the Affordable Care Act insurance marketplaces overall appeared fewer, and less healthy, than expected. Medora Lee is a money, markets, and personal finance reporter at USA TODAY. You can reach her at mjlee@ and subscribe to our free Daily Money newsletter for personal finance tips and business news every Monday through Friday. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: US stock futures higher as Trump megabill heads to House Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
