Some fear Chinese automakers' playbook is existential threat to US auto industry
The strategy stretches from internet-connected vehicle technologies and electric vehicle powertrain systems to actuators and even engines that once defined models. Automakers agree to use common specifications for vehicle parts, sometimes at the behest of the government, to create economies of scale, ensure quality and offer better functionality to customers.
The effort has contributed to lower-cost and technologically advanced vehicles from China that people like Ford Motor Co. CEO Jim Farley have called an existential threat to the U.S. auto industry.
"We have to beat (Chinese EV giant) BYD, and we're not going to do it with cheaper batteries," Farley said last week during a panel at the Reindustrialize summit in Detroit. "We're going to have to do that with smarter engineering and better supply chain and manufacturing."
A key part of that, said Terry Woychowski, president of automotive at Caresoft Global Technologies Inc., a benchmarking consulting firm, is common parts between brands and automakers.
"To compete from a cost perspective and time perspective, there needs to be much more sharing of components," he said at the company's vehicle tear-down facility in Livonia.
He gave an example: Three automakers go to a supplier for a windshield wiper motor, each providing several thousand specifications for the parts. The supplier agrees to make the individual part for 100,000 vehicles for each company. In contrast, Chinese brands are increasingly agreeing on a list of requirements for a supplier to produce one part many times over.
"If you could all get together and say, 'OK, we took 8,000 requirements (each), and we made it 4,000, and we've all agreed - boom. Can you make that for all of us?' You say, 'Yeah, 300,000 at scale,'" Woychowski said. "We all need a motor to do this, but we all think we're smarter than anyone else, and that our smartness is what makes us a better product.
"Who would know?" he continued. "Who would care? Nobody. It's got to work. But we fixate on those things because we rely on 100 years of experience. We rely on our specs. We rely on the way we specify a product."
As a result, Chinese automakers take advantage of greater economies of scale and introduce product faster compared to U.S. companies for a part of the vehicle that probably won't make or break a sale, Woychowski said.
Meanwhile, some automakers in China adopting a common structural design have reduced their bill of materials costs by 5-10%, said Sharath Reddy, senior vice president of research and development at Magna International Inc. Standardization also has been key to unlocking product development timelines of less than two years and driving reliability and quality benefits from tested designs built at scale.
Reconciling different engineering philosophies, protecting intellectual property and balancing standardization with the need for differentiation, however, can be a challenge, Reddy said. Additionally, legacy companies work with processes and specifications that have been put in place over decades.
"For them, adopting standardization can take years," Reddy said in an email, "especially as it needs to align with sourcing cycles."
That's less of a challenge for the startups and new brands working from the ground up in China, he added. Additionally, the role of government and the work of organizations like the China Automotive Technology and Research Center and China Society of Automotive Engineers have contributed to accelerating adoption.
For example, the government's standardization of the hardware interface and communication protocols for charging ports for new-energy vehicles, including EVs and plug-in hybrids, allows drivers to use any public or private charging station. That access has helped EV adoption, whereas it's struggled in the United States, where automakers traditionally have used a different charging port from Tesla Inc.
"In North America and Europe, there isn't the same level of centralized collaboration. OEMs tend to operate more independently, which makes broad standardization harder to achieve," Reddy wrote. "That said, we're seeing signs of change. With rising cost pressures and increased competition - especially from Chinese OEMs - some global automakers are beginning to revisit how they approach standardization."
The most effective use of this approach is sharing components that aren't tied to a brand's identity or for areas where customers don't interact with the vehicle, such as structural parts, seat frame closures, actuators and certain electronic modules, Reddy said. More challenging areas are lighting, exteriors, interiors, powertrains, advanced driver assistance systems and infotainment.
"These areas often define the user experience and brand identity," he said, "so OEMs typically want more control and differentiation there."
Shifting consumer expectations
The line for what parts are important for differentiation is shifting, experts said. As the lifespans of gas- and diesel-powered vehicles extend amid a bumpier transition to EVs, automakers are pressed on where to invest. Plus, newer technologies like the interior's digital cockpit experience are increasingly becoming a way for models and brands to separate themselves from the competition.
Bill Russo, CEO of consulting and investment platform Automobility Ltd. in Shanghai, said "the foreign brands have had to rethink, because the whole pricing strategy and the whole content strategy has always been pegged around brands that are defined and differentiated based on their driving performance. It's not about that in the 21st century."
More people in China ride than drive, which means they are looking for a vehicle space to live in and enjoy, he explained. The bragging right of the car, Russo said, isn't about the 0-60 mph acceleration.
"When the transition happens to EV, it goes from an analog to more of a digital measure of technology differentiation," he said. "It's not that I-get-the-good-stuff-if-I buy-the-bigger-engine way of thinking about product planning. I get the good stuff or I opt in for more intelligence, more experience, more comfort, more cabin comfort."
As a result, even engines are increasingly becoming an area of commonality. Horse Powertrain Ltd. is a joint venture between China-based Volvo parent Zhejiang Geely Holding Group Co. and French automaker Renault SA that produces engines, transmissions and other powertrain parts, including for hybrids. Horse also said publicly that it's supplying engines for Mercedes-Benz and other brands.
With 17 plants and five research and development centers on three continents, Horse now has its eyes set on expanding into North America, CEO Matias Giannini said on a recent visit to Detroit.
Traditionally, engines were a part of the DNA of a brand or model. Although that still might be true for performance-oriented vehicles, it may not be as much of a priority for other offerings, creating opportunity for economies of scale, Giannini said.
Collaboration may be a move to save on costs to fill out a company's portfolio for ICE and hybrid vehicles when capital is spread thin investing in EVs and other advanced technologies that automakers see is their future, Giannini said.
"By 2040, 50% of vehicle sales still will not be EVs," he said. "A lot of OEMs had given up (on investing in ICE), and they're realizing there is more than one road to net zero (carbon emissions). We offer solutions to close gaps, as companies realize they need to have more hybrids, and the biggest question is: What is the most efficient way? We can help them get the volume they need."
Giannini said cost savings depend on whether an automaker uses an off-the-shelf product or develops something with Horse. The manufacturer makes 8 million engines and transmissions per year and has $17 billion (15 billion euro) annual revenue outlook.
What the industry says
General Motors Co. had said it's going "all in on EVs," only to reverse that decision by announcing plans to launch plug-in hybrids in 2027 in North America. A representative for the Detroit automaker declined to comment on shared component efforts, citing competitive reasons. GM has partnered with Hyundai Motor Co. on vehicle development, supply chain and clean-energy technology, with GM CEO Mary Barra in recent months teasing that more information on that collaboration will be coming soon.
In a statement, Stellantis NV - parent of Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep and Ram - shared that the automaker isn't a part of any external or industrywide standardization effort, but that it uses collaboration and scale across its 14 brands globally.
Ford Motor Co. spokesperson Mike Levine pointed to the Dearborn automaker's partnership with Volkswagen AG that shares platforms and plants. For example, the VW Amarok truck is based on the Ford Ranger pickup, and both are built at a Ford plant in South Africa. Ford and GM have also developed together nine- and 10-speed transmissions.
Ford also referred The Detroit News to the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, which didn't respond to a request for comment.
German supplier Robert Bosch GmbH seeks standardization of products within its portfolio to save on costs, though automakers define their individual specifications, spokesperson Tim Wieland said in a statement.
Japanese supplier Denso Corp. spokesperson Andrew Rickerman said in a statement that standardization is an area the company is always evaluating. Denso leverages a "core and customize approach" when co-developing products with customers in which it presents a core product that can be altered for the unique applications and requirements of individual customers and the regions in which they operate.
"This approach allows us to produce dependable products," Rickerman said, "that still offer opportunities to innovate for consumer value, helping us make continual advancements in traditional and new product areas."
SAE International in the United States works with stakeholders to develop standards in the automotive and aerospace industries. The organization's standards are voluntary, though it does provide information to governments developing regulations when requested.
Regarding China, "they have certain benefits that we may not recognize as easily in a free market society where their market is somewhat constrained to a certain degree," Christian Thiele, SAE's senior director of ground vehicle standards, said about government support and subsidies in China for standardization.
But industry collaboration in the United States to improve safety, health and other benefits for customers has been ongoing for decades. ADAS, driver monitoring systems and sustainability are major topics today Thiele said. SAE reviews existing standards every five years, though some areas that represent rapidly changing technologies, like those around the North American Charging Standard, are discussed more frequently.
"Getting 125 engineers in the room, you might think sometimes it's efficient, but it doesn't get that efficient, because now you have a lot of strong-willed individuals with their opinions," Thiele said. "But what you're doing at the end of the day is you're delivering the best product there is."
And even in these discussions, Chinese competitors are participating as they look to expand into the U.S. market, Thiele said.
"You may not get a complete vehicle on four wheels from BYD next week," he said, "but eventually that will happen."
Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
U.S., China discuss tariffs in effort to extend truce, Reuters says
U.S. and Chinese negotiators are meeting to tackle economic disputes, aiming to extend a truce meant to keep higher tariffs at bay, David Lawder of Reuters reports. China currently faces an August 12 deadline to reach a tariff agreement with President Donald Trump's administration. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Magnetic Resources Joins 2 Other ASX Penny Stocks Worth Watching
The Australian market has experienced a mixed performance recently, with significant declines in materials and financials contrasted by gains in the energy sector. Despite these fluctuations, investors continue to seek opportunities beyond the major players, exploring areas like penny stocks for potential growth. While the term "penny stock" might seem outdated, these smaller or newer companies can still offer surprising value when backed by strong financials and stability. Top 10 Penny Stocks In Australia Name Share Price Market Cap Financial Health Rating Alfabs Australia (ASX:AAL) A$0.40 A$114.64M ★★★★☆☆ EZZ Life Science Holdings (ASX:EZZ) A$2.14 A$100.95M ★★★★★★ GTN (ASX:GTN) A$0.59 A$112.49M ★★★★★★ IVE Group (ASX:IGL) A$3.00 A$462.55M ★★★★★☆ West African Resources (ASX:WAF) A$2.38 A$2.71B ★★★★★★ Southern Cross Electrical Engineering (ASX:SXE) A$1.78 A$470.65M ★★★★★★ Regal Partners (ASX:RPL) A$2.90 A$975.05M ★★★★★★ Navigator Global Investments (ASX:NGI) A$1.815 A$889.49M ★★★★★☆ Austco Healthcare (ASX:AHC) A$0.38 A$138.44M ★★★★★★ CTI Logistics (ASX:CLX) A$1.86 A$149.81M ★★★★☆☆ Click here to see the full list of 464 stocks from our ASX Penny Stocks screener. Here's a peek at a few of the choices from the screener. Magnetic Resources Simply Wall St Financial Health Rating: ★★★★☆☆ Overview: Magnetic Resources NL is involved in the exploration of mineral tenements in Western Australia and has a market cap of A$411.91 million. Operations: Currently, there are no reported revenue segments for the company. Market Cap: A$411.91M Magnetic Resources NL, with a market cap of A$411.91 million, is currently pre-revenue and unprofitable, lacking significant revenue streams. The company has less than a year of cash runway based on its current free cash flow and no long-term liabilities or debt. Its short-term assets significantly surpass short-term liabilities, indicating sound financial management despite its challenges. Recent board changes include the appointment of Aaron Sim as an alternate director, bringing extensive financial advisory experience to the table. Earnings are forecast to grow significantly annually; however, past losses have increased over five years at 18.8% per year. Take a closer look at Magnetic Resources' potential here in our financial health report. Learn about Magnetic Resources' future growth trajectory here. NextEd Group Simply Wall St Financial Health Rating: ★★★★☆☆ Overview: NextEd Group Limited offers educational services across Australia, Europe, and South America with a market cap of A$51.09 million. Operations: NextEd Group's revenue is primarily derived from its International Vocational segment at A$73.79 million, followed by Technology & Design at A$11.29 million, Domestic Vocational at A$9.22 million, and Go Study Group contributing A$6.16 million. Market Cap: A$51.09M NextEd Group Limited, with a market cap of A$51.09 million, primarily generates revenue from its International Vocational segment. Despite being unprofitable and not expected to achieve profitability in the next three years, it benefits from a strong cash runway exceeding three years due to positive free cash flow growth. The company is debt-free but faces challenges with short-term assets not covering liabilities. Recent leadership changes include appointing Andrew Nye as Chief Financial Officer, bringing extensive financial management expertise. Although NextEd trades at good value compared to peers, losses have increased significantly over the past five years. Dive into the specifics of NextEd Group here with our thorough balance sheet health report. Examine NextEd Group's earnings growth report to understand how analysts expect it to perform. Perenti Simply Wall St Financial Health Rating: ★★★★★★ Overview: Perenti Limited is a global mining services company with a market capitalization of A$1.64 billion. Operations: Perenti's revenue is primarily derived from Contract Mining Services at A$2.50 billion, followed by Drilling Services at A$750.65 million, and Mining Services and Idoba contributing A$229.77 million. Market Cap: A$1.64B Perenti Limited, with a market cap of A$1.64 billion, primarily derives revenue from Contract Mining Services (A$2.50 billion). Despite negative earnings growth over the past year and lower profit margins (2.5% compared to last year's 3.9%), the company is trading at a significant discount to its estimated fair value. Perenti's debt management has improved, with a reduced debt-to-equity ratio now at 45.5%, and its short-term assets exceed both short- and long-term liabilities, indicating solid financial footing. Earnings are forecasted to grow annually by 24.84%, supported by high-quality past earnings performance and stable weekly volatility (5%). Get an in-depth perspective on Perenti's performance by reading our balance sheet health report here. Evaluate Perenti's prospects by accessing our earnings growth report. Summing It All Up Jump into our full catalog of 464 ASX Penny Stocks here. Ready To Venture Into Other Investment Styles? AI is about to change healthcare. These 26 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10b in market cap - there's still time to get in early. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include ASX:MAU ASX:NXD and ASX:PRN. This article was originally published by Simply Wall St. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data


CNBC
2 hours ago
- CNBC
U.S. and China to resume tariff talks on Monday in effort to extend truce
Senior U.S. and Chinese negotiators meet in Stockholm on Monday to tackle longstanding economic disputes at the center of the countries' trade war, aiming to extend a truce keeping sharply higher tariffs at bay. China is facing an Aug. 12 deadline to reach a durable tariff agreement with President Donald Trump's administration, after Beijing and Washington reached a preliminary deal in June to end weeks of escalating tit-for-tat tariffs. Without an agreement, global supply chains could face renewed turmoil from duties exceeding 100%. The Stockholm talks, led by U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng, take place a day after European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen met Trump at his golf course in Scotland to clinch a deal that would see a 15% baseline tariff on most EU goods. Trade analysts on both sides of the Pacific say the discussions in the Swedish capital are unlikely to produce any breakthroughs but could prevent further escalation and help create conditions for Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping to meet later this year. Previous U.S.-China trade talks in Geneva and London in May and June focused on bringing U.S. and Chinese retaliatory tariffs down from triple-digit levels and restoring the flow of rare earth minerals halted by China and Nvidia H20 AI chips and other goods halted by the United States. So far, the talks have not delved into broader economic issues. They include U.S. complaints that China's state-led, export-driven model is flooding world markets with cheap goods, and Beijing's complaints that U.S. national security export controls on tech goods seek to stunt Chinese growth. "Stockholm will be the first meaningful round of U.S.-China trade talks," said Bo Zhengyuan, Shanghai-based partner at China consultancy firm Plenum. Trump has been successful in pressuring some other trading partners, including Japan, Vietnam and the Philippines, into preliminary deals accepting higher U.S. tariffs of 15% to 20%. Analysts say the U.S.-China negotiations are far more complex and will require more time. China's grip on the global market for rare earth minerals and magnets, used in everything from military hardware to car windshield wiper motors, has proved to be an effective leverage point on U.S. industries. In the background of the talks is speculation about a possible meeting between Trump and Xi in late October. Trump has said he will decide soon whether to visit China in a landmark trip to address trade and security tensions. A new flare-up of tariffs and export controls would likely derail any plans for a meeting with Xi. "The Stockholm meeting is an opportunity to start laying the groundwork for a Trump visit to China," said Wendy Cutler, vice president at the Asia Society Policy Institute. Bessent has already said he wants to work out an extension of the Aug. 12 deadline to prevent tariffs snapping back to 145% on the U.S. side and 125% on the Chinese side. Still, China is likely to request a reduction of the multi-layered U.S. tariffs, which total 55% on most goods, and further easing of U.S. high-tech export controls, analysts said. Beijing has argued that such purchases would help reduce the U.S. trade deficit with China, which reached $295.5 billion in 2024. China is currently facing a 20% tariff related to the U.S. fentanyl crisis, a 10% reciprocal tariff, and 25% duties on most industrial goods imposed during Trump's first term. Bessent has also said he would discuss the need for China to rebalance its economy away from exports toward domestic consumer demand. The shift would require China to put an end to a protracted property crisis and boost social safety nets to encourage household spending. Michael Froman, a former U.S. trade representative during former President Barack Obama's administration, said such a shift has been a goal of U.S. policymakers for two decades. "Can we effectively use tariffs to get China to fundamentally change their economic strategy? That remains to be seen," said Froman, now president of the Council on Foreign Relations think-tank.