logo
How Jonathan Powell's people brokered Syria deal from inside president's palace

How Jonathan Powell's people brokered Syria deal from inside president's palace

Daily Mail​5 days ago
When British special forces mounted a dramatic 'kill' operation against a senior terrorist in Syria last month, intelligence sources boasted how the hit meant the country was now a safer place.
But while military might was neutralising the threats to Westerners in the troubled state, in the shadows of diplomatic back-channels, go-betweens were secretly working on ways the UK could re-establish formal links with Damascus and its new regime, led by Islamists once linked to Al Qaeda.
Those moves are understood to have been significantly influenced by Sir Keir Starmer 's National Security Adviser, Jonathan Powell, using a mix of his powerful position in government and, as The Mail on Sunday reveals today, the organisation he founded.
Inter Mediate is so embedded in the fledgling presidency of Ahmed Al-Sharaa that they are even said to operate an office inside the presidential palace.
Diplomatic sources say their work, combined with security operations such as the killing of Abu Hasan al-Jazrawi – the mastermind behind suicide truck attacks on Western troops who was hit by a Hellfire missile unleashed from a Reaper drone – made Syria safe enough for David Lammy to become the first British minister to set foot on Syrian soil in 14 years.
While in Damascus earlier this month, the Foreign Secretary announced the reinstatement of diplomatic links and spoke of 'renewed hope for the Syrian people' after a decade of conflict.
After the visit, Mr Lammy said: 'As the first UK minister to visit Syria since the fall of Assad's brutal regime, I've seen first-hand the remarkable progress Syrians have made in rebuilding their lives and their country.
The UK is re-establishing diplomatic relations because it is in our interests to support the new government to deliver their commitment to build a stable, more secure and prosperous future for all Syrians.'
But yesterday, as Syria was plunged into further sectarian conflict, Mr Lammy was forced to strike a different tone.
After a ceasefire failed to put an end to clashes between Bedouin tribes and Druze-linked militias, Mr Lammy said he was 'horrified by the violence in Southern Syria'.
Writing on social media, the Foreign Secretary said: 'A sustainable ceasefire is vital. I spoke to Syrian Foreign Minister Asaad al-Shaibani yesterday as part of UK efforts to urge a peaceful resolution.
'We want to see the fighting ended, civilians protected and humanitarian access enabled.'
The new regime is scrambling to keep control of the country following the renewed clashes between militias from the minority Druze religious group and the Sunni Muslim Bedouin which have claimed hundreds of lives and left tens of thousands of people displaced.
Fresh violence erupted last Sunday. Government forces intervened, nominally to restore order – but then sided with the Bedouins.
Israel then launched air strikes against Syrian forces in defence of the Druze, which form a substantial community in Israel.
Yesterday Mr Al-Sharaa urged Bedouin tribes to 'fully commit' to ending hostilities.
Government forces had withdrawn from the Sweida province of Southern Syria following a ceasefire announced on Wednesday, but they are now preparing to return as it appears to crumble.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Starmer and Modi hail ‘historic day' as UK-India trade deal is signed
Starmer and Modi hail ‘historic day' as UK-India trade deal is signed

The Guardian

time3 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Starmer and Modi hail ‘historic day' as UK-India trade deal is signed

Keir Starmer and Narendra Modi have hailed a 'historic day' as they signed a free trade agreement between the UK and India. The two leaders said the trade deal, which is projected to boost the UK economy by £4.8bn a year and bring in £6bn of investment by British and Indian businesses, marked a 'step change' in relations between their countries. Modi and Starmer addressed cameras at Chequers, the prime minister's country house near Aylesbury in Buckinghamshire, after signing the deal, which was finalised in May following nearly three and a half years of negotiations. Modi, speaking via a translator, described the UK and India as 'natural partners'. The agreement will see average tariffs on UK goods cut from 15% to 3%, with whisky tariffs halved initially and reduced further over the next few years. It will now be ratified by the British and Indian parliaments, a process which will take several months. Critics have argued that the deal does not offer enough for the UK's financial and legal services industries and have raised questions over India's human rights and environmental record. The London Mining Network said in a statement that the deal 'lacks robust climate safeguards', particularly around coal extraction in India. Negotiations continue over a bilateral investment treaty, which would benefit the City of London, but UK ministers and officials are understood to believe it is unlikely that one would be agreed. The two governments also continue to discuss the UK's plans for a carbon border tax, which India strongly opposes. Modi is in the UK for meetings with Starmer and King Charles, and is expected to attend a business reception on Thursday evening. The prime minister has been urged to raise the case of Jagtar Singh Johal, a Sikh activist from Dumbarton who has been detained in India for eight years. Sign up to Headlines UK Get the day's headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning after newsletter promotion Johal was arrested in connection with terror-related offences while in India for his wedding in 2017, and has been held since despite having been cleared of one of the nine cases against him this year. He says he was tortured in the early days of his detention and forced to make a confession. Ian Murray, the Scotland secretary, said the case was 'right at the top of the agenda'. He told BBC Radio Scotland on Thursday: 'The government are doing all we possibly can to get this resolved. There was a recent meeting, just at the start of June, between the foreign secretary and his counterpart in India.' Johal's brother, Gurpreet Singh Johal, said before Modi's visit that he was 'putting my faith in the prime minister to get this done and bring Jagtar home. He was rightly critical of the previous government's failure, and he recognised that Jagtar is arbitrarily detained … I've grown very tired of fine words and weak excuses for a lack of action, while my brother grows old in prison.' Andrew Griffith, the shadow business secretary, said the free trade agreement with India had only been made possible 'because of Brexit delivered by the Conservatives'. Kemi Badenoch, the Tory leader, was critical of the deal when it was announced in May. The Confederation of British Industry said the signing 'sends a powerful signal that the UK is open for business and remains resolute in its commitment to free and fair trade'.

Public frustrated by asylum seeker housing, says minister Jonathan Reynolds
Public frustrated by asylum seeker housing, says minister Jonathan Reynolds

BBC News

time3 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Public frustrated by asylum seeker housing, says minister Jonathan Reynolds

Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds has said the government shares the public's "huge frustration" at the pressure the asylum system puts on housing to the BBC, he acknowledged concern about the Home Office competing with local councils to find temporary homes for asylum seekers and homeless people respectively. He said the solution lay in building more homes, processing asylum applications faster, removing those with no right to be in the UK and cutting small boat crossings. Earlier this week, the Conservatives criticised Sir Keir Starmer for claiming there was "lots of housing in many local authorities" to provide temporary accommodation for homeless families. The Conservative's new shadow housing secretary Sir James Cleverly said the remarks had "amplified" the frustrations of people who were trying to get on the housing past week has seen ongoing demonstrations outside a hotel in Epping being used to house asylum seekers. The prime minister made the remark when appearing at the Liaison Committee, a group of senior MPs. Labour MP Dame Meg Hillier, who chairs the Treasury Committee, asked the prime minister where the government was going to house homeless people, given that the price of temporary accommodation had been driven up by the need to house asylum replied: "Oh, there is lots of housing and many local authorities that can be used, and we're identifying where it can be used."Pressed for specific examples, Sir Keir said he would write to the about the comments on the Today programme, Reynolds said the prime minister "was talking about, in lengthy way, we need to put more in place to solve the housing crisis. "We're doing that and there are several options that can be considered for British families in temporary accommodation." Speaking to the same programme, chair of the Housing Committee Florence Eshalomi said councils were "at breaking point when it comes to housing supply".She said her committee had been told that between 2023- 2024, local councils had spent a total of £2.3bn on temporary accommodation and that the numbers in temporary accommodation had risen by 11% in the past year. Asked about the Sir Keir's comments, she said she would "welcome seeing the detail the prime minister was alluding to". She said it "cannot be right" that the Home Office and local authorities were having to compete for the same accommodation and that there needed to be better "co-operation" between government departments. She also said more social housing - housing that can be rented at affordable levels - needed to be built in order to ease the pressures. Figures released earlier this year found that a record 123,000 families were living in temporary housing in accommodation refers to accommodation which is organised by the local authority but is not a permanent home. It can include hotels, hostels or caravans. It is provided to those who are homeless, while they wait for longer term housing. Priority is given to those at risk of abuse from a partner or relative, pregnant women, people with dependent children or those who are homeless because of a fire or flood. Separately, the government is required by law to provide accommodation to destitute asylum seekers, while their application is being processed. In general asylum seekers are not allowed to work and earn money until their claim has been completed, although there are some exceptions. Since 2020, there has been an increased in using hotels to provide this accommodation. As of March 2025, there were 32,345 people in asylum hotels, up from 29,585 at the end of June 2024, but lower than the total in December. The Home Office's annual accounts show a third less was spent on hotels to house asylum seekers between April 2024 and March 2025, falling from £3bn to £2.1bn. A senior Home Office source told the BBC one of the main factors behind the saving was moving some asylum seekers from hotels into other types of cheaper said the department had prioritised moving families and children into regular housing so they were not living in hotels for long periods of government has said it wants to end the use of hotels to house asylum seekers altogether and Reynold told the BBC the number of hotels being used had fallen from a peak of 400 to 200. However, he added: "The solution is not about putting people into different forms of accommodation"It's about having a system where if people shouldn't be in the UK they have to leave the UK."That is government policy... it is about having a system that processes the claims at the pace they should be processed and doesn't leave people in limbo."

BBC claims its journalists are facing starvation in Gaza
BBC claims its journalists are facing starvation in Gaza

Telegraph

time22 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

BBC claims its journalists are facing starvation in Gaza

The BBC has warned Israel that its journalists are facing starvation in Gaza. In a joint statement with the world's largest news agencies, the broadcaster called for 'adequate food supplies' to be provided to people in the war-torn area. It raised concerns about its journalists in Gaza, who they said are suffering the same conditions as the population they are reporting on for the BBC. Foreign reporters are barred from entering the Gaza Strip, apart from a few short cases of being 'embedded' with Israeli forces, and international news organisations rely on journalists based in the war-torn region. The statement by the BBC, Reuters, the Associated Press and Agence France Presse said: 'We are desperately concerned for our journalists in Gaza, who are increasingly unable to feed themselves and their families. 'For many months, these independent journalists have been the world's eyes and ears on the ground in Gaza. They are now facing the same dire circumstances as those they are covering. 'Journalists endure many deprivations and hardships in war zones. We are deeply alarmed that the threat of starvation is now one of them. 'We once again urge the Israeli authorities to allow journalists in and out of Gaza. It is essential that adequate food supplies reach the people there.' The plea comes after more than 100 international aid organisations and human rights groups, including Médecins Sans Frontières, warned that Gaza was at critical risk of famine. The groups claimed that the 'Israeli government's siege starves the people of Gaza'. The World Health Organisation has also warned of 'mass starvation'. The Hamas-run health ministry has tallied the total death count during the conflict overall at 59,000. Israel claimed that more than 150 food trucks were already on the move, and a hundred more are awaiting pick up by UN agencies. The BBC's intervention in the crisis comes after a string of controversies about its coverage of the Israel-Hamas conflict. The corporation was found to have breached its editorial guidelines over the acquisition of the documentary of Gaza: How to Survive a Warzone. This documentary was pulled when it was revealed that its main narrator, a boy named Abudullah, was the son of the Hamas-run government's deputy minister of agriculture, Ayman Alyazouri - a fact not disclosed to viewers. This blunder was compounded when Deborah Turness, the BBC News boss, told staff there was a 'difference' between the Hamas government and the Hamas military wing. Tim Davie, the BBC director-general, has moved to reassure Jewish members of staff who are concerned about the broadcaster's culture and leadership following a series of ' catastrophic failures '. The BBC's leadership has drawn up plans to expand anti-Semitism awareness training in the wake of these damaging scandals.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store