
Fed keeps interest rates steady despite Trump's push for cuts
The choice to hold off on a rate cut will almost certainly result in further conflict between the Fed and White House, as Trump has repeatedly demanded that the central bank reduce borrowing costs as part of his effort to assert control over one of the few remaining independent federal agencies.Trump argues that because the US economy is doing well, rates should be lowered. But unlike a blue-chip company that usually pays lower rates than a troubled start-up, the Fed adjusts rates to either slow or speed growth, and would be more likely to keep them high if the economy is strong to prevent an inflationary outbreak.Earlier Wednesday, the government said the economy expanded at a healthy 3% annual rate in the second quarter, though that figure followed a negative reading for the first three months of the year, when the economy shrank 0.5% at an annual rate. Most economists averaged the two figures to get a growth rate of about 1.2% for the first half of this year.Some of the disagreement likely reflects jockeying to replace Powell, whose term ends in May 2026. Waller in particular has been mentioned as a potential future Fed chair.Bowman, meanwhile, last dissented in September 2024, when the Fed cut its key rate by a half-point. She said she preferred a quarter point cut instead, and cited the fact that inflation was still above 2.5% as a reason for caution.Waller also said earlier this month that he favoured cutting rates, but for very different reasons than Trump has cited: Waller thinks that growth and hiring are slowing, and that the Fed should reduce borrowing costs to forestall a weaker economy and a rise in unemployment.There are other camps on the Fed's 19-member rate-setting committee (only 12 of the 19 actually vote on rate decisions). In June, seven members signalled that they supported leaving rates unchanged through the end of this year, while two suggested they preferred a single rate cut this year. The other half supported more reductions, with eight officials backing two cuts, and two -- widely thought to be Waller and Bowman -- supporting three reductions.advertisementThe dissents could be a preview of what might happen after Powell steps down, if President Donald Trump appoints a replacement who pushes for the much lower interest rates the White House desires. Other Fed officials could push back if a future chair sought to cut rates by more than economic conditions would otherwise support.Overall, the committee's quarterly forecasts in June suggested the Fed would cut twice this year. There are only three more Fed policy meetings -- in September, October, and December -- and some economists forecast that a cut will occur in September. Wall Street investors also expect cuts in September and December, according to futures pricing.When the Fed cuts its rate, it often -- but not always -- results in lower borrowing costs for mortgages, auto loans and credit cards.Some economists agree with Waller's concerns about the job market. Excluding government hiring, the economy added just 74,000 jobs in June, with most of those gains occurring in health care.advertisement'We are in a much slower job hiring backdrop than most people appreciate,' said Tom Porcelli, chief US economist at PGIM Fixed Income.Michael Feroli, an economist at JPMorgan Chase, said in a note to clients this week if the pair were to dissent, 'it would say more about auditioning for the Fed chair appointment than about economic conditions.'The Fed's two-day meeting comes after a week of extraordinary interactions with the Trump White House, which has accused Powell of mismanaging an extensive, $2.5 billion renovation of two office buildings. Trump suggested two weeks ago that the rising cost for the project could be a 'firing offense' but has since backed off that characterisation.Notably, Trump argues that the Fed should cut because the economy is doing very well, which is a different viewpoint than nearly all economists, who say that a healthy, growing economy doesn't need rate cuts.'If your economy is hot, you're supposed to have higher short-term rates,' Porcelli said.- EndsMust Watch

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
28 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Trump fires data chief after disappointing jobs report shakes markets
President Donald Trump got some bad economic news Friday, and responded by shooting the messenger. Trump fired the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, hours after it sent markets tumbling with a report that showed a dramatic slowdown in US hiring. It's an escalation of his campaign against economic institutions long held to be above partisan politics — one that until now has principally targeted the Federal Reserve. And Trump got an unexpected opportunity that same afternoon to exert more influence at the central bank too, when Governor Adriana Kugler announced her imminent resignation, just as investors were still digesting the jobs numbers and the BLS news. He'll now get to name a replacement, likely one who's inclined to support his drive for lower interest rates. There's already widespread concern about Trump's relentless pressure on the Fed and its chief Jerome Powell to cut rates, since the consensus is that central banks do a better job of taming inflation when politicians leave them alone. His move against US data agencies now risks damaging the integrity of the world's most important statistics – numbers that can move global markets by trillions of dollars at a time. Trump's targeting of the BLS will 'spark general anxiety in the market that politics may bleed over into future economic considerations,' said Yung-Yu Ma, chief investment strategist at PNC Asset Management Group. 'The bigger concern now for investors is what is the next step? Will Trump threaten to fire Fed Chair Powell again after this?' And these questions arise with the US already facing a 'nasty cycle,' Ma said, where growth slows and inflation starts to rise. Trump used Friday's hiring numbers to renew his attack on Powell, who'd cited a solid jobs market as one reason for holding interest rates steady earlier this week. There was a silver lining for the president: Markets immediately started pricing in a September cut when the data came in. Two-year Treasury bonds – which are tightly linked to short-term Fed rates – soared the most since 2023, sending yields down almost 30 basis points. The announcement of Kugler's departure, and the prospect of a Trump pick joining the Fed in her place, amplified rate-cut bets for later in the year. Meanwhile the S&P 500 index was slumping, the president was directing barbs at McEntarfer, and economists linked to both political parties were jumping to her defense. The BLS on Friday slashed its payroll estimates for the previous couple of months, as well as posting a below-forecast number for July. It's the latest in a series of unusually large revisions, which have drawn Trump's ire before – including in the runup to last year's election. 'Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate, they can't be manipulated for political purposes,' Trump posted Friday on social media. He later added that the figures 'were RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad.' But US data agencies enjoy a global reputation for 'gold standard' statistics – one Trump may now be putting in danger — and economists of all stripes dismissed the idea of politically motivated manipulation. 'There's just absolutely no evidence' that McEntarfer had any desire to fake the numbers, said Michael Strain of the conservative-leaning American Enterprise Institute. William Beach, who was appointed to head the BLS during Trump's first term, called her firing 'totally groundless' and said it sets a 'dangerous precedent.' McEntarfer will be replaced at the BLS on an acting basis by William Wiatrowski, currently the deputy chief, the administration said. As for Kugler, whose term was due to end in January, it's not clear who'll be appointed to fill her seat – and it could be a decision with major consequences. Even before her early departure, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent had suggested the administration might nominate a replacement for Kugler who'd then be elevated into the post of Fed chair. At the start of Friday, before all the drama that followed – the shock job numbers, BLS firing and Fed departure – Trump had issued a call to arms on social media, urging members of the central bank's board to defy their chair and vote for lower interest rates. 'ASSUME CONTROL, AND DO WHAT EVERYONE KNOWS HAS TO BE DONE!' he wrote. Later on, departing the White House, the president told reporters he was 'very happy' that he now has an open spot on the board — and posted that Powell should follow Kugler's example and resign.


Hindustan Times
28 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Mithi River fraud: EOW submits charge-sheet against two middlemen
MUMBAI: A 7,000-page charge-sheet has been submitted against two alleged middlemen involved in the Mithi River desilting fraud. Police said the charge-sheet also names deputy chief engineers Prashant Ramgude and Ganesh Bendre of the storm water drains department of the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC), and civic official Prashant Tayshete. Mumbai, India - May 7, 2025:EOW Dept of Mumbai Police arrested 2 accused Ketan Kadam and Jay Joshi Mithi River Desilting case and produced at Esplanade Court, in Mumbai, India, on Wednesday, May 7, 2025. (Photo by Anshuman Poyrekar/ Hindustan Times) (Hindustan Times) 'We have submitted a charge-sheet of more than 7,000 pages before the EOW (Economic Offences Wing) court. The court is yet to take cognisance of the chargesheet,' said a police officer, adding that around 15 people have been cited as witnesses. The charge-sheet was submitted by the Economic Offences Wing (EOW) of the Mumbai Police in the Esplanade metropolitan magistrate court on Friday. The case relates to a ₹65.54-crore fraud that involves the manipulation of tenders to favour certain middlemen, in the desilting of the Mithi River. 'Our evidence in the charge-sheet is primarily receipts, statements, air-ticket copies of foreign trips of BMC officers, which show how the two arrested accused middlemen, who acted as middlemen, sponsored foreign trips for BMC officials. These middlemen are Ketan Kadam, director of Woder India LLP, a Mumbai-based company that provides desilting services, and Jayesh Joshi, who is associated with Virgo Specialties Pvt Ltd, a Mumbai-based industrial products manufacturer. The middlemen then got contracts to supply equipment to the contractors at inflated rates. The equipment was then supplied to the BMC,' said a police officer. Police have charged the accused under sections 406 (criminal breach of trust), 420 (cheating), 465 (forgery) and 120B (criminal conspiracy) and 474 (possessing a forged document or electronic record with the intention of using it as genuine) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). Police said that prima facie investigations show that Kadam and Joshi, who acted as middleman in the desilting scam, had together received ₹9 crore. Kadam and Joshi are among 13 people named in the First Information Report (FIR). Investigators have questioned all 13 accused including actor Dino Morea and his brother, but have made only two arrests so far. These are Ketan Kadam and Jayesh Joshi, both of whom are out on bail. 'We have kept the option of further investigations open under section 193 (3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), for further investigations in the charge-sheet,' said the police officer. The FIR was registered in May, against 13 people, including three civic officials, for allegedly causing a loss of ₹65.54 crore to the BMC through irregularities in the execution of contracts for desilting the Mithi River. The FIR also names senior executives of the contractors involved in the desilting project, such as Matprop Technical Services, Virgo Specialties, Woder India, Acute Designs, Kailash Construction Company, NA Constructions, Nikhil Constructions and JRS Infrastructure. The alleged scam took place between 2013 and 2023, officials said. A special investigation team (SIT) was constituted in August 2024 after questions were raised in the state legislative council about alleged irregularities in the desilting of the 17.84-km-long river.


Economic Times
28 minutes ago
- Economic Times
US defense bill proposes examination of Apple display supplier
A measure added into a massive U.S. defense spending bill in recent weeks will, if passed, ask the Pentagon to determine whether one of Apple's display suppliers should be listed as a Chinese military company. Being on the list does not block companies from doing business in the U.S. but will in coming years block them from being part of the U.S. military's supply chain. The bill, known as the National Defense Authorization Act, was approved in July by key committees in both houses of the U.S. Congress. The final bill, considered a "must-pass" because it funds the U.S. military, is expected to become law later in the year. When the bill was approved by the U.S. House of Representatives Armed Services Committee, a newly added amendment for the first time asked the U.S. Defense Department to consider whether BOE Technology Group Co, listed on Apple's official suppliers list, should be added to a list of firms that allegedly aid China's military. BOE and Apple did not respond to requests for comment. Craig Singleton, a China expert at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, a Washington think-tank, said Beijing had offered billions of dollars in subsidies, tax breaks and loans to help firms such as BOE dominate global panel production. "This creates a single-source vulnerability that could be easily exploited to disrupt or degrade U.S. military operations, not to mention undermine commercial supply chains, during a conflict or period of heightened bilateral tension with Beijing," Singleton added. A study published last month by New York-based NERA Economic Consulting and commissioned by BOE's U.S. subsidiary found that the display industry, which includes major Korean players such as Samsung Electronics and LG Electronics, remains highly competitive, with no single player capable of significantly affecting global prices. "There is no credible risk of a supply chain disruption by mainland China display manufacturers," the report said.