Chandigarh: In Mauli Jagran rally, Congress hails army action
The rally was led by Manish Tewari, member of Parliament from Chandigarh, and HS Lucky, president of the Chandigarh Pradesh Congress Committee. Also present were Surjit Dhillon, president of the District Congress Committee, Manimajra, and Mukesh Rai, chairman, of the party's colony cell.
Manish Tewari, while addressing the gathering, said, 'The Indian Army has once again proved that the safety, sovereignty and dignity of our nation are in the most capable hands. Their resolute and effective action against aggression from across the border deserves not only our gratitude but our highest respect. Today, we stand united to honour their bravery and sacrifice.'
Lucky said, 'The Jai Hind Yatra is our humble tribute to the bravehearts of the army. They are the true guardians of our nation and their courage, in the face of constant threat, is an inspiration to every Indian. We thank them with folded hands and reaffirm our unwavering support.' The event concluded with national anthem and a pledge to uphold the unity and integrity of the nation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Deccan Herald
29 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
Censors and their ridiculous cuts
In 2010, the Indian government undid one of their more contentious decisions. They 'unbanned' the Satyajit Ray documentary, Sikkim. This film, commissioned in 1971 by the Chogyal (king) of Sikkim and then cast aside since he was not happy with its final cut (too much reality … err… poverty!) had been banned in 1975 by the Indian government in the light of Sikkim's controversial accession to India that year. Over the years, the film had vanished from public view and only in 2010 was it screened in Kolkata to a rapturous response. By then, the context had changed, and it was deemed 'safe'. .As far as films were concerned, 1975 (the year of the infamous Emergency) was annus horribilis. That year also witnessed the government come down on Aandhi, directed by Gulzar. The lead character's look and the plot were deemed much too close to Indira Gandhi and her life. And then there was the case of Kissa Kursi Ka (KKK), submitted to the Censor Board in 1975, blacklisted (without due process) owing to its spoofing of Indira and Sanjay Gandhi and their flunkies like Dhirendra Brahmachari and Rukhsana Sultana. Its prints were then secreted away and burnt on the express instructions of V C Shukla, the then I&B minister. This, despite the fact that the movie was directed by Amrit Nahata, who was a Congress MP. The movie was subsequently reshot and released in was common to all of these films was their politics. Sikkim made the larger Indian state uncomfortable. Aandhi and KKK made political leaders calling the shots in the government uncomfortable. That state of affairs continues. .'Superman' can't save Hollywood from superhero one were to list the films that have found themselves in the crosshairs of the Censor Board in recent times, the same terms and conditions apply. Panjab '95 and Santosh question the role of the state and its enforcement wing, the police. L2: Empuraan with its depiction of the 2002 Gujarat riots was skating close to the brings us to the case of 'Janaki V v/s State of Kerala'..State as 'sanskari'.Janaki V v/s State of Kerala is about sexual assault. And that its eponymous victim-character bore the name of the goddess who was the epitome of Indian womanhood was what waylaid the film for a while. Why even a kissing scene from 'Superman' had the censor authorities' knickers in a twist and was cut. .This cultural dimension to censorship wasn't always a thing. British-era censorship rules came down mostly on politics. Gandhi, the freedom movement, revolution — it was these that were on their proscribed list. .But it didn't always work. For all their attempts to curb political messaging, the British were daft enough to pass the song 'Door hato, ye duniyawaalon' in the 1943 movie, 'Kismet'. Since it was World War II, they read it as a warning to the Germans and Japanese to stay away from India. All of India knew that the song was aimed at our then-rulers. And it is they who were being asked to leave. .As for the 'sanskari' angle, movies of the 1920s and 30s were decidedly more uninhibited. Kissing was common with movies featuring both many, many kisses (1932's 'Zarina' — 42!) and long, long ones (1933's 'Karma' — allegedly four minutes). But somewhere along the line, the powers that be deemed it necessary to 'save' the Indian public from overtly sensual displays and began to come down hard on what they deemed was 'vulgar' and against 'family values'. These categories, fuzzy as they were, gave the censor authorities a lot of leeway and power. We were then ushered into the era of negotiation as filmmakers and pen-pushers argued, often maddeningly, about art and the 'national interest' and struck deals. The public, who were both to be fed these films and 'protected', were mute spectators. .Is all hope lost? .Are we, the public, then condemned to be patronised and hoodwinked eternally? Are we going to be 'protected' from risqué content because of our 'tender' sensitivities on the one hand and denied political content and ushered into a state of blind obedience, on the other? .Well… yes! If we continue to be so thin-skinned and demand 'bans' on all and sundry on the basis of the dodgy 'hurt sentiments' argument, this is how things are likely to be. In fact, it will probably get worse. A scenario where someone calls for a ban on the cooking or eating of non-vegetarian food on screen is not unimaginable. Equally, another might want to have a say in the 'naming' of characters. Villains cannot bear 'good' names may be the it is time we healed ourselves. Committing to free expression and a willingness to tolerate contrary opinions (political, artistic, whatever) is de rigueur for good citizenship. That is the need of the hour. The state must be held accountable for livelihoods, health and education rather than focusing on censorship..(The author is a well-known writer and editor)
India.com
29 minutes ago
- India.com
Deep As Ocean: PM Modi, Muizzu Affirm Centuries-Old Maldives-India Relation Amidst Reset
New Delhi: In a powerful symbol of renewed cooperation, Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu reaffirmed the enduring bond between India and the Maldives during a state banquet in Malé on Friday, celebrating 60 years of diplomatic relations. During the banquet, hosted in PM Modi's honour, President Muizzu reflected on the shared history between the two nations. 'This year marks 60 years of diplomatic relations between the Maldives and India, a milestone that reflects not only our shared history but also the depth and resilience of our partnership,' he said. 'Yet, the bond between our people predates diplomatic formalities. For centuries, the Indian Ocean has witnessed our exchanges as traders, travellers, and neighbours. Today, it continues to unite us with ties that no tide can break.' The banquet marked a significant moment in bilateral diplomacy, with PM Modi becoming the first state guest of President Muizzu's tenure. Modi was also present as the Guest of Honour at the Maldives' 60th Independence Day celebrations, an honour he described as 'deeply meaningful.' Addressing the gathering, Prime Minister Modi said, 'Maldives holds a special place in India's 'Neighbourhood First' policy. This relationship is not just about diplomacy; it's a bond of deep affinity.' He noted that this year also marks the 60th anniversary of India-Maldives diplomatic relations, a symbolic and timely coincidence. Modi emphasised the historical and cultural links that continue to define the India-Maldives relationship. 'Our shared heritage is as old as the monsoon and as sweet as Addu Bondi,' he said, drawing a cultural connection. 'Several words in Dhivehi have come from Indian languages. Our tastes, though different, are remarkably similar.' Highlighting the growing people-to-people ties, Modi shared that the 1 millionth tourist to the Maldives this year was an Indian, underscoring the rising engagement between the citizens of both nations. President Muizzu praised Modi's leadership and congratulated him for becoming India's second-longest-serving Prime Minister. He also thanked the Indian government for its continued support in the Maldives' economic and development journey. 'India has been a true partner and co-passenger on every turn of the Maldives' development path,' Muizzu said, acknowledging India's support in infrastructure, capacity building, and regional security. Reaffirming the Maldives' commitment to building a dynamic, inclusive economy and ensuring regional peace, President Muizzu said India's role is pivotal in realising those aspirations. PM Modi echoed that sentiment. 'Our relationship thrives on goodwill and mutual trust,' he said. 'We are colleagues in the Global South. Today, we have reiterated our commitment to a bright future together, in trade, security, and sustainable development.' The official banquet was attended by top dignitaries from both nations, including Maldivian Vice President Uz Hussain Mohamed Latheef, Speaker of the People's Majlis Abdul Raheem Abdulla, Special Envoy Mohamed Waheed Hassan, and India's External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar, along with senior officials from both governments. This visit marks Prime Minister Modi's first trip to the Maldives since beginning his third term in office.
Hans India
29 minutes ago
- Hans India
‘SIR' row rocks Parl House
NEW DELHI: Several MPs of the INDIA bloc parties, including Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge and former party chief Rahul Gandhi, on Friday held an unusual protest in Parliament House complex against the voter roll revision in Bihar by tearing posters with 'SIR' written on them and putting them in a 'disposal bin'. They also staged a protest march in Parliament House complex, demanding the rollback as well as a discussion on the issue. Ahead of the start of the day's proceedings, several MPs of the opposition, including those of the Congress, DMK, Samajwadi Party, TMC, RJD and Left parties, carried out a protest march with the banner 'SIR- Loktantra par Var'. Then in front of the Makar Dwar steps, a bin was placed and one by one the opposition leaders, including Kharge and Gandhi, tore the poster with SIR written on it and put it in the bin as a symbolic rejection of the exercise. The MPs also raised slogans like "Save democracy" and "Stop vote-bandi". The opposition has been protesting in both houses of Parliament against the Special Intensive Revision (SIR), alleging the EC's exercise was aimed at disenfranchising voters in Bihar ahead of the assembly elections.
