Has Kemi Badenoch finally shown the killer instinct to save her as Tory leader?
Principal among their complaints is that she never seems to get the better of her weekly parliamentary jousts with Keir Starmer. Time and again, she asks the wrong question, chooses the wrong topic, and lacks the wit to seize on any missteps by the Prime Minister, they moan. Why can't she give Starmer and co both barrels – just like showman Nigel Farage does on a regular basis?
It is not a criticism likely to be made of her again anytime soon. Not after her comprehensive filleting of Starmer over his defeat by Labour welfare rebels.
Initially, Starmer fended off Badenoch's barbs at him. It looked as though she would be repulsed yet again. You could imagine her Tory detractors already licking their lips, muttering, 'She can't even score an open goal.' But Badenoch wasn't finished. Starmer was merely the hors d'oeuvres. She took her knife to the person sitting behind Starmer, Rachel Reeves, asking him to guarantee she was safe in her job.
Starmer the lawyer should have seen it coming a mile off. It's the oldest trick in the political book: he could have answered with a categorical yes. But he didn't. In political terms, he left Reeves drifting in the wind. The chancellor's emotional and distraught response signalled that Badenoch had scored a direct hit.
A rare moment in such parliamentary exchanges, which, for the most part, have nothing to do with democracy or debate and are all about posturing, platitudes and pantomime politics. Knockout blows are about as common as someone scoring in the Eton Wall Game – about one per decade. Badenoch didn't just score, she smashed the ball through the back of the net.
The most important consequence of today's events is how, indeed whether, Reeves can survive such a harrowing and humbling public ordeal. And whether Starmer can re-establish his and his administration's personal and political authority. That is all in the balance. But there can be no doubt that eight months after becoming opposition leader, Badenoch has arrived on the big stage.
Her stock reply to complaints that she has not made her mark as a leader has been that it took heroine Margaret Thatcher years to do so. Thatcher became a formidable parliamentary performer, but it took her a long time. In her early years as opposition leader, she was frequently outwitted by Labour Prime Minister Harold Wilson. Thatcher's Tory critics said it showed she wasn't up to it. Just like Badenoch's Conservative critics. They won't be making the same criticism again anytime soon.
In blasting open the fault line between Starmer and Reeves with a lethal precision, a skill most thought was not in her armoury, Badenoch has at long last given demoralised Conservatives reasons to be cheerful.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
13 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Pound calm after Starmer backs Reeves, following bond sell-off
Update: Date: 2025-07-03T06:24:50.000Z Title: Introduction: Bonds and sterling in spotlight after Wednesday wobble Content: Good morning, and welcome to our rolling coverage of business, the financial markets and the world economy. All eyes are on UK bonds, and the pound, after both fell sharply yesterday amid speculation over the future of chancellor Rachel Reeves. Wednesday was a turbulent day for the UK bond market; prices of British government debt fell heavily as investors were gripped by concerns of change at the top of the Treasury. The selloff highlights anxiety that the government's u-turn on welfare reform has blown a multi-billion pound black hole in the chancellor's budget plans. Bonds slumped, driving up borrowing costs, after Keir Starmer failed initially to give his full backing to Reeves at prime minister's questions, with a tearful chancellor alongside him. The pound also suffered, falling by a cent against the US dollar as it slid from $1.3745 to $1.3636, making it the worst-performing major currency in the world. Starmer has now defended Reeves, saying her tears were due to a 'personal matter' and insisted she will remain chancellor 'for a very long time to come'. The bond selloff may actually have reinforced Reeves's position as chancellor, highlighting that the markets would not welcome a replacement who might be less devoted to fiscal discipline. Andrew Wishart, economist at Berenberg Bank argues that 'Investors probably saved the Chancellor', saying: By selling sterling assets investors have probably kept UK chancellor Rachel Reeves in her post. Financial markets initially reacted little to the government failing to get approval for savings in the disability benefit budget from its own parliamentary faction. But when the Prime Minister failed to say that a visibly upset Reeves would remain in her job during Prime Ministers Questions, UK assets sold off. The Chancellor has become synonymous with a fiscal rule of covering day-to-day spending with tax revenue. UK selloff signals that fiscal rules are not just for show #reeves #fiscal #gilts #macro #ukeconomy #ukmacro That fiscal rule may dictate tax rises in the autumn budget, as spending cuts could be too much of a political headache, judging by the massive rebellion against the welfare bill that has created a £5bn hole in the chancellor's plans. America's economy may take the market spotlight off Reeves this afternoon, when the latest US jobs report is released. It will show whether trade war tensions have hit hiring at US businesses. 9.30am BST: UK service sector PMI for June 10am BST: OECD Economic Survey of the European Union and Euro Area 1.30pm BST: US non farm payrolls employment report for June
STV News
17 minutes ago
- STV News
Warning children are receiving ‘life lessons' from influencers and AI
Children are increasingly receiving life lessons from influencers or 'AI-generated summaries', the chief inspector of Ofsted will say. Sir Martyn Oliver will argue that classroom learning with human interaction 'has never been more important' as children are spending their lives online. In a major speech at the Festival of Education, the Ofsted chief will say schools are places of 'refuge', connection, friendship and humanity for children. Sir Martyn will tell the event at Wellington College, Berkshire: 'Right now, many children live much of their lives online. 'Socially, they are never 'off' and always in touch with their friends. 'And they increasingly receive life lessons from influencers or AI-generated summaries. 'I would argue that the place of learning, real learning, classroom learning – with human interaction – has never been more important.' The Ofsted boss will add: 'In a way there's something cloistered about living one's life in a curated online environment. 'You may be able to find 'the best that has been thought or said' if you go looking for it. 'But who's guiding you through it? Where's the human connection? And of course, where's the protection?' His comments come amid calls from the Conservatives for the Government to bring in a statutory ban on smartphones in schools. Schools in England were given non-statutory Government guidance in February last year intended to stop the use of phones during the school day. Sir Martyn will say: 'Schools have never just been places of learning. 'They were, and are places of safety, even refuge. Places of community and connection. Places of friendship and humanity. 'They are citadels of childhood: communities within communities looking after their own and helping children develop into well-rounded adults – capable of looking after others in turn.' On Thursday, Sir Martyn will hit back at cynics who 'decry the norms of education' and who say Ofsted enforces an 'out-of-date, joyless system'. In his speech, he will say: 'For Ofsted, teaching a full, rich range of subjects isn't just a nice to have, it's fundamental to a great education. 'Music and art and sport aren't add-ons to the core curriculum, they are some of the most important subjects to study, in terms of developing a child's awareness of the world around them. 'And in a more macro sense, feeding into the cultural evolution of our country and pushing civilisation on.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Telegraph
28 minutes ago
- Telegraph
We've just had the first ominous taste of what the Blob will do to a Reform government
It would be easy to dismiss the story about a council chief executive in Warwickshire defying its new Reform leadership by refusing to take down a Pride flag. After all, it's only a flag, isn't it? How much can it really matter? Surely not enough to justify the rather wild response by Reform's Zia Yusuf, who claimed that 'unelected bureaucrats' have 'seized control of the country', and 'a coup d'etat is under way in Britain'. Well, perhaps. All the same, I do think Reform's supporters are right to take the story seriously. Because I suspect we've just had the first ominous taste of what the Blob will do to a Reform government. Imagine if Nigel Farage actually does win the next election. In his party's manifesto, he will doubtless have promised to deliver radical change. And, whatever that change entails, it will presumably be a good deal more far-reaching than removing a flag from a council building. Bearing that in mind: how eager do we think Whitehall will be to help him enact this radical change? Any more eager than the council chief executive in Warwickshire, who loftily informed Reform councillors that 'I will not be taking the action that you are requesting', because 'the Pride flag has been flown annually during Pride month for many years and I see no reason to diverge from this approach'? I hope no one will think I'm casting doubt on the scrupulous impartiality of our Rolls-Royce Civil Service. All the same, I'm sure Reform will have taken note of the lecture delivered in Oxford last month by a man with extensive experience of how Whitehall really works: Dominic Cummings. Behind closed doors, claimed the former No 10 chief adviser, civil servants are rather more influential than mere politicians. Or, in Mr Cummings's words: we have 'a system where the political ministers are essentially non-player characters in a video game, and the characters with real power are the unelected officials'. The result of this, he said, is that 'for a very long time, the government has not controlled the government'. Mr Farage will already be familiar with these views, because, a few months ago, he and Mr Cummings secretly met for dinner, and one topic of conversation, the latter has since revealed, was 'we have a broken Whitehall'. When Mr Cummings was in No 10, he didn't get far with his own plans to fix it, as he was derailed by the pandemic, and then fell out with Boris Johnson. I wonder whether he might be interested, one day, in having another crack. And whether the same thought has occurred to Mr Farage.
