Take 'precautionary approach' on deep-sea mining: top official tells AFP
Rules for the emerging deep-sea mining sector should take a "precautionary approach" that protects the environment, the head of the body drafting regulations for the practice told AFP Friday.
At stake is a potential new frontier for developing mineral resources like nickel, cobalt and copper that are crucial for renewable energy technology.
But researchers and environmentalists have long warned it risks destroying habitats and species that are little understood, and could upset delicate ocean processes that affect climate change.
Regulating the industry is the responsibility of the International Seabed Authority (ISA), an independent body established under a UN convention.
Its Council aims to adopt a code this year, after more than a decade of work.
In an interview with AFP, ISA Secretary-General Leticia Carvalho said there was "no rush or delay" on finalising the rules, and urged an approach that prioritises the environment.
"We are developing regulations for an entirely new industry," said Carvalho, who took the top job this year.
"A key principle in this regard is the precautionary approach, which will help us navigate the sustainable use and management of deep-sea mineral resources."
- Divisive issue -
The world paid little attention when the ISA, created in 1994, quietly began negotiating the mining code.
But the effort has taken on new urgency.
Since July 2023, due to a legal clause invoked by the tiny Pacific island nation of Nauru, any country can apply for a mining contract in the name of a company it sponsors.
Nauru Ocean Resources Inc., a subsidiary of Canada's The Metals Company (TMC), wants to begin mining polymetallic nodules in the Pacific as soon as 2026.
It plans to file an exploitation application in June, making the need for a code governing mining all the more pressing.
Carvalho has stressed that rebuilding trust is a priority for her tenure, after her predecessor was accused of favouring mining interests and even misusing funds -- allegations the ISA Secretariat denied.
An oceanographer by training, Carvalho can only guide member states as they decide whether and how to draft a code.
The ISA's Council is deeply divided, with some member states keen to see mining start soon, and others backing a moratorium or even outright ban on seabed exploitation.
Carvalho has projected a scrupulously neutral image on the issue, emphasising the need for science-based decision-making, and equitable sharing of any profits from resources often dubbed a "common heritage of mankind."
"Without a Mining Code, the legal framework for deep-seabed mining in the Area (international seabed) would be incomplete," she said in written answers.
That could open the door to significant legal uncertainty if mining applications are filed without a code.
- 'Realm of wonder' -
Concerns about the impact of mining gained strength with the discovery last year that oxygen was being released on the ocean floor not just by living organisms, but by polymetallic nodules that would be targeted by companies.
The findings have been rejected by the TMC, even though it helped fund the research, and follow-up work is ongoing.
Mining proponents point to the growing need for minerals to drive the renewable energy transition, and the problems associated with on-land exploitation -- including environmental degradation and rights abuses.
Carvalho noted that the "dark oxygen" findings have not yet been replicated, and are the subject of debate.
And she pointed out "common misconceptions" about the prospect of deep-sea mining, including about its proposed scale, as well as what deep-sea ecosystems look like.
"Roughly 0.13 percent of the world's seabed — about 478,000 kilometres squared — could eventually be mined, a relatively small fraction compared to the vastness of the ocean floor," she said.
And while scientists are still learning about life on the seafloor, deep-sea ecosystems "tend to have lower population densities and function under vastly different environmental conditions," Carvalho said.
While running for the job last year, the Brazilian scientist emphasised her background in developing industry regulations, as well as her personal connection to the sea.
"The ocean has always been a fundamental part of who I am," she said.
It is "a realm of wonder and vast opportunities that must be responsibly managed."
sah/lb

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Why The Jobs Report Doesn't Tell Us The Truth About The Economy
The May jobs report held steady at 4.2 percent. Black unemployment remained over 6 percent. That 4.2 percent headline rate? It hides more than it shows. Forbes points out that while job growth looked solid, the government quietly revised earlier numbers down. The real story is slower, shakier. June's data is due July 3, just ahead of the Fourth of July holiday, and few expect surprises. Meanwhile, the Trump administration tried to shut down Job Corps, a federal program that trains low-income youth. A judge blocked the move, but the attempt speaks volumes. These numbers often leave out who gets hit first and helped last. People fill out questionnaires as they line up to try for jobs at the City University of New York's ... More Big Apple Job Fair March 20, 2009 at the Jacob Javits Convention Center in New York. An estimated 6,000 students and alumni showed up to apply for jobs overed by about 100 employers. AFP PHOTO/DON EMMERT (Photo credit should read DON EMMERT/AFP via Getty Images) Every month, the jobs report drops. Cable news lights up. Economists chime in. Politicians spin. Somewhere, in a newsroom, a business reporter tries to explain it all in under three minutes. For years, the U.S. unemployment rate has been treated as the economy's most important number. It leads headlines and drives markets. But the more you report on it, the clearer it becomes: that number hides more than it reveals. The Bureau of Labor Statistics puts out a careful, well-constructed report. But it's built on averages. It smooths over gaps that matter. That gap shows up in the data. Forbes breaks down how one survey shows job gains while another shows losses. It's not a glitch. It's a warning. Gig workers, undocumented workers, people working multiple jobs, and people who've given up looking for work—they're often missing from the headline. So are questions of pay, stability, and dignity. Jobs Day hits every first Friday at 8:30 AM Eastern, and the jobs number—6.1, 4.9, 3.7—gets treated like a verdict, not an explanation. The jobs report is based on a survey of 60,000 households. It only covers a specific week in the month, and it excludes a lot. The Labor Force Participation Rate, for example, is often overlooked. That number tells us who's working or actively looking—not just who has a job. Underemployment, long-term joblessness, and wage stagnation are also rarely part of the headline. Even the "quits rate," which shows how confident workers are to leave jobs, gets buried. What the Jobs Numbers Don't Tell You Black unemployment often remains nearly double that of white workers, and many impacted groups receive little attention in coverage. Large parts of the workforce see little change during periods labeled "growth." Editors and reporters may not always ask why. The sound bite comes fast. The story moves quickly. But these patterns deserve more space and context. UNITED STATES - NOVEMBER 11: On the TV set with Maria Bartiromo as she tapes a "Wall Street ... More Journal" Show at the CNBC Studios, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey., (Photo by Bill Stahl Jr./NY Daily News Archive via Getty Images) What we choose to measure reveals what we pay attention to. If we only ask how many people are working, we miss what kind of work they're doing, what they earn, and what they give up to keep those jobs. That number still drives coverage. It often flattens the story to a single digit. A number that doesn't speak to quality, stability, or power. The same gaps show up every month. Black workers are hit hardest during downturns and benefit least during recovery. The unemployment rate can fall while wages stay flat. Coverage tends to follow the topline number, not the full picture. Ask different questions, you get different answers. Who's underemployed? Who's working part-time when they want full-time? Who's been out of the labor force so long they've stopped being counted? The Black unemployment gap isn't just persistent. It's structural. The unemployment rate among Black men in America has hovered at or above 10 percent for most of my adult life. That reflects deep disparities in access and opportunity. Ask Different Questions, Get Better Answers The topline number fits neatly in a headline, but it doesn't say what kind of jobs people are getting. In past reports, wages grew for some workers, but not all. Industries like hospitality and retail showed hiring gains, but those gains often came with lower pay and fewer benefits. That's a detail that rarely makes it to air. The rise in gig and contract work has also gone underreported. For many, it's become harder to find jobs that include health care, retirement, or even guaranteed hours. SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA - SEPTEMBER 12, 2018: A group of laborers take a break from their work in ... More the Union Square public plaza in San Francisco, California. (Photo by) It's worth asking what these numbers do—and don't—tell us about the people they describe. In May 2010, the national unemployment rate was 9.3 percent. For Black workers, it was 15.8. For Hispanic workers, 12.4. For white workers, 8.7. Those gaps didn't just close overnight. Even when jobs came back, they didn't come back evenly. The recovery arrived on paper before it showed up in people's lives. The stock market isn't the economy. And the jobs report isn't either—not for most people. What counts as 'progress' depends on where you're standing. For many people of color, the economic crisis never really ended. It just got redefined. And each time the monthly report hits, we're reminded of that gap between measurement and meaning. The story of the economy should track more than recovery—it should track reality. We still don't have a good system for tracking underemployment. There's no clean number for job quality. No single metric can capture what it means to string together temp work, or drive for two apps, or work full time without paid leave. But those are all parts of the real economy, and they show up in the lives of real people. The way we count should reflect that. Month after month, the story doesn't change. The same thing happens every month. The unemployment number comes out. The cable news shows light up. The number is low. The president takes a victory lap. The story moves on. And yet, if you dig into the numbers, the reality isn't moving at all. These reports can't explain what it means to be counted or not counted. The unemployment number often obscures the life behind the statistic. It doesn't account for the dignity of the job, the stability of the paycheck, or whether a person is working three part-time jobs just to stay afloat. WASHINGTON, DC - MARCH 07: U.S. President Donald Trump delivers remarks on the jobs report from the ... More Oval Office at the White House on March 07, 2025 in Washington, DC. The U.S. economy added 151,000 jobs, with the unemployment rate rising slightly to 4.1%, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. (Photo by) The Jobs Report Isn't Built to Reflect Everyone This isn't just about differences between groups. It's about how we define work. The labor force participation rate is key. That number includes those who are working or actively looking. But if someone stops looking? They disappear from the count. That's how you lose whole neighborhoods in the data. Reporting on the jobs report can follow familiar patterns. I've been in newsrooms where editors assign the story before the data comes out. The angle is set. The quote from the White House is slotted in. The nuance gets edited out. That kind of routine can miss what really matters. If you're unemployed or underemployed, the number on a screen might not line up with your day-to-day life. People don't experience the economy in percentages. They experience it in rent. In groceries. In hours worked and time lost. We can start by asking more grounded questions. What kind of jobs are people getting? Can they support a family? Can workers take a sick day without risking their paycheck? Can they get home in time to help their kids with homework? These are not abstract ideas. They are the daily terms of economic survival. The monthly release will keep coming. But if the story stops at the headline number, we miss the reality behind it. This piece appears in Vanilla is Black, my newsletter about race, business, and American contradictions and listen to my audio reporting at


New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Canada rescinds digital services tax targeting US technology firms to advance stalled trade talks
Canada scrapped its digital services tax targeting U.S. technology firms late on Sunday, just hours before it was due to take effect, in a bid to advance stalled trade negotiations with the United States. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and U.S. President Donald Trump will resume trade negotiations in order to agree on a deal by July 21, Canada's finance ministry said in a statement. Trump abruptly called off trade talks on Friday over the tax targeting U.S. technology firms, saying that it was a 'blatant attack.' Advertisement 5 Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said US and Canada will resume trade negotiations later in July. AP 5 Trump abruptly ended trade talks with Canada on Friday, June 27, 2025. Xinhua/Shutterstock He reiterated his comments on Sunday, pledging to set a new tariff rate on Canadian goods within the next week, which threatened to push U.S.-Canada relations back into chaos after a period of relative calm. The breakdown in trade talks comes after the two leaders met at the G7 in mid-June and Carney said they had agreed to wrap up a new economic agreement within 30 days. Advertisement Canada's planned digital tax was 3% of the digital services revenue a firm takes in from Canadian users above $20 million in a calendar year, and payments were to be retroactive to 2022. 5 Mark Carney and Donald Trump at the G7 Summit. POOL/AFP via Getty Images It would have impacted U.S. technology firms, including Amazon AMZN.O, Meta META.O, Alphabet's Google GOOGL.O and Apple AAPL.O, among others. Advertisement Monday collection will be halted, the Canada's finance ministry statement said, and Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne will bring forward legislation to rescind the Digital Services Tax Act. 'The DST was announced in 2020 to address the fact that many large technology companies operating in Canada may not otherwise pay tax on revenues generated from Canadians,' the statement said. 'Canada's preference has always been a multilateral agreement related to digital services taxation.' 5 Canadian businesses have urged locals to buy from Canada versus America. REUTERS Stocks index futures rose after the news the digital tax will be rescinded and the bullish sentiment spilled over into Asian markets. Advertisement Canada is the second-largest U.S. trading partner after Mexico, and the largest buyer of U.S exports. It bought $349.4 billion of U.S. goods last year and exported $412.7 billion to the U.S., according to U.S. Census Bureau data. 5 A Canadian national flag is seen in the background as workers cross the street in front of ArcelorMittal Dofasco's steel manufacturing buildings in Hamilton, Ontario. AFP via Getty Images The Biden administration had requested trade dispute settlement consultations over the tax in 2024, saying it was inconsistent with Canada's North American trade deal obligations. Canada had escaped Trump's broad tariffs imposed in April but faces 50% duties on steel and aluminum.


Newsweek
3 hours ago
- Newsweek
Former Labor Secretary: Here's How Trump Should Rebuild American Manufacturing
Advocates for ideas and draws conclusions based on the interpretation of facts and data. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The House of Representatives recently held a hearing that explored strengthening American manufacturing, specifically in the medical space. The congressional inquiry echoed President Donald Trump's "Made in America" agenda, which intends to ramp up domestic production of everything from cars and trucks to iPhones and computer chips. But as this new landscape takes shape, returning to "peak" American manufacturing should not necessarily be the goal. The world looks very different today than it did in the 1970s, and so does our labor force. Policymakers should focus on making targeted investments—driven by smart tax incentives and reduced regulatory barriers—in key sectors that will help the country meet the strategic demands of the 21st century. President Trump has made it clear he will provide incentives to American companies willing to reshore operations closer to home. But two sectors in particular—national defense and health care—require the most attention. That's because both are foundational to the country's long-term stability and resilience, yet remain concerningly reliant on foreign supply chains that are vulnerable to disruption and manipulation. Take semiconductors. These chips power everything from smartphones to fighter jets, yet the vast majority of production occurs overseas in places like Taiwan. With COVID-19's supply chain disruptions fresh in our memory and China's growing hostility toward Taiwan, America should not be dependent on troubled areas for the technologies that underpin our defense systems. The same applies to shipbuilding and aerospace. In April, President Trump signed an executive order to restore American maritime dominance by boosting domestic vessel production. The initiative not only reinforces our national defense infrastructure; it also presents a major opportunity to revitalize America's skilled labor force by bringing thousands of high-quality manufacturing and engineering jobs back to coastal and heartland communities alike. US President Donald Trump (L) gestures as US Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta looks on as they speak to the media on July 12, 2019 at the White House in Washington, DC. US President Donald Trump (L) gestures as US Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta looks on as they speak to the media on July 12, 2019 at the White House in Washington, DC. Alastair Pike / AFP/Getty Images Such a large-scale effort would rely on smaller manufacturers to supply key components and materials. Large manufacturers currently take up that spotlight. (The recent deal brokered between U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel is a prime example.) But for every large manufacturer willing to take part in the "Made in America" campaign, ten smaller manufacturers are lining up at the door. Connecting small manufacturers to procurement pipelines—and reducing the regulatory burdens they face—would unleash a new level of innovation and coordination across the country. Just as national defense requires a robust industrial foundation, so too does our health care system. In fact, a strong health care system is itself essential to protecting and defending the nation. The inevitable vulnerabilities of diversified global supply chains, coupled with China's focused efforts to invest in its own biomedical industries, leaves Americans exposed when diplomatic relationships sour or global crises strike. Fortunately, the U.S. already has the infrastructure to bring pharmaceutical manufacturing home. States like Indiana, North Carolina, Ohio, and Pennsylvania are established industry hubs. Meanwhile, the U.S. territory of Puerto Rico—which currently boasts the second-largest pharmaceutical manufacturing output in the country—has long supported large-scale medicine production and is poised to continue to do so. Incentivizing further investment in these areas must remain a top priority for the Trump administration. The White House's recent executive action to reduce regulatory barriers for pharmaceutical companies reshoring their operations is a strong start—but it shouldn't stand alone. The budget reconciliation package, now advancing in Congress, presents a key opportunity to pair these efforts with targeted, pro-growth tax incentives. Cutting government red tape and lowering taxes can lay the foundation for a new golden age of American manufacturing. Rebuilding American manufacturing, an idea with strong national support, is rightly a focus of President Trump and his allies in Congress. But rather than spreading resources thin to cast a wide net that lightly lifts production across the board, policymakers should focus their energy on restoring the production capacity of sectors critical to national security and Americans' health. Alexander Acosta served as the 27th United States Secretary of Labor from 2017 to 2019. The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.