We're another step closer to living on the Moon
Yet, much to the rest of humanity's annoyance, they haven't followed in his footsteps – literally.
The grey, pockmarked orb doesn't exactly scream real estate, but Nasa hopes to build homes for astronauts and civilians on the Moon by 2040.
Chinese scientists have suggested that this might not be as far-fetched as it might seem – the soil on the Moon could potentially support life.
According to a study, the Chinese University of Hong Kong have invented a way to extract water from the chalky lunar soil.
This celestial water is then used to convert carbon dioxide – such as that exhaled by astronauts – into carbon monoxide and hydrogen gas, which can be used to make fuel and oxygen for the astronauts to breathe.
Just like on Earth, fuel and food would be costly on the Moon, given how expensive it would be flying up essentials into space.
Travelling light is critical to spaceflight, where just one kilogram of supplies can cost well over £74,000 to ship up by rocket.
And this includes water, too. The academics estimated that getting a single gallon of water to the Moon would cost £61,000, barely enough to quench the four gallons an astronaut would drink a day.
But the researchers say this technology could 'potentially open new doors for future deep space exploration' by eliminating these eye-watering costs.
Lead researcher Lu Wang said: 'We never fully imagined the 'magic' that the lunar soil possessed.'
Appearances are deceiving when it comes to water on the Moon, where years of being pelted with asteroids and comets have left water on it.
Shadowy craters on the lunar poles, known as permanently shadowed regions (PSRs), never see sunshine, meaning there's water ice tucked inside minerals such as ilmenite.
The tool developed by the Chinese researchers would involve taking the reoglith – a layer of loose material that blankets solid rock – of ilmenite and heating it using sunlight to release the water.
Carbon dioxide is then chucked in, causing the ilmenite to undergo photothermal catalysis – a novel method that uses sunlight to speed up chemical reactions.
Wang added in a statement that 'one-step integration of lunar water extraction and photothermal carbon dioxide catalysis' could make efforts to build lunar outposts or Tescos (we assume) more energy efficient.
Easier said than done, however, the researchers said, given that 'drastic temperature fluctuations', radiation and low gravity can make harvesting oxygen and water from the land tricky.
Nasa's plan to build a colony on the Moon similarly involves making the most of the materials already there.
The plan, first reported on in 2023, will involve blasting a 3-D printer into the heavens that will build structures out of lunar concrete created from the rock chips, mineral fragments and dust that cover the Moon.
This debris is harmful to humans and is easily kicked up into the air – or rather, the lack of it – as astronauts lumber around in their heavy boots.
The first lunar Americans could get some neighbours pretty soon, with South Korea to develop lunar landers by 2040 before building a 'lunar economic base by 2045', according to The Korea Times.
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
MORE: Longest solar eclipse in 100 years to happen in 2027 – here's where to see it
MORE: Astronomers just casually witnessed the birth of a new solar system
MORE: France's new rocket Baguette One to go where no baker has gone before
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Is THIS where aliens are hiding? Scientists discover a 'super–Earth' planet 35 light–years away – and it might have the right conditions to support life
It's one of the biggest unanswered questions in science. Are there aliens out there, and if so, where are they hiding? Now, researchers may have taken a huge step towards answering this question. Using NASA 's TESS space telescope, a team from Trottier Institute for Research on Exoplanets has detected a 'super–Earth' 35 light–years away that might be habitable. The planet, called L 98–59 f, is one of five worlds found orbiting a red dwarf star called L 98–59. However, it is the only one with the right conditions to support life. 'Finding a temperate planet in such a compact system makes this discovery particularly exciting,' said Charles Cadieux, lead author of the study. 'It highlights the remarkable diversity of exoplanetary systems and strengthens the case for studying potentially habitable worlds around low–mass stars.' The planet, called L 98–59 f, is one of five worlds found orbiting a red dwarf star called L 98–59 L 98–59 was first discovered in 2019, and was originally confirmed to have just four planets around it. However, by carefully reanalysing data collected from ground–based and space–based telescopes, the team was able to identify a fifth planet. This planet does not transit its host star – meaning it doesn't pass directly between us and the star. However, its presence was confirmed through subtle variations in the star's motion. The scientists believe the planet receives about the same amount of stellar energy as Earth does from the sun. Excitingly, this places it 'firmly' within the habitable zone – a region where water could remain in liquid form. The new study also sheds light on the four other planets orbiting the star. The innermost planet, L 98–59 b, is about 84 per cent the size of Earth, and about half its mass. Meanwhile, the two inner planets are believed to be similar to Jupiter's moon, Io, with extreme volcanic activity. Finally, the fourth planet may be a 'water world', the experts say. 'With its diversity of rocky worlds and range of planetary compositions, L 98–59 offers a unique laboratory to address some of the field's most pressing questions: What are super–Earths and sub–Neptunes made of?' asked René Doyon, co–author of the study. 'Do planets form differently around small stars? Can rocky planets around red dwarfs retain atmospheres over time?' Having found the fifth planet and learned more about the other four, the team now hopes to use James Webb – NASA's most powerful telescope – to study the star system in more detail. 'With these new results, L 98–59 joins the select group of nearby, compact planetary systems that we hope to understand in greater detail over the coming years,' said Alexandrine L'Heureux, co–author of the study. 'It's exciting to see it stand alongside systems like TRAPPIST–1 in our quest to unlock the nature and formation of small planets orbiting red dwarf stars.' PLANETARY SYSTEM L 98-59 The planetary system and its star - which are only around 35 light years away - are both called L 98-59. The planets in this system are the following, from closest to the star to further away: - L 98-59b: This rocky planet has half the mass of Venus (4.868×1024 kg). It's likely dry, but might have small amounts of water. It's smaller than the Earth but still bigger than Mars. - L 98-59c: Likely dry, but might have small amounts of water - L 98-59d: About 30 per cent of the mass of this planet could be water (but note that this would not be liquid water at the planet's surface) - L 98-59e: Has a 'year' of 12.8 days and is at least three times more massive than the Earth (a 'super-Earth'). Its temperature is thought to be only a few ten degrees warmer than that of the Earth. - L 98-59f: In the habitable zone of the star, meaning liquid water may exist at the surface of this planet
Times
5 hours ago
- Times
How China may save us all — Xi's power play to end emissions
In the year to March 2024, China emitted a staggering amount of carbon. Twelve billion tonnes. It was more than the rest of Asia combined. Twice that of the United States. Just slightly less than Britain belched out through the entire reign of Queen Victoria. In the year that followed, China also released a staggering amount of carbon. The total was easily equivalent to a coal power plant running continuously since the Norman conquest. But that year's staggering amount was in one very crucial aspect unexpected: it was, just, smaller than 2023's staggering amount. This might in turn end up being the most staggering statistic of the year. Because for the first time, analysis suggests China's energy use has increased but its carbon emissions have not. 'We are seeing the beginning of a decoupling,' said Ma Jun, from the Institute of Public and Environmental Affairs, a non-profit Chinese research organisation. 'The deployment of solar is massive.' Ever since much of the world pledged to aim for net-zero carbon emissions, ever since the economies of Europe set out to do something unprecedented in the history of humanity — move from a dense and easy source of energy to a diffuse, difficult and variable source — there has been a niggling argument facing environmentalists. What is the point of doing this, sceptics would ask, when China is adding more emissions in a year than entire countries? What can Britain do, when China's carbon footprint is about 30 times as big and getting bigger? Now, though, it is not getting bigger. It is, as one environmentalist put it, the end of the 'But China' argument. But is it? 'There are lots of environmentalists saying, 'I told you so,'' said Sir Dieter Helm, a professor of economics at Oxford University. ''It's all working,' they say. 'Isn't it wonderful the Chinese have turned the tide, and are building all these renewables and are going to peak their emissions?'' Indeed it is, he said, compared with the alternative — but we should also look closely at what is going to happen to the many dozens of coal plants they are still building. 'If China's emissions plateau at the current level, that's a climate disaster. That's not a great success. That is horrendous.' In terms of emissions per capita, China is still less than the US — but comfortably exceeds the EU and UK. There are two narratives about China and net zero. For the first, go to the Northern Shaanxi Mine. There, in China's biggest coalmine, a mountain's worth of carbon has been pulled out of a scarred, dusty, black hellscape. It is still being pulled out. Last year, China started construction of 94 gigawatts of coal-fuelled power plants. To put that in scale, it is enough to power Britain's grid twice over. In this first narrative, while the West frets about wind turbines and veganism, here trucks the size of houses shift dirty fuel for a superpower still going all in on coal. For the second narrative, go to the Kubuqi desert of Inner Mongolia, China. There, across an area the size of New York, all you can see is solar panels. They sit, silent, turning sunshine on worthless ground into valuable clean energy to be sent south. Last year, China had 500GW of wind and solar projects under construction. While the West argues about the cost of renewables, in this narrative China is building more than the rest of the world combined. It is monopolising silicon and lithium. It is electrifying everything it can electrify. Cars. Industry. Trains. It is winning the next great industrial revolution: to become the world's first electrostate. Which narrative is true? Both. It is indeed building a coal station a week — give or take. But its biggest bet by far is on renewables. The proximal reason its emissions are falling, despite coal capacity going up, is in part because of something else entirely. Construction is falling too. A real estate crash means less carbon-intensive cement is being poured into the foundations of apartment blocks. But, there is hope this is more than a blip. Ma said it would be wrong to view the coal plants as a traditional part of the grid. 'China is going through a very difficult, but crucial, transition,' he said. 'How we adapt to a high penetration of renewable energy is a new challenge.' As Britain knows, when it is cloudy and the wind does not blow, you need a backup. Batteries and other storage are not ready at scale yet. This is why, in the UK, we still have so many gas plants — which a lot of the time sit unused. 'So, yes, there are more coal plants, but we can see quite rapid reduction of coal generation hours,' Ma said. 'We are paying a high price for energy security — building all this redundancy.' Can we believe the statistics, about those generation levels — and emissions in general? They are compiled from official sources, by Lauri Myllyvirta, from Finland's Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air. Rich Collett-White, from Carbon Tracker Initiative, a think tank that analyses the energy transition, said that while there were always questions about how much we can trust Chinese statistics, he and other analysts thought the trajectory made sense. He said: 'A lot of the data that's out there is based on customs, and tracking commodity flows. That's fairly straightforward to verify, and I think would be quite difficult to fake.' It also fits with their policies. That Chinese emissions would peak around now should not be a surprise. It is exactly what President Xi promised. The country pledged to start reducing emissions before 2030, and reach net zero by 2060. Some observers expect the Chinese leader to announce a new target for 2035 at the UN general assembly in September. Richard Folland, also from Carbon Tracker, said that we often ignored this in the UK debates. He added: 'The approach the Chinese government take on targets is that they tend to underpromise and overdeliver.' For him, being five years ahead of schedule makes sense. 'It is important. It is a pivotal moment when China starts bending that curve downwards.' Is this job done, then? Globally, said Helm, the situation is dire. The concentration of CO₂ in the atmosphere — ultimately the only statistic that matters, and the only one you can absolutely trust — keeps on going up regardless. But, he conceded, 'this is better than if China was going the other way'. And for Ma there is a message too to the rest of the world. He said: 'Now is a very important moment. We hope there will be recognition that actions are being made in China.' If, sometimes, the rest of the world has used supposed Chinese inaction as an argument for their own inaction, he said, the reverse would not be true. He added: 'We will keep on doing this by ourselves. But if there's a chance to work together, with those who care about this issue, hopefully we can.' Change will not be fast. Over the next year, China will once again emit a staggering amount of carbon. Of every three carbon dioxide molecules put into the atmosphere, one will be Chinese. There is, critics point out, enough coal power being built that that could easily remain unchanged. Yet there is another China too. In the deserts of Inner Mongolia, endless solar farms catch the light. Stand on the shoreline of the Yellow Sea, and the sunrise that once scattered red in the air pollution glows red on the spinning blades of turbines. It is the biggest bet by far that a different kind of power is possible, and with it a riposte in steel and silicon to the argument, 'But China …'.
The Independent
15 hours ago
- The Independent
MTG again lashes out at Trump this time over his AI plan: ‘An absolute threat to federalism'
Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, a staunch ally of the MAGA movement, broke from President Donald Trump on Thursday to oppose his executive order on artificial intelligence, raising concerns about its impact on the environment and states' rights. Hoping to accelerate the United States's development of AI, Trump signed a series of executive orders on Wednesday, making it easier to build data centers on federal lands and incentivizing states to impose fewer regulations by threatening to withhold federal funding to AI projects. But Greene raised a red flag, saying she was concerned with the impact of massive data centers on the people and environment around, while providing little to no regulations. 'My deep concerns are that the EO demands rapid AI expansion with little to no guardrails and breaks. It also contains the threat of withholding federal funds from states who regulate AI, which is an absolute threat to federalism and why I strongly opposed the AI state moratorium originally in the BBB,' Greene wrote on X. Trump has pushed for more AI development in the U.S., hoping for companies such as Meta, Google, OpenAI, and Microsoft to develop and expand their AI technology beyond what the Chinese-based company DeepSeek has already done. But the Georgia congresswoman said the 'rushed AI expansion' should include a plan to address human and environmental impact – with particular concerns around using nearby water supplies that cross state lines. 'Competing with China does not mean become like China by threatening state rights, replacing human jobs on mass scale creating mass poverty, and creating potentially devastating effects on our environment and critical water supply,' Greene wrote. 'This needs a careful and wise approach. The AI EO takes the opposite.' Greene's statement is the latest in a string of opposing stances that she has taken against Trump, whom she has typically expressed unwavering loyalty to. Recently, Greene has also criticized the administration for not releasing the Epstein Files, a recent Trump-backed crypto bill, and the president's decision to intervene in the Iran–Israel conflict by bombing Iranian nuclear facilities. Her additional opposition also comes at a moment of contention between the president and his MAGA base. Trump's dismissal of the Epstein Files, of which conspiracy theories have floated in the MAGA world for years, appears to have caused a fracture in his base's trust. It's unclear how many may feel about the AI bill, but Greene's opposition provides some insight. 'I represent the base and when I'm frustrated and upset over the direction of things, you better be clear, the base is not happy,' Greene said on X back in May.
