
Iran alone in crises: Where were Russia, China in their time of need?
But none of these countries came to Iran's aid during the Iran-Israel war or when American forces attacked Iran's nuclear facilities.
China and Russia, the most powerful countries in the axis, have only expressed verbal condemnation of Washington's actions but stopped short of providing any financial, material or military assistance to Tehran.
Alexander Gaboyev, Director of the Carnegie Centre for Russian and Eurasian Affairs, told the New York Times: 'Each of these countries is completely pacifist and they don't want to get involved in each other's wars. Unlike the US and its allies, these countries do not necessarily have the same structures, values and institutional links with each other."
The four countries have authoritarian regimes and are hostile to the United States, which has always tried to undermine them and question their legitimacy. They also have some strategic ties with each other which seek to circumvent US-led economic sanctions by advancing trade and exchanging weapons technology.
Michael Kimge, a professor of history at The Catholic University of America and a former US State Department official, also believes that 'there is probably little coordination between China, North Korea, Iran and Russia, so that they share views and have conversations around the centre of dissatisfaction with the United States, but not very meaningful coordination with each other.'
Among those countries, only Russia and North Korea have a mutual defence pact. In addition to sending weapons to Russia, North Korea has deployed more than 14,000 troops to fight alongside Russian forces in their more than three-year long military offensive in Ukraine.
Moscow and Pyongyang's relationship is rooted in a shared communist past and anti-American war on the Korean peninsula from 1950 to 1953. China under Mao Zedong's rule was also present then.
This same historical background also explains the close ties between China and Russia. The two countries' leaders have maintained a personal bond over the years, with their governments announcing 'unimpeded cooperation' only weeks before the Kremlin launched its offensive on Ukraine in February 2022.
China, of course, still shows itself adhering to some of the international values that Washington promoted during the pre-Trump era, and accordingly has refused to send major arms aid to Russia during the war.
However, according to US officials, China has played a role in rebuilding Russia's defence industries and remains one of the largest customers of Russian oil.
Russia and Iran have never had such a relationship. One of the reasons could be religious differences. Iran has a theocracy that is viewed with doubt by the other three secular and socialist governments of Russia, China and North Korea.
Moscow and Beijing view the spread of Islamic fundamentalism with concern. Chinese President Xi Jinping has taken draconian measures against Muslims in the country, cracking down on some Islamic rites among Uighur and Kazakh ethnicities.
Sergei radchenko, a cold war historian at Johns Hopkins University, also told the New York Times: 'there is no common value but statements about a multipolar world order between them, and at the same time, there are so many contrasts between them that Putin has pointed to and said that his relations with Iran's neighbours, including Israel and Arab countries, are more important than the friendship between Russia and Iran.'
'Putin is a cynical, opportunistic actor who thinks only of his strategic interests, and he will do so if he needs to sacrifice Iran. And of course, that feeling is reciprocated in Tehran as well," he added.
China was also a mere observer during the Iran-Israel military confrontation. Jinping said all sides 'should work to reduce tension'. The Chinese leader strongly condemned US President Donald Trump's strikes on Iran and accused the Washington of violating the UN Charter.
But like Russia, Beijing didn't help Iran either. Though China sometimes takes an official stance toward conflicts in the region, it often tries to appear neutral in order to safeguard its interests. The country has for years expanded ties with Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, Iran's two regional rivals of whom they've clashed with for years.
A broad regional war would jeopardize China's oil imports from those countries, so Beijing is seeking to calm the conflict, not inflame it.
China's goal to play a neutral mediating role in the Middle East became apparent in March 2023, when it played a role in a diplomatic agreement between Iran and Saudi Arabia. China also used that opportunity to strengthen its ties with Syria, Iran's ally in the region.
Enrico Fardella, a professor at the University of Naples Lorentale who formerly taught at Peking University, believes that now that Iran has been weakened by the war with Israel and the fall of Syria's longtime President Bashar al-Assad, Beijing is cautiously and carefully assessing the situation to see which governments, political groups or militias find the upper hand, or fill a vacuum in the region.
Yun Soon, a researcher on Chinese foreign policy at the Stimson Research Institute in Washington, believes the term 'pivot' to describe the relationship between China, Russia, Iran and North Korea remains valid.
Although these countries do not have a common defence pact, they share a common view of anti-America, anti-West, and anti-liberal democracy.
'The alliance, even without mutual defence, remains an alliance,' he noted. "That they do not fight for each other does not mean that their cooperation is insignificant. China has provided Iran with nuclear and missile technology, financed Russia's war and kept North Korea alive".
But Yun Soon noted that Beijing's support for Iran is limited and Chinese officials do not trust Iran's religious leadership. They see Iran as a country 'too simplistic, opportunistic, hesitant and unstable in foreign relations.'
He also added that Chinese officials are aware Iran, like North Korea, is an isolated country and needs China under any circumstances even if their relations sometimes suffer ups and downs.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Euronews
19 minutes ago
- Euronews
No, Trump hasn't threatened to bomb Norway
Misleading claims are circulating online that US President Donald Trump has threatened to bomb Norway if he doesn't receive the Nobel Peace Prize. Posts on X and other social media platforms like those pictured below suggest that Trump said he brought peace in the Israel-Iran war "by blowing things up", and that he can do the same in Norway to secure the prestigious award. The claims are sometimes shared with pictures of Trump or even footage of various explosions. Nevertheless, a Google search for any trace of Trump ever making such remarks yields very few results. Searching for terms like "Trump", "Norway", "bomb" and "Nobel Prize" doesn't point to any official communication by the US president. There are also no reputable news reports about any such comments either, apart from other fact-checkers also debunking the claims. The closest thing that appears is an article published on 26 June by The Borowitz Report, which carries the headline that Trump has warned he'll attack Norway if he doesn't get the Nobel Peace Prize. However, the website's About page says that it's a satirical news site created by Andy Borowitz, a writer and comedian. "I've been writing satirical news since I was eighteen," Borowitz says in the About section. "This represents either commitment to a genre or arrested development." It reads that Chinese media once believed a satirical story that Borowitz published about Trump wrapping the White House's phones in tinfoil. Could Trump win the Nobel Peace Prize? The US president has been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize before and has repeatedly made the case that he deserves it. However, he's never won it. Trump claims that the Nobel committee is deliberately ignoring him and is politically biased. In June, he published on his Truth Social platform: "No, I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize no matter what I do, including Russia/Ukraine, and Israel/Iran, whatever those outcomes may be, but the people know, and that's all that matters to me!" Recently, Pakistan put Trump forward to receive the award for what it said was his role in resolving Islamabad's conflict with India. It described him as a "genuine peacemaker" in the nomination, but a day later condemned the president for violating international law after the US bombed Iranian nuclear sites. Republican politician Buddy Carter also nominated Trump for bringing about a ceasefire between Israel and Iran. Oleksandr Merezhko, the head of Ukraine's parliamentary foreign committee, meanwhile, withdrew his nomination for Trump because he said he'd "lost any sort of faith and belief" in the president's ability to secure a ceasefire between Kyiv and Moscow. Merezhko originally nominated Trump for the prize in November, soon after his victory in the 2024 US presidential election. The Nobel Peace Prize is awarded by the Norwegian Nobel Committee, which is typically made up of five members appointed by the Norwegian parliament, as per the will of Swedish chemist Alfred Nobel. This is unlike the other Nobel prizes, such as the prizes for literature, physics and medicine, which are handed down by different Swedish bodies depending on the award. The Norwegian Nobel Committee shortlists nominations and consults experts before deciding on a winner for the Peace Prize. Nominations for the annual award can only come from certain recognised bodies or individuals, such as national governments, professors of law, history or religion, or past winners. Nobel said in his will that it should go to the person who has done the most for "fraternity between nations" and the abolition of standing armies. US presidents have won the Nobel Peace Prize before. Theodore Roosevelt was the first to do so in 1906 for mediating the end of the Russo-Japanese War, followed by Woodrow Wilson in 1919 for founding the League of Nations (the precursor to the United Nations). In 2002, Jimmy Carter was awarded the prize for decades of peaceful conflict resolution, the promotion of democracy, and humanitarian work, while Barack Obama received it in 2009 "for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples". So, in theory, there is no bar to Trump winning the award, provided he receives a valid nomination and as long as the Norwegian Nobel Committee and its consulted experts deem his claimed contributions to peace as valid and extensive enough to warrant the prize.


AFP
2 hours ago
- AFP
False posts share AI-generated news report about Iran 'surrendering' to Israel
"Breaking news, Iran has officially surrendered to Israel," says a supposed CNN anchor in a Facebook reel shared June 26, 2025. "A path to peace may finally be in sight between the two nations," he adds before the clip cuts to a group of protesters holding Iranian flags while appearing to apologise to Israel. Image Screenshot of the false Facebook post taken on July 3, 2025, with the red X mark added by AFP The Middle East foes traded devastating missile attacks after Israel launched an unprecedented bombing campaign on June 13 targeting Iran's nuclear and military facilities. The strikes left more than 900 people dead in Iran and 28 people dead in Israel (archived link). A ceasefire between Iran and Israel took effect on June 24. The fabricated CNN video surfaced elsewhere on Facebook, YouTube and TikTok, racking up more than a million views in total. Several users seemed to believe the report was genuine. "Very good Iran. Peace. God bless Iran and Israel," one commented. "Good job Iran. Better to be humble," another said. CNN's senior vice president of communications Emily Kuhn dismissed the posts. "This is a fake video and never aired on CNN," Kuhn told AFP on July 2. The footage also bears signs it was AI-generated. Compared to genuine CNN coverage of Iranians at a pro-government rally on June 25, the "live" label above the CNN logo is misspelled and the usual timestamp and name of the news programme are instead made up of jumbled characters. Image Screenshot comparison of the false post, with the chyron zoomed in using Forensically (L) and a June 25 CNN TV report on a protest in Iran Additionally, the news anchor's mouth does not move in accordance with his speech, another hallmark of AI-altered footage. Despite the meteoric progress in Generative AI, errors still show up in AI-generated content. These defects are the best way to recognise a fabricated image. The overly smooth skin and hair of the protesters suggest the video was AI-generated, as AFP previously noted in its video tutorial on spotting inauthentic visuals. Image Screenshot of the false Facebook post, with AI-generated features highlighted by AFP A reverse image search on Google using keyframes from the video found the clip was earlier shared on TikTok on June 24. The post shows the video was taken from another user whose account is named "Ai VIDEOS". While the circulating clip does not appear on the user's profile, a review of the account shows similar AI-generated news reports (archived link). The clips bear an identical "AI VIDEO" text at the lower right corner of the frame. Image Screenshot comparison of the falsely shared clip (L) and the Ai VIDEOS TikTok post AFP has debunked a wave of AI-generated visuals being falsely linked to the Iran-Israel conflict (archived link).

LeMonde
2 hours ago
- LeMonde
BRICS struggle to find common ground despite shared ambition to challenge the West
Has the moment arrived for the Global South to push back against Donald Trump? That is the hope in some countries at the 17 th BRICS summit is to be held on Sunday, July 6, and Monday, July 7, in Rio de Janeiro. The event is highly anticipated, given the hike in US tariffs, as well as the war in Ukraine and ongoing conflicts in the Middle East. Since 2023, the so-called "bloc" has been steadily expanding. It now brings together 11 countries representing about half of the world's population and 30% of global GDP. Historic members – Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa – are now joined by Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Ethiopia, the United Arab Emirates, Iran, and Indonesia. Also present in Rio will be 10 "associated" states: Belarus, Bolivia, Kazakhstan, Thailand, Cuba, Uganda, Malaysia, Nigeria, Vietnam, and Uzbekistan. Meticulously prepared by the Brazilians, the summit will nevertheless take place without two major figures: Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping. The Russian president, who is the subject of an International Criminal Court arrest warrant, will participate via video link. "The Brazilian government was unable to adopt a clear position that would allow our president to attend this meeting," lamented Yuri Ushakov, Kremlin diplomatic adviser, who specified that Putin would be replaced by his foreign minister, Sergei Lavrov.