Govt gives rebel Labour MPs major concession to welfare bill 90 minutes before vote
In a further attempt to allay dozens of Labour MPs' fears that the bill will be detrimental to disabled people, disabilities minister Stephen Timms told the Commons any changes to eligibility for personal independence payment (PIP) will only be made after the review he is carrying out is completed.
The Timms review is looking into PIP, the main disability benefit to help adults with the extra costs of living with a health condition or disability.
Mr Timms made the announcement just 90 minutes before MPs were due to vote on the bill.
Dozens of Labour MPs had raised concerns the review will be published in autumn 2026 - the same time changes to PIP eligibility were to be made - so the findings could not be taken into account.
On Monday, Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall announced the government was watering down its original proposal as it faced a rebellion by 127 Labour MPs.
However, the Timms review timing remained a major concern.
This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly.
Please refresh the page for the fullest version.
You can receive Breaking News alerts on a smartphone or tablet via the Sky News App. You can also follow @SkyNews on X or subscribe to our YouTube channel to keep up with the latest news.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
The welfare reform vote: All you need to know
MPs have backed a Government proposal to reform welfare payments for sick and disabled people, but only after significant concessions saw much of Sir Keir Starmer's plan abandoned. Below, the PA news agency looks at what happened, what it means for personal independence payment (Pip) and universal credit, and what might come next. – What have MPs agreed to? MPs voted on Tuesday to allow the Government's Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill to advance to the next stage in becoming law. Some 126 Labour backbenchers had previously threatened to vote against the legislation, enough to block its passage through the Commons, but in the end only 49 did so. But ministers were forced to offer a series of concessions to persuade the rebels to back the Government. – What concessions did the Government make? Last week, Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall announced a partial U-turn aimed at heading off the rebellion that included three key points. Firstly, changes to Pip eligibility would only come into effect in November 2026, and anyone claiming the benefit before that date would not be subject to the new rules, instead of imposing the changes on everyone. Secondly, people claiming the health element of universal credit, and new claimants with the most severe conditions, would see their incomes protected in real terms. Thirdly, disabilities minister Sir Stephen Timms would conduct a review of the Pip assessment, 'co-produced' with disabled people. But during Tuesday's debate, Sir Stephen offered a further concession, saying any changes to Pip eligibility would only be introduced after his review had concluded, further delaying them. – What do the concessions mean for the Government's proposals? The decision to push back Pip changes to an unspecified date, and leave uncertain the details of what those changes will be, removes a major part of the Government's reform plans. The proposed changes to universal credit remain, raising the standard allowance while halving the health element for most new claimants from April 2026. But the concessions will also pose a problem for Chancellor Rachel Reeves, who will need to find extra money now the expected savings from welfare reform are no longer expected to materialise. Indeed, the Resolution Foundation think tank suggested the concessions meant there would now be no 'net savings' from the reform by 2029/30, a key year for Ms Reeves' fiscal targets. – What happens next? The Government has pledged to make the necessary amendments to remove the Pip changes from the Bill when it returns to the Commons next week. It is then likely to continue through Parliament, becoming law after it has been approved by both MPs and peers. But wider questions remain for the Government. Not only does Ms Reeves face a fiscal headache, but the Prime Minister could face a political one too as he seeks to repair fractured relations with his backbenchers. And uncertainty will continue to surround the Government's plans for welfare reform. Ministers will still want to reduce the cost of the welfare bill and get more people back into work, while Sir Stephen's Pip review could result in another row depending on what it recommends.
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
How every Greater Manchester MP voted on the controversial welfare reform bill
Labour's controversial welfare reforms have been voted through after the government made a major U-turn at the eleventh hour. The bill, which was set to make it harder to claim disability benefits, has been voted through by a majority of 75 votes in the House of Commons. It came after the government made yet another concession during the debate in a last-minute offer to Labour rebels. Disabilities minister Stephen Timms said that controversial changes to Personal Independence Payments (PIP) which would have raised the threshold for new claimants to qualify would not come into effect until his review of the disability benefit is completed. READ MORE: 'Armed police' storm residential street and arrest man following incident READ MORE: Police release details after woman dies in horror building fall in Manchester Nevertheless, 49 Labour MPs still voted against the bill - including some from Greater Manchester - with others choosing to abstain. Sign up to the MEN Politics newsletter Due North here In total, three Labour MPs from Greater Manchester voted against the bill alongside the region's two Lib Dems who also opposed it. There was no vote recorded for two Labour MPs, both of whom took to social media to explain why they could not support the bill. The remaining 20 MPs in Greater Manchester, nearly half of whom are government ministers or whips, all voted in favour of the bill. It comes after 10 out of our 27 MPs came out against the bill last week, with eight of them signing a rebel amendment opposing it. However, the reasoned amendment was withdrawn after the government promised to protect those currently claiming PIP. A new reasoned amendment was debated on Tuesday (July 1), but only 42 Labour MPs voted for it alongside opposition parties. Oldham MP Debbie Abrahams, who chairs the Work and Pensions Select Committee, did not sign the latest reasoned amendment, but said during ahead of the debate that she would not be supporting the bill. However, she changed her mind following the U-turn. If all opposition MPs voted against the bill, it would have taken 83 Labour rebels to vote it down - but in the end there were only 49. Here's the full breakdown of how each Greater Manchester MP voted. Connor Rand (Labour), Altrincham and Sale West Angela Rayner (Labour), Ashton-under-Lyne Kirith Entwistle (Labour), Bolton North East Phil Brickell (Labour), Bolton West James Frith (Labour), Bury North Christian Wakeford (Labour), Bury South Andrew Gwynne (Independent), Gorton and Denton Elsie Blundell (Labour), Heywood and Middleton North Jo Platt (Labour Co-op), Leigh and Atherton Josh Simons (Labour), Makerfield Lucy Powell (Labour Co-op), Manchester Central Jeff Smith (Labour), Manchester, Withington Debbie Abrahams (Labour), Oldham East and Saddleworth Jim McMahon (Labour Co-op), Oldham West, Chadderton and Royton Paul Waugh (Labour), Rochdale Jonathan Reynolds (Labour Co-op), Stalybridge and Hyde Andrew Western (Labour), Stretford and Urmston Lisa Nandy (Labour), Wigan Michael Wheeler (Labour), Worsley and Eccles Mike Kane (Labour), Wythenshawe and Sale East Graham Stringer (Labour), Blackley and Middleton South Tom Morrison (Lib Dem), Cheadle Lisa Smart (Lib Dem), Hazel Grove Rebecca Long-Bailey (Labour), Salford Navendu Mishra (Labour), Stockport Yasmin Qureshi (Labour), Bolton South and Walkden Afzal Khan (Labour), Manchester Rusholme
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
How the new welfare bill affects PIP and universal credit payments
The government was forced to make another major concession to its welfare bill in a last-ditch attempt to pass it on Tuesday night. With just over an hour before a crunch vote that an under-fire Keir Starmer was in danger of losing, disabilities minister Stephen Timms announced no cuts would be made to PIP until he conducted and concluded a review of the disability benefit. It followed previous concessions to PIP and universal credit announced last week as ministers initially tried to appease Labour rebels. The chaotic changes come some three months after the controversial reforms were first announced by the government and are likely to leave many claimants trying to catch up with what the latest changes mean for them. The Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill was introduced by the government in March of this year with the aim of stabilising welfare spending as well as getting more people claiming benefits back into work. Initially, the government proposed £5bn worth of cuts to the health element of universal credit, as well as limiting who would be eligible for PIP. It also proposed axing any kind of disability payments for those under 22. Now, the bill has radically changed following widespread backlash from disabled people, at least 86 charities, and a swell of Labour backbenchers. However, cuts to universal credit still feature. While the health top-up amount was set to be frozen until 2028 and the payments for new claimants halved, the benefit top-up will now be raised in line with inflation. The PIP changes have now been shelved by the government until the disabilities minister, Stephen Timms, conducts a review into the impact of the cuts in 2026. The Timms review is a comprehensive review of the PIP assessment system and is aimed at ensuring the PIP system is fair, supportive, and reflects the realities of modern life. The review will be co-produced with disabled people, organisations representing them, and MPs, with the goal of delivering better experiences and outcomes for disabled people and those with health conditions. The review will be the first comprehensive report into the disability benefit in a decade, and is expected to be published in autumn 2026. Under the government's last-minute concession, PIP claimants will no longer have to score four points or more in a single category of their benefit assessment in order to qualify for the benefit. Now, the implications of the decision — and how the benefit payment works at large — will be reviewed by Timms. The findings of the review are expected late 2026, meaning payments will not be affected until at least this date — if at all. Under the government's initial welfare reform proposal, around 800,000 people were estimated to lose out on the daily living component of PIP by 2029/30. Now, no one will be affected at least until the review takes place and it seems likely the government will struggle to push through similar reforms. Even after a series of concessions, the health top-up element of universal credit will still be frozen — to an extent — for current claimants, and halved for new claimants. However, under one of the concessions the government made last week, it will now rise in line with inflation year-on-year. The freezing of the universal credit health element and reductions for new claimants are expected to impact 2.25 million existing and 730,000 future claimants. The government will save some money overall, but a drastically smaller amount than it first calculated at £5bn. Before the inflation announcement, the government was expected to make over £1.1 billion in net savings by 2029/30 from the combined measures of freezing the universal credit health element for existing claimants and halving it for most new claimants from April 2026. Now, the figure is expected to be lower.
