Nicola Coughlan Set to Lead BAFTA-Winning ‘I Am Helen' with Joe Cole in New Season of Channel 4 Anthology Series
According to Variety, Coughlan, known for her roles in Bridgerton, Derry Girls, and Big Mood, joins the list of high-profile female leads who have previously headlined the 'I Am' series, including Kate Winslet, Letitia Wright, Samantha Morton, and Lesley Manville.
What is 'I Am Helen' about?
The story for I Am Helen has been developed in creative collaboration between Nicola Coughlan and Dominic Savage, who continues his signature approach of working closely with his lead actors to shape the narratives.
'It's an absolute honour to be part of telling the next I Am story alongside Dominic Savage, a singular talent and a storyteller deeply committed to exploring the breadth of the female experience,' said Coughlan. 'To follow in the footsteps of the brilliant women who've collaborated with him on this series feels truly surreal, and I feel incredibly fortunate to be embarking on this journey.'
Joe Cole, known for Gangs of London and A Small Light, will star opposite Coughlan in the two-part installment. The exact plot and broadcast date are yet to be revealed, but I Am Helen will air on Channel 4.
Why 'I Am Helen' could be the most powerful chapter yet
Since its debut in 2019, 'I Am' has become Channel 4's most successful new 10 pm drama in six years, praised for its emotionally raw storytelling and focus on female-led narratives. Winslet's I Am Ruth won two BAFTAs in 2023, while earlier stories like I Am Nicola (Vicky McClure), I Am Kirsty (Samantha Morton), and I Am Maria (Lesley Manville) received critical acclaim.
Krishnendu Majumdar and Richard Yee of Me+You Productions said, 'It's a genuine privilege to continue our creative relationship with Dominic Savage, one of the most brilliant and uniquely talented filmmakers today, and to be working with Nicola Coughlan, one of the standout performers of her generation.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
Jeannie Seely, ‘Don't Touch Me' singer and Grammy winner, dies at 85
Jeannie Seely, the Grammy-winning country music singer and longtime member of the Grand Ole Opry, has died at the age of 85. According to The Hollywood Reporter, Seely passed away on Friday in Nashville due to complications from an intestinal infection. She rose to fame in 1966 with her hit song Don't Touch Me, written by Hank Cochran. The track earned her a Grammy Award for Best Female Country Vocal Performance and launched a successful music career. She went on to receive two more Grammy nominations. In 1967, Seely became a member of the Grand Ole Opry. She made history as the first woman to regularly host and emcee segments of the show. Over the years, she performed on the Opry stage more than 5,000 times, making her one of its most frequent performers. Born on July 6 1940 in Titusville, Pennsylvania, Seely developed a passion for music early on and appeared on local radio and television programmes. After a brief career in banking, she moved to Nashville to pursue music full-time, signing with Challenge Records. According to THR, her debut single with Monument Records, "Don't Touch Me" reached No. 2 on the Billboard Hot Country Songs chart and No. 85 on the Hot 100. Over the years, she had more than 25 singles on the country charts, including "Can I Sleep in Your Arms" and "Lucky Ladies". Seely also wrote songs for other artists, including Faron Young's "Leavin' and Sayin' Goodbye." She often performed with Jack Greene in the late 1960s and early 1970s, with their duet "Wish I Didn't Have to Miss You" reaching No. 2 on the country chart. She released 17 studio albums, with her final album "An American Classic" coming out in 2020. The album featured collaborations with Willie Nelson, Ray Stevens, and Lorrie Morgan. In 2018, she launched her own SiriusXM show "Sundays With Seely." Her last performance at the Grand Ole Opry was in February 2024. According to the publication, singer Tim Atwood, in a statement, paid tribute to Seely and said, "It doesn't seem possible to know a world without Seely in it. And as good as the Opry show is, the Opry spotlight will never shine as brightly without Jeannie in the center circle." Dolly Parton, a longtime friend, took to her Instagram account and wrote, "I have known Jeanie Seely since we were early on in Nashville. She was one of my dearest friends. I think she was one of the greatest singers in Nashville, and she had a wonderful sense of humour. We had many wonderful laughs together, cried over certain things together, and she will be missed." Seely's husband, Gene Ward, died in December 2023 after a battle with cancer.
News18
2 hours ago
- News18
Pallavi Joshi Recalls Being Hit By Director At Age 4: 'How Could He Slap Me?'
Pallavi Joshi recalls being slapped on set at age four during her debut film. The award-winning actor opens up about the incident and her remarkable career. National Award-winning actor Pallavi Joshi may be celebrated today for her powerful performances, but her entry into the world of cinema came with an unexpectedly harsh lesson in showbiz. In a candid interview with Friday Talkies, Pallavi opened up about a shocking incident from her debut film Naag Mere Saathi (1973), revealing that she was slapped by the film's director on set when she couldn't deliver an emotional scene. Recounting the moment with startling clarity, Pallavi, who was just four years old at the time, said that director Shantilal Joshi—a friend of her father's—cast her after noticing her interest in acting. She played the younger version of Sarika in the film, which also starred Sachin. During one particular song sequence, the young Pallavi was asked to cry while performing a puja to the Nag Devta. But instead of weeping, she found the entire scene hilarious. 'They told me to cry, but I just kept laughing," she shared. 'After multiple failed takes, Shantilal uncle asked my father to slap me. My father refused, of course. He just pretended to scold me from behind the camera. I could tell he wasn't serious, and that made me laugh even more." But what followed next left a permanent impression on her young mind. 'Frustrated, Shantilal uncle walked up and slapped me while the camera was rolling. I was stunned. I had never been hit before. I felt humiliated in front of the whole unit. I broke into uncontrollable sobs. After the shot, I got up and shouted, 'I don't want to shoot for this film!'" Her father, equally taken aback, confronted the director, asking, 'How could you slap my daughter?" The shoot was called off, and although days passed in silence, the director eventually resumed filming once little Pallavi had calmed down. The experience, though bruising, didn't deter her from continuing in the industry. Pallavi went on to act in several acclaimed films as a child, including Aadmi Sadak Ka, Badla, and Dada, where her portrayal of a blind child earned special praise. Her career flourished through the 1990s in both parallel and commercial cinema, with standout performances in Rukmavati Ki Haveli, Trishagni, and Saudagar. In 1992, she earned her first National Award for Woh Chokri, and later portrayed Kasturba Gandhi in Shyam Benegal's The Making of the Mahatma. After a brief hiatus, she returned to cinema with Renuka Shahane's Rita in 2009. Most recently seen in Tanvi The Great, Pallavi is now gearing up for the release of The Bengal Files, the next chapter in husband Vivek Agnihotri's politically charged Files trilogy. Also starring Mithun Chakraborty, Anupam Kher, and Darshan Kumar, the film is slated for release on September 5. First Published: August 02, 2025, 19:57 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Mint
3 hours ago
- Mint
Who, Exactly, Is the ‘Netflix of AI' For?
(Bloomberg Opinion) -- In the ongoing, fiercely competitive race to see who can come up with the most unwanted, unwelcome AI technology, we may have a new frontrunner. According to Variety, Inc. has made an undisclosed investment in Fable, a Bay Area start-up, and specifically in its newly launched Showrunner service, which Fable is touting as the 'Netflix of AI.' The company describes its software, which went public Wednesday and is currently available via its Discord, as '[an] AI platform that puts a studio at your fingertips, where anyone can create, watch, and personalize series and stories.' More specifically, it allows users to use keywords to create scenes or episodes of animated cartoon shows, either of the user's own creation or (more likely, and easily) from existing templates of television programs. What seems to be missing from Fable and Amazon's efforts is consideration for the most essential question in any consumer product strategy: Who, exactly, is this for? The potential copyright issues alone are exhausting. Fable's CEO and co-founder Edward Saatchi told Variety that he is 'in talks' with Walt Disney Co. and other studios about licensing partnerships, but there's plenty of potential here for studios and IP holders to slap the company with a Midjourney Inc. type lawsuit. When Saatchi tested (and showed off) the software two years ago with nine short South Park episodes, he didn't bother securing rights or permission from the show's creators. Reportedly, he reached out to assure them that it wasn't for commercial use. While the animations got over 80 million views, South Park's cultural cachet was likely the driving force. With the software's star power still a big if, the question of who Showrunner's intended audience is looms even larger. On one hand, sure, animation (and, for that matter, live-action filmmaking) is costly, laborious and difficult. I'm certain there are plenty of would-be Walt Disneys who'd like to make their own little cartoons. But — and this is the tricky part — who wants to watch them? It's tiring enough to scroll through the constant stream of clumsy generative-AI 'art,' with its unsettling visuals and recurring anatomical errors— so the idea of actually watching a full scene, let alone an entire episode, of AI-generated animation feels especially unappealing. What Showrunner is offering seems like the streaming equivalent of self-publishing in the book world: empowering for the authors, but rarely read by anyone else. The company's website proudly promises 'No agents' and 'no studio gatekeepers,' but here's a potentially controversial opinion: Sometimes gatekeepers are good. They serve to filter out untalented artists and elevate gifted ones. The burning desire to tell a story does not necessarily translate to the skill of telling one, and if you don't believe me, go spend a day at a third-tier film festival sometime. Beyond the specifics of this software, however, lurks a larger disconnect between the people who create entertainment and the people who create technology intended to supplant entertainment. Saatchi insists, 'Our relationship to entertainment will be totally different in the next five years,' and claims that 'Hollywood streaming services are about to become two-way entertainment: audiences watching a season of a show [and] loving it will now be able to make new episodes with a few words and become characters with a photo.' As someone who engages with film and television all the time, the concept is genuinely puzzling and not particularly appealing. The idea of 'two-way entertainment'— where loving a show or movie leads to inserting oneself into it or reshaping its narrative through personalized storylines — runs counter to why we engage with art. Part of the joy in watching something is experiencing a creator's vision. The expectation that audiences should actively participate in shaping entertainment feels more like a shift toward self-involvement than storytelling. It's hard to imagine watching a favorite show and thinking, 'The only thing that would make this better is if I were in charge of it.' The creators and consumers of fanfiction may disagree, but these matters are best left to the professionals. Perhaps that, ultimately, is what this all boils down to. The generative AI that we're constantly being bombarded with, in the fields of prose writing, visual art and now streaming television, comes at the expense of human artists, sidelining the very creativity and craft that give meaning to the work itself. People in all walks of life — especially in business and tech — love to describe themselves as 'storytellers' (even when they're only 'telling stories' in the most generous sense of the phrase), while simultaneously taking every opportunity to kneecap actual storytellers. Each so-called advancement rests on the premise that anyone can create high-quality art. But the reality is, not everyone can. Sure, I can daydream my own episodes of The Sopranos or Breaking Bad, to use two of my favorite series as examples. But that's exactly where those fantasies belong: in my head. What makes those shows exceptional is the mastery of David Chase and Vince Gilligan, who understand how to build complex characters, construct meaningful conflict, and deliver rising action and satisfying conclusions. Of course, it would be far more convenient — and far more profitable — for streaming platforms if anyone could replicate that expertise. And that may be the most troubling part of this deal: not just that software exists that devalues artists, erases creative labor and potentially infringes on copyrights, but that Amazon is so eager to invest in From Bloomberg Opinion: This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners. Jason Bailey is a film critic and historian whose work has appeared in the New York Times, Vulture, the Playlist, Slate and Rolling Stone. He is the author, most recently, of 'Gandolfini: Jim, Tony, and the Life of a Legend.' More stories like this are available on
