India to maintain Russian oil imports despite Trump threats
On top of a new 25 percent tariff on India's exports to the US, Trump indicated in a Truth Social post last month that India would face additional penalties for purchases of Russian arms and oil. On Friday, Trump told reporters he had heard that India would no longer be buying oil from Russia.
But the sources said there would be no immediate changes.
"These are long-term oil contracts," one of the sources said. "It is not so simple to just stop buying overnight." Justifying India's oil purchases from Russia, a second source said India's imports of Russian grades had helped avoid a global surge in oil prices, which have remained subdued despite Western curbs on the Russian oil sector.
Unlike Iranian and Venezuelan oil, Russian crude is not subject to direct sanctions, and India is buying it below the current price cap fixed by the European Union, the source said.
The New York Times also quoted two unnamed senior Indian officials on Saturday as saying there had been no change in Indian government policy.
Indian government authorities did not respond to Reuters' request for official comment on its oil purchasing intentions.
However, during a regular press briefing Friday, foreign ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said India has a "steady and time-tested partnership" with Russia.
"On our energy sourcing requirements ... we look at what is there available in the markets, what is there on offer, and also what is the prevailing global situation or circumstances," he said.
The White House did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Trump, who has made ending Russia's war in Ukraine a priority of his administration since returning to office this year, has expressed growing impatience with Russian President Vladimir Putin in recent weeks.
He has threatened 100 percent tariffs on US imports from countries that buy Russian oil unless Moscow reaches a major peace deal with Ukraine.
Russia is the leading supplier to India, the world's third-largest oil importer and consumer, accounting for about 35 percent of its overall supplies.
India imported about 1.75 million barrels per day of Russian oil from January to June this year, up 1 percent from a year ago, according to data provided to Reuters by sources.
But while the Indian government may not be deterred by Trump's threats, sources told Reuters last week that Indian state refiners stopped buying Russian oil after July discounts narrowed to their lowest since 2022 -- when sanctions were first imposed on Moscow -- due to lower Russian exports and steady demand.
Indian Oil Co., Hindustan Petroleum Co., Bharat Petroleum Co. and Mangalore Refinery Petrochemical have not sought Russian crude in the past week or so, four sources told Reuters.
Nayara Energy -- a refinery majority-owned by Russian entities, including oil major Rosneft, and major buyer of Russian oil -- was recently sanctioned by the EU.
Nayara's chief executive resigned following the sanctions, and three vessels laden with oil products from Nayara Energy have yet to discharge their cargoes, hindered by the new EU sanctions, Reuters reported earlyl this month.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Korea Herald
7 hours ago
- Korea Herald
FM Cho says US troops in S. Korea to remain as is amid drawdown reports
South Korea's top diplomat has said the US forces stationed in the country and their role will remain unchanged amid ongoing speculation that President Donald Trump's administration may reduce troop levels as part of a military posture adjustment. Foreign Minister Cho Hyun made the remarks in an interview with The Washington Post, as speculation persists over the possibility of the 28,500-strong US Forces Korea being reduced for use in operations outside the Korean Peninsula as the Trump administration prioritizes deterring an assertive China. Such a possibility has gained traction amid a growing view that Washington could push for a troop reduction, alongside other demands to reshape the alliance with Seoul, including increased defense spending, as part of broader efforts to "modernize" the alliance with a focus on countering China. "We are talking with the United States, but there is no concern about the US forces in Korea. We believe that they will remain as such, and their role will remain as of today," Cho said in the interview, published Sunday local time. Asked what the potential troop drawdown would mean for bilateral relations, Cho cast it as hypothetical and said he does not believe it will happen. "I don't think it will happen. I have met a number of senators this time, and they all have assured me that it will not be the case," he said. Cho was visiting Washington last week for talks with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and meetings with US government officials, lawmakers and experts from think tanks. Regarding China, Cho said that South Korea, led by the new Lee Jae Myung government, seeks to maintain good relations with China, although its economic and geopolitical rise has become "somewhat problematic" for its neighbors. "But we will try to send a message to China: 'We want to maintain a good relationship and (see) you abide by international law in not only bilateral but in regional affairs,'" he said. In response, the Chinese Embassy in Seoul emphasized its amicable ties with neighboring countries. "China currently maintains favorable relations with all neighboring nations, and the vast majority of them regard strengthening friendly cooperation with China as a priority in their foreign policy," the embassy said. Cho said that South Korea will work with the neighboring Japan to address various challenges posed by China, noting the need for engaging with Beijing, rather than attempting to contain it. "I've emphasized that all of these things will be in good collaboration with our ally, the United States," he said. On the recent tariff agreement reached with the Trump administration, Cho assessed that it was a "win-win" proposal that aims to reduce the trade imbalance for the U.S. while giving South Korea a chance to "remain at the top" in manufacturing areas. "Korea was not singled out to rebalance the trade imbalance," he said. "We believe it is extremely important for us and for the United States as well because of geopolitical challenges we have in Northeast Asia." On Thursday, the allies agreed to lower the U.S. reciprocal tariff rate for South Korea to 15 percent from the originally proposed 25 percent. South Korea, in return, committed to investing US$350 billion in US industries. (Yonhap)
![[Contribution] Is China equity recovery durable?](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwimg.heraldcorp.com%2Fnews%2Fcms%2F2025%2F08%2F04%2Fnews-p.v1.20250730.f513ce50602c41fb9e37a37d8ec73fce_T1.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
Korea Herald
13 hours ago
- Korea Herald
[Contribution] Is China equity recovery durable?
China's equity rally faces a wall of scepticism after years of false dawns. However, this time could be different: Beijing's crackdown on irrational competition in key industries and sustained stimulus, compounded by moderating US trade rhetoric ahead of a potential Trump-Xi meeting, are setting the stage for a sustainable equity market rebound most are missing. The Hang Seng index and MSCI China index have soared over 25 percent year to date. However, China equities still registered a net fund outflow this year. This illustrates that global investors have yet to gain high conviction in China equities. Such sentiment could mainly be attributable to policy uncertainty and lacklustre equity performance in recent years, among other reasons. We see reasons for optimism for a durable recovery in China equities. Early signs of economic improvement are emerging, including stronger-than-expected 6.4 percent year-on-year retail sales in May. Sceptics may view this as bad news, since this, when combined with the improving market performance, may signal no urgency for further policy stimulus to revitalize domestic demand. We argue otherwise. There are two trends on which authorities are placing increased emphasis: rising savings rates and persistent deflationary pressures. The Chinese are known for saving up for the "rainy day." However, the acceleration in the household savings rate from 44 percent in 2023 to 55 percent in 2024 has been startling, masking concerns about economic uncertainty. This uneasiness is understandable given the challenging global environment. While US-China tensions have eased of late, tariffs on Chinese imports have gone up. Meanwhile, excess manufacturing capacity, after front-loading of exports to beat US tariffs fades, could sustain deflation. For instance, producer price deflation worsened more than expected to minus 3.6 percent year-on-year in June. There is a risk China's retail sales growth could decelerate without incremental stimulus. Subsidized trade-in consumption programs launched last year, which contributed to strong retail sales in the first half, will likely lose steam in the coming months. Given consumption is a key engine of China's growth, we see an increased likelihood of additional policy measures to drive retail growth tactically and structurally. Policies will likely include ways to widen the scope of consumption subsidies and ease restrictions on household registration, or 'hukou.' Hukou relaxation could be strategically bundled with housing stimulus and social safety net reforms. On one end of the demographic spectrum, retirees could be incentivized to shift to lower-tiered cities or rural areas with lower costs of living and better living conditions. The lower-tiered cities suffering the largest housing supply gluts could turn the unoccupied housing projects into social housing developments for older adults. Affordable housing projects could also be developed in the outskirts of top-tiered cities, with the aim to attract younger, educated migrants, who, encouraged by better career prospects, could establish families sooner. Structurally, China is seeking to spur childbirth by recently announcing the first nationwide cash handout program for every child under the age of three. Furthermore, the nation will likely accelerate the upgrade of elderly care goods and health care services to stimulate consumption of the 'silver hair' segment, including the development of humanoid robots for elderly care. Recent official meetings since July have further reinforced our optimism about China's policy outlook. On 1 July, the Central Commission for Finance and Economic Affairs called for the need to curb irrational price competition, accelerate the eradication of obsolete capacity and promote local government standards to support businesses. Following the meeting, the State Council pledged on 16 July to regulate the irrational price competition in the EV industry. The State Administration for Market Regulation also met with major online food delivery platforms to stem unfair competition. We believe these measures align with China's shift in growth focus from quantity to quality. These measures will help mitigate deflation, boding well for China equities. There is no coincidence that the policy-sensitive onshore A shares index, which has underperformed Hong Kong's Hang Seng index YTD, has been catching up with the latter in July. Backed by improving fundamentals, China's equities are at the cusp of a turnaround, with earnings expectations bottoming and valuations ticking up. China equity valuations, partly constrained by low investor positioning, still trail their historical and peer averages, with a price-to-earnings multiple of 12-13x notably below the US level of above 22x. China's earnings prospects are also brightening as pricing and profit margin trends stabilize with policymakers focusing on rationalizing competition and capacity. Rising prospect of a Trump-Xi meeting this year, the dollar's ongoing weakness and a peak in trade tensions are broadly supportive of our positive view on global equities. Within our globally diversified allocation, we are overweight Asia ex-Japan equities. Within Asia, excluding Japan, we believe China equities will generate excess returns (alpha) thanks to Beijing's concerted and targeted policy measures to sustain growth, reduce capacity and overcome deflation. That said, we reiterate the importance of diversifying across asset classes, including quality bonds, gold and alternative investments, to produce optimal returns and protect your wealth against market volatility.
Korea Herald
16 hours ago
- Korea Herald
White House defends firing of labor official
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -- White House economic advisers on Sunday defended President Donald Trump's firing of the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, pushing back against criticism that Trump's action could undermine confidence in official US economic data. Later on Sunday, Trump again criticized BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer, without providing evidence of wrongdoing, and said he would name a new BLS commissioner in the next three or four days. US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer told CBS that Trump had "real concerns" about the BLS data, while Kevin Hassett, director of the National Economic Council, said the president "is right to call for new leadership." Hassett said on Fox News Sunday the main concern was Friday's BLS report of net downward revisions showing 258,000 fewer jobs had been created in May and June than previously reported. Trump accused McEntarfer of faking the jobs numbers, without providing any evidence of data manipulation. The BLS compiles the closely watched employment report as well as consumer and producer price data. The BLS gave no reason for the revised data but noted "monthly revisions result from additional reports received from businesses and government agencies since the last published estimates and from the recalculation of seasonal factors." McEntarfer responded to her abrupt dismissal on Friday in a post on the Bluesky social media platform, saying it was "the honor of her life" to serve as BLS commissioner and praising the civil servants who work there. McEntarfer's firing added to growing concerns about the quality of US economic data and came on the heels of a raft of new tariffs on dozens of trading partners, sending global stock markets tumbling as Trump presses ahead with plans to reorder the global economy. Investors also are watching the impact of the surprise resignation of Federal Reserve Gov. Adriana Kugler, which opened a spot on the central bank's powerful board and could shake up what was already a fractious succession process for Fed leadership amid difficult relations with Trump. Trump said on Sunday he would announce a candidate to fill the open Fed position within the next couple days. In an interview with CBS' "Face the Nation," Greer acknowledged there were always revisions of job numbers, "but sometimes you see these revisions go in really extreme ways." Brian Moynihan, CEO of Bank of America, said large revisions of economic data could undermine public confidence and that government officials should develop ways of improving data quality. "They can get this data, I think, other ways and I think that's where the focus ought to be: how do we get the data to be more resilient and more predictable and more understandable?" he said on CBS. "Because what bounces around is restatements ... that creates doubt about it." Critics, including former leaders of the BLS, slammed Trump's move and called on Congress to investigate McEntarfer's removal, saying it would shake trust in a respected agency. "It undermines credibility," said William Beach, a former BLS commissioner and co-chair of the group Friends of the BLS. "There is no way for a commissioner to rig the jobs numbers," he said. "Every year we've revised the numbers. When I was commissioner, we had a 500,000 job revision during President Trump's first term," he said on CNN's "State of the Union." Former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers, who worked in both the Clinton and Obama administrations, also criticized McEntarfer's firing. "This is a preposterous charge. These numbers are put together by teams of literally hundreds of people following detailed procedures that are in manuals," Summers said on ABC's "This Week." The BLS surveys 121,000 employers -- businesses and government agencies -- each month, seeking their total payroll employment during the week in which the 12th day of the month falls. The response rate has fallen sharply since the COVID pandemic, from 80.3 percent in October 2020 to about 67.1 percent in July. Knowing that, BLS allows late-arriving employer submissions, and revisions to earlier submissions, to be taken into account over the next two months. That means each month's initial estimate of employment for the immediately preceding month also contains revisions to the two months before that. The revisions in Friday's report were large by historic standards. The downward revision of 125,000 jobs for May was the largest between a second estimate and third estimate since a 492,000 reduction for March 2020. That was the largest ever and was reported in June 2020 for the payrolls report for May 2020.
