Zohran Mamdani's victory is a Barack Obama moment
Zaid Jilani
When I found out about New York Democratic Assembly member Zohran Mamdani's upset victory in New York City's mayoral Democratic primary, an old memory popped into my head.
It was the day after Barack Obama trounced John McCain in 2008's presidential election. A friend of mine who was running his student chapter for the state of Georgia greeted me at the student center of the University of Georgia, where we both went to school.
His face was gleaming. He was the son of Liberian immigrants, and Obama's victory had special resonance for him. America - the same country built off the backs of enslaved Africans - was capable of electing a Black man.
'Now you could be elected president,' I told him.
Not missing a beat, he replied, 'Now you could!'
Let's not get carried away, I thought.
This was still the United States of America. Seven years earlier, a group of fanatics who committed the 9/11 attacks had made Muslim Americans such as me synonymous with terrorism in the eyes of millions. Heck, Obama had to swear up and down over and over that he wasn't Muslim just to get elected.
And, in my years working in and around politics since then, my cynicism about this was unchanged. Recall that then-Minnesota Democratic Rep. Keith Ellison - the first Muslim elected to Congress - had to prove to a CNN host that he wasn't 'working with our enemies.' Then Ellison's bid to run the Democratic Party was derailed nine years later in part because of a handful of critical comments he had made about Israel's treatment of the Palestinians. This came only months after Donald Trump was elected in part on a promise to ban Muslims from entering the United States entirely.
Just like our parents had slapped American flags on everything they owned after 9/11, Muslim American politicians and staffers across Capitol Hill and Washington more broadly were counseled to always demonstrate our patriotism first and foremost because it was constantly being questioned by everyone around us.
When I worked at progressive think tanks or left-wing political action committees, my superiors were terrified of coming across as too sympathetic to Muslim American concerns about the Middle East or American foreign policy more broadly. They didn't want to get called antisemitic or be accused of sympathizing with terrorists.
The war in Gaza compounded this sense of feeling besieged. Two presidents in a row have signed up to support what appears to be an endless war against Palestinian sovereignty itself, going far beyond what was necessary to defend against Hamas militancy. As they watched tens of thousands of civilians killed on their TV screens and social media feeds by a military backed to the hilt by American taxpayer support, many Muslims I knew felt like the country had accepted these Palestinian deaths so easily because America simply will never allow Muslims to be coequals.
But Mamdani's victory set off a vibe shift among my Muslim friends, family and colleagues like nothing I've ever seen before.
People I know who believed that America would never accept Muslims for who they were now believe that anything is possible. Maybe my friend at UGA all those years ago wasn't wrong. Maybe there could be a Muslim president in my lifetime.
In that sense, Mamdani's victory is an Obama moment for us.
A young and principled Muslim faced off with the beating heart of the local Democratic establishment, which held nothing back as it sought to tar him as an antisemitic extremist. There is no more politically inflammatory charge in New York, which has the largest Jewish population of any city in America.
And yet not only did he win, he won handily. By breaking this glass ceiling, Mamdani restored faith in the American experiment among millions of American Muslims.
The way he did it mattered, too: Watching Mamdani run what was essentially a joint ticket with Comptroller Brad Lander, a Jewish progressive, I saw a vision of mutual respect and admiration across cultural lines that felt like the best of America.
That it happened in the same city targeted on 9/11 made it all the more poignant as well. The national trauma that defined American life in my childhood did not have to define it in my future. If New Yorkers could give Mamdani a chance, they could give the rest of us one, too.
None of this is to say that I endorse the idea of voting for someone just because they share your faith or ethnicity. I agree with then-Sen. John F. Kennedy, who said in 1960: 'I want no votes solely on account of my religion.'
I think people should vote for the best candidate based on their experience, values and ideas - not based on religious or ethnic tribalism. I worry that Mamdani's relative inexperience could be an issue as he is likely set to govern America's most populated city, and some of his ideas might be too radical. Scrutinizing him on these grounds is warranted.
But I also want to live in a country where a Muslim candidate for office will be scrutinized based on their record, not their religion. And with Mamdani's victory on Tuesday, America showed Muslim Americans that despite all our cynicism over the past 20 years, this continues to be the best country in the world for minorities - a place where prejudices cannot and will not hold back progress.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
eNCA
10 minutes ago
- eNCA
US House close to final vote on Trump tax bill
US lawmakers teed up a final vote on Donald Trump's marquee tax and spending bill for Thursday morning after bruising Republican infighting nearly derailed the centerpiece of the president's domestic agenda. Almost 24 hours after debate began, Trump appeared close to major victory as Congress edged towards passing his "One Big Beautiful Bill," despite misgivings in his party over a text that would balloon the national debt while launching a historic assault on the social safety net. Speaker Mike Johnson struggled through the night to corral his rank-and-file members after the package scraped through a series of "test" votes in the House of Representatives that laid bare deep divisions in the party. It was on course for a final vote that would put it on Trump's desk to be signed into law after passing its last procedural hurdle in the early hours of Thursday. "We feel very good about where we are and we're moving forward," an upbeat Johnson told reporters at the Capitol. "So we're going to deliver the Big, Beautiful Bill -- the president's 'America First' agenda -- and we're going to do right by the American people." - Trump's flagship bill - The timetable could slip however as Democratic minority leader Hakeem Jeffries continued a long speech opposing the bill that delayed proceedings by several hours. Originally approved by the House in May, Trump's sprawling legislation squeezed through the Senate on Tuesday but had to return to the lower chamber for a rubber stamp of the senators' revisions. The package honors many of Trump's campaign promises, boosting military spending, funding a mass migrant deportation drive and committing $4.5 trillion to extend his first-term tax relief. But it is expected to pile an extra $3.4 trillion over a decade onto the country's fast-growing deficits, while shrinking the federal food stamps program and forcing through the largest cuts to the Medicaid health insurance scheme for low-income Americans since its 1960s launch. While moderates in the House are anxious that the cuts will damage their prospects of reelection, fiscal hawks chafed over savings that they say fall far short of what was promised. Johnson has to negotiate tight margins, and can likely only lose three lawmakers in the final vote, among more than two dozen who had declared themselves open to rejecting Trump's bill. - 'Abomination' - The 869-page text only passed in the Senate after a flurry of tweaks that pulled the House-passed version further to the right. It offsets its tax relief with around $1 trillion in health care cuts, and some estimates put the total number of recipients set to lose their insurance coverage under the bill at 17 million. Scores of rural hospitals are expected to close due to the cuts. Most legislation in the House has to run the gauntlet of multiple preliminary votes before it can come up for final approval. But there was alarm early on as the One Big Beautiful Bill stumbled at one of its first procedural stages, with a vote that ought to have been straightforward remaining open for seven hours and 31 minutes -- making it the longest in House history. Johnson had been clear that he was banking on Trump leaning on waverers, as the president has in the past to turn around contentious House votes that were headed for failure. The Republican leader has spent weeks hitting the phones and hosting White House meetings to cajole lawmakers torn between angering welfare recipients at home and incurring his wrath. "FOR REPUBLICANS, THIS SHOULD BE AN EASY YES VOTE. RIDICULOUS!!!" Trump thundered in one of multiple posts to his Truth Social platform that sounded increasingly frustrated as Wednesday's marathon voting session spilled into Thursday. House Democrats have signaled that they plan to campaign on the bill to flip the chamber in the 2026 midterm elections, pointing to analyses showing that it represents a historic redistribution of wealth from the poorest Americans to the richest. Jeffries held the floor for his Democrats for more than three hours ahead of the final vote, as he told the stories of everyday Americans whom he argued would be harmed by Trump's legislation. "This bill, this one big, ugly bill -- this reckless Republican budget, this disgusting abomination -- is not about improving the quality of life of the American people," he said. By Frankie Taggart
Mail & Guardian
2 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
Shivambu's predatory politics
Floyd Shivambu's new political project masks its predatory character in the language of liberation. Photo: Lunga Mzangwe On 24 June, Zohran Mamdani won the New York City Democratic mayoral primary. Three days later Floyd Shivambu launched his Mayibuye consultation process, introducing what he called a national consultation team as the first step toward forming a new political party. Mamdani's victory was the result of an impressive grassroots mobilisation — more than 50,000 volunteers knocked on more than 1.5 million doors. Neighbourhood assemblies and local coalitions — including tenant unions, transport justice groups, migrant groups and faith-based networks — were organised in working-class and migrant areas. Mamdani's platform emerged directly from these encounters and included proposals for city-run grocery stores stocked with affordable healthy food, free, safe and efficient buses, universal childcare supported by unionised care work, a rent freeze on one million homes and the construction of 200,000 affordable homes. His success reminds us of something that was well understood in South Africa in the 1980s: that careful bottom-up organising rooted in respectful dialogue with people can build an insurgent left political project.. Mamdani is a gifted young man but, as John French shows in his book on Lula da Silva, political charisma is developed in the ongoing relationship between a leader and the led. It is co-constructed through shared effort, recognition and building trust over time. Mamdani's authority was not simply declared. It was built through long, patient work among people struggling with rent, transport, food, and the structural denial of their dignity. This is very different from the way in which Shivambu, along with Julius Malema, built his charisma through social media and carefully staged rallies, both often inviting dispossessed people to compensate for their suffering by identifying with an assertion of masculinist power. Online expression that finds a sufficiently resonant note in a moment of political intensity can pull people into stadiums or the streets but it doesn't build the kind of sustained movements that can achieve deep structural change. That requires many things, including the development of leaders with the kind of charisma built in vast numbers of meetings over many years, meetings in which leaders listen as much or more than they speak. At their best these kinds of meetings generate a transformative sense of shared participation in the construction of an ethic and vision of the common good. For Frantz Fanon, evidently carrying vestiges of the Catholicism with which he was raised: 'The branch meeting and the committee meeting are liturgical acts. They are privileged occasions given to a human being to listen and to speak … the eye discovers a landscape more and more in keeping with human dignity.' Like Fanon, Amílcar Cabral understood that leaders in national liberation movements are often initially blind to the political capacities of the most oppressed — and come to recognise them through shared participation in struggle. In a 1970 speech, he said that 'The leaders realise, not without a certain astonishment, the richness of spirit, the capacity for reasoned discussion and clear exposition of ideas, the facility for understanding and assimilating concepts on the part of population groups who yesterday were forgotten, if not despised, and who were considered incompetent by the colonisers and even by some nationals …' Shivambu quoted Cabral at the announcement of his new political project, but his political style is far removed from the kind of patient political labour affirmed by Cabral. He adopts the strongman posture typical of the politics of the Economic Freedom Fighters and uMkhonto (MK) weSizwe party — claiming the role of a leader who will direct his people from the front. There is, though, a fundamental difference between a politics mobilised to enable an aspirant counter-elite to smash its way into power and wealth and a politics that, affirming the equal humanity and dignity of all people as a starting point for action, seeks to build towards collective advancement. Both speak in the name of the people but one seeks to redistribute power and wealth among elites; the other to redistribute power and wealth and build institutions — public housing, healthcare, education, transport — in ways that enable the material and social advancement of the people as a whole. When the redistribution of power and wealth among elites is achieved at the direct expense of the public good it is well described as a predatory project. In contemporary South Africa, it has long been common for the kind of aspirant counter-elites that rallied round the 'Radical Economic Transformation' project to present the rules established to ensure the integrity of the management of public funds, institutions and services as a barrier to transformation. Efforts to bypass or undo these rules are often legitimated as a continuation of the national liberation struggle via new means on a new terrain. This is the politics of the synecdoche: a part is taken for the whole, the enrichment of the few as progress for everyone. But the appropriation of public funds for private gain can only compound the crisis of impoverishment and institutional dysfunction. Shivambu carries the wreckage of the VBS Mutual Bank scandal into his new project. There is a noble tradition of robbing banks to fund revolutions but looting a bank that holds the life savings of pensioners, the funds of burial societies, and money from small municipalities for personal enrichment is not just repulsive, it is also plainly predatory. Shivambu also comes out of Zuma's MK party, a chaotic, paranoid mess of a party organised around the cult of a deeply corrupt and authoritarian man, imbricated in all kinds of chauvinism and functioning as a pole of attraction for a set of deeply compromised people. Shivambu's announcement that he was working towards a new party included the announcement of his collaborators. One is Vusi Khoza. Khoza, in the manner typical of political opportunists, has moved through several political formations over the years, one starkly ideologically incompatible with the others. He began his political career as an ANC ward councillor in Durban, later joining the National Freedom Party (NFP), from which he resigned in 2012 after being convicted for his leading role in a xenophobic attack. In 2009, a crowd of about 100 people, many armed, stormed a building in Albert Park in Durban. Two people, one a Zimbabwean and the other a Tanzanian, jumped to their deaths while trying to escape the mob. A Mozambican survived the jump but was seriously injured. Khoza resigned from the NFP after his conviction and then joined the EFF, rising to become the party's provincial chairperson in KwaZulu-Natal and later an MP. He was expelled from the EFF in 2023. Patrick Sindane has been announced as another leading figure in Shivambu's project. He was expelled from the Anti-Privatisation Forum in 2009 after a credible internal disciplinary process found him and two others guilty of involvement in the gang rape of a sex worker. He was arrested but the criminal case did not proceed because the complainant disappeared. In 2013 Sindane was accused of rape again. The other well-known figure in Shivambu's team is Steven Zondo, a Pentecostal leader who, following an all-too-familiar script, has misused religion to sanctify exploitation and abuse. Zondo is currently standing trial for seven counts of rape. In March Judge Mokhine Mosopa dismissed Zondo's attempt to have the case thrown out, ruling that the witnesses, who have been subject to extensive cross-examination, were 'credible, reliable and trustworthy.' Testimony given before the Commission for the Promotion and Protection of the Rights of Cultural, Religious and Linguistic Communities has included allegations of child rape. Shivambu has, of course, also enthusiastically associated himself with Shepherd Bushiri, who faces an avalanche of serious criminal charges — among them eight counts of rape, including the rape of minors, and massive fraud. Aimé Césaire, the great anti-colonial intellectual and one of the great poets of the last century, wrote that 'When the world shall be a tower of silence … we shall be the prey and the vulture.' Shivambu and the people he has sought to build his new party with are predatory men preying off a traumatised and often desperate society in the name of religion and national liberation. Cabral would hold Shivambu and his project in nothing but contempt. Mamdani's success is a timely reminder — one that resonates with the best of our own political history — that genuine left politics builds popular participation in the work of constructing new forms of power directed toward the common good. Richard Pithouse is distinguished research fellow at the Global Centre for Advanced Studies, an international research scholar at the University of Connecticut and professor at large at the University of the Western Cape.
TimesLIVE
2 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Trump to host five African leaders to discuss 'commercial opportunities'
US President Donald Trump will host leaders from five African nations in Washington next week to discuss "commercial opportunities," a White House official said on Wednesday. Trump will host leaders from Gabon, Guinea-Bissau, Liberia, Mauritania and Senegal for a discussion and lunch at the White House on July 9, the official said. "President Trump believes that African countries offer incredible commercial opportunities which benefit both the American people and our African partners," the official said, referring to the reasons why the meeting was arranged. Africa Intelligence and Semafor reported earlier that the Trump administration would hold a summit for the five countries in Washington from July 9-11. The Trump administration has axed swaths of US foreign aid for Africa as part of a plan to curb spending it considers wasteful and not aligned with Trump's "America First" policies. It says it wants to focus on trade and investment and to drive mutual prosperity. On Tuesday US secretary of state Marco Rubio said the US was abandoning what he called a charity-based foreign aid model and will favour those nations that demonstrate "both the ability and willingness to help themselves." US envoys in Africa will be rated on commercial deals struck, African affairs senior bureau official Troy Fitrel said in May, describing it as the new strategy for support on the continent.
