Viral video: Industrial robot goes berserk in China, injures workers after ‘coding error'
— jasonscheer (@jasonscheer)
It is not clear where the incident occurred. The manufacturer is
Unitree Robotics
. The H1 Robotic model seen in the video is reportedly priced at 650,000 yuan, and is said to be a part of broader trend in robotics aimed at creating machines that can integrate seamlessly into human environments.
Humanoid robot's turns aggressive toward humans at Lunar Festival
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
New Container Houses Vietnam (Take A Look At The Prices)
Container House
Search Now
Undo
In another similar incident this year, at a festival in China, viral footage captured a robot, part of a performing group, suddenly lurching toward a crowd behind a safety barricade, startling spectators and reigniting debates over robotic reliability.
Robot Goes Wild Malfunctions and Scares Woman in Crowd!
The video shows the robot pausing, seemingly fixating on the audience in an "eerily human" manner, before making an abrupt, uncontrolled movement. Security personnel swiftly intervened, restraining the machine before the situation escalated. Experts are divided on whether the incident stemmed from a mechanical glitch or a more concerning AI misfire.
The manufacturer, Unitree Robotics, reportedly attributed the incident to a "program setting or sensor error."
Podcaster Joe Rogan amplified the clip online, commenting, 'An AI robot got aggressive with spectators in China. The way it did it was eerily human. I don't like this at all.' The incident has fueled public unease, with social media buzzing about the implications of advanced robotics in public spaces.
AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
Building the next generation of tech professionals: Traditional interviews out, companies gamify aptitude assessment
HYDERABAD: Excelling in group discussions or answering tough technical questions alone might not land you a job after graduation. Many companies are now opting for gamified aptitude assessments, virtual interviews and online exam to better gauge capabilities. Over 60% institutes reported that entry-level tests were significantly redesigned in the past two years, reflecting the shift toward more skillbased evaluation, according to a NASSCOM report, 'Building the Next Generation of Tech Professionals'. Employers are increasingly looking at coding proficiency, logical reasoning and real-world situations involving Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning while hiring candidates. You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad ' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với sàn môi giới tin cậy IC Markets Tìm hiểu thêm Undo Many top companies have stopped coming for placement drives. Now, it's all about students' capabilities and online profiles. For any coding job, companies see coding profiles on sites such as LeetCode and CodeChef to assess students' skills by seeing their ratings. They are also conducting coding competitions,' said NLN Reddy, director, career development cell, Chaitanya Bharathi Institute of Technology. He said companies are also looking at global certifications in emerging tech courses to assess candidates' interest in their chosen field. Companies are even hiring through own portals or third-party services, offering live evaluation to prevent manipulation by candidates. Even the NASSCOM report highlighted how companies are using platforms such as HackerRank, HackerEarth, CodeSignal, Codility, Phenom and HireVue to screen candidates across a range of skills in a virtual set-up with AI-driven evaluation support. He said that unlike the earlier practice of screening tests for all final year students, companies are now showing interest in only those with good profiles – internships, projects, and certifications. 'Most companies either have hackathons or coding rounds. Some even have both,' said C Vinod Kumar from Forum for IT Employees.
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
Necessity, not greed: Soham Parekh explains why he worked for over 140 hours a week in five US tech jobs at the same time
Soham Parekh has faced weeks of online uproar. Now he has spoken for himself. The Indian tech worker sat down with TBPN to answer point-blank whether he did what everyone accused him of. His reply was plain: 'It is true.' He admitted misleading employers about where he worked from and how many jobs he held. 'I'm not proud of my actions,' Parekh told TBPN . He stressed that desperation drove him. 'Dire financial hardship drove him to make those decisions,' he said. Moonlighting has a schedule few could endure Parekh painted a bleak picture of how far he went. He said plainly, 'I don't think anyone enjoys working 140 hours a week , but I had to do it because of financial conditions.' Asked how he stayed afloat through such brutal weeks, he added, 'So an average day… an average week for you it feels like basically you sleep for 6 to 8 hours and you're basically programming for 12 to 14 hours every single day for seven days a week.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Co-live Spaces Starting from 42L+ | Whitefield Sumadhura Learn More Undo He said he was known for pushing himself to exhaustion. 'I think people around me will probably say this that I am notoriously known for not sleeping. I am a… you know… I am a serial like non-sleeper at this point I would say.' Despite his heavy coding routine, Parekh said AI tools only helped a little. He told TBPN he didn't take on more jobs just because he had AI. He focused, he said, on the tasks in front of him. Live Events 'I did what I had to do': Soham Parekh Parekh also described how it all began. Asked if he thought he broke contracts or found legal loopholes, he answered: 'Honestly, going back to how it started and what the motivations were. You probably know, I would want to preface with saying I'm not proud of what I've done. It's not something I endorse either.' He said the real reason was simple: survival. 'Financial circumstances essentially. No one really likes to work 140 hours a week but I had to do it out of necessity.' He added firmly, 'I did what I had to do to get out of a tough situation.' For Parekh, it was a personal battle. 'I was determined to change my situation, and I took action to help myself through it.' Responding to claims he ran a secret team Online, some claimed Parekh ran a mini business under his name — hiring junior developers to handle his workload. He pushed back strongly. 'That's simply not true,' he said. He insisted, 'I wrote every inch of codes.' A 'scammer,' says Mixpanel co-founder Suhail Doshi, co-founder of Mixpanel, went public with his side on X. Doshi wrote that Parekh tricked his company, calling him a 'scammer.' He said Parekh joined one of his firms but was let go within a week once his secret came out. Doshi claimed he had 'tried to warn Parekh about moonlighting, but the warning clearly didn't work.' Doshi's posts opened the floodgates. At least six other startup heads shared similar stories. They said they too found out Parekh was working at multiple companies at once while sitting in India — without telling anyone. Parekh's journey started in Mumbai. He told TBPN he was meant to move to the US in 2018 for graduate school but could not afford it. In the end, he shifted in 2020 instead — and fell into mounting bills and debts he claims left him cornered. Since the revelations, social media has not stopped talking. Some call him a symbol of moonlighting gone too far. Others see a man who felt he had no choice. One recruiter said Parekh 'deserves a second chance.' Meanwhile, Parekh stands by what he did — not to justify, but to own up. 'I take full responsibility,' he said in closing. Whether that brings him back into tech's good books, only time will tell.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
American CTO shares 'his story' of Soham Parekh: Indian techie used to ...
Soham Parekh An Indian software engineer Soham Parekh has been accused of moonlighting practices at multiple US startups simultaneously. Now, another American starts has shared a cautionary tale involving the techie. An American CTO has accused the Indian software engineer of emotionally manipulating him during the height of Operation Sindoor . American CTO shares 'his story' of Soham Parekh Arkadiy Telegin Arkadiy Telegin, founder and CTO of AI firm Leaping AI , shared a screenshot of his conversation with Shoam Parekh on social media platform X (formerly known as Twitter). Telegin shared screenshots of messages from Parekh, who claimed a drone had been shot down '10 minutes away' from his home during the conflict. The messages, sent at 2:29 a.m., appeared to suggest Parekh was in a war zone. However, it was later revealed he was in Mumbai, far from the active conflict areas. 'He used to guilt-trip me for being slow on pull requests while claiming to be in a conflict zone,' Telegin wrote. 'Next person should hire him as Chief Intelligence Officer.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo The issue of Soham Parekh moonlighting at various US startup escalated when other startup founders chimed in. Flo Crivello (Lindy), Matthew Parkhurst (Antimetal), Nicolai Ouporov (Fleet AI), and Adish Jain (Mosaic) all revealed that Parekh had worked at their companies—often simultaneously—and performed exceptionally well in interviews. Soham Parekh confesses to moonlighting at Silicon Valley startups Soham Parekh has publicly admitted to working at multiple Silicon Valley startups simultaneously after being exposed in a viral social media post, claiming financial desperation drove his controversial employment scheme. "It is true," Parekh confirmed in a TBPN interview when asked about allegations of holding multiple full-time jobs. "I'm not proud of what I've done. That's not something I endorse either. But no one really likes to work 140 hours a week, I had to do it out of necessity." Parekh attributed his actions to severe financial circumstances rather than greed. "I was in extremely dire financial circumstances," he explained in the interview. "I'm not a very people person. I don't share much about what's going on in my life. So I just thought: if I work multiple places, maybe I can elevate myself out of the situation faster."
