Contrasting fate: Zaid berates MACC's double standards of charging Muhyiddin but not Ismail Sabri
On the contrary, Bersatu president Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin faces four charges under the MACC Act 2009 and two under the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act 2001 (AMLA) involving a total of RM200 mil, including RM195 mil allegedly transferred into the party's account held with CIMB Islamic Bank.
Additionally, Muhyiddin, 78, was charged in the Kuala Lumpur Sessions Court with abusing his power as prime minister in connection with the Jana Wibawa programme by seeking to obtain RM232 mil for Bersatu in 2021.
'MACC has seized RM169 mil in cash, RM1.5 mil in gold and frozen 43 bank accounts, all of which are linked to Ismail Sabri's former senior private secretary and possibly himself but no charges were made,' the opposition-slant UMNO member penned on X.
Muhyiddin: RM232 million allegedly flowed into Bersatu accounts. He was charged under abuse of power and AMLA
Ismail Sabri: MACC seized RM169 million in cash, RM1.5 million in gold, and frozen 43 bank accounts; all linked to his former senior private secretary and possibly…
— Zaid Ibrahim (@zaidibrahim) July 8, 2025
'It defies logic that the one with physical money recovered isn't charged while the other is.'
Recall that on Monday (July 7), the anti-graft agency had filed an application to forfeit over RM169 mil in cash belonging to Ismail Sabri
The application was filed at the Kuala Lumpur Sessions Court on Monday (July 7) by the deputy public prosecutor who named Ismail Sabri's former political secretary Datuk Mohammad Anuar Mohd Yunus and the Bera MP as first and second respondents.
'Ismail Sabri not critical of Madani gov't'
Additionally, the former premier with the shortest stint of 14 months were also subject to a series of questioning between March and June 25 when MACC head honcho Tan Sri Azam Baki revealed that the probe into the corruption and money laundering allegations linked to the former has been completed.
Following this, Azam had contended that the investigation papers had been submitted to the deputy public prosecutor's office for further action.
On this note, Zaid argued that 'MACC has the power to go for civil forfeiture or to go for a criminal conviction' but that power has to be exercised properly and with good reason.
'MACC's excuse of no criminal element found (in Ismail Sabri's case) is vague and unconvincing. In fact, the MACC chief (commissioner Tan Sti Azam Bali) claimed there were only 'governance issues' in Ismail Sabri's case. Really?' asked the former defence counsel of now incarcerated Datuk Seri Najib Razak.
'So when MACC want to charge someone, they say possible corruption and abuse of power but if not, its governance issue.
'But money doesn't appear magically in bags and safes. If MACC believes the money is linked to corruption, then someone committed a crime. If not Ismail Sabri, then who? And why hasn't anyone been charged?'
In essence, Zaid described the entire episode as rooted in political alignment of Muhyiddin and Ismail Sabri.
It smells of political convenience. Ismail Sabri, though no longer in power, is supportive of Madani and has not criticised PMX Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim.
In fact, he has maintained silence on Madani policies. Muhyiddin is a direct political opponent and leads the opposition bloc. This creates the perception that if you're friendly with the regime, you get a civil forfeiture. If you're not, you get charged in court.
The rule of law demands equal treatment. Justice cannot be 'pick and choose.' If the authorities believe Muhyiddin's conduct merited criminal charges, they must apply the same threshold to Ismail Sabri – or explain clearly why not.
This is not just a legal inconsistency. It's a moral failure of the justice system under the Madani administration. – July 10, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Borneo Post
an hour ago
- Borneo Post
Datuk denies cheating in alleged 'Dato' title scam
Ling (left) with his counsel Ngui after the proceedings today. KOTA KINABALU (July 24): A businessman pleaded not guilty in a Sessions Court here today to three charges of cheating in connection with the acquisition of an honorary 'Dato'' title. Datuk Ling How Ee, 40, entered his plea before judge Jason Juga, who had the charges read to him in Mandarin. Ling is accused of dishonestly inducing a man to transfer RM2,500, RM500, and RM3,000 into his bank account for the purported purchase of gold accessories for ceremonial attire, and to assist in securing a 'Dato'' title from Pahang, despite having no authority to do so. The alleged offences took place at a bank branch here on April 19, April 20 and May 17, 2023. All the charges fall under Section 420 of the Penal Code, which carries a penalty of imprisonment between one and ten years, whipping, and a fine upon conviction. The court set September 3 for pre-trial case management. Ling was granted bail of RM10,000 with a RM3,000 deposit and one local surety. Additional conditions imposed included reporting to the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) once every two months, surrendering his passport to the court (if any), and refraining from contacting or interfering with prosecution witnesses. He was represented by counsel Ngui Kuang Kee @ George Ngui. Ling was arrested on July 2 after giving a statement at the Sabah MACC Office.
Borneo Post
an hour ago
- Borneo Post
Two more local authority officers remanded over RM200,000 bribery case
One of the suspects being escorted by MACC officers. KOTA KINABALU (July 24): Two more local authority officers have been remanded by the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) Sabah on suspicion of accepting bribes amounting to RM200,000 in exchange for awarding infrastructure repair work. Magistrate Yong Ching Hong granted a five-day remand order until July 28, following an application made by the MACC at the Sandakan Magistrate's Court today. According to sources, the male and female suspects, aged between 20 and 30, were arrested at the MACC Sandakan Office when they appeared to give their statements between 7pm and 8pm yesterday. 'Initial investigations revealed that the suspects were allegedly involved in the corruption scheme from 2022 to 2025. This arrest follows the earlier detention of five individuals linked to the same case,' said a source. The two suspects are believed to have received around RM200,000 through personal bank accounts via money transfers from contractors, in exchange for approving infrastructure projects, including pedestrian walkway repairs, fencing works and mosque reconstruction. Sabah MACC director Datuk S. Karunanithy confirmed the arrests when contacted and said the case is being investigated under Section 17(a) of the MACC Act 2009, which relates to accepting bribes in connection with official duties. He added that further arrests may follow as investigations progress. Yesterday, the Sandakan Magistrate's Court also issued a seven-day remand order, until July 23, for five other individuals — including engineers, assistant engineers, and former local authority staff — suspected of accepting similar bribes totalling RM200,000. The five, comprising three men and two women aged between 30 and 50, are believed to have facilitated contractors in securing quotations and tenders for local authority projects between 2022 and 2025.
Borneo Post
2 hours ago
- Borneo Post
Siburan shoplot tenant jailed 6 months for power theft, landlord gets DNAA
KUCHING (July 24): The Sessions Court here today sentenced an unemployed man to six months in prison for stealing electricity to power cryptocurrency mining machines at a rented shoplot. Judge Saiful Bahari Adzmi convicted Hii King Lee, 49, on his own guilty plea to a charge under Section 33(5) of the Electricity Ordinance (Chapter 50), which provides for a fine not exceeding RM200,000 or imprisonment for up to five years, or both. Hii, from Miri, committed the offence at a commercial shop lot in Siburan, Jalan Kuching-Serian at around 10.50am on June 21, 2023. Based on the facts of the case, a team of inspectors from Syarikat Sesco Berhad were conducting routine inspections of electricity meters at the commercial premises when they detected direct-tapping cables connected from the main wirings that bypassed the electricity meter. Further checks found 60 cryptocurrency mining machines connected directly via the direct-tapping cables, all of which bypassed the electricity meter. It was informed that Hii is currently serving a six-month jail sentence for power theft linked to cryptocurrency mining activities, after he was convicted on July 11 this year at the Miri Sessions Court. The accused is also currently facing several drug-related cases and corruption cases in Miri. Deputy public prosecutor Ronald Felix Hardin of the State Attorney-General's Chambers handled the prosecution, while Hii was unrepresented. Meanwhile in the same courtroom, Chang Foh Foong, 53, the landlord who rented the shoplot to Hii, was jointly charged with the same offence but was given a discharge not amounting to an acquittal (DNAA). His lawyer Michael Kong in a statement to the press after the proceedings said his client maintained that he had no role in the offence committed by his tenant. 'After considering the circumstances and lack of direct involvement, the charges against the landlord were withdrawn, and the court granted him a DNAA,' he said. Kong said his client's only mistake was renting the premises to the wrong tenant and failing to transfer ownership of the electricity meter from his name to the tenant's after the tenancy agreement was signed. 'This incident should serve as a serious reminder to all property owners to always ensure that the name on your electricity meter reflects the current user or tenant. 'Failing to do so may expose you to criminal liability even if you had no involvement in any wrongdoing,' he added. Kong urged landlords and property managers to be vigilant and proactive in managing their tenancy agreements. 'It is not just about protecting your rights, but also safeguarding yourself from unnecessary legal consequences.'
