logo
A Miami Proud Boy wants us to snitch for the government, Cuba-style

A Miami Proud Boy wants us to snitch for the government, Cuba-style

Miami Herald7 days ago

When Enrique Tarrio, the former Proud Boys leader recently pardoned by President Donald Trump, showed up at a 'No Kings' protest in downtown Miami Saturday, he was greeted by chants of 'Send him back to jail' by protesters.
But Tarrio wasn't there to make a political statement. He was there to promote an app called ICERAID that encourages users to report undocumented immigrants in exchange for cryptocurrency. He calls it patriotism. It's something far more dangerous.
We've seen this tactic before.
In 1960, Fidel Castro stood before a euphoric crowd in Havana and announced the creation of the Committees for the Defense of the Revolution — los comités — neighborhood watch groups that turned into grassroots informant networks. Their mission: expose Cubans seen as disloyal to the revolution. It was surveillance disguised as civic duty.
Over six decades later, those networks still exist. And now, Tarrio — himself the son of Cuban exiles who fled that oppressive system — is championing a digital version.
Instead of turning in 'counterrevolutionaries,' the new enemy is the undocumented immigrant. And instead of whispering to secret police, app users upload photos and locations of 'suspects' — and receive crypto as a reward.
Until recently, Tarrio was serving a 22-year sentence for his seditious conspiracy conviction for his involvement in organizing the Jan. 6 attack. Now, though, he's dubbed himself the ICERAID czar and aligned himself with the Trump-era playbook of encouraging civilian tip-offs to fuel immigration crackdowns.
The app has no official affiliation with the federal government. But it coincides with a troubling Department of Homeland Security campaign featuring a vintage-style Uncle Sam urging Americans to 'Report All Foreign Invaders.'
The message is unmistakable: Spy on your neighbors. That's the same message Tarrio is pushing with this app.
This is not patriotism. It's vigilantism cloaked in red-white-and-blue. Tarrio — who identifies as as Afro-Cuban, the Herald reported, and grew up in Little Havana — knows that Miami's Cuban exile community was shaped by the trauma of political surveillance and persecution. And yet, here he is, promoting the very thing so many Cuban families fled.
In Castro's Cuba, a whisper could ruin a life. In Tarrio's America, a photo upload could mean detention and deportation.
In Cuba, informants earned perks and privileges from the government for turning in those who did not support Castro's revolution. Here, it's crypto coins. But the goal is the same: normalize suspicion of one another and persecute and punish the perceived 'other.'
What this app is encouraging people to do is not about protecting borders. It's not about law and order. It's about validating people's worst instincts — to profile, to assume guilt, to fuel the Trump administration-sponsored paranoia against immigrants.
It doesn't take much imagination to see where this inform-on-your-neighbor fervor inevitably leads. Even ICE officials admits many of the tips they receive today come from jealous exes, spiteful neighbors and professional rivals. An app will only make that worse.
All of this, of course, is unfolding against a backdrop of national political tension. Scapegoating immigrants is, once again, politically convenient. But that doesn't make it right; it makes it cruel.
When governments — or their proxies like Tarrio — encourage citizens to turn on each other, the casualties aren't just those who are accused. It's democracy itself.
Let's not make informing on a neighbor a civic virtue or a patriotic duty. And let's hope this app — and the ideology behind it — is a bust.
Click here to send the letter.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What the '12-day war' teaches us about Trump's foreign policy
What the '12-day war' teaches us about Trump's foreign policy

Vox

time26 minutes ago

  • Vox

What the '12-day war' teaches us about Trump's foreign policy

is a senior politics correspondent at Vox, covering the White House, elections, and political scandals and investigations. He's worked at Vox since the site's launch in 2014, and before that, he worked as a research assistant at the New Yorker's Washington, DC, bureau. When President Donald Trump announced late Saturday that he ordered the bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities, critics on both the left and the right feared a spiral into a wider war. Yet just two days later, Trump announced a ceasefire deal between Israel and Iran that he claimed would end what he called 'the 12-day war' entirely. And though this ceasefire looked quite fragile at first, three days later, it's still holding. There's much we still don't know about whether Trump's strikes were successful in their short-term objective of disabling Iran's nuclear program. And of course, the long-term consequences of the war for Iran and the region are very far from clear. The past week's events did, however, clarify some things about Trump and his approach to foreign policy in his second term. Specifically, though Trump attacked Iran's nuclear program, he quickly pivoted to a ceasefire, suggesting that he's still wary of the hawks' transformational 'regime change' ambitions. He instead prefers to deal with countries' existing leaders at the negotiating table — and views military force as a tool to get himself a better deal. At first, it seemed that Trump had handed hawks on the right a decisive victory. Sweeping aside the concerns of the 'America First' faction that urged restraint and feared entanglement in a new 'forever war,' Trump supported Israel's attack on Iran and then sent US bombers in as well. But what Trump did next is just as revealing. Though the Iranian government was badly weakened, and some hawks were hoping it could be toppled, Trump demurred, dismissing Iran's retaliation against the US Monday as inconsequential and working to put together a ceasefire. That is, he had an opportunity to push onward for regime change in Tehran but turned it down. Then, when it looked like the new ceasefire might not hold, Trump profanely berated both Iran and Israel and particularly urged Israel to scale back a retaliatory mission that was in progress. After Israel complied, Trump did a solid for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu with a Truth Social post urging Israeli authorities to cancel Netanyahu's corruption trial. Finally, Trump also declared the US strikes a complete success, insisting that Iran's nuclear program has been wiped out and disputing leaked intelligence estimates that say otherwise. He seems uninterested in hawkish arguments that he hasn't finished the job. This week, administration officials have even tried to restart nuclear talks with Iran, unlikely as that may seem. All this suggests that, despite bombing the nuclear sites, Trump has not embraced open-ended war as US foreign policy just yet. He rolled the dice on a risky military operation — but remained intent on avoiding a wider war. He supported Israel — but then, when he wanted the war to stop, called the Israelis out. It also suggests that Trump, unlike the GOP's more hawkish faction, is uninterested in seeking transformational regime change in Iran. Despite a Truth Social post on Sunday (after the strikes and before the ceasefire) in which Trump suggested 'Regime change' might be a possibility, he didn't go through with it. During his first presidential run, Trump trashed George W. Bush's Iraq War as a debacle, and the collapse of Iran's government would likely bring similar turmoil. Rather, Trump would prefer to settle things at the negotiating table, and he continues to view military action like his strikes on Iran as another way to enhance his leverage there. If negotiations aren't going the way he likes, however, dropping bombs is still a card he could play — or at least, that's what he wants his negotiating partner to fear. As I wrote before the US struck Iran, Trump has some wariness toward the hawks, but he's not a dove or a peacenik: If he's persuaded a military action will go well and make him look strong and successful, he's happy to endorse it. It is clear, though, that he continues to be wary of more prolonged wars that could go poorly. So for now at least, Trump appears to lack the appetite for a prolonged, costly, and painful war. He approved the Iran strikes because he thought Iran had been so weakened that he could get away with them, with limited consequences to Americans. But just as soon as he approved them, he hastened to wrap up the conflict.

Iran warns of 'real capabilities' if Trump doesn't drop 'disrespectful' tone toward supreme leader
Iran warns of 'real capabilities' if Trump doesn't drop 'disrespectful' tone toward supreme leader

Fox News

time27 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Iran warns of 'real capabilities' if Trump doesn't drop 'disrespectful' tone toward supreme leader

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi warned President Donald Trump Friday to drop what he called a "disrespectful" tone toward Tehran's supreme leader or face serious consequences. In a blunt post on X, Araghchi said if Trump truly wants a deal with Iran, he must show respect instead of insulting Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Araghchi wrote that Trump should "put aside the disrespectful and unacceptable tone" toward Khamenei and "stop hurting [Khamenei's] millions of heartfelt followers." Araghchi wrote, "The complexity and tenacity of Iranians is famously known in our magnificent carpets, woven through countless hours of hard work and patience. But as a people, our basic premise is very simple and straightforward: we know our worth, value our independence, and never allow anyone else to decide our destiny." Araghchi's most provocative line came as he mocked Israel's reliance on the U.S. during the recent military confrontation. "The Great and Powerful Iranian People, who showed the world that the Israeli regime had NO CHOICE but to RUN to 'Daddy' to avoid being flattened by our Missiles," he wrote, referring to U.S. intervention in striking Iranian nuclear sites. The jab was a pointed reference to the longstanding U.S. and Israeli alliance and a not-so-subtle attempt to portray Israel as weak and dependent. The post concluded with a clear threat. "If Illusions lead to worse mistakes, Iran will not hesitate to unveil its Real Capabilities, which will certainly END any Delusion about the Power of Iran. Good will begets good will, and respect begets respect." Araghchi's broadside comes just days after the war between Iran and Israel ended and less than a week after U.S. airstrikes ordered by Trump destroyed Iran's key nuclear sites of Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. The 12-day conflict ended June 24 under a U.S.-brokered ceasefire, yet postwar tensions remain high. Khamenei declared that Tehran had beaten Israel and even dealt Washington a "slap" in the confrontation. Trump rejected Khamenei's victory claims as false and "foolish." He promptly froze any talk of sanctions relief for Iran in response and claimed he personally stopped Khamenei from being killed during the conflict, writing on Truth Social that he refused to let U.S. or Israeli forces "terminate" the ayatollah despite knowing his secret location. Araghchi also rejected President Trump's recent claim that new nuclear talks were imminent, telling reporters that "there are no negotiations underway" and that Tehran would make decisions "based on our national interests." According to Reuters, the foreign minister flatly denied any plans to meet with U.S. officials next week, contradicting Trump's earlier remarks suggesting diplomacy was back on track. "I wish the leadership of Iran would realize that you often get more with HONEY than you do with VINEGAR," wrote Trump on Truth Social. "PEACE!!!" The White House did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment.

Key House GOP centrist will not seek reelection, opening up major swing seat battle
Key House GOP centrist will not seek reelection, opening up major swing seat battle

Yahoo

time36 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Key House GOP centrist will not seek reelection, opening up major swing seat battle

GOP Rep. Don Bacon, who represents one of House Republicans' toughest battleground districts, has decided not to run for reelection next year, according to three people familiar with his plans – opening up a critical seat in Nebraska for Democrats in the 2026 midterms. Bacon will formally make the announcement next week, likely on Monday, those people said. Bacon did not return a immediate request for comment from CNN. The departure of the centrist Republican will be a major loss for House GOP leaders, who will need to hang onto every GOP seat to maintain their narrow majority in the upcoming midterms. But his decision does not come as a shock to many House Republicans, who believe the retired Air Force officer has been telegraphing his plans to leave Congress, including through his voting record. Bacon, who was first elected in 2016, has long been weighing whether to seek reelection, making little secret of his frustration with Washington. His victory last fall was seen as one of the biggest Republican surprises in the country, given that he outperformed Donald Trump and overcame stiff Republican headwinds in his Omaha-area district. The outspoken Nebraskan has been one of the few Republicans willing to challenge Trump on key decisions in his second term, particularly on foreign policy issues like Ukraine. Some privately believe he could seek a run for the presidency in 2028. House Democrats were already feeling upbeat about their chances of retaking the majority, which would only require flipping a handful of seats next November. The party's campaign officials point to the long-time historical trends that show new presidential administrations enduring steep losses in their first midterm – as Trump did during his first term in the 2018 wave. Some Republicans, too, privately fear a blue wave, but they also point to key factors in their favor, including redistricting battles in red states like Ohio that will easily favor the GOP. They also believe Trump's personal involvement in 2026 – including his fundraising – will be crucial to turning out his voters that largely sat out the 2018 midterm. CNN's Manu Raju contributed to this report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store