Australia may boost defence budget if US asks for more ‘capability', minister says
The Albanese government could boost defence spending if the US asks for more Australian 'capability', a senior minister says.
Anthony Albanese has resisted Washington's call to lift the defence budget to 3.5 per cent of GDP despite alarm bells over China's military build-up.
The Prime Minister has held firm that Australia would first determine its defence needs and then fund them.
But all NATO members bar Spain agreed to increase defence spending to 5 per cent of GDP this week, highlighting Australia as an on outlier in the West.
Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke hinted on Sunday that could change.
'We make decisions on behalf of Australia and on behalf of Australia's national interest,' Mr Burke told Sky News.
'We have mature, decent, respectful conversations with the United States.
'But as I say, the conversation doesn't start with the dollars at our end – it starts with the capability.
'It is true … now that the world is a less stable place than it was, that means the conversations you're having now about capability are different to what you would have had.'
Pressed on whether a US request for more capability rather than a flat GDP figure would free up the funds, Mr Burke said it might but that the Albanese government would 'look at it from the perspective of if Australia requires more capability'.
'We look at what capability's required, and that so far has meant, over time, we've been spending more money on defence than happened before Labor came to government.'
US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth directly called on Australia to set the 3.5 per cent target in a meeting with Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles earlier this month.
It ignited a major debate in Canberra and fuelled criticisms that Australia is ill-prepared to defend itself against an increasingly aggressive China.
While the Albanese government has committed record cash for the defence budget, much of it will not kick in until after 2029.
With Australia itself predicting a major global conflict by 2034 and some analysts warning of a US-China conflict before 2030, critics have argued the money is not flowing fast enough and instead tied up in longer-term projects at the cost of combat-readiness.
Mr Albanese's resistance to Washington's call has also fuelled worries he has mismanaged the relationship with the US.
Appearing on Sky after Mr Burke, opposition defence spokesman Angus Taylor repeated the Coalition's demand for a 3 per cent target.
He said Mr Albanese 'is right' not to base Australia's defence spending on a figure set by another country, but accused the government of not funding the needs set by its landmark defence strategic review.
'It should be based on need, but its own defence strategic review, has laid out where the money needs to be spent and it's not being spent,' Mr Taylor said.
'I mean, this is the point. This government's not even meeting its own goals.'
He added that 'recruitment numbers … are way below where they need to be' and that Australia's 'naval surface fleet is not where it needs to be'.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
‘Bugger off': PM urged to act over Donald Trump's refusal to meet
Anthony Albanese has been urged to tell the US President to 'bugger off' during an agonising line-up of interviews over his failure to secure face-to-face talks. As the Prime Minister faced breakfast TV this morning to spruik a range of July 1 changes, his good news announcement was overshadowed over questions surrounding the 'embarrassing' situation with the Trump administration. Mr Albanese is now the only member of the Quad group — India, the US, Japan and Australia — not to have met Mr Trump in person since his re-election as President and tariff decision. 'Disrespectful' PM grilled over US President Today show host Karl Stefanovic said he 'can't comprehend how the President, given how close allies we have been with the US for so long, couldn't give a rat's about meeting with you'. 'I think it's so disrespectful. And why don't you just tell him to bugger off?' Stefanovic asked. 'Sorry, I've lost the audio there,' Mr Albanese replied. 'Have you? Karl was just asking if you. Why don't you tell the president to bugger off?' host Sarah Abo added. 'He seems to be snubbing you.' 'No, not at all. And we've had really constructive discussions,' Mr Albanese said. 'They've been respectful. I've been respectful of the President.' Why planned talks were cancelled Mr Albanese did not meet with Mr Trump earlier in the year amid speculation he wanted to avoid an unpredictable meeting in the lead-up to the election. And while he was expected to have a brief chat at the G7, that idea was put on the back burner. 'Look, every Quad leader has met him. It's all got a little bit embarrassing hasn't it? Pretty simple question. When are you going to meet the Donald?' Stefanovic said. 'Not at all. Look, we will meet when we meet in coming months, but my priority has been on delivering for Australians,' Mr Albanese said. 'Do you have a date? It sounds a bit open-ended in coming months,' Abo asked. 'Well, it is at this point in time, but we'll have a meeting. We've had a few constructive discussions,' Mr Albanese replied. Speaking on Sunrise, Mr Albanese was again grilled over the failure to secure talks with the US President. 'Are you just kicking yourself for [not] getting on that plane to meet Trump earlier?' host Nat Barr asked. 'Are you now looking at this and thinking it was a mistake to leave it this late?' 'Not at all, Nat!' he said. 'I've had my priorities right, which the Australian people got to have their say in on May the 3rd, which is why I'm still speaking to today. 'We're available for a meeting. We would've met at the sidelines of the G7, except that the President quite understandably left and left meetings with others as well, left the G7 to go back to Washington because of what was happening with Iran and Israel.' Mr Albanese was also grilled over former Prime Minister turned US ambassador Kevin Rudd's description of the US President as 'a village idiot'. Suggesting there was 'no coming back from Mr Rudd's past comments about the President' Mr Albanese was then asked, 'Are you putting your loyalty to Kevin Rudd above our alliance with the US?' 'Well, JD Vance had some pretty strong comments, it's gotta be said, and he's now the Vice-President of the United States of America,' Mr Albanese replied.


Daily Telegraph
an hour ago
- Daily Telegraph
Nude model's money woes exposed
Given the couple's propensity for their Instagrammable lives to be also regularly snapped by the paparazzi, the recent on-again/off-again listing of the Darling Point apartment co-owned by nude artist Dina Broadhurst and her ex-partner, builder Max Shepherd, kept gossip column readers riveted for months until its recent sale. The price guidance for the Etham Ave garden apartment sat at $11.5m for its abandoned December auction, and by the time of its rescheduled June auction, had dropped to $8.4m. It apparently fetched $8m in its undisclosed pre-auction negotiations this month. MORE: Aus pub's $500m collapse, staff owed $7m There has been a continuing backdrop of intricate financing of their renovation project after kicking off with a standard NAB mortgage. The duplex apartment, with 280sq m of indoor-outdoor living space, had cost $5.2m unrenovated in 2022, which was followed by a 'Cinderella transformation' by emerging interior designer, Josh Knight from Glebe. 'No expense was spared to deliver a home of high-end luxury showcasing bespoke design by Studiojos,' its marketing advised. Though the couple had split by mid-2023 after 4½ years together, NSW Land Registry documents indicate that about April 2024, the duo secured second mortgage funding from Greg Reed's Benchmark Property Finance. MORE: Huge promise Hemsworths made about Byron Bay The extra $500,000 finance was obtained at 24 per cent for nine months to a total 70 per cent loan to value ratio. By last September, it sat at $1.16m with the funding agreement specifying the apartment needed to be listed for sale within five months with a 'reputable agent'. By February this year, the loan expiry date had been extended to August. It has also emerged that veteran Sydney businessman Basil Sellers had separately lent Shepherd $260,000 in 2022, with the amount owing at $358,000 last month. Shepherd moved on and stepped out with his Vanderpump Rules star girlfriend Vail Bloom, while Broadhurst remains devoted to her 365,000-strong Instagram following and her risqué self-portraits. One of her artworks has just been installed in the conference room of Ray White Touma Taylor in Redfern. MORE: Wild reason Aussie has 300 homes

News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
‘Messed up': Sydney restaurant sparks fury over ‘live' dish
A Sydney restaurant has sparked outrage after serving a seemingly live lobster to customers. Korean seafood restaurant, Getbawi, opened its doors in late 2024 and has quickly garnered a following as one of the few Sydney restaurants specialising in hoe, or authentic raw seafood. But footage of what appears to be a live lobster being eaten by customers has now sparked controversy online and thrown concerns for animal welfare into the spotlight. In a clip posted to TikTok, a customer can be seen recording two other diners eating a lobster as it twitches and moves its legs. 'Wow, live lobster eating,' the cameraman says before asking if it's good. 'It's good, it's actually good,' replies one of the diners. Commenters were quick to express their shock over the clip with some branding it as 'straight up cruel.' 'How do you enjoy a meal while watching the poor thing suffer?,' questioned one viewer. 'This is so wrong,' wrote another. 'So cruel,' agreed a third. A spokesperson from Getbawi told that in order to ensure the freshest seafood they 'take the lobster from the aquarium when the customer orders and kill it straight away.' When asked how they respond to claims of animal cruelty a staff member replied, 'I can see how some people might think about it like that.' He added: 'It's for the freshness, we do it for the fish too. We have live fish for our sashimi.' The lobster is priced off market price but could set you back over $180 per kg. The Getbawi spokesperson did not agree with claims that its lobster is served alive. Lobsters sometimes exhibit movement after death due to residual nerve and muscle activity. When a crustacean is killed, its nervous system doesn't always shut down instantly and its muscles may continue to contract, resulting in twitching and movements. In Australia, the protection of shellfish under animal welfare laws is minimal. Most states and territories exclude crustaceans from their definitions of 'animals' under animal welfare legislation. In NSW the Cruelty to Animals Act 1979 protects crustaceans, but only when they are being prepared for sale or offered for consumption in places like restaurants or wet markets. In South Australia, Queensland, Tasmania and Western Australia, crustaceans are not included within the definition of animal and therefore have no protection under animal cruelty laws. A spokesperson for PETA told 'Prosecutors must throw the book at this restaurant for its disgusting and egregious breach of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, which clearly prohibits 'producing food for human consumption, in a manner that inflicted unnecessary pain upon the animal'.' The PETA spokesperson continued: 'The pain this lobster must've endured when his body was ripped apart and his delicate flesh sucked out is unimaginable. Research shows that lobsters have sophisticated nervous systems made up of ganglia throughout their bodies – this makes them extra-sensitive, meaning that they can feel every moment of their prolonged deaths when they're immersed in boiling water or eaten alive. 'This restaurant must immediately lose its licence, and people upset by this can do their part to help lobsters and other sea animals by leaving them off their plates.'