Kharge sees bid to exclude two crore voters to secure poll victory in Bihar
Addressing a public meeting in Chhattisgarh's capital Raipur, Mr. Kharge called the exercise a 'fraud' even as he warned that the ruling party would regret the move.
'This [Prime Minister Narendra] Modi government is going to destroy everyone. Fraud has started in the voter list. Fraud happened in Maharashtra. Today, they are fighting elections in Bihar and there, 2 crore votes are being excluded. If you people want to win elections by excluding them, a time will come when you regret it. You will have to regret the wrong you are doing today,' the Congress president said.
The assertions came on a day when the Congress along with nine other political parties challenged the SIR in the Supreme Court.
'Mass scale rigging'
Further stepping up the party's attack on the EC over the issue, Congress general secretary (organisation) K.C. Venugopal in a X post called the SIR of Bihar's electoral rolls as 'blatantly unconstitutional' and 'mass scale rigging'.
'It has wreaked havoc across the villages and towns of Bihar — giving crores of voters anxiety about whether their right to vote will be stolen. This is mass scale rigging and mischief being carried out by the EC, under instructions from the ruling regime. We have faith that the Supreme Court will deliver justice,' Mr. Venugopal said.
His party colleague and Rajya Sabha member Randeep Surjewala shared a news report in his X handle that claimed the EC had updated Bihar's electoral roll in January this year, the data were found to be 'robust and processed in June'.
'Then, suddenly, it was discarded,'Mr. Surjewala said, adding, 'This isn't voter list cleanup; it's an attempt to rob the public of their voting rights'.
Mr. Surjewala asserted that 'the process called 'Special Intensive Revision' has neither any legal basis nor any mention in the rules'.
'This term doesn't even exist in electoral law,' he added.
'Jal, Jungle Zameen'
At the Raipur rally titled, 'Jai Jawan-Jai Kisan-Jai Samvidhan', Mr. Kharge asked people to remain united in the fight to protect their 'jal, jungle and zameen' (water, forest, land), he also alleged that the ruling party in the State as well as at the Centre was eyeing the mineral resources of Chhattisgarh for industrialists.
'Today, people like Adani and Ambani have been coming here [Chhattisgarh] and occupying land. They are felling lakhs of trees [in forests for mining]. Modi ji has been destroying the lives of our tribal brothers and the people of Chhattisgarh,' he alleged.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
38 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
‘Never thought of proving citizenship after years'
PATNA: Ram Sevak Paswan is a worried man. A resident of Malti Bedaulia village under Ujiarpur assembly constituency in Samastipur district, Paswan has no document to prove his citizenship. He only has the voter ID, MNREGA job card, Aadhaar card, and Ayushman health card issued by the authorities. Paswan has no land of his own to claim for the Pradhanmantri Awas Yojna to build a pucca house. He owns a 'jhopdi' (hut) erected on the land provided by his 'malik' (landowner) for whom he works as a daily wager. 'I never thought the day would come when I would have to prove my citizenship, decades after my birth,' he told this reporter. His wife, Shanti Devi, engaged in household work, intervenes: 'We, both husband and wife, don't know how to read and write. We are illiterate and don't have birth certificates. How will we prove that we are citizens of this country? It's the government's job to provide us with documents.' Paswan has a query: 'When Aadhar card is required for opening a bank account, why is it not a valid document to prove citizenship? After all, we got the Aadhar card after running from pillar to post. It is required for admission to government schools. Why is it not a valid document for citizenship?' None of the IDs he has figure in the list of 11 documents required for the Special Intensive Review (SIR) of the electoral roll in poll-bound Bihar.
New Indian Express
38 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Edappadi K Palaniswami kicks off AIADMK campaign for 2026 polls
COIMBATORE: AIADMK general secretary and leader of opposition Edappadi K Palaniswami on Monday kick-started his campaign for the 2026 Assembly election from Coimbatore by challenging the DMK's main criticism of his party's alliance with the BJP. Pointing to the DMK's past alliances with the BJP (in 1999 and 2001), he asked how the national party was considered good when it suited the DMK and communal when AIADMK made an alliance with it and said the alliance was forged to defeat the enemy. Beginning his campaign — 'Let's Protect the People, Let's Save Tamil Nadu' — well ahead of his rivals after offering prayers at the Vanabadrakali Amman temple at Mettupalayam, he took part in a roadshow on the Mettupalayam to Ooty road. Then he addressed a public meeting alongside BJP state president Nainar Nagenthiran, Minister of State for Information Broadcasting L Murugan, and former AIADMK minister SP Velumani, at Mettupalayam bus stand. 'If you (DMK) make an alliance with the BJP, then it would be considered a good party. However, DMK is accusing the BJP of being a communal party after the AIADMK made an alliance. Except for this, CM MK Stalin could not level any other charge against the AIADMK-BJP-led alliance. DMK cadres were central ministers during the BJP-led central government for five years,' he said. 'Hereafter, Stalin cannot cheat the people of Tamil Nadu,' EPS said.
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
HC reserves orders on 9 writs seeking judicial probe into Group-1 exams
Hyderabad: The Telangana High Court single bench of Justice Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao on Monday 'reserved orders' on nine writs filed by unsuccessful candidates, who were unable to get a rank in the Group-1 Main exam, seeking a direction to order a judicial probe into the entire selection process. The judge heard nine writs filed by Parmesh Matta and others. Vidya Sagar, KS Murthy and Rachna, senior counsels argued for the petitioners and sought judicial intervention into the action of the TGPSC in conducting the most coveted Group-1 competitive examination in the most haphazard manner, alleging massive illegalities and in sheer violation of rules. Vidya Sagar contended that the TGPSC had not conducted the exam in a fair and transparent manner because, any constitutional body, which holds a competitive exam, first and foremost, notifies each instruction by way of a Gazette.. unless this process is done, a statutory body cannot hold an exam , but here in this case, the TGPSC didn't speak about three rounds of evaluation, moderation method, re-evaluation, which itself speaks about the haphazard manner of conducting the exam. Rachna, in the last hearing, contended that the TGPSC had informed the court it had grossly erred in issuing two hall-ticket numbers to candidates. This had created confusion among the candidates, who got selected in the Preliminary. Moreover, unqualified evaluators had corrected the answer papers of the candidates, who wrote the exam in 'Telugu medium' because of which there is a huge variation in the pass percentage between the candidates, who appeared in English and Telugu--English medium 30% and Telugu medium 18%. This action of TGPSC was to demean the Telugu candidates. The biometrics system was not properly used… the contention of the TGPSC that all CCTV cameras installed at the exam centres had a centralised surveillance system was a suspecting aspect. Criminal petition filed by CM seeking quash of proceedings in pvt complaint; reserved for orders The HC bench of Justice Kunuru Lakshman on Monday 'reserved orders' on the criminal petition filed by CM A Revanth Reddy, seeking quash of proceedings registered before the Principal Special Judicial First Class Magistrate for Excise Cases, Hyderabad, which emanated from a private complaint filed by Kasam Venkateswarlu, State general secretary, BJP from Nalgonda. Reddy at a public meeting (election campaign-2024) 'Jana Jatara Sabha' on May 5 at Prakasam Stadium, Kothagudem, stated that if the BJP comes to power, it will scrap the SC, ST and BC reservations. During the hearing, T Niranjan Reddy, senior counsel appearing for CM, had vehemently opposed contentions of counsel for the petitioner, contending the complaint filed before the lower court was not maintainable and should be dismissed; Venkateshwarulu was not eligible to file the complaint on ground BJP, being a national party, had not given its consent. The counsel for the petitioner had not furnished any document/ letter received from the top BJP brass, giving consent. There is no official communique/no authorisation from the BJP high command directing Venkateshwarlu to file the complaint. Reddy's speech was purely political; political speeches/ statements cannot be construed as defamatory because delivering a political speech is right to freedom under Article 19, which gives freedom of speech to a citizen. The judge reserved orders while hearing the petition filed by CM seeking quash of proceedings in CC 312/2024 U/s. 499 IPC and Section 125 of the Representation of the People Act, before the PSJFCM for Excise Cases. *Notice issued to State: PIL to protect 2-acre govt land in Hyderguda from encroachment The HC division bench of Acting CJ Sujoy Paul & Justice Renuka Yara on Monday issued notices to the Principal Secretary (revenue), Ranga Reddy district collector, GHMC commissioner, RDO and tahsildar Rajenderanagar, directing them to respond on encroachment of two acres of government land in survey no 7 of Upperpally, Hyderguda, Rajendranagar mandal, RR district and file counters within two weeks. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner P Sridhar Reddy, president, Erraboda Weaker Section Colony Welfare Association, Rajendranagar, had informed, despite his repeated representations to the collector apprising him of encroachment and constructions on government land, there was no response. He further contended miscreants were raising huge sheds on the land with a motive of knocking away the land illegally. The petitioner further said there was another attempt of encroaching government land of 1,200 square yards in the same survey no by creating forged and fabricated documents. The miscreants had constructed a compound wall with a room, which was also complained to the Revenue officials. All pleadings of the petitioner and others had gone in vain. The judge heard PIL filed by the Erraboda Weaker Section Colony Welfare Association, represented by its president P Sridhar Reddy, Rajendranagar mandal, seeking directions to the Principal Secretary (Revenue), RR collector, RDO and tahsildar, Rajendranagar, and GHMC commissioner to protect the government land from encroachment. Hearing in the case was adjourned by two weeks directing the government to file counter.
