Dublin Airport area residents appeal against permission for viewing platform
Dublin Airport
have lodged an appeal against Fingal County Council's decision to grant planning permission for an aircraft viewing facility, citing concerns over potentially contaminated soil at the site.
St Margaret's The Ward residents' group said that although it broadly favours improvement works at the observation mound, there is a risk to public health and the environment following the granting of permission.
With its approval, granted late last month, airport operator DAA aims to significantly enhance the site of the current informal airport viewing point – a layby locally known as 'The Mound', which has been in operation for more than 40 years – on the Old Airport Road.
After
receiving the permission
, the airport's managing director, Gary McLean, said the public's reaction to the proposal had been 'incredibly positive'. He said the new facility would make airplane viewing 'safer and more enjoyable'.
READ MORE
However, Liam O'Gradaigh, spokesman for the residents' group, claimed the issue of alleged soil contamination and its treatment at the site were not adequately addressed in Fingal's decision to grant permission to DAA. The council also ruled out any environmental assessment.
Soil contaminations from PFOS (a synthetic chemical used to make products resistant to stains, grease, soil, and water) and PFAS (known as forever chemicals), posed a threat to public health and no screening or assessment were provided for in the council's decision, he said.
PFAS (per-and poly-fluoroalkylated substances) have become a legacy problem globally, including at airports where firefighting foam containing the chemicals was once used.
A 28-month monitoring programme undertaken on behalf of DAA by environmental consultants Fehily Timoney between 2021 and 2023 confirmed the presence of 'forever chemicals' at a number of sample sites across its campus.
Mr O'Gradaigh said: 'We have witnessed how responsible State organisations such as MetroLink and Transport Infrastructure Ireland have handled such issues.'
He said the group learned from a hearing on Metrolink that some excavations near the Mound led to the discovery of contamination. That contaminated soil is going to be shipped overseas by these State bodies, he said.
'The airport campus is one of Ireland's largest known PFAS/PFOS contamination sites and worryingly is hydrologically linked to the European sites along the Dublin coast,' he said. 'There has to be proper oversight, assessment and mitigation plans put in place.'
In their appeal, the residents claim issues relating to soil contamination were raised in third-party submissions and were not addressed by DAA in a further information request.
'We are extremely disappointed with this opinion as we provided ample proof that the site is in very close proximity to known PFAS/PFOS discoveries as part of the Metrolink preliminary investigations,' the group wrote in its submission.
'The airport is widely known to have a serious PFAS/PFOS contamination issue and Fingal County Council have been appointed by the EPA to oversee the issue,' it said.
DAA has been asked to comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
A sleeping passenger goes hungry on an Aer Lingus flight across the Atlantic
'This might seem like a minor gripe because it is about treatment in-flight on a Toronto-Dublin journey last February,' begins a mail from Cathy Power. 'It didn't seem minor to me at the time and when I complained I hoped for a response and an apology. I wasn't expecting much, but a little remorse and an apology goes a long way.' She got nothing back. 'This is the gist of it. I was on a brief trip to Canada as a friend of mine was dying. I went out on 4th February 2025 and returned on 8th February. She had died on 6th. I am 69 years old and travelling alone transatlantic in these circumstances was hard going,' she says. READ MORE 'I feel really gullible now that I think how delighted I was to be travelling with Aer Lingus because I was feeling so vulnerable. That said, on the way out, the cabin crew had been kind and caring to me.' It was somewhat different on her return flight. 'I had chosen a window seat at the back of the aircraft. By mistake, I sat myself in the back row, as my seat appeared to be in the last row on the graphic when I chose it. 'As I was settling myself, a stewardess came and very crossly told me to get up and move to the seat in front of me. I asked if I could stay where I was, as no one else was in that row and she snapped back that I could not.' So, Cathy moved. It wasn't such a big deal as 'again, I was in the window seat and was glad to note that there were no passengers in the other two seats in the row. I was exhausted so dozed off.' When she woke up the cabin was in darkness and as it happens 'there was a passenger in the aisle seat of my row and another one in the back row where I was told I could not sit. They were stretched out, snoring, farting, grunting and bumping the back of my seat.' That is not, however, the cause of her concern. 'The cabin was really quiet, but I got up and went back to the galley where there was no crew, nor anyone visible to me along the aisle. I was reluctant to go the length of the aircraft to look for someone up front, especially as business class was between me and there. 'So, I sat down. To be honest I don't remember what time that was, but I realised that I was very hungry and thought we would be served food soon. Food did not materialise and then I realised that the meal was served and no one had either woken me or left a tray. There was an empty seat beside me, so no excuse not to leave a tray there for me when I woke.' She says that when 'eventually things began stirring again I asked about food and was told that I had been asleep when they served dinner. They don't wake passengers and there was no food for me, as it would be cold now.' She says that 'some time later I was given something left over from the business class breakfast being served. At no time did anyone apologise or suggest that there had been an oversight. When I tried to mention what happened as I disembarked I was told it was my own fault and I 'should have known'. I should have known not to sleep I suppose.' After she got home, she was asked by the automated Aer Lingus systems for feedback on the flight. 'I made a complaint, and this is the thing: that was last February, and since then I have received eleven automated responses, telling me that my complaint is being reviewed and not to get in touch again. That is five months now, and they are still examining my complaint?' She includes the text of the email she is routinely sent. 'Dear Customer, We appreciate your patience and want to update you regarding the processing of your request 01191532. Please rest assured that our team are actively reviewing it and will be in touch with an update as soon as this has been completed. This means you don't need to submit another request. We're sorry for any inconvenience this delay has caused and appreciate your understanding. You will receive an update as soon as possible. Kind regards, Customer Care TeamAer Lingus" She says this 'smacks of indifference and maybe they are hoping I will die before they have to respond'. She says she has two queries. 'Do they not feel that to leave someone asleep and not ask if they want food on a transatlantic flight is bad customer service? And is five months not excessive to review a simple and straightforward complaint, and what's with the emails telling me not to contact them otherwise?' She says she is aware 'this is not life and death stuff, but it might serve as a warning to passengers to remain awake, even when flying transatlantic, if they want to be fed, and if they doze off, tough.' We sent this story to Aer Lingus and received the following statement. 'On our overnight flights from North America, we offer customers two meal services: a main dinner and a lighter meal before arrival. 'Customers are informed about these services both at the start of the flight and again prior to each service. 'To ensure a restful experience, our cabin crew do not wake customers who are sleeping. For health and safety reasons, we are also unable to leave meals unattended at seats or reheat them later. 'We regret that, in this instance, our crew were unable to provide a more substantial option for the customer who missed the meal service while resting. We sincerely apologise for the delay in responding to their feedback. We have since been in direct contact with the customer and have shared their comments with our teams. Their feedback is being carefully considered as we work to improve how we support customers." We got back on to the airline and said that we believed many readers will find the story frustrating, and that there are some very simple solutions that could be introduced instantly at no cost to the airline. Why, for instance, are the meals that can't be given to sleeping passengers not simply returned to the trolleys where they were when the plane took off? It should not be a case of reheating them but simply keeping them warm 30 minutes or 60 minutes longer than might otherwise have been the case. We can't see how there would be any 'health and safety' implications to doing that. Or here's another idea. Why doesn't the airline announce before take off that there is a standard policy of not waking sleeping passengers for the in-flight service. The announcement could then specifically give passengers the options of telling the crew if they wished to be woken up to be fed or not. Instead what the airline appears to be doing is saying 'this is the way it is and we can't think of any way to make it better'. We didn't hear anything back.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
What will €350,000 buy in Co Cork and Sligo town?
Country Derryclough Lower, Drinagh, west Cork €350,000, Hodnett Forde This charming refurbished farmhouse comes to the market in west Cork , 8km outside Skibbereen. The three-bedroom home extends to 105sq m (1,130sq ft) and is in walk-in condition, with a stylish updated kitchen and shower room. It has also retained some rustic original details such as a cut-stone floor and exposed brick hearth in the livingroom. It occupies an acre of land, with charming gardens and outbuildings. Ber F. Plus: Stylish contemporary kitchen and shower room. Minus: Low Ber will need to be addressed. 17 Church Hill, Sligo Town 17 Church Hill, Sligo, Co Sligo €335,000, DNG Flanagan Ford This three-storey townhouse comes to the market, having been completely refurbished, in Sligo town. The home, which extends to 123sq m (1,324sq ft), has an A Ber, with a sittingroom to the front of the ground floor and a bright kitchen/livingroom to the rear that opens out to the garden, where there is a patio and a raised faux lawn. It also features a guest WC and utility room. There are four double bedrooms – including the main, which is en suite – as well as the main bathroom laid out over the top two floors. Ber A2. READ MORE Plus: A rating likely to keep energy bills low. Minus: May hear street noise in front rooms.
Irish Times
8 hours ago
- Irish Times
A grim prediction for teaching
Sir, – I have just stepped away from primary school teaching after 40 years of service. When I started teaching on September 2nd, 1985, little did I know how much the job would change in the interim. I have worked through two curriculums (1971 and 1999) and the newer Primary Language and Maths curriculums. I've avoided the department's newest offering, to be launched in September 2025. I've seen more change than most and not all of it for the best. I cannot see young teachers staying in this job for their lifetimes. The workload is unsustainable. The paperwork (all online) is beyond a joke and the salary? – it really is nothing to write home about. Grand if you're in my shoes, but not if you've a mortgage or rent and childcare costs. READ MORE I have always loved my job; I loved preparing the lessons and teaching in the classroom; I just hated the unnecessary extras that have been added over the years. If the Government is serious about keeping teachers in the profession, it needs to take a serious look at how much it actually values those who devote their lives to education and the demands it places on them. – Yours, etc, DEE DELANY, Raheny, Dublin 5.
