
CNBC's The China Connection newsletter: Beijing has more to worry about than just deflation
That's the message from economists, including those at the highly ranked Peking University's Guanghua School of Management. Academics at Beijing's top schools often share recommendations with policymakers.
It's not that the persistent drop in prices should be overlooked, but that they're signaling the need for more serious changes — just as China prepares its "15th five-year plan." It's a national social and economic development blueprint for the period from 2026 to 2030. China is wrapping up its 14th such plan this year and is expected to reveal details for the next five years in the coming months.
"When we talk about the 15th five-year plan, the key issue is how to grow productivity," Liu Qiao, dean of the Guanghua School and a finance professor, told me last week.
He's referring specifically to "total factor productivity," a measure of an economy's productivity gains from technology, innovation, economies of scale, or policies, without adding more labor or capital.
According to the International Monetary Fund, China's total TFP growth fell from 4.1% in the 2000s to 2.6% in the 2010s, and entered a state of decline from 2006. Liu believes China's TFP needs to grow by at least 2% or more.
To that end, tech innovation is an important part of the upcoming five-year plan, Liu said. But he added that institutional reform is just as important.
The Chinese Communist Party's grip on the state and its institutions enables it to exert greater influence over the economy than in the U.S., for example.
"80% of China's total factor productivity comes from institutional reform," economist Zhou Tianyong wrote in an opinion piece in Chinese business news magazine Caixin, which CNBC translated. Zhou is a former vice president of the International Strategy Institute at the Central Party School, China's higher education institution for training party leaders.
Zhou pointed out that the textbook definition of technology as a way to boost productivity doesn't necessarily apply in China, where business and consumer interests are constrained in certain areas. "Without economic system reform, there will be no medium-to-high-speed growth."
All this may seem rather academic for the average markets discussion more focused on deflation, industrial overcapacity and spillover into trade tensions. But public debate is limited in China. In a country where leaders operate by building consensus behind closed doors, policy signals come largely from key phrases in government documents and high-level speeches.
One of those signals has emerged in just the last few weeks.
Chinese President Xi Jinping led a high-level financial and economic commission meeting on July 1, which called for improving government officials' understanding of how their performance is evaluated, according to a state media readout.
"Routine assessments [of officials] cannot only focus on how much GDP has grown and the number of major projects, but also on how much debt is owed," Xi said at another high-level meeting this month that focused on urban development.
The current system for evaluating the performance of government officials has also inadvertently contributed to China's overcapacity issues, where industries are producing more goods than the market can absorb, according to Goldman Sachs.
Local authorities are incentivised to collect revenue even if manufacturers are losing money under the current production-based tax system, Goldman Sachs Chief China Economist Hui Shan said in a report Monday.
"Solving overcapacity issues requires a different incentive structure for local officials' evaluation and promotion," she added.
"None of these fundamental adjustments will be easy or quick to implement."
As China's economic growth slowed over the last several years, Beijing has emphasized the need for "high-quality" development. But the country still makes a big deal out of its annual GDP target, which is 5% this year.
Looking ahead, China will likely signal a lower growth target around 4.5% to 5%, Guanghua's Liu said. But what's more important in his view is that local authorities may then be able to focus more on consumption, rather than investments, which have contributed to overcapacity issues.
Policymakers will likely also try to reduce the gap in urban and rural income — or "common prosperity" — which can increase support for 255 million people and help boost consumption, Liu said. But in the near term, the economy probably needs a little more stimulus, such as a cash transfer, he said.
Chinese authorities have stepped up plans to further support employment and improve social welfare. But policymakers have so far avoided the mass cash handouts that the U.S. and Hong Kong gave residents to stimulate spending after the pandemic.
In a packed month for policymakers, senior party members are also expected to hold a Politburo meeting to discuss the economy by the end of the month. But analysts don't have high expectations.
With the first half of the year in the books, the scale of stimulus is pretty much already set, and policymakers are now turning their attention to the next five years, said Zong Liang, former chief researcher at the Bank of China.
He expects policymakers to prioritize consumption over investment, and tilt the balance toward the interests of businesses, noting the state has played a larger role in the past five years.
But he cautioned that Beijing would remain wary of the risks that could arise from relaxing too much control.
Old habits may die hard.
Trina Chen, co-head of China equity research at Goldman Sachs, discussed China's efforts to manage overcapacity in key sectors like solar, steel and lithium.
Yang Liu, CIO and chairman of Atlantis Investment Management, said that negative views on China's economy ignore the country's strengths in artificial intelligence and supply chains.
David Autor, labor economist at MIT, said that the U.S. has not "fully come to grips" with the nature of the challenge it faces from China.
China is going after excessive discounts. Premier Li Qiang last week called for more regulatory oversight of the electric car price war. The market regulator later stated on Friday that it had met with JD.com, Meituan, and Alibaba's Eleme, and called on them to compete rationally.
U.S.-China trade truce set for extension. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Tuesday he is likely to hash out an extension of President Donald Trump's upcoming trade deadline with China when he meets with his Chinese counterparts in Stockholm next week.
Economic uncertainty persists. China kept its benchmark lending rates steady on Monday as the country continues to grapple with weak consumer sentiment and softening growth. But the country's affluent are feeling just as poorly about the economy as they did during the pandemic, according to consulting firm Oliver Wyman.
Mainland China and Hong Kong stocks rose on Wednesday amid a broader rise in the region, after U.S. President Donald Trump announced that he had completed a "massive Deal" with Japan, which set tariffs of 15% on the country's exports to the U.S.
Mainland China's CSI 300 was up 0.02% while Hong Kong's Hang Seng Index — which includes major Chinese companies — had gained 1.27% as of 3:30 p.m. local time (3:30 a.m. ET). The Hang Seng Tech Index, which tracks the largest technology companies listed in Hong Kong, rose 2.14%. The mainland benchmark is up around 4.7% year to date, data from LSEG showed.
July 24: European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen is slated to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping during a visit to Beijing
July 26 - 28: World Artificial Intelligence Conference in Shanghai
Next week: U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is scheduled to meet his Chinese counterparts next week in Stockholm
Politburo meeting expected by the end of the month
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
The world's richest people are pouring money into Africa's luxury resorts
A private island off Tanzania's coast, where guests pay around $50,000 per night for exclusive use of a villa, catamaran, and helicopter transfers inside a protected marine reserve, is emerging as the latest marker of Africa's fast-growing luxury hospitality market. According to a Bloomberg report, the resort is run by Dubai's Jumeirah Group LLC, part of the emirate's royal business empire, and reflects a broader surge of global investor interest in African tourism. From vineyard retreats to elite safaris and gorilla treks, billionaires, tech moguls, and Middle Eastern investors are turning their attention and capital toward Africa, now seen as one of the last untapped frontiers of luxury travel. Jumeirah has teamed up with the Swedish founders of Thanda Group to offer a private island escape off Tanzania and a Big Five safari experience in South Africa. Kasada Capital Management, backed by Qatar's sovereign wealth fund, is expanding its footprint, eyeing deals in Morocco and adding to its 19-hotel portfolio across seven African nations. Meanwhile, Albwardy Investment, the firm behind Dubai's Desert Palm Polo Estate, is pushing ahead with developments in Zanzibar and Seychelles. It's a marked shift. Where African hospitality was once largely shaped by state-led initiatives, it's now being redefined by private capital, keen to meet a growing appetite for luxury experiences in untamed destinations. Billionaires are betting big Billionaires are increasingly drawn to Africa. For many, the cost of entry, from land acquisition to development, is significantly lower than in more established markets. Meanwhile, tourism numbers are soaring. In 2024, Africa surpassed pre-pandemic levels of international arrivals, welcoming 74 million visitors, according to UN Tourism. A 2024 Deloitte report on next-generation travellers forecasts that the Middle East and Africa will lead global growth in inbound tourism through 2040. Africa alone is expected to expand at a compound annual rate of 3.5% from 2019 to 2040, showing the region's long-term appeal. Virgin Limited Edition, the luxury hospitality brand founded by Richard Branson, has made Africa central to its strategy; over half its properties are on the continent, with more investments on the horizon. Others are following suit. Koos Bekker, the billionaire behind Naspers Ltd., recently opened his second ultra-luxury lodge in South Africa. United Africa Group, led by entrepreneur Haddis Tilahun, is in talks to acquire five high-end properties, while Club Med, backed by Chinese tycoon Guo Guangchang's Fosun, is preparing to launch a bush-and-beach resort in South Africa by next July.


The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
What China really wants for Russia and Ukraine
Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi was probably dissembling when he recently confided in Kaja Kallas, the European Union's High Representative for foreign affairs and security policy, that China 'can't accept Russia losing its war against Ukraine as this could allow the United States to turn its full attention to China.' Why might Wang have been less than fully truthful? For starters, he's a diplomat, and all diplomats have a tendency to express less than fully truthful views. To confuse adversaries and keep them guessing is a lesson that diplomats in all countries have mastered. In addition, Wang represents a totalitarian state with a huge propaganda apparatus which, like all such entities, is prone to prefer manipulation to truth telling. But the misleading nature of Wang's private comments is most evident in the fact that, contrary to his suggestion that the U.S. is China's greatest worry at the moment, it is actually Russia. Yes, China certainly wants the U.S. off its back, and any distraction is therefore a good distraction. But America isn't next door, and it isn't involved in a debilitating war. Despite the Trump administration's loud barks, it has yet to resort to biting. Nor is it clear, as the ongoing tussle over tariffs shows, just what biting China would entail. In contrast, Russia is a far more immediate security concern, and maybe even threat, for China. Consider these three possible outcomes in terms of China's security interests. If Russia wins in Ukraine — however victory is defined — Putin will be flush with self-confidence and arrogance, his imperialist adventure having proven to be successful in making Russia great again. Such a Russia might be foolhardy enough to attack a NATO country or attempt to annex northern Kazakhstan, neither of which would benefit China. Next would be a change in tone. A triumphant Russia could begin to flex its muscles and challenge its sworn 'no limits' friendship with China. Perhaps the terms of the partnership could be amended to reflect Russia's new status? Perhaps Beijing might consider paying more for energy from Russia? Perhaps China could stop publishing irredentist maps with Chinese names for Russian cities? The eternal friendship might not evaporate overnight, but this would surely create a more complicated relationship that could test China's patience. If Russia loses in Ukraine — however loss is defined — a whole raft of highly destabilizing scenarios could emerge. An utterly defeated Russia could descend into internal violence, thereby destabilizing Eurasia. Vladimir Putin could be ousted in a coup and his regime could collapse. Elite infighting would be inevitable, and civil war could raise its head. Non-ethnic Russians might take advantage of the chaos to declare independence, and Russia's federation could meet its inglorious end. True, China could annex large chunks of the Russian Far East, but those gains would be overshadowed by the security threats that would emanate from its decaying northern neighbor. A war that bloodies but does not beat Russia is China's obvious favorite choice. A weak Russia implicated in an unwinnable war would be chastised but still exist as Beijing's vassal and have no alternative to kowtowing to its Chinese overlord. That kind of Russia suits China perfectly. And the war need not be protracted for this goal to be achieved. It could end tomorrow, because Russia is already a pale shadow of its former self. Its army has been mauled, its economy is on the verge of a major crisis and its people, though largely supportive of the war, are experiencing increasing economic pain. Significantly, a weakened Russia would also suit America's, Europe's and Ukraine's interests, even if such a Russia might not be their first choice. All of which suggests that Wang may have been telling the West that what China wants is what the West should want. The implications for American policy are evident. The U.S. should actively pursue what China wants: a weak Russia. That's easy to achieve by helping Ukraine stop Putin, as the Trump administration may finally be doing. Chances are that Wang will shed crocodile tears and pat poor Putin on the head — but he won't object. Alexander J. Motyl is a professor of political science at Rutgers University-Newark. A specialist on Ukraine, Russia and the USSR, and on nationalism, revolutions, empires and theory, he is the author of 10 books of nonfiction, as well as ' Imperial Ends: The Decay, Collapse, and Revival of Empires' and ' Why Empires Reemerge


Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Who Loves Jensen More — Beijing or Washington?
This is Bloomberg Opinion Today, a symbiotic synthesis of Bloomberg Opinion's opinions. Sign up here. It's not easy to be on the good side — simultaneously — of both Xi Jinping and Donald Trump. But somehow, Nvidia chief executive officer Jensen Huang has managed to stay on the good side of Beijing and Washington. Last week, Huang wowed an audience in China by delivering a speech in Mandarin. The CEO of one of the world's most valuable companies by market cap was born in Mandarin-speaking Taiwan but, after moving to the US at age 9, spoke mainly English. His Mandarin speech was slightly halting, but (unlike Mark Zuckerberg's attempt a while back) Huang — now 62 — had the troublesome Chinese tones right, enunciating with confidence. The result was widespread acclaim in the People's Republic.