Diddy faces same charge that brought down mob bosses. What is racketeering?
As jurors deliberate the fate of Sean "Diddy" Combs, they will have to decide whether his conduct amounted to adventurous sex, as his attorneys argue, or rose to the level of racketeering, a charge usually used against violent mob organizations.
The jury is expected to begin deliberations this week after nearly two months of testimony in a New York courtroom.
Among the questions they will need to answer for a racketeering conviction: Was Combs the head of a criminal organization? Did the people in the organization commit two types of so-called "predicate acts," such as sex trafficking and obstruction of justice? And did it happen more than once?
Convicting someone on a racketeering charge is fairly simple and allows the government to seize a great deal of assets, according to experts interviewed by USA TODAY.
"Prosecutors love this statute," said B. Michael Mears, an associate professor at Atlanta's John Marshall Law School and the former head of Georgia's public defender's office. "They do overuse it because it's so easy. It's a good vehicle for the government to go in and bring down the heads of organizations."
As Combs awaits the jury's decision, here's a look at what racketeering is, what the attorneys in Combs' case say about it and how much time the rap mogul would face if he's convicted.
Racketeering, explained
Passed in 1970, the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) took direct aim at organized crime. Instead of just bringing down low-level foot soldiers of a mafia organization, the new legislation allowed law enforcement to target the generals, Mears said.
"You only have to show that someone associated with the head of the criminal organization commits the crime," he said. "The criminal liability goes from the lowest rung … to the head."
The law allowed the government to take down members of the mob, like the Genovese family and John Gotti, head of the Gambino crime family. In the decades since, prosecutors have used the broad legislation against various criminal enterprises, including gangs like the Hells Angels and MS-13, corrupt officials including mayors, governors, judges, and sheriffs, white supremacists, hackers, and recording artists including R. Kelly. A criminal enterprise can be a loose association of people, it does not have to have a formal structure and it can engage in both legal and illegal activities.
"It's a very broad thing," said John Floyd, a prominent Atlanta prosecutor who tries RICO cases and says that much of the public only thinks of mobsters when it comes to racketeering. "Most folks look at this and try to latch onto something that's familiar and that becomes the Godfather, that becomes Tony Soprano."
"It covers those guys but it's not remotely limited to them," Floyd continued. "It goes beyond guys who have a bottle of Chianti on a checked tablecloth."
Diddy's prosecutors, defense attorney on racketeering charge
Using RICO law, prosecutors say that Combs used "employees, resources, and influence of the multi-faceted business empire that he led and controlled − creating a criminal enterprise" to commit crimes including sex trafficking, forced labor, kidnapping, bribery, and obstruction of justice, according to the indictment.
The indictment says that Combs used his many businesses, including Bad Boy Records, as a criminal organization 'to fulfill his sexual desires, protect his reputation, and conceal his conduct," which included so-called "freak offs" − sometimes dayslong sex performances that federal prosecutors say were captured on video.
Combs has pleaded not guilty to racketeering conspiracy, sex trafficking and transportation to engage in prostitution.
"He's the general, not a foot soldier," prosecutor Maurene Comey told jurors, saying that Combs could not have engaged in the conduct he did without a great deal of help.
Another prosecutor, Christy Slavik, told jurors there is no doubt that Combs was "the head of a criminal enterprise."
"Remember, it's his kingdom," she said. "Everyone was there to serve him."
Combs' team has slammed prosecutors for over-charging the rap mogul, saying all the sex involved in the case was consensual.
'The evidence is going to show you a very flawed individual, but it will not show you a racketeer, a sex trafficker, or somebody transporting for prostitution,' Combs' attorney, Teny Geragos, told jurors during opening statements in May.
In his closing argument last week, defense attorney Marc Agnifilo said of the racketeering charge: "Are you kidding me?"
What happens if Diddy is convicted?
Combs stands to lose everything if he's convicted. A racketeering conviction alone carries a minimum prison sentence of 20 years and maximum of life behind bars.
If convicted of racketeering, the government would also be able to seize all of Combs' assets, leaving him behind bars and powerless, Mears said.
"RICO provides prosecutors with the opportunity to cut off the head of the snake," he said. "They're more concerned about the mob boss than the mobsters themselves."
Contributing: USA TODAY staff
Amanda Lee Myers is a senior crime reporter for USA TODAY. Follow her on X at @amandaleeusat.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
18 minutes ago
- Forbes
Diddy Trial: Jury Reaches Partial Verdict
The jury in Sean 'Diddy' Combs' federal criminal trial has reached a verdict on four of his five charges, the jury said in a note to the judge Tuesday afternoon, though both prosecutors and defense lawyers urged the judge to instruct the jury to continue deliberating. The jury in the criminal case against Diddy began deliberating Monday. (Photo by Amy Sussman/Getty ... More Images for MRC) Getty Images for MRC The jury sent a note to Judge Arun Subramanian Tuesday afternoon stating it reached a verdict on all charges except the racketeering conspiracy charge, multiple news outlets reported (Combs' four other criminal charges are two counts of sex trafficking and two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution). The jury's note to the judge said it is 'unable to reach a verdict on count 1 as we have jurors with unpersuadable opinions on both sides.' Marc Agnifilo, a defense lawyer representing Combs, said the jury should continue deliberations because it has only been deliberating for two days, NBC News reported, while prosecutors also pushed for more deliberations. Subramanian said he will not accept a partial verdict, ABC News reported, and asked lawyers representing both sides to send proposed language for further instructions to the jury. Earlier Tuesday, the jury sent a note to Subramanian requesting transcripts of some testimony from Combs' ex-girlfriend Cassie Ventura and sex worker Daniel Phillip, who participated in a 'freak-off' with Ventura and Combs, CNN reported. The jury requested transcripts from multiple specific moments from Ventura's testimony: her testimony about Combs attacking her at a Los Angeles hotel in 2016, which was captured on surveillance video and shown to the jury; her testimony that Combs threatened to release 'freak-off' videos of her while they were on a flight home from the Cannes Film Festival; and testimony from both Phillip and Ventura about freak-offs they had with one another. The jury asked Subramanian late Monday afternoon, the first day of deliberations, for clarity on whether it is considered drug distribution if a person who is asked for controlled substances provides them to that person, CNN reported. Drug distribution is one of the alleged acts jurors are being asked to consider when deciding whether Combs is guilty of the racketeering charge, along with bribery, forced labor, kidnapping, arson and sex trafficking, according to the jury's verdict sheet. Subramanian said Tuesday morning he would refer the jury to language in its instructions about drug distribution: 'The word 'distribution' means actual, constructive, or attempted transfer. To distribute simply means to deliver, to pass over, or to hand over something to another person, or to cause it to be delivered, passed on, or handed over to another. Distribution does not require a sale.' What Is The Scene Like In The Courtroom? Combs arrived in the courtroom late Tuesday morning, CNN reported. His mother, Janice Combs, who has been present for much of the trial, is also in attendance. Quickly after deliberations began Monday, the jury gave Subramanian a note that said: 'We have a juror, No. 25, who we are concerned cannot follow your honor's instructions.' Subramanian returned a note to the jury reminding 'every juror of their duty to deliberate and their obligation to follow my instruction on the law,' urging them to continue deliberating. Mark Zauderer, a veteran trial and appellate lawyer, told Forbes jury questions are not uncommon and that the problem may blow over if the jury moves on and does not request any more intervention from the judge. When Could The Jury Return A Verdict—and Will Diddy Be Convicted? It's unclear, as the jury will deliberate as long as it needs to reach a verdict. Subramanian has previously said he wanted to wrap up the trial, which began in May, by the July 4 weekend. Legal analysts previously told Forbes the prosecution presented a strong case against Combs, but it is impossible to know what a jury will decide. Zauderer said he believes Combs is more likely to be convicted than acquitted, but noted such a verdict may depend on whether the jury believes prosecutors sufficiently proved Combs ran a 'criminal enterprise,' which would satisfy the racketeering charge. Former federal prosecutor Mark Chutkow also said the prosecution made a 'very compelling case,' noting the prosecution's emphasis on surveillance video depicting Combs attacking his ex-girlfriend and a key witness in the case, Cassie Ventura, in a Los Angeles hotel. Chutkow said, however, a jury may feel the video depicts domestic violence, which he is not charged with, instead of sex trafficking or racketeering. Chutkow also said it is possible the trial could end with a hung jury, meaning not all jurors agree on a verdict. What Is Combs Charged With? Combs faces five federal charges: two counts of sex trafficking, two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution and one count of racketeering conspiracy. He pleaded not guilty to all charges. Throughout the trial, the government has called high-profile victims to testify, including Ventura, considered a key witness for both the racketeering and sex trafficking charges. She testified Combs coerced her into 'freak-off' sex performances throughout their decade-long relationship, which she said his employees assisted in producing, which some legal experts said could be evidence of Combs operating a criminal enterprise. Rapper Kid Cudi also testified Combs broke into his home and said he believed Combs was involved with setting his car on fire after he discovered Kid Cudi and Ventura were dating. Other alleged sex trafficking victims central to the prosecution's case testified under the pseudonyms 'Jane' and 'Mia.' Further Reading Judge Orders Diddy Jury To 'Continue Deliberating' After Concerns Over Juror No. 25 (Forbes) Jury Begins Deliberating Criminal Case Against Diddy: Here's Why A Verdict Is So Unpredictable (Forbes)


Fox News
42 minutes ago
- Fox News
Diddy jury returns partial verdict in sex trafficking, racketeering trial
The jury in Sean "Diddy" Combs' sex trafficking and racketeering trial returned a verdict Tuesday. The jurors reached a verdict on four of the five counts against Diddy around 4:18pm ET. The jury indicated they couldn't reach a unanimous decision on the racketeering charge. Jurors began deliberating on Monday, June 30, after hearing seven weeks of trial testimony. The prosecution chose to rest the case on June 24. Special Agent Joseph Cerciello was the final witness to take the stand for the prosecution, making him the 34th person to testify. Diddy's defense called no witnesses. Diddy pleaded not guilty to charges of racketeering, sex trafficking and transportation to engage in prostitution. If convicted, Diddy faces life in prison. The disgraced music mogul was arrested in September 2024, months after Homeland Security Investigations raided the Los Angeles and Miami homes of the rapper. During closing arguments, Diddy's attorney, Marc Agnifilo, insisted the rapper was innocent. He noted that it takes courage for a juror to acquit. "Return him to his family who have been waiting for him." He also accused the prosecution of bringing a "fake trial" against Diddy, claiming the government went after his "private sex life." According to his lawyer, none of the prosecution witnesses testified to engaging in racketeering. Agnifilo pointed out the disgraced music mogul's former employees all described working for him as hard, but also said it was like "going to Harvard Business School." "That's the fake trial I'm talking about," Agnifilo told the jurors, claiming the prosecution failed to prove the government's theory of racketeering. Agnifilo then brought up the raids on Diddy's homes, pointing out the seizure of Astroglide and baby oil. There was nothing about the rapper's businesses to make this a criminal case, the defense attorney stated. "Where is the crime scene? The crime scene is your private sex life," Agnifilo said. The defense attorney also claimed the rapper never participated in sex trafficking. Agnifilo claimed what happened between Diddy and his ex-girlfriend Cassie was domestic violence, not sex trafficking. "Owning the domestic violence, we own it," he said in court. "That's not charged." WATCH: DEFENSE ATTORNEY BREAKS DOWN 'TROUBLING' TREND WITH DIDDY DEFENSE TEAM Before the defense's closing arguments, the government explained how the trial testimony proved each charge against Diddy – two counts of sex trafficking, racketeering and two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution – over the course of roughly four hours. The government emphasized in their argument that Diddy ran an alleged criminal enterprise with full control. The prosecution pointed out that the jury heard testimony, saw texts, viewed bank records and heard audio allegedly showing the "Last Night" rapper committing crime after crime for decades. According to the prosecution, the government showed Diddy didn't take no for an answer. "Up until today, Diddy was able to get away with crime because of money and power," Assistant U.S. Attorney Christine Slavik said. "That stops now." A 12-person jury comprised of eight men and four women made the decision on whether to convict Diddy of federal crimes, or let the fallen music mogul walk free following a seven-week trial. Throughout the past two months, the jury heard from 34 prosecution witnesses. Diddy's ex-girlfriends, Cassie and Jane, testified about the alleged physical abuse they experienced at the hands of the rapper. Diddy's former personal assistants also told the jury about the long hours they worked and the drugs they allegedly bought for the musician. A woman named Mia, testifying under a pseudonym, claimed she was raped by Diddy while working for him. WATCH: PROSECUTORS ACCUSED DIDDY OF RUNNING A 'CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE' Prosecutors argued the disgraced music mogul used his inner circle, money and influence to cover up the alleged crimes he committed. "Over the last several weeks, you've learned a lot about Sean Combs," Slavik said at the start of closing statements. "He's a leader of a criminal enterprise. He doesn't take no for an answer."


New York Post
3 hours ago
- New York Post
Failure to sequester Diddy trial jury was a mistake, legal expert argues
Jury deliberations in Sean 'Diddy' Combs' federal trial for sex crimes continued to hit roadblocks Tuesday as the court dealt with more notes from the jurors. Multiple notes were sent back from the jury throughout the roughly six hours of deliberations so far. By Tuesday morning, the jury had sent the court three notes of substance. The case against Diddy is proving to be a 'rare nail-biter' for the prosecution, according to Fox News contributor Paul Mauro. 'The Southern District's conviction rate is well-north of 90%. They don't take cases to lose them,' the retired NYPD inspector told Fox News Digital. 'That said, the Diddy case has some real challenges. In the end, the evidence came down to how coerced the female victims were. As these women reached out affirmatively to Diddy, were they suffering a version of battered wife syndrome? Or was the entire thing transactional?' 'Further: Without that sexual activity, will the drug and weapons allegations suffice to demonstrate an actual racketeering entity? This is a rare nail-biter for SDNY – far from a slam-dunk. And the possibility of a split verdict here, at the least, is very real.' 3 Sean 'Diddy' Combs attends Day 1 of 2023 Invest Fest at Georgia World Congress Center on August 26, 2023. Getty Images On Monday, before court ended for the day, the jury sent a note asking 'If a recipient asks for a controlled substance, and another person hands it over to them, are they distributing?' Judge Arun Subramanian chose to send a note back to the jury Tuesday morning as deliberations resumed. He pointed the group to page 37 of the charge document, which explained the law behind the distribution of drugs allegation. Diddy took notes while the prosecution, defense and judge discussed what to respond to the jury's note asking for clarification on drug distribution. The rapper mostly looked at the judge during the short court session. He occasionally looked at defense attorney Marc Agnifilo, seated to his right. Diddy also glanced over to his other lawyers, Teny Geragos and Alexandra Shapiro, seated to his left. Combs and his lawyer, Xavier Donaldson, chatted a bit with some smiles afterward. Diddy spoke with the defense lawyer for a few minutes. Before leaving the courtroom, Diddy waved to his mother and another woman in the family row. He told his mother to 'just relax' and then said he liked her outfit, which was a green and white patterned blouse. Problems within the jury could have been avoided, according to attorney David S. Seltzer, who told Fox News Digital that simply sequestering the jurors throughout the duration of the seven-week trial could have prevented additional issues reaching a verdict. 'I don't see how people are not influenced by outside factors,' Seltzer said. 'We live in a technology world where everyone wants their information now. I know the jury was instructed not to read anything, but I don't think that was realistic given the length of the trial.' Seltzer noted that not sequestering the jury was a mistake. 'I have been saying from day one that it is impossible to tell people to stay off media and/or computers for six weeks-plus, when people are addicted to their devices. I think the court is relying on the admonishment, but respectfully turning a blind eye.' The jury sent two notes to the court throughout the five and a half hours of deliberations on Monday. The first note from the jury claimed one juror could not follow Judge Arun Subramanian's instructions. After a lengthy discussion on what to send back to the jury, Judge Subramanian adopted the language for the note proposed by the prosecution. The note sent read, 'I received your note. I remind every juror of their duty to deliberate and their obligation to follow my instruction on the law. With that instruction in mind, please continue deliberating.' The note also explained not to include specific details about deliberations in any future notes. 'Courts will always push a jury to get to a unanimous verdict, but at the end of the day, it is up to the jury if they think they can get there,' Seltzer noted. 'Often times when there are issues within the jury, they cannot get there, and it ends up in a hung jury.' 3 Criminal defense attorney Mercedes Colwin. FOX News Right before the end of the court day, the jury asked for clarification regarding the alleged distribution of drugs. 'If a recipient asks for a controlled substance, and another person hands it over to them, are they distributing?' The judge told the court that the jury would be given an answer on Tuesday. While sequestering a jury — essentially isolating the 12 jurors and six alternates assigned to the case from the outside world — can be challenging, the process may prove to be essential in eliminating external influences. Albany-based criminal defense attorney Paul DerOhannesian explained to Fox News Digital that jurors may have been swayed by the Internet and access to social media. 'Unfortunately, courts are reluctant to utilize one of the few tools historically used to inoculate jurors against external sources of information during a trial or deliberations — sequestration,' DerOhannesian said. 'We did see sequestration of the jury in the Casey Anthony and OJ Simpson trials. Sequestration in a federal trial is virtually non-existent in recent history.' Another high-profile case where the jury was not sequestered was Karen Read's retrial. Jurors found Read not guilty of second-degree murder, but guilty of a lesser offense of operating a vehicle under the influence with a blood-alcohol level of .08% or greater. 'I think the lack of sequestration favors the defense,' Seltzer told Fox News Digital. 'The media/coverage in the Karen Read trial, as I saw it, was pro-defense. The trial was very technical and not something that favors a prosecution case. The Diddy trial, while not technical, it was much of the same from all the witnesses and the media was not very favorable to the prosecution in meeting their burden.' DerOhannesian said he wouldn't 'necessarily compare the Combs and Read trials. However, I would note Read benefited from some favorable publicity and information, particularly concerning the integrity of the investigation.' John J. Perlstein, a Los Angeles litigator, admitted it would be 'naïve to believe that jurors universally adhere to these instructions and not read up on the situation they find themselves in.' 'I don't believe that any jury needs to be sequestered unless it is a safety concern,' Perlstein added. 'The instructions are what they are. The jurors are admonished daily, and all one can hope is that they abide.' Diddy remained in the courtroom for about 20 minutes after the judge decided to provide the jury with the government's proposed response to their first letter. He was sitting at the defense table with his attorneys. On his way out of the courtroom, he held up the two books he had with him. One is, 'The Power of Positive Thinking.' The other is 'The Happiness Advantage.' 3 Prosecutors began closing arguments Thursday with a focus on Diddy's alleged stance as the leader of a criminal enterprise, a point they've attempted to drive home to the jurors with more than 30 witness testimonies. REUTERS The jury was sent to deliberate around 11:30 a.m. ET by the federal judge after lengthy instructions. Authorities charged Diddy with racketeering, two counts of sex trafficking and two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution. If convicted, he could face life in prison. A 12-person jury comprised of eight men and four women will make the decision on whether to convict Diddy of federal crimes or let the fallen music mogul walk free following a seven-week trial. Prosecutors began closing arguments Thursday with a focus on Diddy's alleged stance as the leader of a criminal enterprise, a point they've attempted to drive home to the jurors with more than 30 witness testimonies. The rapper's defense team, headed by Marc Agnifilo, argued Friday that the prosecution's evidence proved that the government was unfairly targeting Diddy and insisted he was innocent of the charges. If found guilty, the rapper faces a minimum of 15 years behind bars and a maximum sentence of life in prison. Diddy has maintained his innocence throughout the trial.