Member's Bill Would Reduce The Number Of Auckland Local Boards
The bill would amend section the Local Government Act to set a statutory cap on Auckland local board numbers at 15. However, this does not necessarily mean fewer local board members currently at 149.
A new Member's bill that would reduce the number of local boards in Auckland from 21 to 15 would make local Government in Auckland more efficient, says National MP for Upper Harbour, Cameron Brewer.
'Last year, Auckland Council established a Joint Governance Working Group to explore options to reorganise local boards to improve efficiencies and better align governance structures.
'The working party's 'Local Board Reorganisation Plan – Next Steps' report estimated that the potential efficiencies to be $6.9m per annum. Identified one-off costs associated with the reorganisation were estimated at $1.9m.
'In the end, despite significant potential savings for Auckland ratepayers, the proposal did not proceed to public consultation last year. Most councillors chose not to advance it, nor seek the support or views from Aucklanders.
'My Member's bill would effectively align the number of local boards with the number of council wards. This would mean 13 local boards aligned with the 13 existing council wards. However, as the working party also proposed, the provision for two additional boards – one for Waiheke Island and one for Great Barrier Island, given their distinct characteristics and needs.
'The bill would amend section the Local Government Act to set a statutory cap on Auckland local board numbers at 15. However, this does not necessarily mean fewer local board members – currently at 149.
'This bill aligns with National's aim to achieve greater efficiencies for taxpayers and ratepayers, reduce unnecessary bureaucracy, while maintaining strong and effective local representation. It now just needs to get drawn from the ballot, so Aucklanders can have their say,' says Mr Brewer.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
8 hours ago
- RNZ News
Auckland Council votes in favour of amendment to helipad ban Notice of Motion
Auckland richlisters Anna Mowbray and Ali Williams' newly built house on Rawene Avenue. Photo: RNZ/Maia Ingoe Auckland Council have voted in favour of an amendment to councillor Mike Lee's Notice of Motion to ban the private use of helipads in residential areas. The amendment requests staff seek a determination through the Environment Court through the Resource Consent Appeal Process or a declaration from the Environment Court on the activity status of private helipads. The amendment was put forward by councillor Richard Hills and labelled as a "stitch up" and "ambush" by councillor Lee. This in relation to the Auckland Unitary Plan. Councillors are yet to decide on the Hauraki Gulf Islands Section of the Auckland Council District Plan. The meeting has been ongoing since 10am on Wednesday. It comes after Waiheke locals said Auckland Council was ignoring the wants of the communities by allowing a proliferation of private helipads. Last month, independent hearing commissioners appointed by the council approved rich-listers Anna Mowbray and Ali Williams's request for a private helipad at their Westmere property, despite overwhelming public opposition . At the council's Policy and Planning Committee on Thursday morning, Kim Whitaker from Quiet Sky Waiheke was one of several speakers calling on the council to decline private helicopter resource consents in residential areas. He said the constant flow of helicopters was incredibly frustrating and disruptive for residents. "You can demonstrate that this committee is made up of people who believe in democratic principles and are not going to enable a small minority of people to literally fly roughshod over a majority." He said there were nearly 70 private helipads on Waiheke. RNZ contacted Ali Williams and Anna Mowbray's lawyer for comment ahead of the motion of notice and the appeal in the Environment Court. While there was no response, the couple have said in the media that they were deeply disappointed with the legal challenge and the cost to public resources it will use. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
NZ Herald
10 hours ago
- NZ Herald
The Government's homelessness problem; Christopher Luxon and his minced oath
Lobbying by Waikato University paid off and, after convincing National to promise a third medical school last election, specialising in general practice, it has not only been confirmed by Cabinet but at a cost of $200 million less to the Crown than originally estimated. The savings are said to come from ditching previous plans to build regional outposts for the medical school and to use existing facilities instead. We won't know where and how many, even after the business plan is released this week. An artist's impression of the new school. Photo / Supplied. A couple of dozen options are being considered, it is understood, and they will be reduced to about a dozen outposts after discussions with the regions. One could assume, however, that places being considered for outposts would include regions such as Northland, Bay of Plenty, Gisborne, Hawke's Bay, Taranaki, Manawatū, and possibly several regions in the South Island. While the medical school will have a bias towards producing GPs, because much of its coursework is going to be in the regions, it will need to have clinical leadership in those regions and getting that tied down will be a major hurdle before it is due to take its first intake in 2028. The big danger for such a small country is that medical expertise will be spread more thinly across three medical schools. Kate MacNamara has done a piece on how much consultants have been paid on the project since the Government came to power. Disharmony over Harmony Accord What looked like a Kumbaya story this week has turned a little discordant. An initiative by Ethnic Communities Minister Mark Mitchell to establish the foundations for ongoing co-operation between Muslim and Jewish groups has been criticised for not being inclusive. The NZ Harmony Accord was signed by the Federation of Islamic Associations of New Zealand and several Jewish organisations on Tuesday at Government House in Auckland. But a group of 20 Islamic organisations and 18 Imams and Islamic scholars issued a statement rejecting the Accord, saying there had been a lack of consultation by both the Government and the Federation of Islamic Associations. The statement also said they were disappointed the Accord made no mention of the catastrophic humanitarian crisis in Gaza, which leading humanitarian groups said constituted war crimes and acts of genocide. On the same day, New Zealand joined 27 other countries to call on the war to end now. They were responding to horrifying scenes in Gaza, of starvation and of civilians having been killed as they sought food. 'Israel's military response to the events of October 7 2023 [when Hamas killed 1200 Israelis] long ago ceased to be proportionate, reasonable or moral,' Foreign Minister Winston Peters told Parliament. Christopher Luxon and his minced oath You can tell that the Prime Minister has felt the heat this week because he has been a little sweary. First, he referred to Labour leader Chris Hipkins as 'frickin Hipkins,' and then he accused him of asking a 'smart-arse' question. 'Frickin' is what is known as a 'minced oath' or a milder way of using a more offensive word. It's the PM's way of meaning 'f***ing' but not saying it. And in this case, Luxon was responding to criticism that only 153 families were receiving the full rebate in the Family Boost policy. 'I'm not taking any lectures from frickin' Chris Hipkins or the Labour Party,' Luxon said. 'They have no idea what to do. They put us in this mess.' Luxon was probably right about the 'smart-arse' question. Hipkins said: 'How many blocks of butter can he buy for the $60 a week he claims to spend on groceries?' The reference to $60 comes from the final election debate between the two in which Luxon said he spent that amount in a week, before clarifying it was only for three breakfasts and one other meal. Pity poor Mark Patterson, however, who also thought he could get away with saying 'arse' in the House, but was upbraided by assistant speaker Barbara Kuriger. 'Do you think that the farmers, the exporters, the foresters give a rat's arse about Greek philosophy?' Patterson said, after a Green MP mentioned the freedom of expression beginning as a Greek concept. Patterson modified his language to 'rat's derriere'. By the way... Maiden speech: New Zealand First MP Dr David Wilson, who has been sworn in to replace retiring MP Tanya Unkovich, gives his maiden speech tonight at 5.40pm. Wilson has previously talked freely about having been the victim of an investment scam in which he lost $200,000. And they're off: Labour's campaign team is off to an early start with Beth Houston, a former party vice-president, getting to work this week as campaign manager for the 2026 election. The general secretary remains Rob Salmond and party president is Jill Day. National has not settled on its campaign manager yet but it is likely to again be senior MP Chris Bishop. Quote unquote 'I've been very surprised at the almost breathless excitement of the blow by blow of what happened in that meeting.' Finance Minister Nicola Willis plays down her meeting with Fonterra CEO Miles Hurrell about the price of butter, inter alia. Micro quiz Who is Labour's housing spokesperson? (Answer at the bottom of this article.) Brickbat Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters. Photo / Mark Mitchell Goes to Foreign Minister Winston Peters for refusing to answer a question in Parliament yesterday about the UN Oceans conference he attended in France because the Green MP asking it referred to 'Aotearoa New Zealand'. Quel disgrace. Bouquet Act Leader David Seymour. Photo / Mark Mitchell Goes to Act leader David Seymour for keeping the Government's feet to the fire over the Waikato University Medical School, its need and its costs. This week's top headlines Homelessness: Government report on homelessness shows the number of people living without shelter 'appears' to be outstripping population growth. Price of butter: Finance Minister Nicola Willis and Fonterra CEO Miles Hurrell discuss butter prices with no immediate relief. Police numbers: The Government's 500 police target it delayed again as an Australia poaching campaign is considered. Sport NZ: The Government has forced Sport NZ to ditch transgender guidelines as they don't align with its coalition agreement. Foreign buyers ban: Winston Peters says change is likely to be announced this year, but denies NZ First is 'softening'. NZ Harmony Accord: Mark Mitchell says Muslim and Jewish leaders are sending a powerful message in the signing of a new agreement. Policy stoush: Christopher Luxon mouths off at 'frickin' Chris Hipkins over cost of living policy stoush. Conflict of interest: University of Waikato vice-chancellor Neil Quigley denies any conflict of interest exists in balancing his role as Reserve Bank chairman and his university receiving $82 million from the Government. Orr's resignation: RBNZ chairman Neil Quigley apologised for Adrian Orr losing his cool in the lead-up to his shock resignation. FamilyBoost: Just 153 families are getting the maximum $75 weekly childcare tax credit. NCEA: A Government briefing has raised significant concerns about the credibility of NCEA. Quiz answer: Kieran McAnulty
RNZ News
19 hours ago
- RNZ News
Auckland councillor tries again to ban helicopters in residential areas
Auckland richlisters Anna Mowbray and Ali Williams' newly built house on Rawene Avenue. Photo: RNZ/Maia Ingoe Residential helipads will once again be the topic of conversation at Auckland Council. Waitematā and Gulf Ward councillor Mike Lee has confirmed he'll be putting forward a Notice of Motion to ban helicopters in residential areas at Wednesday's Policy and Planning Committee. It follows news this week that Auckland billionaire couple Anna Mowbray and Ali Williams' approval to build a helipad at their Westmere home, will be challenged at the Environment Court. This is the second time Lee has tried to prohibit helipads in residential areas, his motion last year losing by two votes. "Well, it'll be a close-run thing, and so who knows what the outcome really will be." "In some ways, the odds are rather stacked against getting any change, because not only will we have to persuade the elected members, the members of the governing body, the councillors, to agree with us. "Unfortunately, we'll be having to deal with the senior planning staff who are opposed to any change to the system, particularly adverse to the idea of making helipads in residential areas a prohibited activity. "So we're going to have our work cut out for us, but we have the community, the overwhelming majority of the community, supporting this," Lee said. But he said "staff advice" would be the biggest obstacle in getting his motion across the line. "The biggest challenge will be the council officers, the council planners, who seem to have a philosophic opposition to prohibited activity. "Prohibited activity for certain activities are in the Auckland Unitary Plan. Helipads, for instance, in Sydney are a prohibited activity in all residential zones and business zones. Prohibited activity is in the Resource Management Act, it's been there since 1991. "Despite all the reforms, upteam reforms of RMA, that virtually every government since 1991 has undertaken, prohibited activity, Section 87D, remains in the Act for very good reason." He said all three local boards in his ward (Waitematā, Waiheke Island and the Aotea, Great Barrier Island local board areas) backed the move. Lee will also have the support of Whau councillor Kerrin Leoni who said she believed public sentiment from Aucklanders was predominately in their corner. For example, according to Auckland Council, of 1397 written submissions made on the helipad application by Auckland richlisters Anna Mowbray and Ali Williams, most - 1227, or 87 percent - opposed the helipad on Rawene Avenue in Westmere. One-hundred-and-eight were supportive, and 12 were neutral. "I think we need to make a strong stance on that and I'm definitely supporting Mike Lee's notice of motion," Leoni said. "Rich people that are coming into our city and treating it like it's a playground. I mean, it's just unacceptable. "We just can't let our city be seen as a playground for the rich listers to come in and do as they please, there should be some rules around that. "Apparently there are public helipads within 15 minutes or I think half an hour at least from everyone's address across the city. So why can't we use those instead of everyone having to have private ones? "I know there's definitely a lot of support and I'm sure there'll be a lot of people there to support the notice of motion and in the galleries as well." Among them will be members from Quiet Sky Waitematā who this week filed an appeal to the Environment Court in an attempt to block Anna Mowbray and Ali Williams from flying a private helicopter from their multi-million-dollar Westmere property. That's despite independent hearing commissioners appointed by Auckland Council approving the couple's controversial resource consent application for a private helipad in June. "We will have representatives from Quiet Sky who will be presenting a petition of over 4100 signatures to the councillors, letting them know about how Auckland feels about banning private use helicopters in residential areas," said spokesperson Elena Keith. "Paris, Los Angeles, New York, Sydney, Melbourne, none of them allow private helicopters in the city. "This is a very backward move. It's not the city that we want. I don't think it's a city that Auckland ratepayers want," Keith said. RNZ contacted Ali Williams and Anna Mowbray's lawyer for comment ahead of the motion of notice and the appeal in the Environment Court. While there was no response, the couple have said in the media that they were deeply disappointed with the legal challenge and the cost to public resources it will use. Lee said part of the reason behind his motion was to provide more certainty for people like them. "Under the law, the way it is now, they have every right to apply for a helipad and obviously they've spent a lot of money through this process. "Clearly they're extremely disappointed that the local residents are going to appeal. They're disappointed, but they shouldn't be surprised."
