logo
New railway lines put Guinea and Algeria on track to send iron ore to China

New railway lines put Guinea and Algeria on track to send iron ore to China

China is poised to begin receiving iron ore shipments from Guinea and Algeria this year, as Chinese firms complete the railway lines and ports needed to overcome logistical bottlenecks.
For years, the lack of railway infrastructure connecting mine sites to port facilities had stymied iron ore exports from both nations.
These massive projects are strategically important to China as it tries to
diversify its supply of iron ore away from Australia and Brazil, which together account for about 80 per cent of seaborne exports.
Simandou , in the remote southeast of Guinea, is one example. It is said to have the world's largest undeveloped iron ore deposit, and to get that moving a new railway line stretching up to 650km (400 miles) to the Atlantic coast was needed.
Likewise, in Algeria, there is another significant iron ore deposit at the Gara Djebilet mine deep in the southwestern Sahara Desert, near the Mauritanian border. That is about 1,650km away from Mediterranean ports – a distance that will be bridged by a combination of new and upgraded railway lines.
In the remote southeast of Guinea, Simandou is said to have the world's largest undeveloped iron ore deposit. Photo: Rio Tinto
In Guinea, Simandou is now on track to start shipping iron ore from November, according to Rio Tinto, the Anglo-Australian mining giant jointly developing the project with Chinese companies.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hong Kong should support its hawkers, not let them disappear
Hong Kong should support its hawkers, not let them disappear

South China Morning Post

time5 minutes ago

  • South China Morning Post

Hong Kong should support its hawkers, not let them disappear

Hong Kong is seeking to meet the demands of visitors for authentic experiences as it aims to offer 'tourism everywhere.' One of the most appealing attractions remains the city's traditional cuisine. But outdated policies and rigid regulations are threatening the existence of hawkers, an iconic feature of what the Tourism Board describes as 'Hong Kong's diverse culinary culture'. The absurdity of the rules was highlighted by a Post story about a 92-year-old itinerant hawker who cannot retire because this would spell the end for her business. Chan Tak-ching, like all other such licensees, is required to be at her stall at all times and is the only person allowed to conduct sales. This means she is out all day in the summer's searing heat. The hawker would like to pass the licence on to her experienced helpers. This would be a natural step in most other businesses. But itinerant hawker licences cannot be transferred. This inevitably means they will, in time, disappear. The policy dates back to 1972, when the government stepped in to regulate hawkers. At that time, the position was very different, with itinerant and fixed-pitch hawkers flourishing. There were 150 stalls for every 10,000 residents in 1974 – the equivalent of more than 112,000 today – raising genuine concerns about hygiene, safety and obstruction of crowded streets. But the government's restrictive approach resulted in the number of itinerant hawkers dropping, plunging 80 per cent between 2000 and 2024, with only 233 remaining. Fixed-pitch licences, which can be passed on to a family member only once, fell by 40 per cent, to fewer than 5,000. Officials continue to be preoccupied with concerns about the nuisance hawkers might cause, rather than the benefits they bring. There is a need for a change in mindset. Other parts of the region have realised that tourists love vibrant street markets and traditional hawker food. The rules should be reviewed, revamped, updated and relaxed.

Chinese companies must turn involution into sustainable evolution
Chinese companies must turn involution into sustainable evolution

South China Morning Post

time35 minutes ago

  • South China Morning Post

Chinese companies must turn involution into sustainable evolution

Beijing is trying to curb cutthroat price wars that have broken out in multiple sectors. Caused by overcapacity and insufficient demand, many companies have been locked into an unsustainable spiral of price-cutting that not only forgoes profits but imperils their very business survival. Ultimately, job losses will be a lose-lose for all sides concerned. Advertisement Whether in food delivery, e-commerce or advanced manufacturing for batteries, solar panels and electric vehicles, excessive competition has created a vicious cycle that Beijing fears is contributing to price deflation. Such deflation is sticky and difficult to reverse once established. Factory gate prices fell for the 33rd month in June, hindering official efforts to boost domestic consumption. The term neijuan, or involution, has gained currency to describe excessive competition . There is emerging consensus among officials and businesses on the need to turn neijuan into sustainable evolution to boost consumption. Online food delivery platforms Meituan and are among the latest to be hauled before regulators and urged to engage in 'rational' competition. All three have been locked in a price war since February. Meituan's core local commerce business director, Wang Puzhong, even admitted that the price war made no sense but that his company was forced to join to avoid looking like 'the loser'. Meanwhile, Industry and Information Technology Minister Li Lecheng warned solar panel makers that excessive competition and oversupply were hurting their industry. It is hardly the only one. Key sectors such as electrical machinery, steel, cement, ceramics and glass have all experienced price declines. Interestingly, the price of polysilicon, a key component of photovoltaic solar panels, rose significantly not long after Li met industry representatives. Advertisement

Which countries will pick sides in a US-China conflict over Taiwan?
Which countries will pick sides in a US-China conflict over Taiwan?

South China Morning Post

time2 hours ago

  • South China Morning Post

Which countries will pick sides in a US-China conflict over Taiwan?

There has been much speculation as to which third parties might get involved if war broke out between China and the United States in the Taiwan Strait. In June, The Economist published an article on this very question. More recently, the Financial Times reported that the US had been putting pressure on Japan and Australia to clarify what role they would play in such a situation. Advertisement It appears that there would be few countries on China's side. China's only treaty ally is North Korea. A 1961 treaty obliges the two sides to take 'all necessary measures' to oppose any country or coalition of countries that attack either nation unprovoked. Although North Korea sending soldiers to fight for Russia in Ukraine could raise the same prospect one day, and Beijing certainly matters much more than Moscow to the survival of a country under extensive international sanctions, currently China's ties with North Korea appear less warm than those between Russia and North Korea Pakistan has been described as an 'iron brother' of China. Given its almost unsalvageable relationship with India, Pakistan might seriously consider following through if China asked it to help take on India in a worst-case scenario. However, Islamabad joining a war to assist China against the US – which is a major provider of aid to Pakistan – is highly unlikely. China's most useful strategic partner is unquestionably Russia. Their closeness is reflected in their regular air and sea exercises. But why would Russia choose to get involved in a conflict in the Taiwan Strait if China has not provided Russia with military assistance in the Ukraine war? Presumably Russia would continue to sell China oil and gas , just like China is still selling Russia non-military items, but that's probably all. On the American side, not more than a handful of countries would provide military assistance to the US in a conflict with China, and each would do so half-heartedly at best. The Economist article seems to share this view as it quotes a recent paper from the Centre for a New American Security (CNAS), though the paper's analysis is not entirely convincing. 02:57 Shandong aircraft carrier moves into Taiwan response zone ahead of PLA drills Shandong aircraft carrier moves into Taiwan response zone ahead of PLA drills Its first conclusion is obvious: if the US stays out of the war, its allies will, too. The second is that if the US does step in, its most affected allies would be Japan and the Philippines. Japan's participation would be unlikely to go much further than submarine patrols or missile strikes. The Philippines would be more cautious, the CNAS paper said, but if Chinese forces were bogged down, it might be tempted to advance its claims in the South China Sea.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store