Older People Seeking Care for Cannabis Use at Greater Risk for Dementia
When compared with adults who sought care for other reasons, the risk of developing dementia was still 23 percent higher among users of cannabis, the active ingredient in marijuana, the study also found.
The study included the medical records of six million people in Ontario from 2008 to 2021. The authors accounted for health and sociodemographic differences between comparison groups, some of which play a role in cognitive decline.
The data do not reveal how much cannabis the subjects had been using, and the study does not prove that regular or heavy cannabis use plays a causal role in dementia.
But the finding does raise serious concerns that require further exploration, said Dr. Daniel T. Myran, the first author of the study, which was published in JAMA Neurology.
'Figuring out whether or not cannabis use or heavy regular chronic use causes dementia is a challenging and complicated question that you don't answer in one study,' said Dr. Myran, an assistant professor of family medicine at University of Ottawa.
'This contributes to the literature and to a sign, or signal, of concern.'
Dr. Myran's previous research has found that patients with cannabis use disorder died at almost three times the rate of individuals without the disorder over a five-year period. He has also reported that more cases of schizophrenia and psychosis in Canada have been linked to cannabis use disorder since the drug was legalized.
The latest study, focusing on dementia, adds to a growing body of literature on regular or heavy cannabis use and cognition. Researchers have reported impacts on verbal learning, memory and attention, while imaging studies have pointed to changes in the brain related to the use of cannabis and other substances.
Veterans with traumatic brain injuries in addition to cannabis use disorder may be at heightened risk for early-onset dementia, researchers reported last year.
But many of the studies are relatively small. The new report's strength was its large sample and the ability to track patients over time who did not have a diagnosis of dementia when they entered the study, said Madeline Meier, an associate professor of psychology at Arizona State University, who was not involved in the study.
'They were able to rule out dementia at the time of the first cannabis visit, and were able to show the temporal order — the cannabis came first, and the dementia came second,' said Dr. Meier.
Her research, which has followed and periodically tested a cohort of over 1,000 individuals over a period of many years, has linked cannabis use and neuropsychological decline.
'I think you want to combat this whole idea that cannabis is harmless and maybe even has some medical benefits,' Dr. Meier said. 'This study is showing an association that I think people should take seriously and say, 'Maybe this is putting me at risk.''
She noted that the work by Dr. Myran and his colleagues also found that people seeking care for alcohol use were even more likely to receive a dementia diagnosis than were cannabis users.
'I'm worried about the substance abuse in that Baby Boomer age,' she said.
More and more people, including seniors, are using cannabis. Medical visits related to cannabis increased more than fivefold among adults 45 and older between 2008 and 2021, the new study found. Among adults 65 and over, visits increased almost 27-fold.
The study included more than 6 million people age 45 and over who did not have a diagnosis of dementia at the start of the research. Of them, 16,275 had an acute-care medical encounter because of cannabis.
The patients with cannabis-related visits were compared to the matched general population, and in a separate comparison, to 140,824 matched patients who needed medical care for all other reasons.
Within five years, 5 percent of those with acute care cannabis visits received a dementia diagnosis. The figure for individuals needing care for other reasons was 3.6 percent, and for similar individuals in the general population, 1.3 percent.
But people who are heavy cannabis users differ from those who are not in a variety of ways, some of which may help explain the increased risk for dementia, Dr. Myran explained.
While some of the factors can be accounted for, he said, 'you can't control for all of them.'
Another unknown is self-medication, he said. Someone who has started experiencing symptoms of cognitive decline may be more likely to turn to cannabis. If so, then 'it looks as if the cannabis is causing dementia, but it's just on the pathway — they were already developing dementia,' Dr. Myran said.
After making adjustments for age, sex, income and other factors, including other health conditions, he and his colleagues determined that patients who sought care for cannabis-related reasons were 1.23 times as likely as those who had gotten any kind of acute care to be diagnosed with dementia, and 1.72 times as likely as those in the healthier general population.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Drug User Advocacy Groups Challenge ‘Recriminalization' in Court
The federal government was in court this week listening to arguments that it made a mistake when it allowed British Columbia to roll back its decriminalization pilot project. Counsel for a coalition of 13 drug user advocacy groups argued in an application for a judicial review that Health Canada didn't properly consider all the evidence before it when it broadly recriminalized public drug use in 2024. Canadian drug laws are set out in the federal Controlled Drugs and Substances Act. To provincially change drug laws for decriminalization, B.C. had to ask Health Canada for an exemption under the act. It later asked Health Canada to amend that exemption to recriminalize public drug use. The process will see a federal judge examine the evidence that was available to the federal government at the time, and rule on whether or not the government's decision to allow the decriminalization rollback was fair. Justice Meaghan M. Conroy heard the coalition's arguments Monday and Health Canada's defence Tuesday. She is expected to make a decision in the coming months. She could agree the decision was unfair and ask Health Canada to go over the evidence again, say the decision was fair and no further action is needed, or something in between. While B.C.'s government has made a lot of changes since decriminalization was introduced in January 2023, the judicial review is looking at only the most recent change, which essentially made it illegal again to have or use drugs in all public spaces across B.C. Decriminalization was a three-year pilot project introduced by the BC NDP to help people access harm reduction services and reduce the number of fatal overdoses. It let anyone 18 and older carry and use up to 2.5 grams of opioids, methamphetamines, powdered cocaine or MDMA in most places across B.C. without risking arrest. There were some exemptions — drugs were not allowed on school grounds or licensed child-care facilities, for example. In September 2023 the province added to that list, making playgrounds, splash pads, wading pools and skate parks drug-free zones. One month later it attempted to amend decriminalization further with Bill 34, which would have given police additional powers to control people who use drugs, or people who were suspected of using drugs, and introduced a confusing patchwork of places where people weren't allowed to use drugs. But Bill 34 was blocked by a temporary injunction before it could come into force, after a judge said the bill could cause 'irreparable harms' to people who use drugs. After Bill 34 was blocked, the province asked Health Canada to make possession and public drug use illegal again in April 2024. Drugs were still allowed in homes or shelters. This has been dubbed 'recriminalization' by drug user advocacy groups. The request was approved by Health Canada. This decision is the subject of the judicial review. B.C.'s Ministry of Health told The Tyee that decriminalization is just one part of a multi-pronged approach it is taking to address toxic drug deaths. Drug deaths have been climbing since early 2014 when the synthetic opioid fentanyl started being added to illicit, unregulated drugs in the province. Unregulated drugs have killed more than 17,800 British Columbians since then. Representing the coalition were lawyers Lindsay Frame and Jack Ruttle, who argued recriminalization contravened the general goal of Canada's drug policies, which is to keep people healthy and safe. Prohibiting public drug use, Frame argued, will push people to use drugs while isolated or alone, which increases their risk of fatal overdose because someone might not be around to call 911, administer naloxone or provide first aid. The current unregulated drug supply is often referred to as 'toxic' because of the unpredictability and potency of the supply, which can mean a regular dose can include unexpected drugs, such as benzodiazepines, and be hundreds or thousands times more potent than expected. Representing the federal government was lawyer Adrienne Copithorne, who delivered a technical argument, focusing on how most of the coalition's complaints went against the broad drug prohibitions laid out in the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, rather than Health Canada's decision to roll back decriminalization. Decriminalization didn't set a permanent standard that potential future harms can be compared against, she added. It was meant to be only a temporary measure that the health minister could adjust as needed. The federal government was asking to throw the case out due to these technicalities. How prohibition harms the most marginalized The court heard from the coalition that one reason B.C. asked Health Canada to recriminalize drugs was that police weren't able to maintain public order, and the 'vibrancy' of public spaces was being impacted by people who use drugs. But even with decriminalization, police still had laws against public intoxication, littering and trespassing, Frame said. Copithorne disagreed, pointing out how police tried to use the tools they had and later asked for more power when those tools weren't working. Frame said the public and political pushback against decriminalization often conflated poverty and the rise of homelessness with decriminalization. There is no evidence that decriminalization increased drug use, she said. But there was an increase in homelessness that made more people visible while they used drugs, she said. Copithorne said the core problem was still that people were using drugs in public and causing a disturbance. Frame also told the court that recriminalization disproportionately impacts marginalized communities, effectively treating them as second-class citizens. For example, remote Indigenous communities are less likely to have access to harm reduction sites where they can use while supervised by someone who can step in if there's an emergency, such as an overdose prevention site or supervised consumption site, she said. Indigenous people are disproportionately harmed by unregulated drugs, and recriminalizing drugs will reintroduce a lot of those harms, Frame said. At the time of Health Canada's decision to recriminalize drugs, the crisis was killing seven people in B.C. per day. Indigenous people were dying at six times the rate non-Indigenous people were, and First Nations women were dying at 12 times the rate of non-Indigenous women in the province, she said. 'Racism, colonialism and intergenerational trauma all contribute to these drug deaths,' Frame said. Copithorne said the change doesn't specifically target any particular groups and is applied to all people in B.C. equally. Frame argued that there is a 'profound unmet need for places to safely use' across the province, which means unhoused people have nowhere else to use but in public spaces. But using in public spaces increases a person's risk of interacting with a police officer, which can lead to arrest or drugs being confiscated. Both things increase a person's risk of a fatal overdose, Frame said. When someone's drugs are confiscated, Frame said, they might have to turn to an unfamiliar supply, risk going into life-threatening withdrawal or lose drug tolerance, which puts them at a higher risk of overdose the next time they use. An arrest can impact a person's housing, job or access to their children. 'Criminalization feeds into cycles of harm,' Frame said. Kali Rufus-Sedgemore said they feel 'hopeful' that Conroy 'will see the government did something wrong.' Rufus-Sedgemore is the executive director of the Coalition of Peers Dismantling the Drug War. They spoke to The Tyee on behalf of the coalition of 13 organizations that applied for the judicial review. Rufus-Sedgemore said politicians have been feeding into a 'mass hysteria' about people who use drugs, which ignores people's humanity and overlooks the reasons why they might take drugs. Rufus-Sedgemore, who has ADHD, takes methamphetamine, for example. They say drug use calms their brain down and lets them work effectively in their community. They sometimes use a prescription to treat their ADHD but say the medications are expensive, can make them sick and are not strong enough to properly medicate them. But police and health-care workers don't see that and treat Rufus-Sedgemore, who is from the 'Namgis First Nation/Kwakwaka'wakw, like they might become violent at any moment. This is something Indigenous people and stimulant users often have to deal with, Rufus-Sedgemore told The Tyee. 'I've never been violent,' they say softly. 'But if I go to St. Paul's [Hospital] I have to take a sobriety and drug test, with a security guard posted outside of my room. I don't drink and I have to wait for hours before someone even asks me what's wrong.' To actually end the ongoing toxic drug crisis, Rufus-Sedgemore said, the government needs to bring back decriminalization, introduce a regulated safer supply that is more accessible and actually separates people from the unregulated supply, and create comprehensive drug education for kids. They've worked with youth before and remember being asked if you can un-burn microwave popcorn by microwaving it again, or, if drugs are making you feel weird, taking more drugs will make you feel better. Kids are still figuring this world out and won't know something if we don't teach them, they said. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Newsweek
3 hours ago
- Newsweek
Alert Issued Urging People to Monitor Themselves for 'Unusual Fatigue'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A slew of air quality alerts was issued across the Upper Midwest on Thursday, advising some residents to seek medical attention if they experience symptoms such as "unusual fatigue." Newsweek reached out to the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (DNR) by email for comment. Why It Matters Residents across Wisconsin faced potentially hazardous air quality on Thursday due to a mass of wildfire smoke drifting from Canada. With fine particulate matter (PM2.5) levels reaching thresholds deemed unhealthy for sensitive groups, state officials responded by issuing advisories for more than a dozen counties. The move underscored the ongoing public health risk posed by recurring wildfire smoke events, which have grown increasingly common in recent years as large blazes persist in Canadian provinces. Vulnerable individuals—especially those with heart or respiratory conditions, children, and older adults—have been warned that even brief exposure can trigger symptoms or exacerbate underlying health issues. What To Know The Wisconsin DNR issued an air quality advisory beginning at 6 a.m. Thursday, impacting the counties of Ashland, Barron, Bayfield, Burnett, Chippewa, Douglas, Dunn, Iron, Pepin, Pierce, Polk, Price, Rusk, Sawyer, St. Croix, Vilas, and Washburn. Burning forest fire in British Columbia in Kootenay National Park. Burning forest fire in British Columbia in Kootenay National Park. James_Gabbert/Getty According to state officials, the Air Quality Index (AQI) for PM2.5—tiny particles capable of penetrating deep into the lungs—was forecast to reach levels classified as "Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups" (USG) and, in some areas, "Unhealthy." The advisory stemmed from dense smoke originating in ongoing Canadian wildfires, particularly from Saskatchewan and Manitoba, that migrated south into the Upper Midwest. The smoke plume was expected to reach the Duluth/Superior area between 6 and 9 a.m. and gradually move southeast, extending impacts throughout the day and possibly into the weekend. As meteorological conditions change, the alert area was scheduled to be updated in response to real-time monitoring and predictive models. The official alert recommended that residents—especially those with preexisting lung or heart disease, asthma, young children, and older adults—take precautionary measures. These include limiting the intensity and duration of outdoor activities, moving activities indoors if possible, and staying alert for any new or worsening symptoms. For all residents, staying indoors and keeping windows closed remained a key precaution while smoke persists in the area. Health officials urged residents to monitor themselves for symptoms associated with poor air quality. Key symptoms to watch for included: Coughing Shortness of breath Throat irritation Unusual fatigue Chest discomfort Heart palpitations People with asthma were advised to follow their asthma action plans and keep quick-relief inhalers readily available. Those with heart disease were instructed to contact their health care providers if symptoms such as palpitations, shortness of breath, or unexpected fatigue developed. The advisory also encouraged all residents, including healthy individuals, to keep outdoor activities shorter and less intense, and to go inside if any symptoms present. What People Are Saying Air quality alert issued in Wisconsin: "People with heart disease: Symptoms such as palpitations, shortness of breath, or unusual fatigue may indicate a serious problem. If you have any of these, contact your health care provider." A Wisconsin DNR webpage about wildfire smoke: "Larger and more frequent wildfires are a growing public health concern, as wildfire smoke from larger fires can travel and impact air quality hundreds or even thousands of miles away and cause a wide range of health impacts based on a person's sensitivity to pollutants and the amount of pollutants in the air." What Happens Next The air quality advisory remained in effect through Thursday with a possibility for extension or adjustment depending on updated smoke projections and AQI readings. As southerly winds are forecast to return over the weekend, state officials anticipated that smoke may be pushed farther north, allowing air quality to improve gradually in majority of the state. However, lingering smoke impacts could require advisories to remain in effect for certain regions.
Miami Herald
6 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Migrating sea creature makes ‘extremely rare' appearance off Canada, video shows
A leatherback sea turtle made a remarkably rare appearance off the coast of Canada, thrilling onlookers and conservation officials. The marine creature — the largest turtle species in the world — was spotted near Langara Island, British Columbia, according to the Marine Education & Research Society (MERS), a Canadian conservation non-profit. A video posted by the group shows the rotund reptile swimming near the shore, with its head and carapace protruding above the waves. 'Oh my god,' a woman can be heard saying. 'This is the coolest thing I've ever seen.' The encounter is considered 'extremely rare.' Just 154 sightings have been made in British Columbia since 1931, according to MERS. 'They travel all the way from Indonesia to feed in B.C. waters,' the group said, adding that, 'They are the only sea turtle species that belongs in our waters and is astoundingly adapted to deal with cold water AND to slurp up jellyfish.' Leatherbacks are renowned for making the longest migrations of any turtle species, with some traveling an average of 7,400 miles round-trip between their breeding and feeding grounds, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The ocean giants, which can measure up to 6 feet and weigh up to 1,000 pounds, are classified as endangered. They face threats from fishing gear, habitat loss, vessel strikes and more, according to NOAA. Only about 5% of the Pacific population is estimated to still survive in the wild, Jackie Hildering, an education director at MERS, told CBC.
