Ending of electricity credits will bite hard this winter
Government
legislation on the triple lock and Occupied Territories Bill last week, the agenda was deathly quiet.
In the midst of that August haze, it can be hard to believe that the weather will ever turn again. Inevitably, however, it will – this is as true of politics as it is of climate. And there are signs that as the days shorten and the weather turns, the old truism will be borne out – winter will be much trickier for the Government.
Earlier this week, figures released to
Sinn Féin
MEP
Lynn Boylan
showed that 301,000 households are now in arrears on their electricity bills. One of the significant things about this is that the arrears figures appear to be creeping up even when the weather is mild – and doing so as the last of the previous government's electricity credits wash out of the system. It seems likely that the credits suppressed a rate of electricity arrears that would otherwise have emerged given the still-elevated cost of power.
The electricity credits were a blunt, expensive – and politically expedient – tool to address a genuine crisis. In September 2022, as the country faced its first post-Ukraine invasion winter (and budget), a senior government figure texted me to say that modelling suggested energy bills over the winter would be more like mortgage payments. Cabinet had been warned earlier that week that household bills could hit €6,000 annually. That was both economically and politically unsustainable, and the Coalition applied €600 worth of electricity credits to household bills between November that year and March 2023, costing a little over €1.2 billion. From April 2022 until February this year, households got nine payments worth a total of €1,500 – costing almost €3 billion. It was a stark summation of two things: the scale of the crisis and the political willingness to cure – or at least ameliorate – it with exchequer spending.
READ MORE
Both those things have changed in important but different ways. Firstly, the cost of electricity has come down in line with reductions in wholesale gas prices – the main input into Irish electricity prices. However, it has not returned to pre-crisis levels, and energy boffins who understand these things expect that utility bills this winter will be about the same as last winter (or maybe even a little higher). The second important change is that while the situation has improved, the Coalition has resolved to turn off the tap completely on electricity credits. From a policy point of view, given the economic backdrop and the constant refrain over State spending, there is a strong case to be made for this – and it is one that has been made early and often by Minister for Finance
Paschal Donohoe
and Minister for Public Expenditure
Jack Chambers
. Both have been backed up by their respective party leaders. But the politics of this has a hard edge: the simple fact is that voters up and down the country are likely to be exposed to a more expensive winter in real terms than they have been for many years. As universal once-off payments are rolled up, they will get a delayed – but real – shock. This also comes against the backdrop of ever-higher grocery costs. More expensive turkey and electricity bills (or colder homes) beckon for the festive period. That does not sound like a recipe for a happy electorate.
It is often said that inflation kills governments, but the last coalition was returned to power at least in part because it insulated households to an extraordinary degree as the election beckoned – not just the electricity credits, but recall two double payments of child benefit, either side of polling day.
Against this backdrop, there is a compelling logic to intervene to protect lower-income households – and this is something I would expect the Government to do in the budget. Ditto extending the lower
VAT
rate on electricity bills. Meanwhile, Minister for Energy
Darragh O'Brien
has convened an energy affordability task force, which is to sketch out support measures for Budget 2026 some time soon. The Government's actions suggest it knows it has an issue – but all the steps the Coalition is minded to take – targeted measures, structural reforms, investment in the grid – are either partial or much more long-term in nature. They lack the raw retail politics of the once-off payments.
Meanwhile, the Opposition's actions are equally as instructive. Before the Dáil rose for summer, the cost of living seemed to be the issue they most routinely raised in the Dáil.
During his meeting with UK prime minister Keir Starmer this week, US president Donald Trump riffed on how politics is pretty simple, at the end of the day. The politician who wins out, he opined, is generally the one that cuts taxes the most, who keeps you out of wars – and 'the one who gives you the lowest energy prices'. Say what you like about him, he is an operator with extraordinary instincts for the prevailing politics of the day.
It is possible that higher energy costs – and the price of the low-carbon transition – will become baked into economies in the time ahead. That suggests that energy politics may become a feature of the system here and elsewhere, not a passing storm.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
3 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Twelve times more properties available for short-term lets than for renters, new figures show
There are 12 times more 'entire' properties available for rent on short-term letting platforms than there are available for long-term living, new figures show. Nearly 22,000 properties advertised on short-term letting websites are offering tourists, holidaymakers, and those heading to concerts and events the opportunity to rent 'entire' houses or properties. This compares to just 1,800 properties or fewer that were available for hard-pressed renters countrywide on Tourism Minister Peter Burke confirmed 34,000 short-term lets were advertised across four platforms in May — up from 33,000 in April. He said 'approximately 64% of these properties are advertised as 'entire' houses and apartments' — about 21,760 properties. In Dublin, some 3,850 (55%) of 7,010 properties available for short-term let offered the entire property. In response to a parliamentary question from Social Democrats housing spokesperson Rory Hearne, Mr Burke said as there was no register, there was 'no way of knowing whether these are people's principal private residences or otherwise'. He also noted there was an annual 10% increase in the short-term letting sector. The number of properties available for renters across the country on has differed over the last week. On Wednesday, there were 1,800 properties countrywide. This dropped to 1,688 properties on Thursday. By Friday, this had fallen further to 1,669, and decreased further to 1,633 on Monday. There were 868 properties for rent on Daft in Dublin on Friday. This fell to 838 on Monday. In May, the same month as the short-term letting data was captured, there were 15,747 people classified as homeless. This included 4,844 children. There were 2,273 families in emergency accommodation. The latest homelessness figures for June rose to 15,915, including 4,958 children and 2,230 families. Mr Hearne told the Irish Examiner the number of properties available shows the 'real negative impact of short-term lets on the housing disaster'. 'There are twice as many entire properties being let as short-term lets (21,760) as the number of households who are homeless (2,320 families and 7,060 individuals),' he said. That we could house everyone in homelessness twice over in the number of full homes being let short-term is a shocking indictment of the Government's housing failures. 'The increasing impact of short-term lets is a result of a rampant lack of regulation and enforcement, resulting from a policy failure on the part of the Government. 'These houses did not just spring up on the market like mushrooms. They were allowed to by policy and a lack of enforcement.' A short-term let is when a property is rented out for periods not exceeding 15 days. Currently, people must apply for planning permission to rent out their principal private residence for less than 14 days at a time. This is not required if the owner rents out the property for fewer than 90 days a year. If the property is not their principal private residence, the 90-day exemption does not apply, and planning permission is needed for the property to become a short-term let. In April, Mr Burke secured Cabinet approval to progress the general scheme of the new Short-Term Letting and Tourism Bill. However, it will not go through the full legislative process in the Oireachtas until later this year. The proposed legislation will introduce a register for all short-term lets from May 2026, with Fáilte Ireland put in charge of implementing and managing the register. Hosts offering accommodation for periods up to 21 nights will be obliged to register and hold a valid registration number. This must be displayed when advertising their property. The legislation will restrict short-term lets in towns with populations of more than 10,000 people. However, people in these towns will still be allowed to rent out their primary residences for up to 90 days. The bill will also introduce sanctions for hosts who do not have a registration number. An administrative financial sanction procedure will also be introduced for platforms that do not comply with their obligations.
Irish Examiner
3 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Nature is worryingly absent from the National Development Plan review
Albert Einstein once said, look deep into nature, and then you will understand everything better. But even somebody with the cerebral capacity of Einstein would struggle to understand and get their head around the latest National Development Plan. This is a plan which purports to chart the progress of the country over the coming years, but which bizarrely fails to allocate any finance to nature in the middle of, what our current Taoiseach had referred to as, a biodiversity crisis. Low on detail, high on promises was how the Irish Examiner's Mick Clifford Podcast accurately described the NDP. Unfortunately when it comes to nature, it was worse – no detail and not even a promise. The gutting of nature from the Infrastructure, Climate & Nature Fund (ICNF) to finance transport, energy and water infrastructure projects in the National Development Plan is very alarming, deeply disappointing and flies in the face of the Government's previous guarantees on nature restoration. The decision is even more concerning given that the Programme for Government committed that the Infrastructure, Climate & Nature Fund will 'ensure ongoing protection for our environment for future generations', while also committing to the development of Ireland's Nature Restoration Plan which requires ambitious nature restoration at land and at sea under the EU's flagship Nature Restoration Law. However, the National Development Plan announced by the Government this week has allocated nothing to nature, instead taking €3.15 billion from the Infrastructure, Climate and Nature Fund for transport, energy and water infrastructure. It appears that the Government is saying one thing but doing the opposite on nature restoration. It has decided to gut Nature from the Infrastructure, Climate & Nature Fund, instead using the budget to fund investment in transport, energy and water infrastructure. The Environmental Pillar has repeatedly criticised the absence of ringfencing for nature within the ICN fund, criticism that has been fully vindicated this week by the Government's shortsightedness. There is now a genuine concern that nature restoration funding is losing out to infrastructure projects that prioritise economic growth over measures to address the biodiversity emergency. It seems like a cynical sleight of hand to use ICN funding for a project that has been talked about for decades in various different forms and which pre-dates the fund. The Infrastructure, Climate and Nature Fund's purpose is to support State expenditure: where there is a significant deterioration in the economic or fiscal position of the State, and in the years 2026 to 2030, on designated environmental projects. But, while everyone acknowledges that we are living in uncertain times economically, the Government is not proposing to invoke the 'economic deterioration' provision, designed 'to provide for countercyclical capital expenditure in the event of an economic or fiscal downturn' (NTMA), so all the allocated spending for 2026 to 2030 must therefore be for 'designated environmental projects'. Under Section 20 of the Future Ireland Fund and Infrastructure, Climate and Nature Fund Act 2024, such projects must contribute to the achievement of various national and EU environmental regulations such as on water quality, greenhouse gas emissions reduction, the Birds and Habitats Directives, the National Biodiversity Action Plan and the Wildlife Act. However, the proposed allocation of the €3.15 billion that can be spent before 2030, laid out by Government in the NDP, contains no allocation for nature and looks much more like what the fund would be spent on if the 'economic deterioration' condition was being invoked to ensure 'countercyclical capital expenditure' in infrastructure. This is not an argument against funding for Metrolink. Ireland needs greater investment in public transport – whether it is Metrolink in Dublin, light rail in other major cities, expanded bus routes and active transport infrastructure. But in this case, there is over €100 billion of other money allocated to infrastructure by 2030 under the NDP so that provision clearly does not apply. This is not to mention the billions of euros in Apple back-taxes which Jack Chambers in a budget statement last October said provided the country with one-off revenue that has the capacity to be transformational and address the known challenges that we face in housing, energy, water and transport infrastructure. An artist's impression of the MetroLink rail project's Tara Street entrance. The Government has decided to gut Nature from the Infrastructure, Climate & Nature Fund, instead using the budget to fund investment in transport, energy and water infrastructure. File picture And then, there's the €305 million from the sale of the final AIB shares. It is all the more disappointing therefore that the dedicated Climate and Nature Fund is being diverted from its nature focus to further boost infrastructure spending which is not short of other funding. The lack of any funding for nature in the financial allocations for the NDP is even more shocking and worrying given that the State is currently engaging in an extensive consultation process involving farmers, fishers and environmentalists to inform the development of a national Nature Restoration Plan. The financing of that plan remains a key concern for all stakeholders. Ireland's Nature Restoration Plan has to be underpinned by significant investment. The Government has repeatedly told farmers that any nature restoration under the Nature Restoration Law would be funded and voluntary and that the main burden of restoration would take place on public lands. They have clearly been misleading farmers and Irish society as there is no indication that the Government intends to allocate new and additional funding towards nature restoration. And there is no sign that the Government is willing to take the kind of action that is needed to utilise Coillte and Bord Na Mona lands to the extent that is needed to achieve Ireland's legally binding targets. The Environmental Pillar is calling for the ringfencing of a substantial proportion of the Climate and Nature Fund for spending on nature. And we are in the fortunate position of knowing how much and where to invest that money. Unlike the vague and abstract NDP, a detailed financial needs assessment for biodiversity is available. Ireland needs greater investment in public transport – whether it is Metrolink in Dublin, light rail in other major cities, expanded bus routes and active transport infrastructure. File photo: Sasko Lazarov / The National Parks and Wildlife Service tasked UCD with carrying out a Biodiversity Financial Needs Assessment on how much would be required to reach the targets of the 4th National Biodiversity Action Plan 2023-2030 and international obligations including the EU Biodiversity Strategy 2030. This was delivered in 2021 and updated in 2023 to take account of the draft Nature Restoration Law. The study estimated the expenditure required for nature restoration in Ireland at €463.5m per annum, according to the report Funding Ireland's Biodiversity: A Financial Needs Assessment for Biodiversity in Ireland. And last year, Natural Capital Ireland was commissioned by the Irish Environmental Network to deliver a report on high-level recommendations for funding nature restoration in Ireland. This project brought together a diverse group of subject matter experts from academia, business, environmental NGOs, farming, government departments, and semi-state bodies to workshop high-level recommendations for funding nature restoration. These would be good places for the Government to start if it's serious about nature restoration. Nature is conspicuous by its absence in the National Development Plan. Given that we are at a crucial time in relation to the biodiversity crisis in Ireland, it is inexcusable that no funding was earmarked for nature restoration. Biodiversity supports and underpins our society, whether it is food production or clean air or a stable climate. It is imperative that nature is adequately funded. Ciarán Brennan is communications officer at the Irish Environmental Network
Irish Examiner
4 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Venture capital funding environment for Irish AI start-ups 'challenging'
Despite venture capital investing heavily in generative AI during the first half of the year, Irish AI start-ups are finding the funding environment 'challenging', a new report from consultancy company EY has found. Between January and June, global venture capital investment in generative AI surged to $49.2bn (€42.5bn), outpacing the total for all of 2024 at $44.2bn, according to EY Ireland's latest Generative AI Key Deals and Market Insights study. The company said the sharp rise comes as venture capital firms concentrate on more mature, revenue-generating AI companies, resulting in fewer but significantly larger deals. Average transaction size for late-stage deals more than tripled to more than $1.55bn, up from $481m in 2024. EY Ireland's technology, media and telecoms lead Grit Young said this investment momentum was expected to continue to build into the second half of this year with the launch of new generative AI platforms. However, the report noted while Ireland had emerged as a strong adopter of AI among start-ups, many are struggling with access to capital and infrastructure. 'In Ireland, the appetite for AI adoption is strong, and we are working with many indigenous and international companies who are already well established on their AI journey,' Ms Young said. 'However, for AI start-ups, the funding environment remains challenging, particularly in the €1m to €10m funding space.' She added many start-ups with high potential were finding themselves in a difficult middle ground where they are 'too advanced for early-stage support, yet not quite large enough to attract global venture capital attention'. 'However Ireland has a deep and well-established pool of talented entrepreneurs, and with increased collaboration between businesses, founders, academic institutions and policymakers, there are plenty of opportunities to be seized,' she said.
