The Australian scientist helping to re-write the story of civilisation
More than 8500 years ago, these ancient villagers from Catalhoyuk in Turkey – a leading contender for the world's oldest farming settlement – made wall paintings of the same twin-peaked volcano she could see on the horizon.
'It's one of the few moments in my life that I suddenly understood what it is to feel the ancestors,' Schotsmans, an expert in archaeo-anthropology from the University of Wollongong, said.
Cutting-edge new DNA analysis of the skeletons Schotsmans helped excavate has revealed the people in this prehistoric outpost of civilisation may have venerated women as the centre of society, upending the assumption early agricultural settlements were ruled by men.
Catalhoyuk marks one of the critical turning points in the history of civilisation when, 9000 years ago, Neolithic nomads built a village of mud-brick homes studded with the skulls of wild bulls, weasels and foxes, and began to cultivate crops and tend livestock. Upon the discovery of its remains in the 1960s Catalhoyuk was dubbed 'the world's first city'.
The new evidence shows the households of the ancient settlement were dominated by matriarchal lines, and that girls who died were adorned with more elaborate burial offerings than boys.
'Societies that stay at the same spot and do agriculture are usually patrilineal,' said Schotsmans, who was a co-author of the major new findings led by Eren Yuncu and Professor Mehmet from Middle East Technical University.
'Here we're actually looking at matrilineal society, and I think that is quite unique.
'I think nowadays, with the world's problems, it's very relevant. The world is still very male dominated, isn't it? I was looking at the NATO Summit in The Hague, and it's just males.'
Experts believe Catalhoyuk was an egalitarian place with little social hierarchy. Everyone's homes were of similar size. The spoils of early agriculture including barley, pistachios and goat milk were shared; bone analysis showed everyone ate well regardless of their sex or family.
The people of Catalhoyuk buried the dead underneath their homes. The new analysis of ancient DNA from the burials published in Science revealed family members in a household were usually connected through the female line.
Two homes had burials spanning three generations, all connected through mothers. In one building, the children of three sisters were buried together but the child of their brother – a paternal cousin – was laid to rest elsewhere.
Females usually remained connected to their household while males moved away, suggesting husbands relocated to their wife's household when they were married.
One elderly woman was afforded an 'exceptional' burial underneath the main room of a home she didn't share with genetic kin, with an anklet of deer canines and a grave adorned with boar tusks and beads, suggesting she may have held a prominent social role.
For the first time, scientists were also able to identify the sex of children buried at Catalhoyuk through DNA, which showed girls may have been particularly venerated in death.
People were often buried with an array of grave goods, including obsidian blades, eagle talons, bracelets of human teeth, hooks fashioned from the jawbones of aurochs and beads made from turquoise, shells and the vertebrae of fish spines.
The new paper reveals girls had five times the number of such offerings compared to boys.
'I think it stresses the diversity in social systems. Maybe we should stop with having our Western assumption that everyone is like us,' Schotsmans said.
Schotsmans had already studied differences in how men and women were buried by the people of Catalhoyuk, who daubed the bodies of their dead with dyes of malachite, azurite and ochre.
Orange stripes of cinnabar often marked the craniums of men, while women were anointed in shades of green and blue, colours associated with the growth, fertility and ripeness which could be related to the society's transition to agriculture.
Loading
The role of women at Catalhoyuk has been discussed at length since the site was discovered in the 1960s and voluptuous female statues were recovered, sparking imaginations of a 'mother goddess' cult.
The new evidence raises the prospect these figurines didn't represent gods or fertility – perhaps they were designed to celebrate the real women of Catalhoyuk, said Professor Andrew Fairbairn, an archaeology expert from the University of Queensland who wasn't involved in the study.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
6 days ago
- ABC News
Grab your loudest shirt, we're taking Science with Dr Karl live for the first time
He's been your weekly brain-busting buff, your mind-melding master, and your slick science sorcerer for years and now we're going large. Get ready for Science with Dr Karl LIVE! That's right doctors, our long-running Thursday morning science hour where Dr Karl Kruszelnicki answers all of your weirdest, wildest and most wonderful questions is leaving the studio for the very first time. For one night only in Science Week to celebrate 50 years of triple j and 48 years (!!!) of Dr Karl on triple j, we'll be taking your questions live on stage at Eora/Sydney's Enmore Theatre. So what can you expect from a live Dr Karl show? We'll have music, quizzes, live questions and more information than you'd ever thought possible as we delve into the brilliant mind of Dr Karl. Wanna come down and pitch your head-scratcher to the man himself? You gotta get yourself a ticket! Tickets are on sale from 10am Thursday 3 July (today!) and will set you back $20 + booking fee. Grab your tickets right here and start thinking of what you want Dr Karl to put his mind to. Check out all the crucial information below, and we'll see you at the big science show, doctor! Science with Dr Karl Live Monday 11 August - Enmore Theatre, Gadigal Land, Sydney NSW
ABC News
28-06-2025
- ABC News
Antarctic scientists analyse first samples from 'Million Year Ice Core' project
Inside an ice-cold laboratory in Hobart, where the temperature is almost 20 degrees Celsius below zero, scientists in thick puffer jackets begin their work. Wearing gloves, they carefully pull out a one-metre cylinder of ice from an insulated box that recently arrived from Antarctica. "In the freezer lab today, we're cutting the first samples from the 'Million Year Ice Core'," Dr Joel Pedro explained. For almost a decade, the paleoclimatologist and a team from the Australian Antarctic Program have been planning an ambitious project. Known as the 'Million Year Ice Core', the aim is to extract the world's oldest, continuous core of ice from deep beneath the frozen continent. "More than any other archive of climate in the past, [ice cores have] a range of information that helps you to understand the changes in the total climate system," Dr Pedro said. In other words, ice cores are like time capsules that allow scientists to get a clear picture of the Earth's climate and atmospheric history. That's because they contain tiny bubbles of air trapped over thousands, and even millions of years, depending on the depth of the ice. The ice that's being analysed in the Hobart laboratory comes from a depth of 150 metres, making it almost 4,000 years old. While it's a significant milestone, it's only the start of a much bigger mission. Over the coming years, the team hopes to reach a depth of 3,000m. If successful, it will be the oldest ice ever recovered. Getting to this point has been a mammoth logistical undertaking. The drill site, known as Dome C North, is 1,200 kilometres from the nearest Australian station in Antarctica. It's also 3,000m above sea level, where the temperature can fall below minus-50 degrees Celsius. Turning the site into a deep field station involved a 10-person team using six tractors to haul almost 600 tonnes of gear across the frozen landscape. "In the Australian program, it's the biggest traverse that we've undertaken," traverse leader Chris Gallagher, from the AAD, said. After enduring multiple blizzards, the team eventually made it to Dome C North 18 days after setting off from Casey Station. "It's a very specialised team that has extremely high skills, but also that ability to really get on with each other and care for each other," Mr Gallagher said. Once the accommodation modules and drill shelter were set up, a separate team of scientists flew in to begin drilling and processing the ice core. Chelsea Long, a field assistant, said the extraction of the first section of ice was a momentous occasion. "It was really celebratory when it came out and just finally to see this happening and to touch the ice and measure it, was a real joy," she said. For Dr Pedro, it was a moment to savour after many years of hard work, as well as delays caused by the COVID pandemic. "The start to the project was easily the most exciting thing that's happened in my science career," he said. "But at the same time, it's just the start of the project — we've [still] got 3 kilometres to go." Currently, the oldest ice core on record dates back almost 800,000 years. But a European team, known as Beyond EPICA, recently extracted ice from a depth of 2,800m, which is expected to date back almost 1.2 million years. The Australian team plans to drill more than 200m deeper than Beyond EPICA, which Dr Pedro said could date back up to 2 million years. "If we can get this record − and the modelling suggests [Dome C North] is the best site in Antarctica for recovering [the] oldest ice − then we'll produce data that will stand for decades as the measurement of Earth's atmosphere [and] greenhouse gas levels through that period." If successful, that data would help scientists better understand why the Earth's ice ages became much longer about a million years ago. "It remains one of the biggest puzzles, [or] challenges, in ice core science and in climate science to resolve what the cause of that was, and, in particular, what the role of C02 [carbon dioxide] was in that." Data from the 'Million Year Ice Core' could also improve the accuracy of climate change forecasts. The team plans to resume drilling during the 2025/26 summer and expect to reach the 3,000m-mark in 2028/29.
ABC News
27-06-2025
- ABC News
Can 'biological clock' tests tell you anything worthwhile?
We all like to imagine we're ageing well. Now a simple blood or saliva test promises to tell us by measuring our "biological age". And then, as many have done, we can share how "young" we really are on social media, along with our secrets to success. While chronological age is how long you have been alive, measures of biological age aim to indicate how old your body actually is, purporting to measure "wear and tear" at a molecular level. The appeal of these tests is undeniable. Health-conscious consumers may see their results as reinforcing their anti-ageing efforts, or a way to show their journey to better health is paying off. But how good are these tests? Do they actually offer useful insights? Or are they just clever marketing dressed up to look like science? Over time, the chemical processes that allow our body to function, known as our "metabolic activity", lead to damage and a decline in the activity of our cells, tissues and organs. Biological age tests aim to capture some of these changes, offering a snapshot of how well, or how poorly, we are ageing on a cellular level. Our DNA is also affected by the ageing process. In particular, chemical tags (methyl groups) attach to our DNA and affect gene expression. These changes occur in predictable ways with age and environmental exposures, in a process called methylation. Research studies have used "epigenetic clocks", which measure the methylation of our genes, to estimate biological age. By analysing methylation levels at specific sites in the genome from participant samples, researchers apply predictive models to estimate the cumulative wear and tear on the body. Although the science is rapidly evolving, the evidence underpinning the use of epigenetic clocks to measure biological ageing in research studies is strong. Studies have shown epigenetic biological age estimation is a better predictor of the risk of death and ageing-related diseases than chronological age. Epigenetic clocks also have been found to correlate strongly with lifestyle and environmental exposures, such as smoking status and diet quality. In addition, they have been found to be able to predict the risk of conditions such as cardiovascular disease, which can lead to heart attacks and strokes. Taken together, a growing body of research indicates that at a population level, epigenetic clocks are robust measures of biological ageing and are strongly linked to the risk of disease and death. While these tests are valuable when studying populations in research settings, using epigenetic clocks to measure the biological age of individuals is a different matter and requires scrutiny. For testing at an individual level, perhaps the most important consideration is the "signal to noise ratio" (or precision) of these tests. This is the question of whether a single sample from an individual may yield widely differing results. A study from 2022 found samples deviated by up to nine years. So an identical sample from a 40-year-old may indicate a biological age of as low as 35 years (a cause for celebration) or as high as 44 years (a cause of anxiety). While there have been significant improvements in these tests over the years, there is considerable variability in the precision of these tests between commercial providers. So depending on who you send your sample to, your estimated biological age may vary considerably. Another limitation is there is currently no standardisation of methods for this testing. Commercial providers perform these tests in different ways and have different algorithms for estimating biological age from the data. As you would expect for commercial operators, providers don't disclose their methods. So it's difficult to compare companies and determine who provides the most accurate results — and what you're getting for your money. A third limitation is that while epigenetic clocks correlate well with ageing, they are simply a "proxy" and are not a diagnostic tool. In other words, they may provide a general indication of ageing at a cellular level. But they don't offer any specific insights about what the issue may be if someone is found to be "ageing faster" than they would like, or what they're doing right if they are "ageing well". So regardless of the result of your test, all you're likely to get from the commercial provider of an epigenetic test is generic advice about what the science says is healthy behaviour. While companies offering these tests may have good intentions, remember their ultimate goal is to sell you these tests and make a profit. And at a cost of around $500, they're not cheap. While the idea of using these tests as a personalised health tool has potential, it is clear that we are not there yet. For this to become a reality, tests will need to become more reproducible, standardised across providers, and validated through long-term studies that link changes in biological age to specific behaviours. So while one-off tests of biological age make for impressive social media posts, for most people they represent a significant cost and offer limited real value. The good news is we already know what we need to do to increase our chances of living longer and healthier lives. These include: We don't need to know our biological age in order to implement changes in our lives right now to improve our health. Hassan Vally is an associate professor of epidemiology at Deakin University. This piece first appeared on The Conversation.
