logo
My child with cancer goes to private school … so he can't learn in hospital

My child with cancer goes to private school … so he can't learn in hospital

Times22-06-2025
Councillors have been accused of 'bashing' private schools that refuse to provide lessons for their pupils when they are ill in hospital for months with cancer.
Parents who pay for education have described how their children are prevented from joining state-school patients in the ward classroom at the Royal Hospital for Children and Young People in Edinburgh.
Privately educated children with cancer, and other serious conditions, are excluded from the hospital teaching service unless a fee of £115 per hour — more than double the typical cost of cover teachers or home tuition — is paid by the families or their schools.
In an escalating row Edinburgh city council has written to all private schools in the capital to remind them of this situation. The council is also writing to the Scottish government, asking if it plans to review its guidance on the matter, which the city claims to be following.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Childhood verbal abuse can have similar mental health impact as physical abuse'
‘Childhood verbal abuse can have similar mental health impact as physical abuse'

The Independent

time32 minutes ago

  • The Independent

‘Childhood verbal abuse can have similar mental health impact as physical abuse'

Verbal abuse of children could be as damaging to their mental health in adulthood as physical abuse, according to researchers. A study of more than 20,000 adults in England and Wales found that people exposed to verbal abuse in childhood were likely to feel disconnected, pessimistic, and emotionally unwell in later life. Adults who were physically abused as children had a 52% higher chance of experiencing low mental wellbeing, and this stood at around 64% for those who had been subjected to solely verbal abuse. While verbal abuse did show as having a marginally higher impact in this study, the researchers said the difference was not statistically significant and that further studies would be needed perhaps with a larger sample size to confirm the validity of the difference. Being exposed to both types of abuse compounded the risk even further, at 115% higher, the study led by Liverpool John Moores University found. Lead author, Professor Mark Bellis, who is director of research and innovation at the university, said: 'Our research shows that verbal abuse in childhood may inflict mental health scars as deep and enduring as those caused by physical abuse. Important progress has been made in reducing physical abuse, but verbal abuse is often overlooked.' The study, published in the BMJ Open, also suggested the prevalence of verbal abuse has risen in recent decades 'eroding the long-term mental health benefits we should see from reducing physical abuse'. The authors worked alongside Bangor University and Public Health Wales to pool data from seven relevant studies, involving 20,687 adults from England and Wales and looking at birth cohorts from the 1950s onwards. They found that the prevalence of child physical abuse halved from around 20% among those born between 1950 and 1979 to 10% among those born in 2000 or later. But when it came to verbal abuse, the prevalence rose from 12% among those born before 1950 to around 20% among those born in 2000 or later. The researchers said an estimated one in six children endure physical abuse, primarily from family members and caregivers, but one in three are subjected to verbal abuse. Jessica Bondy, founder of Words Matter, an organisation focused on ending childhood verbal abuse by adults said: 'This study confirms what survivors and professionals have long known: words can wound deeply and have a lasting impact on a child's mental health and development. We all get overloaded sometimes, but too many adults are turning to harsh words without realising the lasting damage they cause to children. 'Any gains made in reducing physical abuse risk being undone by rising rates of verbal abuse. We must act now to confront the lasting harm caused by cruel, critical or controlling language. We need to build children up – not knock them down. The mental health of the next generation and our shared future depend on it.'

Prince Harry criticised over row that risks damaging his charity's reputation
Prince Harry criticised over row that risks damaging his charity's reputation

The Sun

timean hour ago

  • The Sun

Prince Harry criticised over row that risks damaging his charity's reputation

PRINCE Harry was blasted last night for letting a boardroom battle damage his charity Sentebale. A watchdog said the public row risked undermining trust in good causes generally. 2 The Charity Commission said chances were missed to settle differences at Sentebale, set up by Harry and Lesotho's Prince Seeiso in 2006 for young people and kids living with HIV and Aids. It launched a probe when they stood down as patrons in support of trustees who quit in a dispute with Dr Sophie Chandauka over a fundraising strategy. Board of trustees chair Dr Chandauka said the 'toxicity' of Harry's brand since his move to live in the US had seen a drop in donors. She accused the Duke of Sussex, 40, of involvement in a 'cover-up' of a probe into bullying and harassment. Last night, she said the 'adverse media campaign' launched by those who resigned 'caused incalculable damage' to the charity. The Times reported a source close to Harry blasted the report and said the prince was 'devastated the chair had been allowed to succeed with a hostile takeover'. His spokesman said those who rely on Sentebale would bear the 'consequences of her actions'. The Charity Commission said the public airing of the row harmed Sentebale's reputation and risked overshadowing its achievements. The regulator, which cannot investigate individual allegations of bullying, found no evidence of systemic bullying or harassment, including misogyny or misogynoir at the charity but acknowledged 'the strong perception of ill treatment' felt by some involved. David Holdsworth, chief executive of the Charity Commission, said: 'Passion for a cause is the bedrock of volunteering and charity, delivering positive impact for millions of people here at home and abroad every day. Harry QUITTING his own charity is utterly humiliating - misogyny row will hurt him deeply 'However, in the rare cases when things go wrong, it is often because that very passion has become a weakness rather than a strength. 'Sentebale's problems played out in the public eye, enabling a damaging dispute to harm the charity's reputation, risk overshadowing its many achievements, and jeopardising the charity's ability to deliver for the very beneficiaries it was created to serve.' 2

Nationwide leads new calls for change to protect domestic abuse survivors
Nationwide leads new calls for change to protect domestic abuse survivors

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

Nationwide leads new calls for change to protect domestic abuse survivors

Nationwide Building Society has partnered with Refuge, the UK's largest domestic abuse charity, in a bid to both bring about change and help protect survivors of abuse. The partnership is aiming to extend existing support for victims, as well as remove barriers which can prevent survivors from taking back control of their lives. A key part of the reform being asked for is for the Individual Insolvency Register (IIR) to be made private, protecting survivors' details, while also removing the £308 fee currently due. 'Nationwide and Refuge have signed Money Wellness's campaign to get the g overnment to make the IIR private – protecting the addresses of survivors who have become insolvent through bankruptcy, for example,' a statement read. 'Domestic abuse survivors often struggle to pay for this protection order because abusers typically exercise full financial control, leaving survivors with little or no personal funds. This comes in addition to the increased risk survivors face when having to list their details on the register.' Earlier this year, Nationwide and Refuge partnered with The Independent on the Brick by Brick campaign, with a second safe haven built for women fleeing domestic abuse, completed in July. Office for National Statistics records show 2.3 million adults in England and Wales experienced domestic abuse across 2023-24, including 1.6 million women. Women are more than twice as likely to be affected. In addition, specialist support staff will be able to refer people to Refuge via telephone, while Nationwide – as well as other financial institutions– offer safe spaces within branches where at-risk individuals can call family or sort through financial issues. Staff are also trained to help spot signs of domestic abuse. Emma Pickering, head of technology-facilitated abuse at Refuge, said: 'One in four women will experience domestic abuse in their lifetime, and cases are continuing to grow in both quantity and complexity. Thanks to Nationwide Building Society, Refuge will be able to expand its support for survivors of abuse. 'Our partnership has never been more needed. With Nationwide's support, Refuge's expert team will empower survivors with practical advice and emotional support, helping them to rebuild their lives. No survivor should have to navigate domestic abuse alone, and Nationwide's commitment means we will be able to ensure even more survivors receive the support they deserve.' It's not too late to support Refuge and to help more survivors find their freedom. Donations will be spent on Refuge's lifesaving work housing survivors of domestic abuse.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store